Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Influences of Various Supports, γ-Al2O3, CeO2, and SBA-15 on HDO Performance of NiMo Catalyst

  • Published:
Catalysis Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Hydrodeoxygenation (HDO) of guaiacol (GUA), has been carried out over γ-Al2O3, CeO2, SBA-15 supported NiMo catalysts in an autoclave at 250 °C and a hydrogen pressure of 5 MPa. In comparison with NiMo/γ-Al2O3, both NiMo/CeO2 and NiMo/SBA-15 catalysts showed their higher activities. NiMo/SBA-15 has been found to be the most potential one for HDO of GUA with GUA conversion and HDO degree of 90  and 67.5 %, respectively. The main product was cyclohexane with its yield of 56 mol%. The outstanding activity of this catalyst results from a high dispersion of its active sites on SBA-15 as catalyst support. For CeO2 supported catalyst, some interactions of Ce–Mo can be occurred, leading to an enhancement of its HDO performance.

Graphical Abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lange JP (2007) Catalysis for renewables. Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim

    Google Scholar 

  2. Mohan D, Pittman CU, Steele PH (2006) Energy Fuels 20:848–889

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Mortensen PM, Grunwaldt JD, Jensen PA, Knudsen KG, Jensen AD (2011) Appl Catal A 407:1–19

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Wildschut J, Mahfud FH, Venderbosch RH, Heeres HJ (2009) Ind Eng Chem Res 48:10324–10334

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bui VN, Toussaint G, Laurenti D, Mirodatos C, Geantet C (2009) Catal Today 143:172–178

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Venderbosch RH, Ardiyanti AR, Wildschut J, Oasmaa A, Heeres HJ (2010) J Chem Technol Biotechnol 85:674–686

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Elliott DC (2007) Energy Fuels 21:1792

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Şenol Oİ, Viljava TR, Krause AOI (2005) Catal Today 106:186–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Antonakou E, Lappas A, Nilsen MH, Bouzga A, Stöcker M (2006) Fuel 85:2202–2212

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Huirache-Acuña R, Nava R, Peza-Ledesma C, Lara-Romero J, Alonso-Núez G, Pawelec B, Rivera-Muñoz E (2013) Materials 6:4139–4167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Trovarelli A (1996) Catal Rev 38:439

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Bui VN, Laurenti D, Delichère P, Geantet C (2011) Appl Catal B 101:246–255

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhao HY, Li D, Bui P, Oyama ST (2011) Appl Catal A 391:305–310

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Gutierrez A, Kaila RK, Honkela ML, Slioor R, Krause AOI (2009) Catal Today 147:239–246

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Boullosa-Eiras S, Lodeng R, Bergem H, Stocker M, Hannevold L, Blekkan EA (2014) Catalysis: vol 26. The Royal Society of, Chemistry, pp 29–71

    Book  Google Scholar 

  16. He Z, Wang X (2012) Catal Sust Energy 1:28

    Google Scholar 

  17. Luan Z, Hartmann M, Zhao D, Zhou W, Kevan L (1999) Chem Mater 11:1621–1627

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Bykova MV, Ermakov DY, Kaichev VV, Bulavchenko OA, Saraev AA, Lebedev MY, Yakovlev VA (2012) Appl Catal B 113–114:296–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Alberton AL, Souza MMVM, Schmal M (2007) Catal Today 123:257–264

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Jin S, Xiao Z, Li C, Chen X, Wang L, Xing J, Li W, Liang C (2014) Catal Today 234:125–132

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Regalbuto J, Ha JW (1994) Catal Lett 29:189–207

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Maity SK, Srinivas BN, Prasad VVDN, Singh A, Murali Dhar G, Rao TSRP (1998) Studies in surface science and catalysis. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 579–590

    Google Scholar 

  23. Chary KVR, Bhaskar T, Seela KK, Sri Lakshmi K, Reddy KR (2001) Appl Catal A 208:291–305

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Rajagopal S, Marini HJ, Marzari JA, Miranda R (1994) J Catal 147:417–428

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Marzari JA, Rajagopal S, Miranda R (1995) J Catal 156:255–264

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Brito J, Laine J (1986) Polyhedron 5:179–182

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Ramírez J, Macías G, Cedeño L, Gutiérrez-Alejandre A, Cuevas R, Castillo P (2004) Catal Today 98:19–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Gutiérrez OY, Valencia D, Fuentes GA, Klimova T (2007) J Catal 249:140–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Barrault J, Alouche A, Paul-Boncour V, Hilaire L, Percheron-Guegan A (1989) Appl Catal 46:269–279

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Lin Y-C, Li C-L, Wan H-P, Lee H-T, Liu C-F (2011) Energy Fuels 25:890–896

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Bui VN, Laurenti D, Afanasiev P, Geantet C (2011) Appl Catal B 101:239–245

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Romero Y, Richard F, Brunet S (2010) Appl Catal B 98:213–223

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Roh HS, Eum IH, Jeong DW (2012) Renew Energy 42:212–216

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Lin KH, Tsai CY, Chang ACC (2013) Mod Res Catal 2:42–49

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Furimsky E, Massoth FE (1999) Catal Today 52:381–495

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was carried out at PVPro, VPI and supported by Vietnam National Oil and Gas Group and the Ministry of Industry and Trade of Vietnam.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Petrovietnam R&D Center for Petroleum Processing (PVPro), Vietnam Petroleum Institute (VPI), 4 Nguyen Thong, District 3, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

    Binh M. Q. Phan, Quan L. M. Ha, Nguyen P. Le, Phuong T. Ngo, Thu H. Nguyen, Tung T. Dang, Luong H. Nguyen & Duc A. Nguyen

  2. Hochiminh City University of Technology, 268 Ly Thuong Kiet, District 10, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

    Loc C. Luu

Authors
  1. Binh M. Q. Phan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Quan L. M. Ha
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Nguyen P. Le
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Phuong T. Ngo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Thu H. Nguyen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Tung T. Dang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Luong H. Nguyen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Duc A. Nguyen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Loc C. Luu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nguyen P. Le.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Phan, B.M.Q., Ha, Q.L.M., Le, N.P. et al. Influences of Various Supports, γ-Al2O3, CeO2, and SBA-15 on HDO Performance of NiMo Catalyst. Catal Lett 145, 662–667 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10562-014-1412-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10562-014-1412-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation