Skip to main content
Log in

Regional aortic distensibility and its relationship with age and aortic stenosis: a computed tomography study

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aortic distensibility (AD) decreases with age and increased aortic stiffness is independently associated with adverse cardiovascular outcomes. The association of severe aortic stenosis (AS) with AD in different aortic regions has not been evaluated. Elderly subjects with severe AS and a cohort of patients without AS of similar age were studied. Proximal aortic cross-sectional-area changes during the cardiac cycle were determined using retrospective-ECG-gating on 128-detector row computed-tomography. Using oscillometric-brachial-blood-pressure measurements, the AD at the ascending-aorta (AA), proximal-descending-aorta (PDA) and distal-descending-aorta (DDA) was determined. Linear mixed effects modelling was used to determine the association of age and aortic stenosis on regional AD. 102 patients were evaluated: 36 AS patients (70–85 years), 24 AS patients (>85 years) and 42 patients without AS (9 patients <50 years, 20 patients between 51–70 years and 13 patients 70–85 years). When comparing patients 70–85 years, AA distensibility was significantly lower in those with AS compared to those without AS (0.9 ± 0.9 vs. 1.4 ± 1.1, P = 0.03) while there was no difference in the PDA (1.0 ± 1.1 vs. 1.0 ± 1.2, P = 0.26) and DDA (1.1 ± 1.2 vs. 1.2 ± 0.8, P = 0.97). In patients without AS, AD decreased with age in all aortic regions (P < 0.001). The AA in patients <50 years were the most distensible compared to other aortic regions. There is regional variation in aortic distensibility with aging. Patients with aortic stenosis demonstrated regional differences in aortic distensibility with lower distensibility demonstrated in the proximal ascending aorta compared to an age-matched cohort.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nelson AJ, Worthley SG, Cameron JD, Willoughby SR, Piantadosi C, Carbone A, Dundon BK, Leung MC, Hope SA, Meredith IT, Worthley MI (2009) Cardiovascular magnetic resonance-derived aortic distensibility: validation and observed regional differences in the elderly. J Hypertens 27(3):535–542

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ganten M, Krautter U, Hosch W, Hansmann J, von Tengg-Kobligk H, Delorme S, Kauczor HU, Kauffmann GW, Bock M (2007) Age related changes of human aortic distensibility: evaluation with ECG-gated CT. Eur Radiol 17(3):701–708. doi:10.1007/s00330-006-0309-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Metafratzi ZM, Efremidis SC, Skopelitou AS, De Roos A (2002) The clinical significance of aortic compliance and its assessment with magnetic resonance imaging. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 4(4):481–491

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Siegel E, Thai WE, Techasith T, Major G, Szymonifka J, Tawakol A, Nagurney JT, Hoffmann U, Truong QA (2012) Aortic distensibility and its relationship to coronary and thoracic atherosclerosis plaque and morphology by MDCT: insights from the ROMICAT Trial. Int J Cardiol. doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2012.04.107

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Nemes A, Forster T, Csanady M (2004) Decreased aortic distensibility and coronary flow velocity reserve in patients with significant aortic valve stenosis with normal epicardial coronary arteries. J Heart Valve Dis 13(4):567–573

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Laurent S, Katsahian S, Fassot C, Tropeano AI, Gautier I, Laloux B, Boutouyrie P (2003) Aortic stiffness is an independent predictor of fatal stroke in essential hypertension. Stroke 34(5):1203–1206. doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000065428.03209.64

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Herrington DM, Kesler K, Reiber JC, Davis W, Brown WV, Helms R, Mallon SM, Raines J (2003) Arterial compliance adds to conventional risk factors for prediction of angiographic coronary artery disease. Am Heart J 146(4):662–667. doi:10.1016/S0002-8703(03)00254-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Blacher J, Safar ME, Guerin AP, Pannier B, Marchais SJ, London GM (2003) Aortic pulse wave velocity index and mortality in end-stage renal disease. Kidney Int 63(5):1852–1860. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1755.2003.00932.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Laurent S, Cockcroft J, Van Bortel L, Boutouyrie P, Giannattasio C, Hayoz D, Pannier B, Vlachopoulos C, Wilkinson I, Struijker-Boudier H (2006) Expert consensus document on arterial stiffness: methodological issues and clinical applications. Eur Heart J 27(21):2588–2605. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehl254

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Nemes A, Galema TW, Geleijnse ML, Soliman OI, Yap SC, Anwar AM, ten Cate FJ (2007) Aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis is associated with improved aortic distensibility at long-term follow-up. Am Heart J 153(1):147–151. doi:10.1016/j.ahj.2006.08.025

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Carrascosa P, Capunay C, Deviggiano A, Rodriguez-Granillo GA, Sagarduy MI, Cortines P, Carrascosa J, Parodi JC (2013) Thoracic aorta cardiac-cycle related dynamic changes assessed with a 256-slice CT scanner. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther 3(3):125–128. doi:10.3978/j.issn.2223-3652.2013.07.02

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Leung MC, Meredith IT, Cameron JD (2006) Aortic stiffness affects the coronary blood flow response to percutaneous coronary intervention. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 290(2):H624–H630. doi:10.1152/ajpheart.00380.2005

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Smith CR, Leon MB, Mack MJ, Miller DC, Moses JW, Svensson LG, Tuzcu EM, Webb JG, Fontana GP, Makkar RR, Williams M, Dewey T, Kapadia S, Babaliaros V, Thourani VH, Corso P, Pichard AD, Bavaria JE, Herrmann HC, Akin JJ, Anderson WN, Wang D, Pocock SJ, Investigators PT (2011) Transcatheter versus surgical aortic-valve replacement in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med 364(23):2187–2198. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1103510

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Roccabianca S, Figueroa CA, Tellides G, Humphrey JD (2014) Quantification of regional differences in aortic stiffness in the aging human. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 29:618–634. doi:10.1016/j.jmbbm.2013.01.026

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Redheuil A, Yu WC, Mousseaux E, Harouni AA, Kachenoura N, Wu CO, Bluemke D, Lima JA (2011) Age-related changes in aortic arch geometry: relationship with proximal aortic function and left ventricular mass and remodeling. J Am Coll Cardiol 58(12):1262–1270. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2011.06.012

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bensalah MZ, Bollache E, Kachenoura N, Giron A, De Cesare A, Macron L, Lefort M, Redheuil A, Mousseaux E (2014) Geometry is a major determinant of flow reversal in proximal aorta. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 306(10):H1408–H1416. doi:10.1152/ajpheart.00647.2013

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Pibarot P, Dumesnil JG (2012) Improving assessment of aortic stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 60(3):169–180. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2011.11.078

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Briand M, Dumesnil JG, Kadem L, Tongue AG, Rieu R, Garcia D, Pibarot P (2005) Reduced systemic arterial compliance impacts significantly on left ventricular afterload and function in aortic stenosis: implications for diagnosis and treatment. J Am Coll Cardiol 46(2):291–298. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2004.10.081

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Halloran BG, Davis VA, McManus BM, Lynch TG, Baxter BT (1995) Localization of aortic disease is associated with intrinsic differences in aortic structure. J Surg Res 59(1):17–22. doi:10.1006/jsre.1995.1126

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Tsamis A, Krawiec JT, Vorp DA (2013) Elastin and collagen fibre microstructure of the human aorta in ageing and disease: a review. J R Soc Interface 10(83):20121004. doi:10.1098/rsif.2012.1004

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Chatzizisis YS, Coskun AU, Jonas M, Edelman ER, Feldman CL, Stone PH (2007) Role of endothelial shear stress in the natural history of coronary atherosclerosis and vascular remodeling: molecular, cellular, and vascular behavior. J Am Coll Cardiol 49(25):2379–2393. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2007.02.059

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Davies PF (2009) Hemodynamic shear stress and the endothelium in cardiovascular pathophysiology. Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med 6(1):16–26. doi:10.1038/ncpcardio1397

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Siegel E, Thai WE, Techasith T, Major G, Szymonifka J, Tawakol A, Nagurney JT, Hoffmann U, Truong QA (2013) Aortic distensibility and its relationship to coronary and thoracic atherosclerosis plaque and morphology by MDCT: insights from the ROMICAT Trial. Int J Cardiol 167(4):1616–1621. doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2012.04.107

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kingwell BA, Gatzka CD (2002) Arterial stiffness and prediction of cardiovascular risk. J Hypertens 20(12):2337–2340

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Rerkpattanapipat P, Hundley WG, Link KM, Brubaker PH, Hamilton CA, Darty SN, Morgan TM, Kitzman DW (2002) Relation of aortic distensibility determined by magnetic resonance imaging in patients > or =60 years of age to systolic heart failure and exercise capacity. Am J Cardiol 90(11):1221–1225

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Lehmann ED, Hopkins KD, Jones RL, Rudd AG, Gosling RG (1995) Aortic distensibility in patients with cerebrovascular disease. Clin Sci (Lond) 89(3):247–253

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Dart AM, Reid CM, McGrath B, Tonometry Study G (2001) Effects of ACE inhibitor therapy on derived central arterial waveforms in hypertension. Am J Hypertens 14(8 Pt 1):804–810

    Google Scholar 

  28. Borow KM, Newburger JW (1982) Noninvasive estimation of central aortic pressure using the oscillometric method for analyzing systemic artery pulsatile blood flow: comparative study of indirect systolic, diastolic, and mean brachial artery pressure with simultaneous direct ascending aortic pressure measurements. Am Heart J 103(5):879–886

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dennis T. L. Wong.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wong, D.T.L., Narayan, O., Leong, D.P. et al. Regional aortic distensibility and its relationship with age and aortic stenosis: a computed tomography study. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 31, 1053–1062 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-015-0640-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-015-0640-z

Keywords

Navigation