Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Should carbon-exporting countries strive for consumption-based accounting in a global cap-and-trade regime?

A letter

  • Letter
  • Published:
Climatic Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the context of the post-Kyoto policy debate, the question was raised whether the current practice of production-based emissions accounting should be replaced by a consumption-based approach. In this paper, we qualify the conditions under which the way of carbon accounting makes a difference, and show how this affects the incentive of countries to opt for one or the other alternative. Two main insights are presented: First, it is emphasized—and formally shown with a general equilibrium trade model—that the way of accounting has neither efficiency nor distributive effects in the presence of a global cap-and-trade regime with full coverage and given national emission caps. Second, the accounting scheme does matter whenever the initial allocation rule for emission rights is related to past emissions. However, for a net exporter of carbon such as China, the preference for one or the other turns out to be ambiguous, since the current production-based accounting would be favored under grandfathering, whereas consumed carbon would be the preferred measure whenever higher current or historic emissions imply a lower initial allowance, as e.g. under the principle of historical responsibility.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Baer P, Harte J, Haya B, Herzog AV, Holdren J, Hultman NE, Kammen DM, Norgaard RB, Raymond L (2000) Equity and greenhouse gas responsibility. Science 289:2287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bastianoni S, Pulselli FM, Tiezzi E (2004) The problem of assigning responsibility for greenhouse gas emissions. Ecol Econ 49:253–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bodansky D (2004) International climate efforts beyond 2012: a survey of approaches. Pew Center on Global Climate Change, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Dröge S, van Asselt H, Brewer T, Grubb M, Ismer R, Kameyama Y, Mehling M, Monjon S, Neuhoff K, Quirion P, Schumacher K, Mohr L, Suwala W, Takamura Y, Voituriez T, Wang X (2009) Tackling Leakage in a world of unequal carbon prices. Climate Strategies, Cambridge. http://climatestrategies.org/our-reports/category/32/153.html. Accessed 14 December 2009

  • Guan D, Peters GP, Weber CL, Hubacek K (2009) Journey to world top emitter: an analysis of the driving forces of China’s recent CO2 emissions surge. Geophys Res Lett 36:L04709. doi:10.1029/2008GL036540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin B, Sun C (2010) Evaluating carbon dioxide emissions in international trade of China. Energy Policy 38:613–621

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu X, Wang C (2009) Quantitative analysis of CO2 embodiment in international trade: an overview of emerging literatures. Front Environ Sci Eng China 3(1):12–19. doi:10.1007/s11783-009-0011-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munksgaard J, Pedersen KA (2001) CO2 accounts for open economies: producer or consumer responsibility. Energy Policy 29:327–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pan J, Phillips J, Chen Y (2008) China’s balance of emissions embodied in trade: approaches to measurement and allocating international responsibility. Oxf Rev Econ Policy 24:354–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters GP, Hertwich EG (2008a) CO2 embodied in international trade with implications for global climate policy. Environ Sci Technol 42:1401–1407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters GP, Hertwich EG (2008b) Post-Kyoto greenhouse gas inventories: production versus consumption. Clim Change 86:51–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richels R, Blanford G, Rutherford T (2009) International climate policy: a “second best” solution for a “second best” world? Clim Change Lett 97(1):289–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salanie B (2002) The economics of taxation. The MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern N (2009) The global deal: climate change and the creation of a new era of progress and prosperity. Public Affairs

  • Wang T, Watson J (2008) China’s carbon emissions and international trade: implications for post-2012 policy. Clim Policy 8:577–587

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WBGU (2009) Solving the climate dilemma: the budget approach. Special Report. German Advisory Council on Global Change. WBGU, Berlin

  • Weber CL, Peters GP, Guan D, Hubacek K (2008) The contribution of Chinese exports to climate change. Energy Policy 36:3572–3577

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang Y, Yang L (2010) China’s foreign trade and climate change: a case study of CO2 emissions. Energy Policy 38:350–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jan Christoph Steckel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Steckel, J.C., Kalkuhl, M. & Marschinski, R. Should carbon-exporting countries strive for consumption-based accounting in a global cap-and-trade regime?. Climatic Change 100, 779–786 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-010-9825-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-010-9825-6

Keywords

Navigation