Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

In vivo semi-automatic segmentation of multicontrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance for prospective cohort studies on plaque tissue composition: initial experience

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Automatic in vivo segmentation of multicontrast (multisequence) carotid magnetic resonance for plaque composition has been proposed as a substitute for manual review to save time and reduce inter-reader variability in large-scale or multicenter studies. Using serial images from a prospective longitudinal study, we sought to compare a semi-automatic approach versus expert human reading in analyzing carotid atherosclerosis progression. Baseline and 6-month follow-up multicontrast carotid images from 59 asymptomatic subjects with 16–79 % carotid stenosis were reviewed by both trained radiologists with 2–4 years of specialized experience in carotid plaque characterization with MRI and a previously reported automatic atherosclerotic plaque segmentation algorithm, referred to as morphology-enhanced probabilistic plaque segmentation (MEPPS). Agreement on measurements from individual time points, as well as on compositional changes, was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). There was good agreement between manual and MEPPS reviews on individual time points for calcification (CA) (area: ICC; 0.85–0.91; volume: ICC; 0.92–0.95) and lipid-rich necrotic core (LRNC) (area: ICC; 0.78–0.82; volume: ICC; 0.84–0.86). For compositional changes, agreement was good for CA volume change (ICC; 0.78) and moderate for LRNC volume change (ICC; 0.49). Factors associated with LRNC progression as detected by MEPPS review included intraplaque hemorrhage (positive association) and reduction in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (negative association), which were consistent with previous findings from manual review. Automatic classifier for plaque composition produced results similar to expert manual review in a prospective serial MRI study of carotid atherosclerosis progression. Such automatic classification tools may be beneficial in large-scale multicenter studies by reducing image analysis time and avoiding bias between human reviewers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Redgrave J, Lovett JK, Gallagher PJ, Rothwell PM (2006) Histological assessment of 526 symptomatic carotid plaques in relation to the nature and timing of ischemic symptoms—the Oxford plaque study. Circulation 113:2320–2328

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Narula J, Nakano M, Virmani R, Kolodgie FD, Petersen R, Newcomb R, Malik S, Fuster V, Finn AV (2013) Histopathologic characteristics of atherosclerotic coronary disease and implications of the findings for the invasive and noninvasive detection of vulnerable plaques. J Am Coll Cardiol 61:1041–1051

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Saam T, Ferguson MS, Yarnykh VL, Takaya N, Xu D, Polissar NL, Hatsukami TS, Yuan C (2005) Quantitative evaluation of carotid plaque composition by in vivo MRI. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 25:234–239

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Wasserman BA, Smith WI, Trout HH, Cannon RO, Balaban RS, Arai AE (2002) Carotid artery atherosclerosis: in vivo morphologic characterization with gadolinium-enhanced double-oblique MR imaging–initial results. Radiology 223:566–573

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Trivedi RA, U-King-Im J, Graves MJ, Horsley J, Goddard M, Kirkpatrick PJ, Gillard JH (2004) Multi-sequence in vivo MRI can quantify fibrous cap and lipid core components in human carotid atherosclerotic plaques. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 28:207–213

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Cappendijk VC, Cleutjens KBJM, Kessels AGH, Heeneman S, Schurink GWH, Welten RJTJ, Mess WH, Daemen MJAP, van Engelshoven JMA, Kooi ME (2005) Assessment of human atherosclerotic carotid plaque components with multisequence MR imaging: initial experience1. Radiology 234:487–492

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sun J, Balu N, Hippe DS, Xue Y, Dong L, Zhao X, Li F, Xu D, Hatsukami TS, Yuan C (2013) Subclinical carotid atherosclerosis: short-term natural history of lipid-rich necrotic core—a multicenter study with MR imaging. Radiology 268:61–68

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Wagenknecht L, Wasserman B, Chambless L, Coresh J, Folsom A, Mosley T, Ballantyne C, Sharrett R, Boerwinkle E (2009) Correlates of carotid plaque presence and composition as measured by MRI: the atherosclerosis risk in communities study. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2:314–322

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhao XQ, Dong L, Hatsukami T, Phan BA, Chu B, Moore A, Lane T, Neradilek MB, Polissar N, Monick D, Lee C, Underhill H, Yuan C (2011) MR imaging of carotid plaque composition during lipid-lowering therapy: a prospective assessment of effect and time course. J Am Coll Cardiol Imaging 4:977–986

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhao XQ, Hatsukami TS, Hippe DS, Sun J, Balu N, Isquith DA, Crouse JR III, Anderson T, Huston J III, Polissar N, O’Brien K, Yuan C (2014) Clinical factors associated with high-risk carotid plaque features as assessed by magnetic resonance imaging in patients with established vascular disease (from the AIM-HIGH Study). Am J Cardiol 114:1412–1419

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Kwee RM, van Oostenbrugge RJ, Prins MH, Ter Berg JW, Franke CL, Korten AG, Meems BJ, van Engelshoven JM, Wildberger JE, Mess WH, Kooi ME (2010) Symptomatic patients with mild and moderate carotid stenosis: plaque features at MRI and association with cardiovascular risk factors and statin use. Stroke 41:1389–1393

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Liu F, Xu DX, Ferguson MS, Chu BC, Saam T, Takaya N, Hatsukami TS, Yuan C, Kerwin WS (2006) Automated in vivo segmentation of carotid plaque MRI with morphology-enhanced probability maps. Magn Reson Med 55:659–668

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Adame IM, van der Geest RJ, Wasserman BA, Mohamed MA, Reiber JH, Lelieveldt BP (2004) Automatic segmentation and plaque characterization in atherosclerotic carotid artery MR images. MAGMA 16:227–234

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Clarke SE, Beletsky V, Hammond RR, Hegele RA, Rutt BK (2006) Validation of automatically classified magnetic resonance images for carotid plaque compositional analysis. Stroke 37:93–97

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. van’T Klooster R, Naggara O, Marsico R, Reiber JH, Meder JF, van der Geest RJ, Touze E, Oppenheim C (2012) Automated versus manual in vivo segmentation of carotid plaque MRI. Am J Neuroradiol 33:1621–1627

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hofman JM, Branderhorst WJ, Ten EH, Cappendijk VC, Heeneman S, Kooi ME, Hilbers PA, ter Haar RB (2006) Quantification of atherosclerotic plaque components using in vivo MRI and supervised classifiers. Magn Reson Med 55:790–799

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Sun J, Zhao XQ, Balu N, Hippe DS, Hatsukami TS, Isquith DA, Yamada K, Neradilek MB, Canton G, Xue Y, Fleg JL, Desvigne-Nickens P, Klimas MT, Padley RJ, Vassileva MT, Wyman BT, Yuan C (2015) Carotid magnetic resonance imaging for monitoring atherosclerotic plaque progression: a multicenter reproducibility study. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 31:95–103

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Kerwin WS, Xu D, Liu F, Saam T, Underhill HR, Takaya N, Chu BC, Hatsukami TS, Yuan C (2007) Magnetic resonance imaging of carotid atherosclerosis: plaque analysis. Top Magn Reson Imaging 18:371–378

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Takaya N, Cai JM, Ferguson MS, Yarnykh VL, Chu BC, Saam T, Polissar NL, Sherwood J, Cury RC, Anders RJ, Broschat KO, Hinton D, Furie KL, Hatsukami TS, Yuan C (2006) Intra- and interreader reproducibility of magnetic resonance imaging for quantifying the lipid-rich necrotic core is improved with gadolinium contrast enhancement. J Magn Reson Imaging 24:203–210

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Cai JM, Hatsukami TS, Ferguson MS, Kerwin WS, Saam T, Chu BC, Takaya N, Polissar NL, Yuan C (2005) In vivo quantitative measurement of intact fibrous cap and lipid-rich necrotic core size in atherosclerotic carotid plaque: comparison of high-resolution, contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and histology. Circulation 112:3437–3444

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Davison AC, Hinkley DV (1997) Bootstrap methods and their application. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  22. Fleiss J (1986) Reliability of measurement. In: Fleiss J (ed) The design and analysis of clinical experiments. Wiley, New York, pp 1–31

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kerwin WS, Liu F, Yarnykh V, Underhill H, Oikawa M, Yu W, Hatsukami TS, Yuan C (2008) Signal features of the atherosclerotic plaque at 3.0 Tesla versus 1.5 Tesla: impact on automatic classification. J Magn Reson Imaging 28:987–995

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Touze E, Toussaint JF, Coste J, Schmitt E, Bonneville F, Vandermarcq P, Gauvrit JY, Douvrin F, Meder JF, Mas JL, Oppenheim C (2007) Reproducibility of high-resolution MRI for the identification and the quantification of carotid atherosclerotic plaque components: consequences for prognosis studies and therapeutic trials. Stroke 38:1812–1819

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Virmani R, Kolodgie FD, Burke AP, Farb A, Schwartz SM (2000) Lessons from sudden coronary death—a comprehensive morphological classification scheme for atherosclerotic lesions. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 20:1262–1275

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Takaya N, Yuan C, Chu BC, Saam T, Underhill H, Cai JM, Tran N, Polissar NL, Isaac C, Ferguson MS, Garden GA, Cramer SC, Maravilla KR, Hashimoto B, Hatsukami TS (2006) Association between carotid plaque characteristics and subsequent ischemic cerebrovascular events: a prospective assessment with MRI—initial results. Stroke 37:818–823

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Kwee RM, van Oostenbrugge RJ, Mess WH, Prins MH, van der Geest RJ, Ter Berg JW, Franke CL, Korten AG, Meems BJ, van Engelshoven JM, Wildberger JE, Kooi ME (2013) MRI of carotid atherosclerosis to identify TIA and stroke patients who are at risk of a recurrence. J Magn Reson Imaging 37:1189–1194

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Underhill HR, Yuan C, Zhao XQ, Kraiss LW, Parker DL, Saam T, Chu B, Takaya N, Liu F, Polissar NL, Neradilek B, Raichlen JS, Cain VA, Waterton JC, Hamar W, Hatsukami TS (2008) Effect of rosuvastatin therapy on carotid plaque morphology and composition in moderately hypercholesterolemic patients: a high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging trial. Am Heart J 155:581–584

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Liu W, Balu N, Sun J, Zhao X, Chen H, Yuan C, Zhao H, Xu J, Wang G, Kerwin WS (2012) Segmentation of carotid plaque using multicontrast 3D gradient echo MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 35:812–819

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Cappendijk VC, Heeneman S, Kessels AG, Cleutjens KB, Schurink GW, Welten RJ, Mess WH, van Suylen RJ, Leiner T, Daemen MJ, van Engelshoven JM, Kooi ME (2008) Comparison of single-sequence T1w TFE MRI with multisequence MRI for the quantification of lipid-rich necrotic core in atherosclerotic plaque. J Magn Reson Imaging 27:1347–1355

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Wasserman BA, Astor BC, Sharrett AR, Swingen C, Catellier D (2010) MRI measurements of carotid plaque in the atherosclerosis risk in communities (ARIC) study: methods, reliability and descriptive statistics. J Magn Reson Imaging 31:406–415

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

MRI scans were performed as part of a clinical trial funded by Kowa Research Institute.

Conflict of interest

DSH receives grant support from GE Healthcare. DX is a consultant for VPDiagnostics Inc, Seattle, WA. WSK is now affiliated with Presage Biosciences, Seattle, WA. TSH receives research grants from Philips Healthcare. CY receives grant support from Philips Healthcare and is a member of Radiology Medical Advisory Network of Philips Healthcare. The remaining authors report no conflicts of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Jie Sun or Chun Yuan.

Additional information

Taku Yoneyama and Jie Sun have contributed equally to this work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yoneyama, T., Sun, J., Hippe, D.S. et al. In vivo semi-automatic segmentation of multicontrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance for prospective cohort studies on plaque tissue composition: initial experience. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 32, 73–81 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-015-0704-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-015-0704-0

Keywords

Navigation