Skip to main content
Log in

Editorial: Business Ethics in a European Perspective: A Case for Unity in Diversity?

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bowie, N. E., & Werhane, P. H. (2005). Management ethics. Malden: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eberl, P., Geiger, D., & Aßländer, M. S. (2015). Repairing integrity-based trust in the organization: The ambivalence of organizational rule adjustments. Organization Studies, 36(9), 1205–1235. doi:10.1177/0170840615585335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elkington, J. (1999). Cannibals with forks—The triple bottom line of 21st century business. Oxford: Capstone.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elkington, J. (2004). Enter the triple bottom line. In A. Henriques & J. Richardson (Eds.), The triple bottom line, does it all add up? (pp. 1–16). London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2011). A renewed EU strategy 2011–14 for corporate responsibility [COM(2011) 681]: Commission of the European Communities, Brussels. Retrieved March 22, 2015, from http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/policies/sustainablebusiness/files/csr/new-csr/act_en.pdf.

  • Fifka, M., & Reiser, D. (2015). Corporate social responsibility in between governmental regulation and voluntary initiative: the case of Germany. In S. Idowu & R. Schmidpeter (Eds.), Corporate social responsibility in Europe: An introduction (pp. 125–135). Heidelberg: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-13566-3_7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forte, A. (2013). Corporate social responsibility in the United States and Europe: How important is it? The future of corporate social responsibility. International Business & Economics Research Journal, 12(7), 815–824. doi:10.19030/iber.v12i7.7970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gatti, L., & Seele, P. (2015). CSR through the CEO’s pen: Comparing CEO letters from CSR reports from Asia, Europe, and the U.S. UmweltWirtschaftsForum, 23(4), 265–277. doi:10.1007/s00550-015-0361-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habisch, A., Jonker, J., Wegner, M., & Schmidpeter, R. (2004). Corporate social responsibility across Europe. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hiss, S. (2009). From implicit to explicit corporate social responsibility: Institutional changes as a fight for myths. Business Ethics Quarterly, 19(3), 433–451. doi:10.5840/beq2009324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Idowu, S., & Schmidpeter, R. (2015). Corporate social responsibility in Europe: An introduction. Heidelberg: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lock, I., & Seele, P. (2016). Deliberative lobbying? Toward a noncontradiction of corporate political activities and corporate social responsibility? Journal of Management Inquiry. doi:10.1177/1056492616640379.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maignan, I. (2001). Consumers’ perceptions of corporate social responsibilities: A cross-cultural comparison. Journal of Business Ethics, 30(1), 57–72. doi:10.1023/A:1006433928640.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maignan, I., & Ralston, D. A. (2002). Corporate social responsibility in Europe and the U.S.: Insights from businesses’ self-presentations. Journal of International Business Studies, 33(3), 497–514. doi:10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8491028.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2008). “Implicit” and “explicit” CSR: A conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 33(2), 404–424. doi:10.5465/AMR.2008.31193458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pučėtaitė, R., Lämsä, A.-M., & Novelskaitė, A. (2010). Building organizational trust in a low-trust societal context. Baltic Journal of Management, 5(2), 197–217. doi:10.1108/17465261011045124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rusinko, C. A. (2010). Integrating sustainability in management and business education: A matrix approach. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 9(3), 507–519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidpeter, R., & Idowu, S. (2015). Corporate social responsibility in Europe: united in sustainable diversity—A summary. In S. Idowu & R. Schmidpeter (Eds.), Corporate social responsibility in Europe: An introduction (pp. 503–508). Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, T. W. (2009). Sweetening the deal: Strengthening transnational bribery laws through standard international corporate auditing guidelines. Minnesota Law Review, 93(3), 1120–1145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sitkin, S. B., & Roth, N. L. (1993). Explaining the limited effectiveness of legalistic remedies for trust/distrust. Organization Science, 4(3), 367–392. doi:10.1287/orsc.4.3.367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vogel, D. (1993). Differing national approaches to business ethics. Business Ethics European Review, 2(3), 164–171. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8608.1993.tb00040.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter Seele.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All the authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Aßländer, M.S., Gössling, T. & Seele, P. Editorial: Business Ethics in a European Perspective: A Case for Unity in Diversity?. J Bus Ethics 139, 633–637 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3283-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3283-7

Keywords

Navigation