Abstract
Potential evapotranspiration models very often are important part of hydrological catchment models to calculate potential evapotranspiration (PET) which then is used to estimate actual evapotranspiration considering the soil moisture status. As many different approaches exist, the question arises in which way the choice of the PET model affects the impact of climate change on the calculated water balance? Therefore, 18 different PET models were compared with respect to their sensitivity to observed climate change. Long-term climate data of six German climate stations were used to identify changes in the climate data itself and changes in the calculated PET. The results show that all investigated PET models are sensitive to significant trends in climate data. However, it is also shown that all models show different sensitivities, and that the sensitivities cannot be grouped in terms of different types of PET models such as the aerodynamic concept, radiation or temperature based approaches and combination equations. Predominantly, the variability within a group of models of the same type is comparable to the variability between different model types. Therefore it can be concluded that PET models should be validated in a regional context before they are applied to a certain region within a climate change study despite the poor availability of long-term PET measurements.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Albrecht F (1950) Die Methoden zur Bestimmung Verdunstung der natürlichen Erdoberfläche. Arch MeteorGeoph Biokl Ser B 2:1–38
Amataya DM, Skaggs RW, Gregory JD (1995) Comparison of methods for estimating REF-ET. J Irrig Drain E-ASCE 121(6):427–435
Andreassian V, Perrin C, Michel C (2004) Impact of imperfect potential evapotranspiration knowledge on the efficiency and parameters of watershed models. J Hydrol 286:19–35
Arnell NW, Reynard N (1993) Impact of climate change on river flow regimes in the United Kingdom. Institute of Hydrology Report to DOE, Water Directorate
Blaney HF, Criddle WD (1950) Determining water requirements in irrigated areas from climatological and irrigation data. USDA Soil Conservation Service Tech Paper 96, 48 pp
Bormann H, Diekkrüger B, Richter O (1996) Effects of data availability on estimation of evapotranspiration. Phys Chem Earth 21(3):171–175
Braden H (1995) The model AMBETI—a detailed description of a soil–plant–atmosphere model. Berichte des Deutschen Wetterdienstes 195, Offenbach, 117 pp
Brockamp B, Wenner H (1963) Verdunstungsmessungen auf den Steiner See bei Münster. Dt Gewässerkundl Mitt 7:149–154
Castaneda L, Rao P (2005) Comparison of methods for estimating reference evapotranspiration in southern California. J Environ Hydrol 13(14):1–10
Clapeyron E (1834) Puissance motrice de la chaleur. Journal de l’École Royale Polytechnique. Vingt-troisième cahier, Tome XIV:153–190
Dalton J (1802) Experimental essays on the constitution of mixed gases; on the force of steam of vapour from waters and other liquids in different temperatures, both in a torricellian vacuum and in air on evaporation and on the expansion of gases by heat. Mem Manch Lit Phil Soc 5:535–602
Doorenbos J, Pruitt WO (1977) CropWater Requirements. Irrigation and Drainage Paper 24, FAO. Rome, Italy. 144 pp
FAO (1990) Report on the export consultation on revision of FAO methodologies for crop water requirements. Land and Water Devel. Div., Rome, Italy
Feddes RA, Kowalik PJ, Zaradny H (1978) Simulation of field water use and crop yield. Simulations Monograph, Pudoc
Federer CA, Vörösmarty C, Fekete B (1996) Intercomparison of methods for calculating potential evaporation in regional and global water balance models. Water Resour Res 32(7):2315–2321
Haude W (1955) Zur Bestimmung der Verdunstung auf möglichst einfache Weise. Mitt Dt Wetterd 2(11). Bad Kissingen
Hounam CE (1971) Problems of evaporation assessment in the water balance. Report No. 3 on WMO/IHD Project, WMO, Geneva
IPCC (2007) Climate Change 2007—the physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the IPCC. Cambridge University Press. 996 pp
Jensen ME, Haise HR (1963) Estimating evapotranspiration from solar radiation. J Irrig Drain Div ASCE 89:15–41
Jensen ME, Burman RD, Allen RG (Eds) (1990) Evapotranspiration and irrigation water requirements. ASC Manuals and Reports on Engineering Practice No. 70. 332 pp
Jensen DT, Hargreaves GH, Temesgen B, Allen RG (1997) Computation of ET0 under nonideal conditions. J Irrig Drain E-ASCE 123(5):394–400
Kashyap PS, Panda RK (2001) Evaluation of evapotranspiration estimation methods and development of crop-coefficients for potato crop in a sub-humid region. Agric Water Manag 50:9–25
Krysanova V, Buiteveld H, Haase D, Hattermann FF, van Niekerk K, Roest K, Martinez-Santos P, Schlüter M (2008) Practices and lessons learned in coping with climatic hazards at the river-basin scale: floods and drought. Ecol Soc 13(2):32. [online] Available at: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol13/iss2/art32/
Löpmeier FJ (1983) Ein Agrarmeteorologischens Modell zur Berechung der Aktuellen Verdunstung (AMBAV). Beiträge zur Agrarmeteorologie 7/83. ZAMF, Braunschweig, 50 pp
Lu J, Sun G, McNulty SG, Amatya DM (2005) A comparison of six potential evapotranspiration methods for regional use in the southeastern United States. J Am Water Resour As 41(3):621–633
Mahringer W (1970) Verdunstungsstudien am Neusiedler See. Arch Met Geoph Biokl Ser B 18:1–20
McKenney MS, Rosenberg NJ (1993) Sensitivity of some potential evapotranspiration estimation methods to climate change. Agr Forest Metorol 64:81–110
Meyer A (1926) Über einige Zusammenhänge zwischen Klima und Boden in Europa. Chemie der Erde 2:209–347
Monteith JL (1965) Evaporation and environment. In: Fogy GT (ed) The state and movement of water in living organism. Cambridge, pp 205–234
Oudin L, Hervieu F, Michel C et al (2005) Which potential evapotranspiration input for a lumped rainfall–runoff model? Part 2—towards a simple and efficient potential evapotranspiration model for rainfall–runoff modelling. J Hydrol 303:290–306
Penman HC (1948) Natural evaporation from open water, bare soil and grass. Proc R Soc Lond Ser A 193:120–145
Priestley CHB, Taylor RJ (1972) On the assessment of surface heat flux and evapotranspiration using large scale parameters. Mon Weather Rev 100:81–92
Rijtema PE (1968) Derived meteorological data: transpiration. Unesco Nat Res Res 7:55–72. Paris
Ritchie JT (1972) Model for predicting evaporation from a row crop with incomplete cover. Water Resour Res 8:1204–1213
Robert G (1998) The effects of possible future climate change on evaporation losses from four contrasting UK water catchment areas. Hydrol Process 12:727–739
Schendel U (1967) Vegetationswasserverbrauch und -wasserbedarf. Habilitation, Kiel, 137 pp
Schönwiese CD (1999) Das Klima der jüngeren Vergangenheit. Physik in unserer Zeit 30(3):94–101
Schrödter H (1985) Verdunstung. Anwendungsorientierte Messverfahren und Bestimmungsmethoden. Springer Berlin, 186 pp
Singh VP, Xu CY (1997a) Evaluation and generalization of 13 mass-transfer equations for determining free-water evaporation. Hydrol Process 11:311–323
Singh VP, Xu CY (1997b) Sensitivity of mass transfer-based evaporation equations to errors in daily and monthly input data. Hydrol Process 11:1465–1473
Temesgen B, Eching S, Davidoff B, Frame K (2005) Comparison of some reference evapotranspiration equations for California. J Irrig Drain E-ASCE 131(1):73–84
Trabert W (1896) Neue Beobachtungen über Verdampfungsgeschwindigkeiten. Meteorol Z 13:261–263
Trajkovic S (2007) Hargreaves versus Penman–Monteith under humid conditions. J Irrig Drain E-ASCE 133(1):38–42
Turc L (1961) Evaluation des besoins en eau irrigation, l’evapotranspiration potentielle. Ann Agron 12:13–49
Vörösmarty CJ, Federer CA, Schloss AL (1998) Potential evaporation functions compared on US watersheds: Possible implications for global-scale water balance and terrestrial ecosystem modelling. J Hydrol 207:147–169
Weiß M, Menzel L (2008) A global comparison of four potential evapotranspiration equations and their relevance to stream flow modelling in semi-arid environments. Adv Geosci 18:15–23
WMO (1966) Measurement and estimation of evaporation and evapotranspiration. Tech Pap (CIMO-Rep) 83. Genf
Xu CY, Chen D (2005) Comparison of seven models for estimation of evapotranspiration and groundwater recharge using lysimeter measurement data in Germany. Hydrol Process 19:3717–1734
Xu CY, Singh VP (2000) Evaluation and generalization of radiation-based methods for calculating evaporation. Hydrol Process 14:339–349
Xu CY, Singh VP (2001) Evaluation and generalization of temperature-based methods for calculating evaporation. Hydrol Process 15:305–319
Xu CY, Singh VP (2002) Cross comparison of Empirical Equations for calculating potential evapotranspiration with data from Switzerland. Water Resour Manag 16:197–219
Yoder RE, Odhiambo LO, Wright WC (2005) Evaluation of methods for estimating daily reference crop evapotranspiration at a site in the humid Southeast United States. Appl Eng Agric 21(2):197–202
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bormann, H. Sensitivity analysis of 18 different potential evapotranspiration models to observed climatic change at German climate stations. Climatic Change 104, 729–753 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-010-9869-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-010-9869-7