Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Managerial Ownership and Agency Cost: Evidence from Bangladesh

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study examines the influence of managerial ownership on firm agency costs among listed firms in Bangladesh. This is an institutional setting that features a mixture of agency costs. This institutional setting has a concentration of ownership by managers, but the firms are not solely owned by managers. The extant literature suggests that the sacrifice of wealth by the principal and potential costs associated with monitoring the agents is known as the agency cost. This study uses three measures of agency cost: the ‘expense ratio’, the ‘Q-free cash flow interaction’, and the ‘asset utilisation ratio’. The finding of the study is that managerial ownership reduces the firm agency cost only under the ‘asset utilisation ratio’ measure of agency cost; this is robust with regard to a number of robustness tests. Furthermore, the non-linearity tests suggest that the convergence of interest is evident with very high and low levels of managerial ownership. The entrenchment effect by the owners is evident at moderate levels of managerial ownership. Although there has been great scepticism among management researchers on the validity of agency theory, overall, the findings of this study do not reject the validity of agency theory. Given that the entrenchment by managers is evident at certain levels of ownership and that the agency problem may still exist between insiders and outsiders, legislative guidelines for controlling share ownership may be required.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahmed, K., Hossain, M., & Adams, M. B. (2006). The effects of board composition and board size on the informativeness of annual accounting earnings. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 14(5), 418–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ang, J. S., Cole, R. A., & Lin, J. W. (2000). Agency cost and ownership structures. The Journal of Finance, 55(1), 81–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bangladesh Companies Act 1994, Ministry of Commerce, Dhaka: Government of the Peoples Republic of Bangladesh

  • Brau, J. C. (2002). Do banks price owner-manager agency costs? An examination of small business borrowing. Journal of Small Business Management, 40(4), 273–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chakravarthy, B. S. (1986). Measuring strategic performance. Strategic Management Journal, 7(5), 437–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y. Y., & Young, M. N. (2010). Cross-border mergers and acquisitions by Chinese listed companies: A principal-principal perspective. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 27(3), 523–539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cho, M. H. (1998). Ownership structure investment, and the corporate value: An empirical analysis. Journal of Financial Economics, 47(1), 103–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coakes, S. J., & Steed, L. G. (2001). SPSS analysis without anguish. Sydney: Wiley Australia Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colombo, M. G., Croce, A., & Murtinu, S. (2014). Ownership structure, horizontal agency cost and the performance of high-tech entrepreneurial firms. Small Business Economics, 42(2), 265–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Core, J. E., Holthausen, R. W., & Larcker, D. F. (1999). Corporate governance, chief executive officer compensation and firm performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 51(3), 371–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dalton, D. R., Daily, C. M., Ellstrand, A. E., & Johnson, J. L. (1998). Meta-analytic review of board composition, leadership structure and financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 19(3), 269–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DataStream (2013), Monthly Share Price of Dhaka Stock Exchange 2000–2013, Available at: DataStream (Viewed on December 2013).

  • Deegan, C. (2005). Australian financial accounting (4th ed.). Sydney: McGraw Hill Australia Pty Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deegan, C. (2006). Financial accounting theory (2nd ed.). Sydney: McGraw Hill Australia Pty Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demsetz, H. (1983). The structure of ownership and the theory of the firm. Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), 375–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demsetz, H., & Lehn, K. (1985). The Structure of corporate ownership: Causes and consequences. Journal of Political Economy, 93(6), 1155–1177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dhaka Stock Exchange (2013), Yearly Share Price of Dhaka Stock Exchange 2000–2013, Available at: Dhaka Stock Exchange, Available at www.dsebd.org (Viewed on various dates between the year 2006 and 2013).

  • Dharwadkar, R., George, G., & Brandes, P. (2000). Privatization in emerging economies: An agency theory perspective. Academy of Management Review, 25(3), 650–659.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dielman, T. E. (2001). Applied regression analysis (3rd ed.). Duxbury: Thomson Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, L., & Davis, J. H. (1991). Stewardship theory or agency theory: CEO governance and shareholder returns. Australian Journal of Management, 16(1), 49–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, L., & Davis, J. H. (1994). Boards and company performance-research challenges the conventional wisdom. Corporate Governance an International Review, 2(3), 151–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doukas, J., Kim, C., & Pantzalis, C. (2000). Security analysis, agency costs and company characteristics. Financial Analysts Journal, 56(6), 54–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Agency theory: An assessment and review. The Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 57–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrar, J. (2005). Corporate governance: Theories, principles and practice (2nd ed.). South Melbourne, VIC: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleming, G., Heaney, R., & McCosker, R. (2005). Agency costs and ownership structure in Australia. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 13(1), 29–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Florackis, C. (2008). Agency costs and corporate governance mechanisms: Evidence for UK firms. International Journal of Managerial Finance, 4(1), 37–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godfrey, J., Hodgson, A., Holmes, S., & Tarca, A. (2006). Accounting theory (6th ed.). Milton: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goyal, V. K., & Park, C. W. (2002). Board leadership structure and CEO turnover. Journal of Corporate Finance, 8(1), 49–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gujarati, D. (2003). Basic econometrics (4th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hampel Report (1998), Hampel committee: Final Report 1998, European Corporate Governance Institute, Online version available at http://www.ecgi.org/codes/documents/hampel_index.htm (Accessed on 4th May 2008).

  • Healy, P. M. (1985). The effect of bonus schemes on accounting decisions. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 7(1–3), 85–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henry, D. (2010). Agency Cost, ownership structure and corporate governance compliance: A private contracting. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 18(1), 24–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hermalin, B., & Weisbach, M. (1988). The Determinants of Board Composition. Rand Journal of Economics, 19(4), 589–606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hills, R. C., & Adkins, L. C. (2003). Collinearity. In B. Baltagi (Ed.), A companion to theoretical econometrics. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M. C. (1986). Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance and takeovers. American Economic Review, 76(2), 323–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M. C. (1993). The modern industrial revolution, exit and the failure of internal control systems. The Journal of Finance, 48(3), 831–880.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. J. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiel, G. C., & Nicholson, G. J. (2003). Board composition and corporate performance: How the Australian experience informs contrasting theories of corporate governance. Corporate Governance an International Review, 11(3), 189–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kole, S. R. (1995). Measuring managerial equity ownership: A comparison of sources of ownership data. Journal of Corporate Finance, 1(3–4), 413–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehn, K., & Poulsen, A. (1989). Free cash flow and stockholder gains in going private transactions. Journal of Finance, 44(3), 774–789.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linck, J. S., Netter, J. M., & Yang, T. (2008). The determinants of board structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 87(2), 308–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maassen, G. F. (2002). An international comparison of corporate governance models (3rd ed.). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Spencer Stuart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney, L., & Roberts, R. W. (2007). Corporate social performance, financial performance and institutional ownership in Canadian firms. Accounting Forum, 31(3), 233–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Majumdar, S. K., & Chhibber, P. (1999). Capital structure and performance: Evidence from a transition economy on an aspect of corporate governance. Public Choice, 98(3–4), 287–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McConnell, J. J., & Servaes, H. (1990). Additional evidence on equity ownership and corporate value. Journal of Financial Economics, 27(2), 595–612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKnight, P. J., & Weir, C. (2009). Agency costs, corporate governance mechanisms and ownership structure in large UK publicly quoted companies: A panel data analysis. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 49(2), 139–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morck, R. K., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1988). Management ownership and market valuation: An empirical analysis. Journal of Financial Economics, 20(1–2), 293–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicholson, G., & Kiel, G. (2007). Can directors impact performance? A case based test of three theories of corporate governance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15(4), 585–608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rappaport, A. (1997). Creating shareholder value–A guide for manager and investors. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rashid, A. (2010). CEO duality and firm performance: Evidence from a developing country. Corporate Ownership and Control, 8(1), 163–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rashid, A. (2011). Corporate governance in Bangladesh: A quest for the accountability or legitimacy crisis? Research in Accounting in Emerging Economies, 11, 1–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rashid, A. (2013a). CEO duality and agency cost: Evidence from Bangladesh. Journal of Management and Governance, 17(4), 989–1008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rashid, A. (2013b). Corporate governance, executive pay and firm performance: Evidence from Bangladesh. International Journal of Management, 30(2), 556–575.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rashid, A. (2014). Revisiting agency theory: Evidence of board independence and agency cost from Bangladesh. Journal of Business Ethics. doi:10.1007/s10551-014-2211-y.

  • Rashid, A., De Zoysa, A., Lodh, S., & Rudkin, K. (2010). Board composition and firm performance: Evidence from Bangladesh. Australasian Accounting Business and Finance Journal, 4(1), 76–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rashid, A., & Hoque, A. (2011). Corporate capital structure and firm performance: Evidence from Bangladesh. Academy of Taiwan Business Management Review, 7(2), 59–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rashid, A., & Lodh, S. C. (2008). The influence of ownership structures and board practices on corporate social disclosures in Bangladesh. Research in Accounting in Emerging Economies, 8, 211–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Review, Monthly. (2013). Monthly review of Dhaka stock exchange 2006–2009. Dhaka: Dhaka Stock Exchange.

    Google Scholar 

  • Short, H., & Keasey, K. (1999). Managerial ownership and performance of firm-evidence from UK. Journal of Corporate Finance, 5(1), 79–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, M., & Davidson III, W. N. (2003). Agency cost, ownership structure and corporate governance mechanisms. Journal of Banking & Finance, 27(5), 793–816.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sobhan, F. and Werner, W. (2003), A Comparative Analysis of Corporate Governance in South Asia: Charting a Roadmap for Bangladesh, Dhaka: Bangladesh Enterprise Institute, Available http://www.bei-bd.org/documents/cg%201.pdf (Accessed on 5th July 2005).

  • Uddin, S., & Choudhury, J. (2008). Rationality, traditionalism and state of corporate governance: Illustrious from a less-developed country. Accounting Auditing and Accountability Journal, 21(7), 1026–1051.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, J. P., & Seward, J. K. (1990). On the efficiency of internal and external corporate control mechanism. The Academy of Management Review, 15(3), 421–458.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wellalage, H. N., & Locke, S. (2012). An empirical investigation of agency costs and ownership structure in unlisted small businesses. New Zealand Journal of Applied Business Research, 10(2), 37–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, H. (1980). A heteroskedasticity consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econometrica, 48(4), 817–838.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiwattanakantang, Y. (2001). Controlling shareholders and corporate value-evidence from Thailand. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 9(4), 323–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, M. N., Peng, M. W., Ahlstrom, D., Bruton, G. D., & Jiang, Y. (2008). Corporate governance in emerging economies: A review of the principal-principal perspective. Journal of Management Studies, 45(1), 196–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, X. (2001). Understanding the determinants of managerial ownership and the link between ownership and performance: Comment. Journal of Financial Economics, 62(3), 559–571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Commerce, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, QLD, 4350, Australia

    Afzalur Rashid

Authors
  1. Afzalur Rashid
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Afzalur Rashid.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rashid, A. Managerial Ownership and Agency Cost: Evidence from Bangladesh. J Bus Ethics 137, 609–621 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2570-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2570-z

Keywords

JEL Classification

Search

Navigation