Abstract
The article spells out four domains of international distributive justice and the consequent criteria of equity, the purpose being to identify a pluralistic normative ethical framework for climate mitigation and adaptation strategies. Justice and equity should play a major role in favouring collective action against climate change, because the more the various dimensions of such action are just, the more any international climate initiative is feasible in principle. As far as mitigation is concerned, the definition of a just initial allocation of endowments focuses on the criterion of differentiated equality, taking account of undeserved inequalities as suggested by Rawls’ theory of justice as fairness. With regard to the subsequent exchange of endowments, the Pareto principle, supplemented by the envy-freeness one, is a viable option. Possibly a sound reference for the just financing of adaptation activities is the criterion of differentiated historical responsibility, backed by Rawls’ theory of justice as fairness. As regards the allocation of adaptation resources, the criterion of lack of human security, as substantiated in Sen’s capability approach, seems promising.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adger WN (1999) Social vulnerability to climate change and extremes in coastal Vietnam. World Dev 27:249–269
Adger WN, Kelly PM (1999) Social vulnerability to climate change and the architecture of entitlements. Mitig Adapt Strategies Glob Chang 4:253–266
Adger WN, Paavola J, Huq S, Mace MJ (2006) Toward justice in adaptation to climate change. In: Adger WN, Huq S, Mace MJ, Paavola J (eds) Fairness in adaptation to climate change. MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts
Albin C (2001) Getting to fairness: negotiations over global public goods. Discussion Papers in Diplomacy, Netherlands Institute of International Relations ‘Clingendael’
Aldy JE, Orszag PR, Stiglitz JE (2001) Climate change: an agenda for global collective action. Pew Center on Global Climate Change, Washington
Ali A (2001) A conceptual framework for environmental justice based on shared but differentiated responsibilities. CSERGE Working Paper EDM 01–02, CSERGE, Norwich
Alkire S (2002) A conceptual framework for human security. CRISE Working Paper #2
Arnsperger C (1994) Envy-freeness and distributive justice. J Econ Surv 8:155–186
Ashton J, Wang X (2003) Equity and climate: in principle and practice. Beyond Kyoto Series, Pew Center on Global Climate Change, Washington
Aslam AM (2002) Equal per capita entitlements: a key to global participation on climate change? In: Baumert KA, Blanchard O, Llosa S, Perkaus J (eds) Building on the Kyoto protocol: options for protecting the climate, World Resources Institute, Washington
Athanasiou T, Baer P (2002) Dead heat. Global justice and global warming. Seven Stories, New York
Baer P (2002) Equity, greenhouse gas emissions, and global common resources. In: Schneider SH (ed) Climate change policy: a survey, Island, Washington, District of Columbia, p 393
Baer P (2006) Adaptation: who pays whom? In: Adger WN, Huq S, Mace MJ, Paavola J (eds) Fairness in adaptation to climate change. MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts
Baer P, Harte J, Herzog A, Hultman N, Raymond L (2000) Equal per capita emission rights: the key to a viable climate change policy. RAEL, University of California, Berkeley
Beitz CR (2000) Rawls’s law of peoples. Ethics 110:669–696
Benestad O (1994) Energy needs and CO2 emissions. Energy Policy 22:725–734
Bodansky D (2002) U.S. climate policy after Kyoto: elements for success. Policy Brief 15, Carnegie Endowments for International Peace, Washington
Bohm P (2000) International greenhouse gas emission trading – with special reference to the Kyoto protocol. In: Carraro C (ed) Equity and efficiency in climate change policy. Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands
Brooks N (2003) Vulnerability, risk and adaptation: a conceptual framework. Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research, Working Paper 38
Brooks N, Adger WN, Kelly PM (2005) The determinants of vulnerability and adaptive capacity at the national level and the implications for adaptation. Glob Environ Change 15:151–163
Caney S (2001) International distributive justice. Polit Stud 49:974–997
Carraro C, Buchner B (2002) Equity, development and climate change policy. In: Carraro C, Galeotti M, Kemfert C, Buchner B (eds) Climate Change Policy Regimes, International Trade and Economic Growth. Bruxelles, CEPS–ESRI Collaboration Studies
Cohen GA (1993) Equality of what? On welfare, goods and capabilities. In: Nussbaum MC, Sen AK (eds) The quality of life. Clarendon, Oxford
Criqui P, Mima S, Viguier P (1999) Marginal abatement cost of CO2 emission reductions, geographical flexibility and concrete ceilings: an assessment using the POLES model. Energy Policy 27:585–601
Cullen B (1992) Philosophical theories of justice. In: Scherer KR (ed) Justice: interdisciplinary perspectives, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, p 15
DeCanio SJ, Niemann P (2006) Equity effects of alternative assignments of global environmental rights. Ecol Econ 56:546–559
Eyckmans J, Schokkaert E (2003) An “ideal” normative theory for greenhouse negotiations. Working paper, Katholieke Universiteit, Leuven
Gardiner SM (2004) Ethics and global climate change. Ethics 114:555–600
Gauthier D (1986) Morals by agreement. Clarendon, Oxford
Grubb M (1995) Seeking fair weather: ethics and the international debate on climate change. Int Aff 71(3):463–496
Gupta J (2000) On behalf of my delegation. A survival guide for Developing Country Climate Negotiators. Center for Sustainable Development in the America, Washington, International Institute for Sustainable Development, Winnipeg
Hay AM (1995) Concepts of equity, fairness and justice in geographical studies. Trans Inst Br Geogr NS 20:500–508
Helm C (2003) Fair division of common property resources when monetary compensations are possible. Working paper, School of Business and Economics, Humboldt University, Berlin
Helm C, Simonis UE (2000) Distributive justice in international environmental policy – theoretical foundation and exemplary formulation. Working paper, Science Center, Berlin
Huq S, Reid H (2004) Mainstreaming adaptation in development. IDS Bull 35:15–21
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change – IPCC (2001a) Climate change 2001: synthesis report – summary for policymakers. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Geneva
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change – IPCC (2001b) Climate change 2001: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability – summary for policymakers. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Geneva
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change – IPCC (2001c) Climate change 2001: mitigation – summary for policymakers. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Geneva
Kelly P, Adger WN (2000) Theory and practice in assessing vulnerability to climate change and facilitating adaptation. Clim Change 47:325–352
King G, Murray CJL (2001–2002) Rethinking human security. Polit Sci Q 116:585–610
Konow J (2003) Which is the fairest one of all? A positive analysis of justice theories. J Econ Lit XLI:1188–1239
Miller D (1988) The ethical significance of nationality. Ethics 98:647–662
Miller D (1995) On nationality. Clarendon, Oxford
Muller B (1999) Justice in global warming negotiations. How to obtain a procedurally fair compromise. Oxford Institute for Energy Studies, London
Muller B (2001a) Fair compromise in a morally complex world. In: Proceedings Equity and Global Climate Change Conference, The Pew Center on Global Climate Change, Washington
Muller B (2001b) Varieties of distributive justice in climate change. Clim Change 48:273–288
Muller B (2002) Equity in climate change: the great divide. Oxford Institute for Energy Studies, London
Neumayer E (2000) In defence of historical accountability for greenhouse gas emissions. Ecol Econ 33:185–192
Nordhaus WD (1999) Global public goods and the problem of global warming. Annual Lecture, The Institute d’Economie Industrielle (IDEI), Toulouse
Nozick R (1974) Anarchy, state and utopia. Basic Blackwell, Oxford
O’Brien K, Eriksen S, Schjolden A, Nygaard, L (2004) What’s in a world? Conflicting interpretations of vulnerability in climate change research. CICERO Working Paper 2004:04, CICERO, Oslo
Ott HE, Sachs W (2000) Ethical aspects of emission trading. Wuppertal Paper Nr. 110, Wuppertal Institute for Climate, Environment and Energy, Wuppertal
Paavola J (2005) Seeking justice: international environmental governance and climate change. Globalizations 2:309–322
Paavola J, Adger WN (2002) Justice and adaptation to climate change. Research Working Paper 23, Tyndall Centre for Climate Change, Norwich
Paavola J, Adger WN (2006) Fair adaptation to climate change. Ecol Econ 56:594–609
Page E (1999) Intergenerational justice and climate change. Polit Stud 47:53–66
Pan J (2003) Emission rights and their transferability: equity concerns over climate change mitigation. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics 3:1–16
Panayotou T, Sachs JD, Zwane AP (2002) Compensation for ‘meaningful participation’ in climate change control: a modest proposal and empirical analysis. J Environ Econ Manage 43:437–454
Parikh J (2000) Viewpoint: inequity, a root cause of climate change. Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research, Mumbai
Paris R (2001) Human security. Paradigm shift or hot air? Int Secur 26:87–102
Pogge T (2004) The incoherence between Rawls’s theories of justice. Fordham Law Rev 72:1739–1759
Rawls J (1971) A theory of justice. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Rawls J (1999) The law of peoples. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts
Rayner S, Malone E (1998) Why study human choice and climate change? In: Rayner S, Malone E (eds) Human choice and climate change. Volume 1. The societal framework. Battelle, Columbus
Richards M (2003) Poverty reduction, equity and climate change: global governance synergies or contradictions? Overseas Development Institute, London
Ringius L, Frederiksen P (2002) Burden sharing in the context of global climate change. NERI Technical Report, no. 424, National Environmental Research Institute, Copenhagen
Rose A, Steven SB, Edmonds J, Wise M (1998) International equity and differentiation in global warming policies: an application to tradable emission permits. Environ Resour Econ 12:25–51
Schokkaert E (1992) The economics of distributive justice, welfare and freedoms. In: Scherer KR (ed) Justice: interdisciplinary perspectives. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
Sen AK (1970) Collective choice and social welfare. North-Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Sen AK (1979) The welfare basis of real income comparison: a survey. J Econ Lit 17:1–45
Sen AK (1987) On ethics and economics. Basic Blackwell, Oxford
Sen AK (1990) Justice: means versus freedoms. Philos Public Aff 19:111–121
Sen AK (1999) Development as freedom. Anchor, New York
Shogren J, Toman M (2000) Climate change policy. RFF Discussion Paper 00–22, Resources for the Future, Washington
Shue H (1992) The unavoidability of justice. In: Hurrell A, Kingsbury B (eds) The international politics of the environment. Oxford University Press, Oxford, p 373
Shue H (1993) Subsistence emissions and luxury emissions. Law Policy 15:39–59
Shue H (1999) Global environment and international inequality. Int Aff 75:531–545
Shue H (2001) Climate. In: Jamieson D (ed) A companion to environmental ethics. Blackwell, Oxford, UK
Shukla PR (1999) Justice, equity and efficiency in climate change: a developing country perspective. In: Toth F (ed) Fair weather? Equity concerns in climate change. Earthscan, London (also: Working paper e2 Analytics)
Tamir Y (1993) Liberal nationalism. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey
Tata Energy Research Institute (TERI) (1999) Climate of concern – bridging the divide. Tata Energy Research Institute, New Delhi
United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, Stockholm, Sweden, June 5–16, 1972, Declaration of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, UN Doc. A/CONF.48/14 [Stockholm Declaration on the Human Environment]
Varian HR (1974) Equity, envy and efficiency. J Econ Theory 9:63–91
Varian HR (1976) Two problems in the theory of fairness. J Pub Econ 5:249–260
Weitzman ML (1974) Price vs. quantities. Rev Econ Stud 41:477–491
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Grasso, M. A normative ethical framework in climate change. Climatic Change 81, 223–246 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-006-9158-7
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-006-9158-7