Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Infinite uncertainty, forgotten feedbacks, and cost-benefit analysis of climate policy

  • Published:
Climatic Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Tol (2003) questioned the applicability of expected cost-benefit analysis to global mitigation policy when he found evidence that the uncertainty surrounding estimates of the marginal damage of climate change could be infinite even if total damages were finite. Yohe (2003) suggested that this problem could be alleviated if international development aid were directed at eliminating the source of the problem – climate induced negative growth rates in a few regions along a handful of troublesome scenarios. The hypothesis about adding a second policy lever to the climate policy calculus is shown to hold, though perhaps not as robustly as originally thought. A portfolio of international policies with at least two independent tools can avoid infinite uncertainty on the margins and the associated implications for global mitigation policy at a reasonable price even in the relatively unlikely event that climate change causes negative economic growth in a region or two.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Azar C, Lindgren K (2003) Catastrophic events and stochastic cost-benefit analysis of climate change. Clim Change 56:245–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batjes JJ, Goldewijk CGM (1994) The IMAGE 2 hundred year (1890–1990) database of the global environment (HYDE). RIVM, Bilthoven, 410100082

  • Bruckner T, Petschel-Held G, Leimbach M, Toth FL (2003) Methodological aspects of the tolerable windows approach. Clim Change 56(1):73–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cline WR (1992) The economics of global warming. Institute for International Economics, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Easterly W (2002) The elusive quest for growth – economists’ adventures and misadventures in the tropics. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Fankhauser S (1994) Protection vs. retreat – the economic costs of sea level rise. Environ Plann A 27:299–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fankhauser S, Tol RSJ (2005) On climate change and economic growth. Resour Energy Econ 27:1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fankhauser S, Tol RSJ, Pearce DW (1997) The aggregation of climate change damages: a welfare theoretic approach. Environ Resour Econ 10:249–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerlagh R (2006) The level and distribution of costs and benefits over generations of an emission stabilization program. Energy Econ 29(1):126–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammitt JK, Lempert RJ, Schlesinger ME (1992) A sequential-decision strategy for abating climate change. Nature 357:315–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howarth RB (2003) Catastrophic outcomes in the economics of climate change. Clim Change 56:257–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kavuncu YO, Knabb SD (2005) Stabilizing greenhouse gas emissions: assessing the intergenerational costs and benefits of the Kyoto protocol. Energy Econ 27(3):369–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kattenberg A, Giorgi F, Grassl H, Meehl GA, Mitchell JFB, Stouffer RJ, Tokioka T, Weaver AJ, Wigley TML (1996) Climate models – projections of future climate. In: Houghton JT et al (eds) Climate change 1995: the science of climate change and contribution of working group I to the second assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change, 1st edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 285–357

    Google Scholar 

  • Leggett J, Pepper WJ, Swart RJ (1992) Emissions scenarios for the IPCC: an update. In: Houghton JT, Callander BA, Varney SK (eds) Climate change 1992 – the supplementary report to the IPCC scientific assessment, vol. 1, 1st edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 71–95

    Google Scholar 

  • Link PM, Tol RSJ (2004) Possible economic impacts of a shutdown of the thermohaline circulation: an application of FUND. Portuguese Economic Journal 3:99–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maier-Reimer E, Hasselmann K (1987) Transport and storage of carbon dioxide in the ocean: an inorganic ocean circulation carbon cycle model. Clim Dyn 2:63–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mendelsohn R, Morrison W, Schlesinger ME, Andronova NG (2000) Country-specific market impacts of climate change. Clim Change 45:553–569

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nordhaus WD (2007) Alternative measures of output in global economic-environmental models: purchasing power parity or market exchange rates? Energy Econ 29(3):349–372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Persky J (2001) Retrospectives: cost-benefit analysis and the classical creed. J Econ Perspect 15(4):199–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pratt JW, Raiffa H, Schlaifer R (1995) Introduction to statistical decision theory. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Shine KP, Derwent RG, Wuebbles DJ, Morcrette J-J (1990) Radiative forcing of climate. In: Houghton JT, Jenkins GJ, Ephraums JJ (eds) Climate change – the IPCC scientific assessment, vol. 1, 1st edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 41–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Tol RSJ (1995) The damage costs of climate change toward more comprehensive calculations. Environ Resour Econ 5:353–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tol RSJ (1996) The damage costs of climate change towards a dynamic representation. Ecol Econ 19:67–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tol RSJ (1999) Spatial and temporal efficiency in climate policy: applications of FUND. Environ Resour Econ 14(1):33–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tol RSJ (2001) Equitable cost-benefit analysis of climate change. Ecol Econ 36(1):71–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tol RSJ (2002a) Welfare specification and optimal control of climate change: an application of FUND. Energy Econ 24(4):367–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tol RSJ (2002b) New estimates of the damage costs of climate change, part I: benchmark estimates. Environ Resour Econ 21(1):47–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tol RSJ (2002c) New estimates of the damage costs of climate change, part II: dynamic estimates. Environ Resour Econ 21(1):135–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tol RSJ (2003) Is the uncertainty about climate change too large for expected cost-benefit analysis? Clim Change 56:265–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tol RSJ (2006a) Multi-gas emission reduction for climate change policy: an application of FUND. Energy J (Multi-Greenhouse Gas Mitigation and Climate Policy Special Issue):235–250

  • Tol RSJ (2006b) Exchange rates and climate change: an application of FUND. Clim Change 75:59–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tol RSJ, Yohe GW (2006) Of dangerous climate change and dangerous emission reduction. In: Schellnhuber HJ, Cramer W, Nakicenovic N, Wigley T, Yohe G (eds) Avoiding dangerous climate change, chapter 30. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 291–298

    Google Scholar 

  • WRI (2000) World resources database 2000–2001. World Resources Institute, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Yohe GW (2003) More trouble for cost-benefit analysis. Clim Change 56:235–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yohe GW, Schlesinger ME, Andronova NG (2004) To hedge or not against an uncertain climate future? Science 306:416–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard S. J. Tol.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

The climate framework for uncertainty, negotiation and distribution (FUND), technical description, version 2.8 (DOC 225 kb)

ESM Tables

(DOC 3.45 mb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tol, R.S.J., Yohe, G.W. Infinite uncertainty, forgotten feedbacks, and cost-benefit analysis of climate policy. Climatic Change 83, 429–442 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-007-9258-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-007-9258-z

Keywords

Navigation