Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility in Controversial Industry Sectors: The Social Value of Harm Minimisation

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper examines how it is possible for firms in controversial sectors, which are often marked by social taboos and moral debates, to act in socially responsible ways, and whether a firm can be socially responsible if it produces products harmful to society or individuals. It contends that a utilitarian justification can be used to support the legal and regulated provision of goods and services in these areas, and the regulated and legal provision of these areas produces less harm than the real alternative—illegal and unregulated supply. Utilitarianism is concerned as much with harm minimisation as good maximisation, and both are equally important when it comes to maximising welfare (Bentham 1789, 1970; Mill [1863] 1964). Any adequate theory of CSR must, therefore, have the capacity to handle a business that minimises harm as well as those that more straightforwardly maximise good. In this paper we therefore attempt two tasks. First, we argue that the legal but regulated provision of products and services may be better from an overall utilitarian perspective than a situation in which these harmful or immoral goods and services are illegal but procurable via a black market. Porter and Kramer’s (2006) strategic CSR framework is then presented to describe how firms in these controversial sectors can act in socially responsible ways. This model highlights the importance of firm strategy in selecting areas of socially responsible behaviours that can be acted upon by firms in each industry.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. It also sidesteps the issue of whether prohibition will result in reduction in the use of the banned goods or service.

References

  • Abel, G., Fitzgerald, L., Healy, C., & Taylor, A. (2010). Part two: Implementation and impact of the 2003 prostitution reform act: The first five years. In G. Abel, L. Fitzgerald, C. Healy, & A. Taylor (Eds.), Taking the crime out of sex work: New Zealand sex workers’ fight for decriminalisation (pp. 105–264). Bristol: The Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adam Smith (1776, 1976). The wealth of nations. In Campbell, R. H., & Skinner, A. S. (Eds.) (New York: Oxford University Press).

  • Aguilera, R. V., Rupp, D. E., Williams, C. A., & Ganapathi, J. (2007). Putting the S back into corporate social responsibility: A multi-level theory of social change in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 32, 836–863.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agustin, L. M. (2005). The cultural study of commercial sex. Sexualities, 8, 618–631.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ASH. (2011). National tobacco legislation analysis. Retrieved Nov 23, 2011 from http://www.ashaust.org.au/lv3/Lv3resources_tobacco_legislation.htm.

  • Australian Government. (2001). The corporation’s act. Retrieved Nov 11, 2011 from http://www.comlaw.gov.au/ComLaw/Legislation/ActCompilation1.nsf/0/06B599E3181C33FCCA2570C20001B061/$file/Corps2001Vol4WD02.pdf.

  • Australian Government, Department of Health and Aging. (2011). National alcohol strategy 2006–2011. Retrieved Nov 23, 2011 from http://www.alcoholguidelines.gov.au/internet/alcohol/publishing.nsf/Content/nas-06-09.

  • Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. (2011). Drugs in Australia 2010: Tobacco, alcohol and other drugs. Drug statistics series no. 27 (Canberra: AIHW). Retrieved Nov 23, 2011 from www.aihw.gov.au/WorkArea/DownloadAsset.aspx?id=10737420455.

  • Banks, G. (2007). Gambling in Australia: Are we balancing the equation? Retrieved Nov 21, 2011 from http://www.pc.gov.au/speeches/cs20070819.

  • Banks, G. (2009). Markets how free? Chairman’s speech, Whitlam institute’s governing the economy symposium, Sydney. Retrieved Nov 21, 2011 from http://www.pc.gov.au/speeches/20091130-markets-how-free.

  • Barnett, M. L. (2007). Stakeholder influence capacity and the variability of financial returns to corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 32, 794–816.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bentham, J. (1970). An introduction of the principles of morals and legislation. London: Atholone Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boatright, J. R. (2006). What’s wrong—and what’s right—with stakeholder management. Journal of Private Enterprise 21 (2) reprinted in Beauchamp, T., Bowie, N., & Arnold, D. (eds.) (2009) Ethical theory and business, pp. 69–80 (New Jersey: Prentice Hall).

    Google Scholar 

  • Burton, B. K., & Goldsby, M. G. (2009). The moral floor: A philosophical examination of the connection between ethics and business. Journal of Business Ethics, 91, 145–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, E. F. (2011). Business ethics should study illicit businesses: To advance respect for human rights. Journal of Business Ethics, 103, 497–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cai, Y., Jo, H., & Pan, C. (2012). Doing well while doing bad? CSR in controversial industry sectors. Journal of Business Ethics, 109, 467–480.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cancer Council Australia. (2011). Revenue from tobacco taxes in Australia. In Tobacco in Australia: Facts and issues (Sect. 13.6). Retrieved Nov 23, 2011 from http://www.tobaccoinaustralia.org.au/chapter-13-taxation/13-6-revenue-from-tobacco-taxes-in-australia.

  • Cannold, L. (2011). Abortion law reform is still unfinished business. The Age, 8 March.

  • Carroll, A. B. (1979). A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. Academy of Management Review, 4, 497–505.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A. B. (1998). The four faces of corporate citizenship. Business and Society Review, 100, 1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Consumer Affairs Victoria. (2011). Operating a licenced sex work business: A guide for licencees and managers. Retrieved Nov 17, 2011 from www.consumer.vic.gov.au/…/operating_a_licensed_sex_work_business.pdf.

  • Collins, D. J., & Lapsley, H. M. (2008). The avoidable costs of alcohol abuse in Australia and the potential benefits of effective policies to reduce the social costs of alcohol. Retrieved Nov 17, 2011 from http://www.nationaldrugstrategy.gov.au/internet/drugstrategy/publishing.nsf/Content/0A14D387E42AA201CA2574B3000028A8/$File/mono70.pdf.

  • De Colle, S., & York, J. G. (2008). Why wine is not glue? The unresolved problem of negative screening in socially responsible investing. Journal of Business Ethics, 85, 83–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Department of Health and Aging. (2010). National binge drinking strategy. Retrieved Nov 18, 2011 from http://www.drinkingnightmare.gov.au/internet/drinkingnightmare/publishing.nsf/Content/about-the-campaign#background.

  • Department of Health and Aging. (2011). Plain packaging legislation passed by parliament. Retrieved Dec 1, 2011 from http://www.yourhealth.gov.au/internet/yourhealth/publishing.nsf/Content/tobacco-label-passedleg.

  • Doane, D. (2005). The myth of CSR. Stanford: Stanford Graduate School of Business.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dwyer, J. M., & Jackson, T. (2008). Unwanted pregnancy, mental health and abortion: Untangling the evidence. Australia and New Zealand Health Policy 5(2). Retrieved Nov 17, 2011 from http://www.anzhealthpolicy.com/content/5/1/2.

  • Freeman, I., & Hasnaoui, A. (2010). The meaning of corporate social responsibility: The vision of four nations. Journal of Business Ethics, 100, 419–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frynas, J. G. (2010). Corporate social responsibility and societal governance: Lessons from transparency in the oil and gas sector. Journal of Business Ethics, 93, 163–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galbreath, J. (2011). To what extent is business responding to climate change? Evidence from a global wine producer. Journal of Business Ethics, 104, 421–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grimes, D. A., Benson, J., Singh, S., Romero, M., Ganatra, B., Okonofua, F. E., et al. (2006). Unsafe abortion: The preventable pandemic. Lancet, 368(9550), 1908–1919.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hellseten, S., & Mallin, C. (2006). Are ‘ethical’ or ‘socially responsible’ investments socially responsible? Journal of Business Ethics, 66, 393–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hemphill, T. A. (2005). Alcoholic beverage industry self-regulation and youth advertising: The federal trade commission reports. Business and Society Review, 110, 321–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henriques, A. (2007). Corporate truth—the limits to transparency. London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heywood, A. (2001). Politics (2nd ed.). Houndmills: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillman, A. J., & Hitt, M. A. (1999). Corporate political strategy formulation: A model of approach, participation, and strategy decisions’. Academy of Management Review, 24, 825–842.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hing, N. (2001). Changing the odds: A study of corporate social principles and practices in addressing problem gambling. Journal of Business Ethics, 33, 115–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hing, N., Huske, E., & Gainsbury, S. (2011). Gamblers at-risk and their help-seeking behaviour. Lismore: Centre for Gambling Education and Research, Southern Cross University. http://www.gamblingresearch.org.au/CA256DB1001771FB/page/GRA+Research+Reports-Gamblers+at+risk+and+their+help+seeking+behaviour?.

  • Hing, N., & McMillan, J. (2002). A conceptual framework of the corporate management of social impacts: The case of problem gambling. Business and Society Review, 107, 457–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, A. J. (2007). If you’re not at the table, you’re on the menu. Harvard Business Review, 85(10), 24–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Husted, B. W., & De Jesus Salazar, J. (2006). Taking Friedman seriously: Maximizing profits and social performance. Journal of Management Studies, 43, 75–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jefferys, S. (2003). The legalisation of prostitution: A failed social experiment, speech, United Nations commission on the status of women, New York. Retrieved from http://mc2.vicnet.net.au/home/catwaust/files/legalisingexp.htm.

  • Jeffrey, L. A., & Sullivan, B. (2009). Canadian sex work policy for the 21st century: Enhancing rights and safety, lessons from Australia. Canadian Political Science Review, 3, 57–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joint Select Committee on Gambling Reform. (2011). First report: The design and implementation of a mandatory pre-commitment system for electronic gaming machines, 6 May 2011. Canberra: Parliament of Australia. Retrieved Nov 16, 2011 from http://www.aph.gov.au/senate/committee/gamblingreform_ctte/precommitment_scheme/report/report.pdf.

  • Kahn, K. S., Wojdyla, D., Say, L., Gulmezogly, A. M., & Van Look, P. F. (2006). WHO analysis of causes of maternal death: A systematic review. Lancet, 367, 1066–1074.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirkbride, J., & Letza, S. (2003). Establishing the boundaries of regulation in corporate governance: Is the UK moving toward a process of collibration? Business and Society Review, 108, 463–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lansing, P., & Peterson, M. (2011). Ship-owners and the twenty-first century Somali Pirate: The business ethics of ransom payment. Journal of Business Ethics, 102, 507–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mallin, C. (2010). Corporate governance (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathers, C. T., Vos, E. T., Stevenson, C. E., & Begg, S. J. (2000). The Australian burden of disease study: Measuring the loss of health from diseases, injuries and risk factors. Medical Journal of Australia, 172, 592–596.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2008). “Implicit” and “explicit” CSR: A conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 33, 404–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2001). Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26, 117–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Medew, J. (2011). No film call by abortion clinics. The Age, 1, 13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mill, J. S. (1863, 1859, 1861) (1964). Utilitarianism, liberty, representative government. London: Everyman.

  • Palazzo, G., & Richter, U. (2005). CSR business as usual? The case of the tobacco industry. Journal of Business Ethics, 61, 387–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parliament of Australia. (1998–1999). Abortion law in Australia. Retrieved Nov 17, 2011 from http://www.aph.gov.au/library/pubs/rp/1998-99/99rp01.htm.

  • Parliament of Australia. (2010). Alcohol taxation reform: Consideration and options, Research paper no. 11. Retrieved Nov 12, 2011 from www.aph.gov.au/house/committee/fca/subabuse/sub123.pdf.

  • Parliament of Victoria. (1988). Health services act. Retrieved Nov 19, 2011 from http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/vic/consol_act/hsa1988161/.

  • Parliament of Victoria. (2008). Abortion law reform bill. Retrieved Nov 19, 2011 from http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/vic/bill/alrb2008219/.

  • Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. K. (2006) Strategy and society: The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 84, 78–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. K. (2011) Creating shared value: How to reinvent capitalism and unleash a wave of innovation and growth. Harvard Business Review, 62–77.

  • Prior Jonson, E. P., Lindorff, M., & McGuire, L. (2012) Paternalism and the pokies: Unjustified state interference or justified intervention? Journal of Business Ethics, Online first http://www.springerlink.com/content/f645qw3q42737k56/.

  • Productivity Commission. (2010). Gambling, report no. 50. Canberra. Retrieved Nov 17, 2011 from http://www.pc.gov.au/projects/inquiry/gambling-2009/report.

  • Public Health Association of Australia. (2005). Abortion in Australia: Public health perspectives (3rd Ed). Retrieved Nov 19, 2011 from www.phaa.net.au/documents/phaa_abortion_kit.pdf.

  • Public Health Association of Australia. (2008). Gambling and health policy. Retrieved Nov 18, 2011 from www.phaa.net.au/…/20081002revisedGAMBLINGANDHEALTH.pdf.

  • Richter, U. H. (2010). Liberal thought in reasoning in CSR. Journal of Business Ethics, 97, 625–649.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roth, L. (2011). Regulation of brothels: An update. NSW Parliamentary Research Library, e-brief 15/2011, November. Retrieved Nov 12, 2011 from http://www.parliament.nsw.gov.au/prod/parlment/publications.nsf/key/Regulationofbrothels:anupdate/$File/E-brief.regulation+of+brothels.pdf.

  • Schaffer, B., & Hillman, A. J. (2000). The development of business-government strategies by diversified firms. Strategic Management Journal, 21, 175–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, M. S. (2003). The ‘ethics’ of ‘ethical investing’. Journal of Business Ethics, 43, 195–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, M. S., & Carroll, A. B. (2003). Corporate social responsibility: A three-domain approach. Business Ethics Quarterly, 13, 503–530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shamir, R. (2004). Between self-regulation and the alien tort claims act: On the contested concept of corporate social responsibility. Law and Society Review, 38, 635–664.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaver, F. M., Lewis, J., & Maticka-Tyndale, E. (2011). Rising to the challenge: Addressing the concerns of people working in the sex industry. Canadian Review of Sociology, 48, 47–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shum, P. K., & Yam, S. L. (2010). Ethics and law: Guiding the invisible hand to correct corporate social responsibility externalities. Journal of Business Ethics, 98, 549–571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, E. (1997). Defects of stakeholder theory. Corporate Governance, 5(1), 3–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taneja, S. S., Taneja, P. K., & Gupta, R. K. (2011). Researches in corporate social responsibility: A review of shifting focus, paradigms, and methodologies. Journal of Business Ethics, 101, 343–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teesson, M., Hall, W., & Grigg, M. (2007). Substance-related disorders. In G. Meadows, B. Singh, & M. Grigg (Eds.), Mental health in Australia: Collaborative community practice (pp. 462–474). Melbourne: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teesson, M., Hall, W., Slade, T., Mills, K., Grove, R., Mewton, L., et al. (2010). Prevalence and correlates of DSM-IV alcohol abuse and dependence in Australia. Addiction, 105, 2085–2094.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Utting, P. (2007). CSR and equality. Third World Quarterly, 28, 697–712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Victorian Law Reform Commission. (2008). Law of abortion: Final report. Retrieved Nov 16, 2011 from http://www.lawreform.vic.gov.au/home/completed+projects/abortion/lawreform+-+law+of+abortion_+final+report.

  • Vogl, F. (2007). Global corruption: Applying experience and research to meet a mounting crisis. Business and Society Review, 112, 171–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Von Nessen, P., & Herzberg, A. (2011). James Hardie’s asbestos liability legacy in Australia: Disclosure corporate social responsibility and the power of persuasion. Australian Journal of Corporate Law, 26, 55–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wettstein, F. (2009). Beyond voluntariness beyond CSR: Making a case for human rights and justice. Business and Society Review, 114, 125–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, A., & West, C. (1981). The marketing of ‘unmentionables’. Harvard Business Review, 51, 91–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization. (2005). The world health report 2005–Make every mother and child count. Geneva: WHO.

  • World Health Organization. (2011). Global status report on alcohol and health. Retrieved Nov 14, 2011 from http://www.who.int/substance_abuse/publications/global_alcohol_report/en/index.html.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Management, Monash University, 3800, Clayton, VIC, Australia

    Margaret Lindorff, Elizabeth Prior Jonson & Linda McGuire

Authors
  1. Margaret Lindorff
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Elizabeth Prior Jonson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Linda McGuire
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Margaret Lindorff.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lindorff, M., Prior Jonson, E. & McGuire, L. Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility in Controversial Industry Sectors: The Social Value of Harm Minimisation. J Bus Ethics 110, 457–467 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1493-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1493-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation