Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Cyberbullying Among Adolescents: The Role of Affective and Cognitive Empathy, and Gender

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Child Psychiatry & Human Development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to examine the association between affective empathy, cognitive empathy, and gender on cyberbullying among adolescents. Participants were 396 adolescents from Singapore with age ranging from 12 to 18 years. Adolescents responded to a survey with scales measuring both affective and cognitive empathy, and cyberbullying behavior. A three-step hierarchical multiple regression analysis was used with cyberbullying scores as the dependent variable. Gender was dummy coded and both affective and cognitive empathy were centered using the sample mean prior to creating interaction terms and entering them into the regression equations. The testing, probing and interpretation of interaction effects followed established statistical procedures. Results from hierarchical multiple regression analysis indicated a significant three-way interaction. At low affective empathy, both boys and girls who also had low cognitive empathy had higher scores on cyberbullying than those who had high cognitive empathy. This pattern of results was similarly found for boys at high affective empathy. However, for girls, high or low levels of cognitive empathy resulted in similar levels of cyberbullying. Implications of these findings include the need for empathy training and the importance of positive caregiver-child relationships in reducing cyberbullying behavior among adolescents.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Patchin JW, Hinduja S (2006) Bullies move beyond the schoolyard: a preliminary look at cyberbullying. Youth Violence Juv Justice 4:148–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kowalski RM, Limber SP (2007) Electronic bullying among middle school students. J Adolesc Health 41:S22–S30

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Raskauskas J, Stoltz AD (2007) Involvement in traditional and electronic bullying among adolescents. Dev Psychol 43:564–575

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Arnett JJ (2008) The neglected 95%: why American psychology needs to become less American. Am Psychol 63:602–614

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Mehrabian A, Epstein N (1972) A measure of emotional empathy. J Pers 40:525–543

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hogan R (1969) Development of an empathy scale. J Consult Clin Psychol 33:307–316

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Cohen D, Strayer J (1996) Empathy in conduct-disordered and comparison youth. Dev Psychol 32:988–998

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Miller PA, Eisenberg N (1988) The relation of empathy to aggressive and externalizing/antisocial behavior. Psychol Bull 103:324–344

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Eisenberg N, Fabes F (1998) Prosocial development. In: Damon W, Eisenberg N (eds) Handbook of child psychology: vol. 3. Social, emotional and personality development, 5th edn. Wiley, New York, pp 701–778

    Google Scholar 

  10. Frick PJ, Cornell AH, Bodin SD, Dane HE, Barry CT, Loney BR (2003) Callous–unemotional traits and developmental pathways to severe conduct problems. Dev Psychol 39:246–260

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hinduja S, Patchin JW (2008) Cyberbullying: an exploratory analysis of factors related to offending and victimization. Deviant Behav 29:129–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Jolliffe D, Farrington DP (2006) Examining the relationship between low empathy and bullying. Aggress Behav 32:540–550

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Feshbach ND (1987) Parental empathy and child adjustment/maladjustment. In: Eisenberg N, Strayer J (eds) Empathy and its development. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 271–291

    Google Scholar 

  14. Shechtman Z (2002) Cognitive and affective empathy in aggressive boys: implications for counseling. Int J Adv Couns 24:211–222

    Google Scholar 

  15. Crick N (1995) Relational aggression: the role of intent attributions, feelings of distress, and provocation type. Dev Psychopathol 7:313–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Loudin JL, Loukas A, Robinson S (2003) Relational aggression in college students: examining the roles of social anxiety and empathy. Aggress Behav 29:430–439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Smith PK, Mahdavi J, Carvalho M et al (2008) Cyberbullying: its nature and impact in secondary school pupils. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 49:376–385

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Li Q (2006) Cyberbullying in schools: a research of gender differences. Sch Psychol Int 27:157–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ybarra ML, Mitchell KJ (2004) Youth engaging in online harassment: associations with caregiver-child relationships, Internet use, and personal characteristics. J Adolesc 27:319–336

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lennon R, Eisenberg N (1987) Gender and age differences in empathy and sympathy. In: Eisenberg N, Strayer J (eds) Empathy and its development. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 195–218

    Google Scholar 

  21. Jolliffe D, Farrington DP (2006) Development and validation of the basic empathy scale. J Adolesc 29:589–611

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Joinsen AN (1998) Causes and implications of disinhibited behavior on the Internet. In: Gackenbach J (ed) Psychology and the Internet: intrapersonal, interpersonal and transpersonal implications. Academic Press, New York, pp 43–60

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kiesler S, Siegel J, McGuire TW (1984) Social psychological aspects of computer mediated communications. Am Psychol 39:1123–1134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kohlberg L (1984) The psychology of moral development. Jossey Bass, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  25. Silfver M, Helkama K (2007) Empathy, guilt, and gender: a comparison of two measures of guilt. Scand J Psychol 48:239–246

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Eisenberg N, Zhou Q, Koller S (2001) Brazilian adolescents’ prosocial moral judgment and behavior: relations to sympathy, perspective taking, gender role orientation, and demographic characteristics. Child Dev 72:518–534

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Byrne BM (2006) Structural equation modeling with EQS: basic concepts, applications and programming, 2nd edn. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah

    Google Scholar 

  28. Bentler PM (2005) EQS 6 structural equations program manual. Multivariate Software, Encino

    Google Scholar 

  29. Satorra A, Bentler PM (1988) Scaling corrections for chi-square statistics in covariance structure analysis. ASA 1988 Proceedings of the Business and Economic Section. American Statistical Association, Alexandria, VA, pp 308–313

  30. Curran PJ, West SG, Finch JF (1996) The robustness of test statistics to nonnormality and specification error in confirmatory factor analysis. Psychol Methods 1:16–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Satorra A, Bentler PM (2001) A scaled difference chi-square test statistic for moment structure analysis. Psychometrika 66:507–514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Aiken LS, West SG (eds) (1991) Multiple regression: testing and interpreting interactions. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  33. Postmers T, Spears R (1998) Deindividuation and anti-normative behavior: a meta-analysis. Psychol Bull 123:238–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Bjorkqvist K, Osterman K, Kaukiainen A (2000) Social intelligence–empathy = aggression? Aggress Violent Behav 5:191–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Derzon JH, Wilson SJ, Cunningham CA (1999) The effectiveness of school-based interventions for preventing and reducing violence. Vanderbilt Institute of Public Policy Studies, Nashville

    Google Scholar 

  36. Ttofi MM, Farrington DP, Baldry AC (2008) Effectiveness of programs to reduce school bullying: a systematic review. Swedish Council of Crime Prevention, Stockholm

    Google Scholar 

  37. Chibbaro JS (2007) School counselors and the cyberbully: interventions and implications. Prof Sch Couns 11:65–67

    Google Scholar 

  38. Greenberg MT, Speltz ML, DeKlyen M (1993) The role of attachment in the early development of disruptive behavior problems. Dev Psychopathol 5:191–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Ang RP (2005) Development and validation of the teacher-student relationship inventory using exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. J Exp Educ 74:55–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Hughes JN, Cavell TA, Jackson T (1999) Influence of the teacher-student relationship on childhood conduct problems: a prospective study. J Clin Child Psychol 28:173–184

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Ooi YP, Ang RP, Fung DSS et al (2006) The impact of parent–child attachment on aggression, social stress, and self-esteem. Sch Psychol Int 27:552–566

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Vania Yip for her assistance with this project. This research was supported by an Academic Research Fund Tier 1 grant [RG96/07] awarded to the first author.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Psychology, School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Nanyang Technological University, 14 Nanyang Drive, Singapore, 637332, Singapore

    Rebecca P. Ang

  2. Division of Information Studies, Wee Kim Wee School of Communication and Information, Nanyang Technological University, 31 Nanyang Link, Singapore, 637718, Singapore

    Dion H. Goh

Authors
  1. Rebecca P. Ang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dion H. Goh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rebecca P. Ang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ang, R.P., Goh, D.H. Cyberbullying Among Adolescents: The Role of Affective and Cognitive Empathy, and Gender. Child Psychiatry Hum Dev 41, 387–397 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10578-010-0176-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10578-010-0176-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation