Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Ethics Matter: Moderating Leaders’ Power Use and Followers’ Citizenship Behaviors

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Followers’ perceptions of their leaders’ ethics have the potential to impact the way they react to the influence of these leaders. The present study of 365 U.S. Air Force Academy Cadets examined how followers’ perceptions of their leaders’ ethics moderated the relationships found between the leaders’ use of power, as conceptualized by French and Raven (Studies in social power, 1959), and the followers’ contextual performance. Our results indicated that leaders’ use of expert, referent, and reward power was associated with higher levels of organizational citizenship behaviors (OCBs) among their followers when the followers perceived these leaders to be more ethical. Moreover, when followers perceived their leaders to be less ethical, these followers reported lower levels of OCBs when their leaders’ utilized referent power. Practical implications, limitations, and future research are also discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

References

  • Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashforth, B. E. (1994). Petty tyranny in organizations. Human Relations, 47, 755–778. doi:10.1177/001872679404700701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avolio, B. J. (2007). Promoting more integrative strategies for leadership theory-building. American Psychologist, 62(1), 25. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.62.1.25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Awamleh, R. A., & Gardner, W. L. (1999). Perceptions of leader charisma and effectiveness: The effects of vision content, delivery, and organizational performance. Leadership Quarterly, 10, 345–373. doi:10.1016/S1048-9843(99)00022-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bachman, J. G. (1968). Faculty satisfaction and the dean’s influence: An organizational study of twelve liberal arts colleges. Journal of Applied Psychology, 52, 55–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bachman, J. G., Bowers, D. G., & Marcus, P. M. (1968). Bases of supervisory power: A comparative study in five organizational settings. In A. S. Tannenbaum (Ed.), Control in organizations (pp. 229–238). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bachman, J. G., Smith, C. G., & Slesinger, J. A. (1966). Control, performance, and job satisfaction: An analysis of structural and individual effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 55–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbuto, J. E, Jr. (2000). Influence triggers: A framework for understanding follower compliance. The Leadership Quarterly, 11(3), 365–387. doi:10.1016/S1048-9843(00)00045-X.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bass, B. (1960). Leadership, psychology, and organizational behavior. New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bass, B. M., & Steidlmeier, P. (1999). Ethics, character, and authentic transformational leadership behavior. The Leadership Quarterly, 10(2), 181–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bateman, T. S., & Organ, D. W. (1983). Job satisfaction and the good soldier: The relationship between affect and employee “citizenship”. Academy of Management Journal, 26, 587–595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bligh, M. C. (2010). Followership and follower-centered approaches. In A. Bryman, K. Grint, B. Jackson, M. Uhl-Bien, & D. Collinson (Eds.), Sage handbook of leadership (pp. 1180–1216). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borman, W. C., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1993). Expanding the criterion domain to include elements of extrarole performance. In N. Schmitt & W. C. Borman (Eds.), Personnel selection in organizations (pp. 71–98). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M. E., & Treviño, L. K. (2006). Ethical leadership: A review and future directions. The Leadership Quarterly., 17(6), 595–616. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.10.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M. E., Treviño, L. K., & Harrison, D. A. (2005). Ethical leadership: A social learning perspective for construct development and testing. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 97(2), 117–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Busch, P. (1980). The sales manager’s bases of social power and influence upon the sales force. Journal of Marketing, 44(4), 91–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carson, P. P., Carson, K. D., & Roe, W. (1993). Social power bases: A meta-analytic examination of interrelationships and outcomes. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23(14), 1150–1169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan, D. (2009). So why ask me? Are self-report data really that bad. In C. E. Lance & R. J. Vandenberg (Eds.), Statistical and methodological myths and urban legends: Doctrine, verity and fable in the organizational and social sciences (pp. 309–336). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cobb, A. T. (1980). Informal influence in the formal organization: Perceived sources of power among work unit peers. Academy of Management Journal, 23, 155–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, F., Solomon, S., Maxfield, M., Pyszczynski, T., & Greenberg, J. (2004). The effects of mortality salience on evaluations of charismatic, task-oriented, and relationship-oriented leaders. Psychological Science, 15, 846–851.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Den Hartog, D. N., & Belschak, F. D. (2012). Work engagement and Machiavellianism in the ethical leadership process. Journal of Business Ethics, 107(1), 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyne, V., Cummings, L. L., & Parks, J. M. (1995). Extra-role behaviors: In pursuit of a construct and definitional clarity (a bridge over mudded waters). In B. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (pp. 43–72). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Einarsen, S., Aasland, M. S., & Skogstad, A. (2007). Destructive leadership behaviour: A definition and conceptual model. The Leadership Quarterly, 18, 207–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elangovan, A. R., & Xie, J. L. (1999). Effects of perceived power of supervisor on subordinate stress and motivation: The moderating role of subordinate characteristics. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20(3), 359–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erez, M. (2011). Cross-cultural and global issues in organizational psychology. In S. Zedeck (Ed.), APA handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 807–854). Washington, DC: APA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etzioni, A. (1975). A Comparative analysis of complex organizations: On power, involvement, and their correlates. New York, NY: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, M. G. (1985). A Monte Carlo study of the effects of correlated method variance in moderated multiple regression analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 36, 305–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falbe, C. M., & Yukl, G. (1992). Consequences for managers of using single influence tactics and combinations of tactics. Academy of Management Journal, 35, 638–652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farmer, S. M., & Aguinis, H. (2005). Accounting for subordinate perceptions of supervisor power: An identity-dependence model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(6), 1069–1083.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiorelli, J. S. (1988). Power in work groups: Team member’s perspectives. Human Relations, 41(1), 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • French, J. R. P, Jr, & Raven, B. R. (1959). The bases of social power. In D. Cartwright (Ed.), Studies in social power. Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gini, A. (1998). Moral leadership and business ethics. In J. B. Ciulla (Ed.), Ethics, the heart of leadership (pp. 27–45). Westport, CT: Quorum Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinkin, T. R., & Schriesheim, C. A. (1989). Development and application of new scales to measure the French and Raven (1959) bases of social power. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74(4), 561. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.74.4.561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, B. J., Blair, C. A., Meriac, J. P., & Woehr, D. J. (2007). Expanding the criterion domain? A quantitative review of the OCB literature. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(2), 555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollander, E. P. (1985). Leadership and power. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (3rd ed., Vol. 2). New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howell, J. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1992). The ethics of charismatic leadership: Submission or liberation? Academy of Management Executive, 6, 43–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, S. T., Bedell-Avers, K. E., & Mumford, M. D. (2007). The typical leadership study: Assumptions, implications, and potential remedies. The Leadership Quarterly, 18, 435–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jain, A. K., Giga, D. S. I., & Cooper, C. L. (2010). Social power as a means of increasing personal and organizational effectiveness: The mediating role of organizational citizenship behaviour. Journal of Management & Organization, 17(3), 412–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanungo, R. N. (2001). Ethical values of transactional and transformational leaders. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 18, 257–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanungo, R. N., & Mendonca, M. (1996). Ethical dimensions of leadership. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellerman, B. (2004). Bad leadership: What it is, how it happens, why it matters. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kipnis, D., Schmidt, S. M., & Wilkinson, I. (1980). IntraorganizationaI influence tactics: Explorations in getting one’s way. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65, 440–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick, S. A., & Locke, E. A. (1991). Leadership: Do traits matter? Academy of Management Executive, 5, 48–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konovsky, M. A., & Pugh, S. D. (1994). Citizenship behavior and social exchange. Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 656–669.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kouzes, J. M., & Posner, B. Z. (1993). Credibility: How leaders gain and lose it, why people demand it. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, K., & Allen, N. J. (2002). Organizational citizenship behavior and workplace deviance: The role of affect and cognitions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 131–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, X. W., Che, H. S., & Leung, K. (2009). The role of leader morality in the interaction effect of procedural justice and outcome favorability. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 39, 1536–1561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McClelland, G. H., & Judd, C. M. (1993). Statistical difficulties of detecting interactions and moderator effects. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 376–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGrath, J. E., Martin, J., & Kulka, R. A. (1982). Judgment calls in research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mudler, M. (1971). Power equalization through participation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 16, 31–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Northouse, P. G. (2012). Leadership: Theory and practice (6th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organ, D. W. (1988). Organizational citizenship behavior: The good soldier syndrome. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organ, D. W., & Ryan, K. (1995). A meta-analytic review of attitudinal and dispositional predictors of organizational citizenship behavior. Personnel Psychology, 48, 775–802.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Padilla, A. (2012). Leadership: The leaders, the followers, and the environments. New York, NY: Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Padilla, A., Hogan, R., & Kaiser, R. B. (2007). The toxic triangle: Destructive leaders, susceptible followers, and conducive environments. The Leadership Quarterly, 18, 176–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patchen, M. (1974). The locus and basis of influence on organizational decisions. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 11, 195–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peabody, R. L. (1961). Perceptions of organizational authority: A comparative analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 6(4), 463–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879–903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff, P. M., & Schriesheim, C. A. (1985). Field studies of French and Raven’s bases of power critique, reanalysis, and suggestions for future research. Psychological Bulletin, 97, 387–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahim, M. A. (1988). The development of a leader power inventory. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 23, 491–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahim, M. A. (1989). Relationships of leader power to compliance and satisfaction with supervision: Evidence from a national sample of managers. Journal of Management, 15, 545–556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahim, M. A., Antonioni, D., Krumov, K., & Illieva, S. (2000). Power, conflict, and effectiveness: A cross-cultural study in the United States and Bulgaria. European Psychologist, 5(10), 28–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahim, M. A., & Magner, N. R. (1996). Confirmatory factor analysis of the bases of leader power: First-order factor model and its invariance across groups. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 31(4), 495–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schriesheim, C. (1979). The similarity of individual directed and group directed leader behavior descriptions. Academy of Management Journal, 22, 345–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheridan, J. E., & Vredenburgh, D. J. (1978). Usefulness of leadership behavior and social power variables in predicting job tension, performance, and turnover of nursing employees. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63, 89–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shukla, R. K. (1982). Influence of power bases in organizational decision making: A contingency model. Decision Sciences, 13, 450–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slocum, J. W. (1970). Supervisory influence and the professional employee. Personnel Journal, 49, 484–488.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, B. P., & Hollenbeck, J. R. (1984). Some issues associated with the use of moderated regression. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 34, 195–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stouffer, S. A., Suchman, E. A., DeVinney, L. C., Star, S. A., & Williams, R. M, Jr. (1949). The American Soldier: Adjustment during army life (Vol. 1). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Student, K. R. (1968). Supervisory influence and work-group performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 52, 188–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutton, R. I. (2007). The no asshole rule: Building a civilized workplace and surviving one that isn’t. New York, NY: Business Plus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tepper, B. J. (2000). Consequences of abusive supervision. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 178–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thoroughgood, C. N., Tate, B. W., Sawyer, K. B., & Jacobs, R. (2012). Bad to the bone: Empirically defining and measuring destructive leader behavior. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 1, 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treviño, L. K., Brown, M., & Hartman, L. P. (2003). A qualitative investigation of perceived executive ethical leadership: Perceptions from inside and outside the executive suite. Human Relations, 55, 5–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Treviño, L. K., Weaver, G. R., & Reynolds, S. J. (2006). Behavioral ethics in organizations: A review. Journal of Management, 32, 951–990. doi:10.1177/0149206306294258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uhl-Bien, M., Marion, R., & McKelvey, B. (2007). Complexity leadership theory: Shifting leadership from the industrial age to the knowledge era. The Leadership Quarterly, 18(4), 298–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vroom, V. H., & Jago, A. G. (2007). The role of the situation in leadership. American Psychologist, 62, 17–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walumbwa, F. O., Mayer, D. M., Wang, P., Wang, H., Workman, K., & Christensen, A. L. (2011). Linking ethical leadership to employee performance: The roles of leader–member exchange, self-efficacy, and organizational identification. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 115(2), 204–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, D. S., Near, D., & Miller, R. R. (1996). Machiavellianism: A synthesis of evolutionary and psychological literatures. Psychological Bulletin, 119(2), 285–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yukl, G. A. (1999). An evaluation of conceptual weaknesses in transformational and charismatic leadership theories. The Leadership Quarterly, 10, 285–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yukl, G. A. (2005). Leadership in organizations (6th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yukl, G., & Falbe, C. M. (1991). Importance of different power sources in downward and lateral relations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 416–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yukl, G., & Van Fleet, D. D. (1992). Theory and research on leadership in organizations. In M. D. Dunette & L. E. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology, 3 (pp. 147–197). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. United States Air Force, USAF Academy, USA

    Peter J. Reiley

  2. Pennsylvania State University, University Park, USA

    Rick R. Jacobs

Authors
  1. Peter J. Reiley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Rick R. Jacobs
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter J. Reiley.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Reiley, P.J., Jacobs, R.R. Ethics Matter: Moderating Leaders’ Power Use and Followers’ Citizenship Behaviors. J Bus Ethics 134, 69–81 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2416-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2416-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation