Abstract
This paper aims at proposing a way to get round the intrinsic deadlocks of the economic assessment of climate change impacts (absence of consistent baseline scenario and of credible description of adaptation behaviours under uncertainty). First, we use climate scenarios from two models of the PRUDENCE project (HadRM3H and ARPEGE) to search for cities whose present climates can be considered as reasonable analogues of the future climates of 17 European cities. These analogues meet rather strict criteria in terms of monthly mean temperature, total annual precipitations and monthly mean precipitations. Second, we use these analogues as a heuristic tool to understand the main features of the adaptation required by climate change. The availability of two analogues for each city provides a useful estimate of the impact of uncertainty on the required adaptation efforts. Third, we carry out a cost assessment for various adaptation strategies, taking into account the cost of possible ill-adaptations due to wrong anticipations in a context of large uncertainty (from sunk-costs to lock-in in suboptimal adaptation choices). We demonstrate the gap between an enumerative approach under perfect expectation and a calculation accounting for uncertainty and spillover effects on economic growth.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Besancenot JP, Laaidi K, Laaidi M (2002) Mortalité en France selon le contexte thermique: réalité présente et scénarios pour le XXIème siècle, Actes du colloque Programme “Gestion et Impacts du Changement Climatique” (GICC): Séminaire de restitution, MATE et MEDIAS FRANCE (org.), Toulouse, France, 25–26 avril 2002
BNP-Paribas (2000) BTP 2000, Encore de l’or pour le béton, Conjoncture, Economic Studies of BNP-Paribas, available on research.bnpparibas.com
Darwin R, Tsigas M, Lewandrowski J, Raneses A (1995) World agriculture and climate change: economic adaptations, US Department of Agriculture, AER-703
EECCAC (2002) “Energy efficiency and certification of central air conditioners,” study for the D.G. Transportation-Energy (DGTREN) of the Commission of the E.U., Coordinator: Adnot J, Septembre 2002
Fankhauser S (1994) The social costs of greenhouse gas emissions: An expected value approach. Energy J 15(2):157–184
Hallstrom DG, Smith VK (2005) Market responses to hurricanes. J Environ Econ Manage 50:541–561
IPCC (2000) Special report on emissions scenarios. In: Nakicenovic N, Swart R (eds). Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, UK
Lhomme G (2003) Les liaisons dangereuses de l’immobilier et de la finance en Allemagne et au Royaume-Uni, Crédit Agricole, Département des Etudes Economiques et Bancaires, available on http://www.credit-agricole.fr/ca/kiosque-eco/index.shtml
Mendelsohn R, Dinar A (1999) Climate change, agriculture, and developing countries: does adaptation matter? The World Bank Observer 14(2):277–293
Mendelsohn R, Morrison W, Schlesinger ME, Andronova, NG (2000) Country-specific market impacts of climate change. Clim Change 45:553–569
Nordhaus W, Boyer JG (2000) Warming the world: economics models of climate change. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, p 246
Oke TR (1987) Boundary layer climates, 2nd edn. Routledge, Evanston, Illinois
Rebelo S (1991) Long run policy analysis and long run growth. J Polit Econ 99:500–521
Tol RSJ (1999a) New estimates of the damage costs of climate change. Part I: Benchmark estimates (report n° D99/01), 29 p. Instituut voor Milieuvraagstuken (IVM), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Tol RSJ (1999b) New estimates of the damage costs of climate change. Part II: Dynamic estimates (report n° D99/02), 37 p. Instituut voor Milieuvraagstuken (IVM), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hallegatte, S., Hourcade, JC. & Ambrosi, P. Using climate analogues for assessing climate change economic impacts in urban areas. Climatic Change 82, 47–60 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-006-9161-z
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-006-9161-z