Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of the reliability of E/E′ to estimate pulmonary capillary wedge pressure in heart failure patients with preserved ejection fraction versus those with reduced ejection fraction

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Accurate assessment of pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) is essential for physicians to effectively manage patients with acute decompensated heart failure. The ratio of early transmittal velocity to tissue Doppler mitral annular early diastolic velocity (E/E′) is used to estimate PCWP noninvasively in a wide range of cardiac patients. However, it remains contentious as to whether mitral E/E′ is a reliable predictor of PCWP. In the present study, acute heart failure patients were divided into two groups on the basis of left ventricular (LV) systolic function: those with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and those with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). The usefulness of mitral E/E′ in estimating PCWP was compared between the two groups. Fifty consecutive patients who were admitted with acute decompensated heart failure and underwent both right-sided cardiac catheterization and transthoracic echocardiography during hospitalization were analyzed retrospectively. Pearson’s correlation was used to evaluate associations between Doppler parameters and PCWP. E/E′ was positively correlated with PCWP (r = 0.56, P = 0.01) in the heart failure with preserved ejection fraction group. However, no significant relationship was observed between PCWP and mitral E/E′ (P = 0.85) in the heart failure with reduced ejection fraction group. There were no significant correlations between any of the conventional parameters considered (LVEF, left atrial dimension, E/A, IVRT, and DT) with PCWP in either group. In conclusion, mitral E/E′ is useful for estimating PCWP in patients with acute heart failure with preserved ejection fraction but may not in those with reduced ejection fraction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nieminen MS, Böhm M, Cowie MR et al (2005) Executive summary of the guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of acute heart failure: the Task Force on Acute Heart Failure of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 26:384–416

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Weintraub NL, Collins SP, Pang PS et al (2010) Acute heart failure syndromes: emergency department presentation, treatment, and disposition: current approaches and future aims: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 122:1975–1996

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ommen SR, Nishimura RA, Appleton CP et al (2000) Clinical utility of Doppler echocardiography and tissue Doppler imaging in the estimation of left ventricular filling pressures : a comparative simultaneous Doppler-catheterization study. Circulation 102:1788–1794

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Nagueh SF, Appleton CP, Gillebert TC et al (2009) Recommendations for the evaluation of left ventricular diastolic function by echocardiography. Eur J Echocardiogr 10:165–193

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Oh JK, Park S-J, Nagueh SF (2011) Established and novel clinical applications of diastolic function assessment by echocardiography. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 4:444–455

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Nagueh SF, Mikati I, Kopelen HA et al (1998) DOPPLER estimation of left ventricular filling pressure in sinus tachycardia : a new application of tissue Doppler imaging. Circulation 98:1644–1650

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sohn DW, Song JM, Zo JH et al (1999) Mitral annulus velocity in the evaluation of left ventricular diastolic function in atrial fibrillation. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 12:927–931

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bruch C, Grude M, Müller J et al (2005) Usefulness of tissue Doppler imaging for estimation of left ventricular filling pressures in patients with systolic and diastolic heart failure. Am J Cardiol 95:892–895

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Dokainish H, Zoghbi WA, Lakkis NM et al (2004) Optimal noninvasive assessment of left ventricular filling pressures: a comparison of tissue Doppler echocardiography and B-type natriuretic peptide in patients with pulmonary artery catheters. Circulation 109:2432–2439

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Firstenberg MS, Levine BD, Garcia MJ et al (2000) Relationship of echocardiographic indices to pulmonary capillary wedge pressures in healthy volunteers. J Am Coll Cardiol 36:1664–1669

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Mullens W, Borowski AG, Curtin RJ et al (2009) Tissue Doppler imaging in the estimation of intracardiac filling pressure in decompensated patients with advanced systolic heart failure. Circulation 119:62–70

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Owan TE, Hodge DO, Herges RM et al (2006) Trends in prevalence and outcome of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. N Engl J Med 355:251–259

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Udelson JE (2011) Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Circulation 124:e540–e543

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lang RM, Bierig M, Devereux RB et al (2005) Recommendations for chamber quantification: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography’s Guidelines and Standards Committee and the Chamber Quantification Writing Group, developed in conjunction with the European Association of Echocardiograph. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 18:1440–1463

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Nagueh SF, Kopelen HA, Zoghbi WA (1995) Feasibility and accuracy of Doppler echocardiographic estimation of pulmonary artery occlusive pressure in the intensive care unit. Am J Cardiol 75:1256–1262

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Ms. Keiko Nishizawa for data collection. This work was supported, in part, by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C) from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (KAKENHI 26461086; to K. Matsushita).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Kenichi Matsushita or Hideaki Yoshino.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Matsushita, K., Minamishima, T., Goda, A. et al. Comparison of the reliability of E/E′ to estimate pulmonary capillary wedge pressure in heart failure patients with preserved ejection fraction versus those with reduced ejection fraction. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 31, 1497–1502 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-015-0718-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-015-0718-7

Keywords

Navigation