Skip to main content
Log in

Social Cognitive Theory: The Antecedents and Effects of Ethical Climate Fit on Organizational Attitudes of Corporate Accounting Professionals—A Reflection of Client Narcissism and Fraud Attitude Risk

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The rash of high-profile accounting frauds involving internal corporate accountants calls into question the individual accountant’s perceptions of the ethical climate within their organization and the limits to which these professionals will tolerate unethical behavior and/or accept it as the norm. This study uses social cognitive theory to examine the antecedents of individual corporate accountant’s perceived personal fit with their organization’s ethical climate and empirically tests how these factors impact organizational attitudes. A survey was completed by 203 corporate accountants to assess their perception of relevant variables. The results of the structural equation model indicate three significant antecedents relating to ethical climate fit: higher internal levels of locus of control; greater numbers of prior job changes; and higher perceptions of an increasingly better fit with the firm’s ethical climate (e.g., fit trend). Our results also indicate that higher levels of perceived fit to the ethical climate of a firm are associated with higher levels of perceived job satisfaction and organizational commitment. We also theorize that perceptions of an organization’s ethical climate may be reflections of client narcissism and serve a potential indicator of fraud risk. This is an important topic of study, since current auditing standards call for auditors to examine organizational attitudes toward fraud, but offer minimal guidance in doing so.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agarwal, J., & Malloy, D. C. (1999). Ethical work climate decisions in a not-for-profit organization: An empirical study. Journal of Business Ethics, 20, 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, N. J., & Meyer, J. P. (1990). The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63(1), 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amernic, J. H., & Craig, R. J. (2010). Accounting as a facilitator of extreme narcissism. Journal of Business Ethics, 96(1), 79–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, M. O. (2013). World Com’s Betty Vinson: A tale of two professionals. Strategic Finance, 7, 48–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, R. E., & Tirrell, M. E. (2004). Too good to be true. CEOs and financial reporting fraud. Consulting Psychology Journal, 56, 35–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aranya, N., & Ferris, K. (1984). A Re examination of accountant’s organizational- professional conflict. The Accounting Review, 59(1), 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashford, B. E., & Anand, V. (2003). The normalization of corruption in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 25, 1–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumhart, R. C. (1961). How ethical are businessmen? Harvard Business Review, 39, 6–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, H. S. (1960). Notes on the concept of commitment. American Journal of Sociology, 66(1), 32–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Black, W. L. (2005). The best way to rob a bank is to own one: How corporate executives and politicians looted the S & L industry. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blair, C. A., Hoffman, B. J., & Helland, K. R. (2008). Narcissism in organizations: A multisource appraisal reflects different perspectives. Human Performance, 21, 254–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonhoeffer, D. (1955). Ethics. London: SCM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, A. D. (1997). Narcissism, identity, and legitimacy. Academy of Management Review, 22, 643–686.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R. P., Budzek, K., & Tamborski, M. (2009). On the meaning and measure of narcissism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35(7), 951–964.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M. E., & Trevino, L. K. (2006). Ethical leadership: A review and future directions. Leadership Quarterly, 17(6), 595–616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brownell, P. (1981). Participation in budgeting, locus of control and organizational effectiveness. The Accounting Review, 56(4), 844–860.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brownell, P. (1982). A field study examination of budgetary participation and locus of control. The Accounting Review, 57(4), 766–777.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunell, A. B., Staats, S., Barden, J., & Hupp, J. M. (2011). Narcissism and academic dishonesty: The exhibitionism dimension and the lack of guilt. Personality and Individual Differences, 50(3), 323–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bullen, M., & Flamholtz, E. (1985). A theoretical empirical investigation of job satisfaction and intended turnover in the large CPA firm. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 10(3), 287–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Business Week (2002).The rise and fall of Dennis Kozlowski (24) June, 34.

  • Campbell, K. W., Hoffman, B. J., Campbell, S. M., & Marchisio, G. (2011). Narcissism in organizational contexts. Human Resource Management Review, 2, 268–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chatterjee, A., & Hambrick, D. C. (2007). It’s all about me: Narcissistic chief executive officers and their effects on company strategy and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52(2), 350–386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cullen, J. B., Parboteeah, K. P., & Victor, B. (2003). The effects of ethical climates on organizational commitment: A two-study analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 46(2), 127–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, B. J., & Stevens, D. E. (2013). Can a code of ethics improve manager behavior and investor confidence? An experimental study. The Accounting Review, 88(1), 51–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deshpande, S. P., George, E., & Joseph, J. (2000). Ethical climates and managerial success in Russian organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 23(2), 211–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duchon D., & Drake, B. (2009). Organizational narcissism and virtuous behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 85, 301–308.

  • Falkenberg, L., & Herremans, I. (1995). Ethical behaviours in organizations: Directed by the formal or informal systems? Journal of Business Ethics, 14(2), 133–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fatt, J. P. T. (1995). Ethics and the accountant. Journal of Business Ethics, 14, 997–1004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Festinger, L. (1957). Theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, J. D., & Campbell, W. K. (2007). Are there such things as “narcissists” in social psychology? A taxometric analysis of the narcissistic personality inventory. Personality and Individual Difference, 43(6), 1321–1332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fritzsche, D. J. (2000). Ethical climates and the ethical dimension of decision making. Journal of Business Ethic, 24(2), 125–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frucot, V., & Shearon, W. T. (1991). Budgetary participation, locus of control, and Mexican managerial performance and job satisfaction. The Accounting Review, 66(1), 80–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerstein, M., & Friedman, H. H. (2013). Is ethical accounting becoming an oxymoron? The IUP Journal of Accounting Research & Audit Practices, 12(2), 58–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glover, H. D., Mynatt, P. G., & Schroeder, R. G. (2000). The personality, job satisfaction and turnover intentions of African-American male and female accountants: An examination of the human capital and structural/class theories. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 11(2), 173–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregson, T. (1992). An investigation of the causal ordering of job satisfaction, and organizational commitment in turnover models in accounting. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 4, 80–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagel, J. (2012). Bridging the ethical divide: Survey finds firms lagging. Journal of Accountancy, 7, 22–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hales, J., Hobson, L., & Resutek, R. J. (2011). The dark side of socially mediated rewards: How social status and narcissism affect managerial reporting. Working Paper, Georgia Institute of Technology.

  • Hartman, S. J., Yrle, A. C., & Galle, W. P. (1999). Procedural and distributive justice: Examining equity in a university setting. Journal of Business Ethics, 20, 337–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrbach, O., & Mignonac, K. (2007). Is ethical P-O fit really related to individual outcomes? A study of management-level employees. Business and Society, 46(3), 304–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunton, J., Hoitash, R., & Thibodeau, J. (2011). The relationship between perceptions of tone at the top and earnings quality. Contemporary Accounting Research, 28(4), 1190–1224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huseman, R. C., Hatfield, J. D., & Miles, E. W. (1987). A new perspective on equity theory: The equity sensitivity construct. Academy of Management Review, 12(2), 222–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyatt, T., & Prawitt, D. (2001). Does congruence between audit structure and auditor’s locus of control affect job performance? The Accounting Review, 76(2), 263–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB). (2009). The auditor’s responsibilities relating to fraud in an audit of financial statements, International Standards on Auditing. New York, NY: IAASB.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaros, S. J., Jermier, J. M., Koehler, J. W., & Sincich, T. (1993). Effects of continuance, affective, and moral commitment on the withdrawal process: An evaluation of eight structural equation models. Academy of Management Journal, 36(5), 951–995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, L. C., & Wygant, S. A. (1990). The developmental self-valuing theory: A practical approach for business ethics. The Journal of Business Ethics, 9(3), 215–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, E. N., Kuhn, J. R., Apostolou, B. A., & Hassell, J. M. (2013). Auditor perceptions of client narcissism as a fraud attitude risk factor. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 32(1), 203–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kets de Vries, M. F., & Miller, M. (1985). Narcissism and leadership: An object relations perspective. Human Relations, 38, 583–601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L. (1973). The claim to moral adequacy of a highest stage of moral judgment. The Journal of Philosophy, 70(18), 630–646.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leong, L., Huann, S., & Hsu, J. (2003). An empirical study on professional commitment, organizational commitment and job involvement in Canadian accounting firms. Journal of the American Academy of Business, 2(2), 360–370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, K. Z. (1936). Principals of topological psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Locke, D. (1979). Cognitive stages of developmental phases: A critique of Kohlberg’s stage-structural theory of moral reasoning. Journal of Moral Education, 9(3), 168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Locke, D. (1980). The illusion of the sixth stage. Journal of Moral Education, 9(2), 103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loeb, S. E. (1971). A survey of ethical behavior in the accounting profession. Journal of Accounting Research, Autumn, 9(2), 287–306.

  • Lubit, R. (2002). The long-term organizational impact of destructively narcissistic managers. The Academy of Management Review, 16(1), 127–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maccoby, M. (2003). The productive narcissist: The promise and peril of visionary leadership. New York: Broadway Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malloy, D. C., & Agarwal, J. (2000). Ethical climate in nonprofit organizations: Propositions and implications. Non Profit Management and Leadership, 12(1), 39–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menon, M. K., & Sharland, A. (2011). Narcissism, exploitive attitudes, and academic dishonesty: An exploratory investigation of reality versus myth. Journal of Education for Business, 86, 50–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1(1), 61–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. P., Allen, N. J., & Smith, C. (1993). Commitment to organizations and occupations: Extension of a test of a three-component conceptualization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(4), 538–551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mobley, W. H., Griffeth, R. W., Hand, H. H., & Meglino, B. M. (1979). Review and conceptual analysis of the employee turnover process. Psychological Bulletin, 86(3), 493–522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morf, C. C., & Rhodewalt, F. (2001). Unraveling the paradoxes of narcissism: A dynamic self-regulatory processing model. Psychological Inquiry, 12(4), 177–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mowday, R. T., Steers, R. M., & Porter, L. W. (1979). The measurement of organizational commitment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 14(2), 224–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mumford, M. D., & Helton, W. B. (2000). Organizational influences on scientific integrity. Paper presented at the ORI conference on research on research integrity, November, Bethesda, MD.

  • Myer, J. (1931). Teaching the accountant the history and ethics of his profession. Accounting Review, 6(1), 44–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • New York Daily News (2009). at: www.nydailynews.com/money/2009/06/30/2009-06- 30_they_too_paid_for_fast_living.html.

  • New York Times (2007). at: www.nytimes.com/2007/01/04/business/04enron.html.

  • New York Times (2009). at: topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/m/bernard_l_madoff/index.html?scp=1&sq=Bernard%20Madoff%20sentenced&st=cse.

  • Norris, D. R., & Niebuhr, R. E. (1984). Professionalism, organizational commitment and job satisfaction in an accounting organization. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 9(1), 49–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsen, K. J., Dworkis, K. K., & Young, M. (2013). CEO narcissism and accounting: A picture of profits. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 23(2), forthcoming.

  • Paulhus, D. L., & Williams, K. M. (2002). The dark triad of personality: Narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy. Journal of Research in Personality, 36, 556–563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peloubet, M. E. (1955). Professional ethics and the student. Accounting Review, 9(2), 164–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, D. K. (2002). Deviant workplace behavior and the organization’s ethical climate. Journal of Business and Psychology, 17(1), 47–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ponemon, L. A., & Gabhart, D. L. (1990). Auditor independence judgments: A cognitive-developmental model and experimental evidence. Contemporary Accounting Research, 7(1), 227–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poznanski, P., & Bline, J. (1997). Using structural equation modeling to investigate the causal ordering of job satisfaction and organizational commitment among staff accountants. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 9, 154–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quarles, R. (1994). An examination of promotion opportunities and evaluation criteria as mechanisms for affecting internal auditor commitment, job satisfaction and turnover intentions. Journal of Managerial Issues, 6(2), 176–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rijsenbilt, J. A. (2011). CEO narcissism and measurement. Doctoral thesis, Erasmus University, Rotterdam.

  • Rijsenbilt, A., & Commandeur, H. (2013). Narcissus enters the courtroom: CEO narcissism and fraud. Journal of Business Ethics, 117, 413–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roepke, R., Agarwal, R., & Ferratt, T. W. (2000). Aligning the IT human resource with business vision: The leadership initiative at 3 M. MIS Quarterly, 24(2), 327–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rotter, J. B. (1954). Social learning and clinical psychology. NY: Prentice-Hall.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Salter, M. (2008). Innovation corrupted: The origins and legacy of Enron’s collapse. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlachter, P. J. (1990). Organizational influences on individual ethical behavior in public accounting. Journal of Business Ethics, 9, 839–853.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlenker, B. R. (2008). Integrity and character: Implications of principled and expedient ethical ideologies. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 27(10), 1078–1125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, B. (1975). Organizational climates: An essay. Personnel Psychology, 28(4), 447–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (2010). The beginners guide to structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, H. S. (1991). Narcissism project and corporate decay: The case of general motors. Business Ethics Quarterly, 1, 249–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shafer, W. E. (2002). Ethical pressure, organizational-professional conflict and related work outcomes among management accountants. Journal of Business Ethics, 38(3), 263–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shafer, W. E. (2009). Ethical climate, organizational-professional conflict and organizational commitment: A study of Chinese auditors. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 22(7), 1087–1110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherer, M., & Adams, C. (1983). The self-efficacy scale: A construct validity study. Psychological Reports, 66, 987–994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shin, Y. (2012). CEO ethical leadership, ethical climate, climate strength, and collective organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 108, 299–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sims, R. L., & Keon, T. L. (1997). Ethical work climate as a factor in the development of person-organization fit. Journal of Business Ethics, 16(11), 1095–1105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sims, R. L., & Kroeck, K. G. (1994). The influence of ethical fit on employee satisfaction, commitment and turnover. Journal of Business Ethics, 13(12), 939–947.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spalding, A. J., & Oddo, A. (2011). It’s time for principles-based accounting ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 99, 49–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spector, P. E. (1988). Development of the work locus of control scale. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 61(4), 335–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spector, P. E. (1994). Job satisfaction survey. University of South Florida, Department of Psychology.

  • Stead, W. E., Worrell, D. L., & Stead, J. G. (1990). An integrative model for understanding and managing ethical behavior in business organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 9(3), 233–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steers, R. M. (1977). Antecedents and outcomes of organizational commitment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 22(1), 46–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trevino, L. K. (1986). Ethical decision making in organizations: A person-situation interactionist model. Academy of Management Review, 11(3), 601–617.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trevino, L. K., Butterfield, K. D., & McCabe, D. I. (1998). The ethical context in organizations: Influences on employee attitudes and behaviors. Business Ethics Quarterly, 8(3), 447–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Troy, C., Smith, K., & Domino, M. A. (2011). CEO demographics and accounting fraud: Who is more likely to rationalize illegal acts? Strategic Organization, 9(4), 259–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsui, J., & Ferdinad, G. (1996). Auditor’s behavior in an audit conflict situation: A research note on the role of locus of control and ethical reasoning. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 21(1), 41–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valentine, S., Greller, M. M., & Richtermyer, S. B. (2006). Employee job response as a function of ethical context and perceived organizational support. Journal of Business Research, 59(5), 582–588.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verbeke, W., Ouwerkek, C., & Peelen, E. (1996). Exploring the contextual and individual factors of ethical decision making of salespeople. Journal of Business Ethics, 15, 1175–1187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Victor, B., & Cullen, J. B. (1988). The organizational bases of ethical work climates. Administrative Science Quarterly, 33(1), 101–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wall Street Journal (2007). at blogs.wsj.com/law/2007/08/07 in-advance-of- prison-john- rigs-speaks-out/.

  • Winbush, J. C., & Shepard, J. M. (1994). Toward an understanding of ethical climate: Its relationship to ethical behavior and supervisory influence. Journal of Business Ethics, 13, 637–647.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winter, S. G. (1928). The next decade of accounting. Accounting Review, 3(3), 311–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, R., & Bandura, A. (1989). Social cognitive theory of organizational management. The Academy of Management Review, 14(3), 361–384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zahra, S. A., Priem, R. L., & Rasheed, A. A. (2005). The antecedents and consequences of top management fraud. Journal of Management, 31, 803–828.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahra, S. A., Priem, R. L., & Rasheed, A. A. (2007). Understanding the causes and effects of top management fraud. Organizational Dynamics, 36(2), 122–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Madeline Ann Domino.

Appendix: Instrumentation

Appendix: Instrumentation

Ethical Climate Fit

How well you currently “fit” with your current organization with respect to the following organizational conditions?

  1. 1.

    Freedom to follow one’s own personal and moral beliefs.

  2. 2.

    Freedom to decide for oneself what is right and wrong.

  3. 3.

    Freedom to be guided by one’s own personal ethics.

  4. 4.

    Freedom to act in the best interests of everyone in the organization.

Organizational Commitment

  1. 1.

    I am willing to put in a great deal of effort beyond that normally expected in order to help this organization be successful.

  2. 2.

    I talk up this organization to my friends as a great organization to work for.

  3. 3.

    I feel very little loyalty to this organization.

  4. 4.

    I would accept almost any type of job assignment in order to keep working for this organization.

  5. 5.

    I find that my values and this organization’s values are very similar.

  6. 6.

    I am proud to tell others that I am a part of this organization.

  7. 7.

    I could just as well be working for a different organization as long as the type of work was similar.

  8. 8.

    This organization really inspires the best in me in the way of job performance.

  9. 9.

    It would take very little change in my present circumstances to cause me to leave this organization.

  10. 10.

    I am extremely glad that I chose this organization to work for over others I was considering at the time I joined.

  11. 11.

    There is not too much to be gained by sticking with this organization indefinitely.

  12. 12.

    Often, I find it difficult to agree with this organization’s policies on important matters relating to its employees.

  13. 13.

    I really care about the fate of this organization.

  14. 14.

    For me, it is the best of all possible organizations for which to work.

  15. 15.

    Deciding to work for this organization was a definite mistake on my part.

Job Satisfaction

  1. 1.

    I am not very satisfied with my job.

  2. 2.

    My job is enjoyable.

  3. 3.

    I feel a sense of pride in doing my job.

  4. 4.

    I like doing the things I do at work.

  5. 5.

    I sometimes feel my job is meaningless.

Self-efficacy

  1. 1.

    I prefer my job assignments to be pretty difficult.

  2. 2.

    If I cannot do a job the first time, I keep trying until I can.

  3. 3.

    When I set important goals for myself, I rarely achieve them.

  4. 4.

    If something looks too complicated, I avoid it.

  5. 5.

    When trying to learn something new, I soon give up if I am not initially successful.

  6. 6.

    If a new task seems especially difficult, I become more determined to master it.

  7. 7.

    Initial failure just makes me try harder.

  8. 8.

    I feel confident about my ability to do things.

  9. 9.

    I am a self-reliant person.

  10. 10.

    I am capable of dealing with most problems that come up at work.

Locus of Control

  1. 1.

    A job is what you make of it.

  2. 2.

    On most jobs, people can pretty much accomplish whatever they set out to accomplish.

  3. 3.

    If you know what you want out of a job, you can find a job that gives it to you.

  4. 4.

    Making money is primarily a matter of good fortune.

  5. 5.

    In order to get a really good job, you need to have family members or friends in high places.

  6. 6.

    Promotions are usually a matter of good fortune.

  7. 7.

    It takes a lot of luck to be an outstanding employee on most jobs.

  8. 8.

    The main difference between people who make a lot of money and people who make a little money is luck.

  9. 9.

    I try very hard to improve on my past performance at work.

Fit trend

With respect to your overall fit with your organization, is the goodness of fit between you and your organization getting better or worse?

The control variables of number prior job changes and the number of prior employer are introduced as an indicator of fit trend

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Domino, M.A., Wingreen, S.C. & Blanton, J.E. Social Cognitive Theory: The Antecedents and Effects of Ethical Climate Fit on Organizational Attitudes of Corporate Accounting Professionals—A Reflection of Client Narcissism and Fraud Attitude Risk. J Bus Ethics 131, 453–467 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2210-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2210-z

Keywords

Navigation