Skip to main content
Log in

Deepening Understanding of Certification Adoption and Non-Adoption of International-Supplier Ethical Standards

Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study presents a theory of causally complex configurations of antecedent conditions influencing the adoption versus non-adoption of international supplier ethical certification-standards. Using objective measures of antecedents and outcomes, a large-scale study of exporting firms in the cut-flower industry in two South American countries (Colombia and Ecuador) supports the theory. The theory includes the following and additional propositions. No single (simple)-antecedent condition is sufficient for accurately predicting a high membership score in outcome conditions; the outcome conditions include a firm’s adoption or rejection of a product certification. No single (simple)-antecedent condition is necessary for accurately predicting high scores in the outcome condition. A few complex antecedent conditions (configurations) are sufficient but the occurrence of each is not necessary for accurately predicting high scores (e.g., adoption) in an outcome condition. Causal asymmetry of antecedent conditions indicating adoption versus non-adoption of specific ethical standards occurs—that is, causal conditions leading to rejection are not the mirror opposites of causal conditions leading to adoption.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AIPH. (2009). International statistics flowers and plants. International Association of Horticultural Producers, 57. Hannover: Institut fur Entwicklungs und Agrarokonomik.

  • Asolflores. (2008). Floricultura Colombiana: Estadísticas 2007. Bogotá: Asocolflores.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bargh, J. A., & Chartrand, T. L. (1999). The unbearable automaticity of being. American Psychologist, 54, 462–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, M. L., & King, A. A. (2008). Good fences make good neighbors: A longitudinal analysis of an industry self-regulatory institution. Academy of Management Journal, 51, 1150–1170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackman, A., & Rivera, J. (2011). Producer-level benefits of sustainability certifications. Conservation Biology, 25(6), 1176–1185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boiral, O. (2003). ISO 9000: Outside the iron cage. Organization Science, 14(6), 720–737.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cashore, B. W., Auld, A. G., & Newsom, D. (2004). Governing through markets: Forest certification and the emergence of non-state authority. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christmann, P., & Taylor, G. (2001). Globalization and the environment: Determinants of firm self-regulation in China. Journal of International Business Studies, 32(3), 439–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christmann, P., & Taylor, G. (2006). Firm self-regulation through international certifiable standards: Determinants of symbolic versus substantive implementation. Journal of International Business Studies, 37(6), 863–878.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, R. G. & Kleinschmidt, E. J. (2007). Winning businesses in product development: The critical success factors. Research-Technology Management. Retrieved December 10, 2009 from (http://www.proddev.com/downloads/working_papers/wp_6.pdf).

  • Corbett, C. J. (2006). Global diffusion of ISO 9000 certification through supply chains. M&Som-Manufacturing and Service Operations Management, 8(4), 330–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corbett, C. J., Montes-Sancho, M. J., & Kirsch, D. A. (2005). The financial impact of ISO 9000 certification in the United States: An empirical analysis. Management Science, 51, 1046–1059.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darnall, N., & Carmin, J. (2005). Greener and cleaner? The signaling accuracy of U.S. voluntary environmental programs. Policy Sciences, 38, 71–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delmas, M. (2002). The diffusion of environmental management standards in Europe and in the United States: An institutional perspective. Policy Sciences, 35, 91–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delmas, M., & Montiel, I. (2008). The diffusion of voluntary international management standards: Responsible care, ISO 9000, and ISO 14001 in the chemical industry. The Policy Studies Journal, 36(1), 65–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doty, D. H., & Glick, W. H. (1994). Typologies as a unique form of theory building: Toward improved understanding and modeling. Academy of Management Journal, 19, 230–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durand, R., & McGuire, J. (2005). Legitimating agencies in the face of selection: The case of AACSB. Organization Studies, 26, 165–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Expoflores (2010). http://www.expoflores.com. Accessed Oct 2010.

  • Feldman, J. M., & Lynch, J. G. (1988). Self-generated validity and other effects of measurement on belief, attitude, intention, and behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 421–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiss, P. C. (2011). Building better causal theories: A fuzzy set approach to typologies in organization research. Academy of Management Journal, 54(2), 393–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gawande, A. (2009). The checklist manifesto. New York: Metropolitan Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gigerenzer, G. (1991). From tools to theoies: A heuristic of discovery in cognitive psychology. Psychological Review, 98, 254–267.

  • Gladwell, M. (2010). Amazon exclusive: Malcolm Gladwell reviews the checklist manifesto. Retrieved, from http://www.amazon.com/Checklist-Manifesto-How-Things-Right/dp/0805091742/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1362928191&sr=1-1&keywords=Checklist+Manifesto.

  • Guler, I., Guillen, M., & MacPherson, J. M. (2002). Global competition, institutions, and the diffusion of organizational practices: The international spread of the ISO 9000 quality certificates. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47, 207–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hira, A., & Ferrie, J. (2006). Fair trade: Three key challenges for reaching the mainstream. Journal of Business Ethics, 63, 107–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howard, J. A., & Morgenroth, W. M. (1968). Information processing model of executive decision. Management Science, 14, 416–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsu, S.-H., Woodside, A.G., & Marshall, R. (2013). Critical tests of multiple theories of cultures’ consequences: Comparing the usefulness of models by Hofstede, Ingelhart and Baker, Schwartz, Steenkamp as well as GDP and distance for explaining overseas tourism behavior. Journal of Travel Research, forthcoming; published online version at http://jtr.sagepub.com/content/early/2013/02/07/oo47287512475218.

  • Katz, D., & Kahn, R. L. (1978). The social psychology of organizations (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khanna, M. (2001). Non-mandatory approaches to environmental protection. Journal of Economic Surveys, 15(3), 291–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, A. A., Lenox, M. J., & Barnett, M. (2002). Strategic responses to the reputation commons problem. In A. J. Hoffman & M. J. Ventresca (Eds.), Organizations, policy, and the natural environment: Institutional and strategic perspectives. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, A. A., Lenox, M. J., & Terlaak, A. (2005). The strategic use of decentralized institutions: Exploring certification with the ISO 14001 Management Standard. Academy of Management Journal, 48(6), 1091–1106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, A., Prado, A., & Rivera, J. (2011) “Industry self-regulation and environmental protection.” In A.J. Hoffman, A. and P. Bansal (pp. 640-655), The Oxford Handbook of Business and the Environment Oxford: Oxford University Press. Retrieved, from http://faculty.tuck.dartmouth.edu/images/uploads/faculty/andrew-king/CH_6_King_Prado_Rivera_FINAL_DRAFT_15_12_2010.pdf. Accessed 17 Nov 2011.

  • King, A. A., & Toffel, M. (2007). Self-regulatory institutions for solving environmental problems: Perspectives and contributions from the management literature. In M. Delmas & O. Young (Eds.), Governing the environment: Interdisciplinary perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loe, T. W., Ferrell, L., & Mansfield, P. (2000). A review of empirical studies assessing ethical decision making in business. Journal of Business Ethics, 25, 185–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyon, T. L., & Maxwell, J. W. (2002). Voluntary approaches to environmental regulation: A survey. In M. Franzini & A. Nicita (Eds.), Economic institutions and environmental policy: Past, present and future. Aldershot, Hampshire, UK: Ashgate Publishing Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malle, B. F. (2004). How the mind explains behavior: Folk explanations of meaning, and social interaction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClelland, D. C. (1998). Identifying competencies with behavioral-event interviews. Psychological Science, 9, 331–3339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery, D. B. (1975). New product distribution: an analysis of supermarket buyer decisions. Journal of Marketing Research, 12, 255–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montiel, I., & Husted, B. (2009). The adoption of certified environmental management programs in Mexico: First movers as institutional entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Ethics, 88(2), 349–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naveh, E., & Marcus, A. A. (2004). When does the ISO 9000 quality assurance standard lead to performance improvement? Assimilation and going beyond. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 51, 352–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nisbett, R. E., & Wilson, T. D. (1977). Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review, 81, 231–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Potoski, M., & Prakash, A. (2005). Covenants with weak swords: ISO 14001 and facilities’ environmental performance. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 24, 745–769.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prado, A. (2012). Choosing among competing environmental and labor standards: An exploratory analysis of producer adoption. Working paper. New York: Stern School, New York University (aprado@stern.nyu.edu).

  • Ragin, C. (2006). Turning the tables: How case-oriented research challenges variable-oriented research. Comparative Social Research, 16(1), 27–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ragin, C. (2008). Redesigning social inquiry: Fuzzy sets and beyond. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rees, J. (1997). Development of communitarian regulation in the chemical industry. Law and Policy, 19, 477–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reinecke, J., Manning, S., & von Hagen, O. (2012). The emergence of a standards market: Multiplicity of sustainability standards in global coffee industry. Organization Studies, 33(5/6), 789–812.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinhardt, F. L. (2000). Down to earth: Applying business principles to environmental management. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice, R. A. (2001). Noble goals and challenging terrain: Organic and fair trade coffee movements in the global marketplace. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 14(1), 39–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riisgaard, L. (2008). Global value chains, labor organization and private social standards: Lessons from East African Cut Flower Industries. World Development, 37, 326–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rivera, J. (2002). Assessing a voluntary environmental initiative in the developing world: The Costa Rican certification for sustainable tourism. Policy Sciences, 35(4), 333–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rivera, J., & DeLeon, P. (2004). Is greener whiter? Voluntary environmental performance of Western Ski areas. Policy Studies Journal, 32(2–3), 417–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, S. (2003). Supply chain specific? understanding the patchy success of ethical sourcing initiatives. Journal of Business Ethics, 44, 159–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sasser, E. N., Prakash, A., Cashore, B., & Auld, G. (2006). Direct targeting as an NGO political strategy: Examining private authority regimes in the forestry sector. Business and Politics, 8(3), 1–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sine, W. D., David, R. J., & Mitsuhashi, H. (2007). From plan to plant: Effects of certification on operational start-up in the emergent independent power sector. Organization Science, 18(4), 578–594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, T. M., & Fischlein, M. (2010a). Rival private governance networks: Competing to define the rules of sustainability performance. Global Environmental Change, 20(3), 511–522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, T. M., & Fischlein, M. (2010b). Rival private governance networks: Competing to define the rules of sustainability performance. Global Environmental Change, 20, 511–522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terlaak, A., & King, A. A. (2006). The effect of certification with the ISO 9000 quality management standard: A signaling approach. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 60(4), 579–602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in Organizations. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wocjik, J. (2011). There’s blood on those valentine’s day roses. People’s World. Retrieved February 11, from http://www.peoplesworld.org/there-s-blood-on-those-valentine-s-day-roses/.

  • Woodside, A. G. (2013). Moving beyond multiple regression analysis to algorithms. Journal of Business Research, 66, 463–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WRI 2010, Global Ecolabel Monitor: Towards transparency. (2010). World Resource Institute (WRI), Retrieved December, 15 2010 from http://www.wri.org/publication/global-ecolabel-monitor.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arch G. Woodside.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Prado, A.M., Woodside, A.G. Deepening Understanding of Certification Adoption and Non-Adoption of International-Supplier Ethical Standards. J Bus Ethics 132, 105–125 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2301-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2301-x

Keywords

Navigation