Date: 03 Nov 2010
Parental Autonomy Support and Student Learning Goals: A Preliminary Examination of an Intrinsic Motivation Intervention
- John Mark Froiland
- … show all 1 hide
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
In a seven week quasi-experimental study, parents (n = 15) of elementary school students (n = 15) learned autonomy supportive communication techniques that included helping their children set learning goals for homework assignments. Treatment vs. comparison group (n = 30) ANCOVA analyses revealed that the parents in the treatment group perceived their children as becoming more autonomously motivated relative to the comparison group, F(1, 26) = 7.69, p < .05. Children in the treatment group reported increased positive affect toward homework relative to the comparison group, F(1,26) = 5.35, p < .05. Children did not significantly improve on general measures of self reported academic intrinsic motivation or relative autonomy. These preliminary findings suggest that autonomy supportive parenting styles may improve parent’s perceptions of their children’s autonomous motivation and children’s subjective experience of positive affect surrounding homework. In order to draw firmer conclusions about the effects of the intervention, more rigorously controlled studies will be needed in the future.
This article is based on a doctoral dissertation completed at Michigan State University by John Mark Froiland under the supervision of Jere Brophy.
This article is dedicated in memory of Jere Brophy, who made priceless contributions to the fields of educational psychology, teacher education, developmental psychology, school psychology, and motivational science.
Assemany, A. E., & McIntosh, D. E. (2002). Negative treatment outcomes of behavioral parent training programs. Psychology in the Schools, 39(2), 209–219.CrossRef
Battistich, V., Schaps, E., Watson, M., & Solomon, D. (1996). Prevention effects of the child development project: Early findings from an ongoing multisite demonstration trial. Journal of Adolescent Research, 11, 12–35.CrossRef
Brophy, J. (2004). Motivating students to learn (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Brophy, J. (2008). Developing students’ appreciation for what is taught. Educational Psychologist, 43(3), 132–141.CrossRef
Brown, D., Pryzwansky, W. B., & Schulte, A. C. (2001). Psychological consultation: Introduction to theory and practice (5th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Conti, R., Amabile, T. M., & Pollak, S. (1995). The positive impact of creative activity: Effects of creative task engagement and motivational focus on college students’ learning. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21(10), 1107–1116.CrossRef
Cooper, H., Lindsay, J. J., & Nye, B. (2000). Homework in the home: How student, family, and parenting-style differences relate to the homework process. Contemporary Education Psychology, 25, 464–487.CrossRef
Cooper, H., Robinson, J. C., & Patall, E. A. (2006). Does homework improve academic achievement? A synthesis of research, 1987–2003. Review of Education Research, 76, 1–62.CrossRef
Corno, L. (1996). Homework is a complicated thing. Educational Researcher, 25, 27–30.
Coutts, P. M. (2004). Meanings of homework and implications for practice. Theory into Practice, 43, 182–188.CrossRef
Gottfried, A. E. (1986). Chidlren’s academic intrinsic motivation inventory. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
Gottfried, A. E. (1990). Academic intrinsic motivation in young elementary school children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(3), 525–538.CrossRef
Gottfried, A. E., Fleming, J. S., & Gottfried, A. W. (1994). Role of parent motivational practices in children’s academic intrinsic motivation and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86(1), 104–113.CrossRef
Gottfried, A. E., Fleming, J. S., & Gottfried, A. W. (2001). Continuity of academic intrinsic motivation from childhood through late adolescence: A longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(1), 3–13.CrossRef
Grolnick, W. S. (2009). The role of parents in facilitating autonomous self-regulation for education. Theory and Research in Education, 7, 164–173.CrossRef
Grolnick, W. S., & Pomerantz, E. M. (2009). Issues and challenges in studying parental control: Toward a new conceptualization. Child Development Perspectives, 3, 165–170.CrossRef
Gurland, S. T., & Grolnick, W. S. (2005). Perceived threat, controlling parenting, and children’s achievement orientations. Motivation and Emotion, 29, 103–121.CrossRef
Harris, J. D., Gray, B. A., Rees-McGee, S., Carroll, J. L., & Zaremba, E. T. (1987). Referrals to school psychologists: A national survey. Journal of School Psychology, 25, 343–354.CrossRef
Joussemet, M., Landry, R., & Koestner, R. (2008). A self-determination theory perspective on parenting. Canadian Psychology, 49, 194–200.
Kasser, T., & Ryan, R. M. (1996). Further examining the American dream: Differential correlates of intrinsic and extrinsic goals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22(3), 280–287.CrossRef
Kenny-Benson, G. A., & Pomerantz, E. M. (2005). The role of mothers’ use of control in children’s perfectionism: Implications for the development of children’s depressive symptoms. Journal of Personality, 73, 23–46.CrossRef
Lepper, M. R., Corpus, J. H., Henderlong, J., & Iyengar, S. S. (2005). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations in the classroom: Age differences and academic correlates. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(2), 184–196.CrossRef
Lochman, J. E. (2000). Theory and empiricism in intervention research: A dialectic to be avoided. Journal of School Psychology, 38(4), 359–368.CrossRef
Marcoulides, G. A., Gottfried, A. E., Gottfried, A. W., & Oliver, P. H. (2008). A latent transition analysis of academic intrinsic motivation from childhood through adolescence. Educational Research and Evaluation, 14, 411–427.CrossRef
Munoz, M. A., & Vanderhaar, J. E. (2006). Literacy-embedded character education in a large urban district: Effect of the Child Development Project on elementary school students and teachers. Journal of Research in Character Education, 4(1–2), 47–64.
Reiss, S. (2004). Multifaceted nature of intrinsic motivation: The theory of 16 basic desires. Review of General Psychology, 8, 179–193.CrossRef
Reiss, S. (2009). Six motivational reasons for low school achievement. Child & Youth Care Forum, 38, 219–225.CrossRef
Rigby, C. S., Deci, E. L., Patrick, B. C., & Ryan, R. M. (1992). Beyond the intrinsic-extrinsic dichotomy: Self-determination in motivation and learning. Motivation and Emotion, 16, 165–185.CrossRef
Sansone, C., & Morgan, C. (1992). Intrinsic motivation and education: Competence in context. Motivation and Emotion, 16(3), 249–270.CrossRef
Sciutto, M. J., Nolfi, C. J., & Bluhm, C. (2004). Effects of child gender and symptom type on referrals for ADHD by elementary school teachers. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 12, 247–253.CrossRef
Sterling-Turner, H. E., Watson, T. S., Wildmon, M., Watkins, C., & Little, E. (2001). Investigating the relationship between training type and treatment integrity. School Psychology Quarterly, 16(1), 56–67.CrossRef
Vansteenkiste, M., Lens, W., & Deci, E. L. (2006). Intrinsic versus extrinsic goal contents in self-determination theory: Another look at the quality of academic motivation. Educational Psychologist, 41, 19–31.CrossRef
- Parental Autonomy Support and Student Learning Goals: A Preliminary Examination of an Intrinsic Motivation Intervention
Child & Youth Care Forum
Volume 40, Issue 2 , pp 135-149
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer US
- Additional Links
- Parenting style
- Intrinsic motivation
- Elementary school students
- Goal setting
- John Mark Froiland (1) (2)
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Department of Counseling, Educational Psychology, and Special Education, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA
- 2. Department of School Psychology, University of Northern Colorado, McKee Hall 298, Box 131, Greeley, CO, 80639, USA