Skip to main content
Log in

A Critical Analysis of Foster Youth Advisory Boards in the United States

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Child & Youth Care Forum Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The enactment of the John H. Chafee Foster Care Independence Act brought welcome attention to young people aging out of foster care, and sought to include them in both case planning and policy dialog. Foster Youth Advisory Boards help to promote such inclusion, though the implementation of those boards has not been formally analyzed.

Objective

This critical analysis of foster youth advisory boards in the United States answers the following questions: (1) What/where are each of the Youth Advisory Boards in the United States? (2) How is each board implemented? (3) How would a young person aging out of care (or a practitioner working with this population) access its local board?

Methods

A content analysis of public child welfare agency programs was conducted to identify youth advisory boards in each of the United States and the District of Columbia to identify implementing agencies and contact information.

Results

While every state and Washington, D.C. had a version of Youth Advisory Board, some boards were implemented exclusively through public child welfare agencies and others through public/nonprofit partnerships. Contact information for each of the 51 boards was identified and is displayed.

Conclusions

Youth Advisory Boards have proliferated throughout the United States since the enactment of Chafee programming. They can be useful, pro-social mediums to include foster youth in case planning and policy dialog, while simultaneously promoting a sense of leadership, mentorship, and ecological permanence. Implications for policy, practice, and research are explored.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arnett, J. J. (2000). Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens though the twenties. American Psychologist, 55(5), 469–480.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Berenson, S., Margolin, D., Martin, L., Pearlman Raab, K., & Zavez, M. (2010). Empowerment, innovation, and service: Law school programs provide access to justice and instill a commitment to serve. Family Court Review, 48(4), 672–684.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berzin, S., Singer, E., & Hokanson, K. (2014). Emerging versus emancipating: The transition to adulthood for youth in foster care. Journal of Adolescent Research, 29(5), 616–638.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, M.A., Barnett, R.V., & Baugh, E. (2007). Youth involvement in community development: Implications and possibilities for extension. Journal of Extention, 45(4), 202–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruskas, D. (2008). Children in foster care: A vulnerable population at risk. Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Nursing, 21(2), 70–77.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, T., Culhane, D. P., Kim, M., Moreno, M., Stephen, M., Stevens, M., & Toros, H. (2014). Public assistance receipt among older youth exiting foster care. Children and Youth Services Review, 44, 307–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Checkoway, B. (2012). Youth empowerment. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan School of Social Work.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chicago Area Project. Statewide youth advisory board. (2014). Retrieved from http://www.chicagoareaproject.org/programs/statewide-youth-advisory-board

  • Child Welfare League of America (CWLA). (2003). Forming a youth advisory council. Retrieved from http://www.ytfg.org/documents/Council.pdf

  • Child Welfare League of America (CWLA). (2014). National Foster Youth Advisory Council. Retrieved from http://66.227.70.18/programs/positiveyouth/nfyac.htm

  • Children’s Bureau. (2012). John H. Chafee foster care independence program. Retrieved from http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/cb/resource/chafee-foster-care-program

  • Christens, B. D., & Peterson, N. A. (2012). The role of empowerment in youth development: A study of sociopolitical control as mediator of ecological systems’ influence on developmental outcomes. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 41(5), 623–635. doi:10.1007/s10964-011-9724-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, M. E. (2004). Enhancing services to youths leaving foster care: Analysis of recent legislation and its potential impact. Children and Youth Services Review, 26(11), 1051–1065.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Courtney, M. (2005). Youth aging out of foster care. Network on transitions to adulthood policy brief. Retrieved from http://transitions.s410.sureserver.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/courtney-foster-care.pdf

  • Courtney, E. M., Lee, S. J., & Tajima, E. (2014). Extended foster care support during the transition to adulthood: Effect on the risk of arrest. Children and Youth Services Review, 42, 34–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Courtney, M. E., Piliavin, I., Grogan-Kaylor, A., & Nesmith, A. (2001). Foster youth transitions to adulthood: A longitudinal view of youth leaving care. Child Welfare, 80(6), 685–718.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Crowe, K.M. (2007). Using youth expertise at all levels: The essential resource for effective child welfare practice. New Directions for Youth Development, 113, 139–149.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Felix, A. (2003). Making youth voice a community principle. Youth Service Journal, 10, 1–8. doi:10.1002/yd.206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finn, J. (2001). Text and turbulence: Representing adolescence as pathology in the human services. Childhood, 8(2), 167–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, P. A., Burraston, B., & Pears, K. (2005). The early intervention foster care program: Permanent placement outcomes from a randomized trial. Child Maltreatment, 10(1), 61–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Font, S. A. (2014). Kinship and nonrelative foster care: The effect of placement type on child well-being. Child Development, 85(5), 2074–2090. doi:10.1111/cdev.12241.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Forenza, B. & Simmel, C. (2014). Civic engagement among youth aging out of foster care. In: Poster presented at the United States Administration for Children and Families Child Abuse and Neglect Biennial Conference. New Orleans, L.A.

  • FosterClub. (2009). National foster youth advisory council joins fosterclub. Retrieved from https://www.fosterclub.com/article/national-foster-youth-advisory-council-joins-fosterclub

  • Goodkind, S., Schlebe, L. A., & Shook, J. J. (2011). Why youth leave care: Understandings of adulthood transition and successes and challenges among youth aging out of child welfare. Children and Youth Services Review, 33(6), 1039–1048.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greeson, J. K., & Thompson, A. E. (2014). Aging out of foster care. The Oxford Handbook of Emerging Adulthood (Forthcoming). doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199795574.013.18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hohenemser, L. K., & Marshall, B. D. (2002). Utilizing a youth development framework to establish and maintain a youth advisory committee. Health Promotion Practice., 3(2), 155–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, C., & Berrick, J. (2014). Experiences of youth who transition to adulthood out of care: Developing a theoretical framework. Children and Youth Services Review, 46, 78–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leslie, L. K., Landsverk, J. A., Ezzet-Lofstrom, R., Tschann, J. M., Slymen, D. J., & Garland, A. F. (2000). Children in foster care: Factors influencing outpatient mental health service use. Child Abuse and Neglect, 24(4), 465–476.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lewit, E.M. (1993). Children in foster care. The Future of Children, 3(3), 192–200. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1602551.

  • McAlesse, M. (2009). Presidential address: Social and human sciences sector global strategy, 2009-2013. Galway: UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGowan, B. G. (2005). Historical evolution of child welfare services. In G. Mallon & P. Hess (Eds.), Child welfare for the twenty-first century: A handbook of practices, policies, and programs. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Association of Counties. (2008). Youth aging out of foster care: Identifying strategies and best practices. Retrieved from http://www.dshs.wa.gov/pdf/ca/YouthAgingoutofFoster.pdf

  • National Youth in Transition Database. (2012). Highlights from state reports to the NYTD, federal fiscal year 2011. Retrieved from http://www.acf.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/cb/nytd_data_brief_1.pdf

  • Newton, R. R., Litrownik, A. J., & Landsverk, J. A. (2000). Children and youth in foster care: Disentangling the relationship between problem behaviors and number of placements. Child Abuse and Neglect, 24(10), 1363–1374.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Oldmixon, S. (2007). State policies to help youth transition out of foster care [white paper]. Retrieved from http://www.nga.org/files/live/sites/NGA/files/pdf/0701YOUTH.PDF

  • Pryce, J. M., & Samuels, G. M. (2008). What doesn’t kill you makes you stronger: Survivalist self-reliance as resilience and risk among young adults aging out of foster care. Children and Youth Services Review, 30, 1198–1210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richards-Shuster, K. (2012). Empowering the voice of youth: The role of youth advisory councils in grant making focused on youth. New Directions For Evaluation, 136, 87. doi:10.1002/ev.20036.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez, J. (2005). California youth connection: Organizing foster youth for change. Poverty Law and Policy, 39, 170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey. (2014). Statewide youth advisory board. Rutgers School of Social Work. Retrieved from http://socialwork.rutgers.edu/InstituteForFamilies/officeofchildwelfareinitiatives/TFY/Projects/statewideYAB.aspx

  • Sector, Independent. (2001). Giving and volunteering in the United States. Washington, D.C.: Independent Sector.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmel, C., Morton, C. M., & Cucinotta, G. (2012). Understanding extended involvement with the child welfare system. Children and Youth Services Review, 34(9), 1974–1981.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • State of New Jersey, Department of Children and Families. (2013). Request for proposals for youth advisory board. Retrieved from http://www.nj.gov/def/def/providers/notices/RFP_YouthAdvisoryBoards.pdf

  • Taft, J. K., & Gordon, H. R. (2013). Youth activists, youth councils, and constrained democracy. Education, Citizenship and Social Justice, 8(1), 87–100. doi:10.1177/1746197913475765.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United States Department of Health and Human Services, Adoption and Foster Care Analysis and Reporting System (AFCARS) Report. (2013). Preliminary FY13 estimates. Retrieved from http://www.acf.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/cb/afcarsreport21.pdf

  • United States Department of Health and Human Services, Child Welfare Information Gateway. (2013). Factsheets: How the child welfare system works. Retrieved from https://www.childwelfare.gov/pubs/factsheets/cpswork/

  • Wildeman, C., & Emanuel, N. (2014). Cumulative risks of foster care placement by age 18 for U.S. children, 2000–2011. Plos One Journal, 9(3), 1–7. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0092785.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeldin, S. (2000). Integrating research and practice to understand and strengthen communities for adolescent development: An introduction to the special issue and current issues. Applied Developmental Science, 4(1), 2–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeldin, S., Christens, B., & Powers, J. (2012). The psychology and practice of youth-adult partnership: Bridging generations for youth development and community change. American Journal of Community Psychology, 51(3–4), 385–397.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brad Forenza.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Forenza, B., Happonen, R.G. A Critical Analysis of Foster Youth Advisory Boards in the United States. Child Youth Care Forum 45, 107–121 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10566-015-9321-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10566-015-9321-2

Keywords

Navigation