Abstract
Review of extant research on the corporate environmental performance (CEP) and corporate financial performance (CFP) link generally demonstrates a positive relationship. However, some arguments and empirical results have demonstrated otherwise. As a result, researchers have called for a contingency approach to this research stream, which moves beyond the basic question “does it pay to be green?” and instead asks “when does it pay to be green?” In answering this call, we provide a meta-analytic review of CEP–CFP literature in which we identify potential moderators to the CEP–CFP relationship including environmental performance type (e.g., reactive vs. proactive performance), firm characteristics (e.g., large vs. small firms), and methodological issues (e.g., self-report measures). By analyzing these contingencies, this study attempts to provide a basis on which to draw conclusions regarding some inconsistencies and debates in the CEP–CFP research. Some of the results of the moderator analysis suggest that small firms benefit from environmental performance as much or more than large firms, US firms seem to benefit more than international counterparts, and environmental performance seems to have the strongest influence on market-measures of financial performance.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Marked References (*) are Included in Meta-Analysis
Ambec, S., & Lanoie, P. (2008). Does it pay to be green? A systematic overview. Academy of Management Perspectives, 22(4), 45–62.
Aragon-Correa, J. A. (1998). Strategic proactivity and firm approach to the natural environment. Academy of Management Journal, 41, 556–567.
*Baker, W., & Sinkula, J. (2005). Environmental marketing strategy and firm performance: Effects on new product performance and market share. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 33(4), 461–475.
*Bansel, P. (2005). Evolving sustainably: A longitudinal study of corporate sustainable development. Strategic management journal, 26, 197–218.
*Bansel, P., & Clelland, I. (2004). Talking trash: Legitimacy, impression management, and unsystematic risk in the context of the natural environment. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 93–103.
*Berrone, P., & Gomez-Mejia. (2009). Environmental performance and executive compensation: An integrated agency-institutional perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 52(1), 103–126.
*Berrone, P., Cruz, C., Gomez-Mejia, L. R., & Larraza-Kintana, M. (2010). Socioemotional wealth and corporate response to institutional pressures: Do family controlled firms pollute less? Administrative Science Quarterly, 54(2), 82–113.
*Bragdon, J. H., & Marlin, J. A. T. (1972). Is pollution profitable? Risk Management, 19(4), 9–18.
Bucholz, R. A. (1993). Principles of environmental management: The greening of business. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
Buysse, K., & Verbeke, A. (2003). Proactive environmental strategies: A stakeholder management perspective. Strategic Management Journal, 24, 453–470.
Carroll, A. B. (1979). A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 4, 497–505.
Chen, M., & Hambrick, D. (1995). Speed, stealth and selective attack: How small firms differ from large firms in competitive behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 38(2), 453–482.
*Choi, J., & Wang, H. (2009). Stakeholder relations and the persistence of corporate financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 30, 895–907.
*Christmann, P. (2000). Effects of “best practices” of environmental management on cost competitiveness: The role of complementary assets. Academy of Management Journal, 43(4), 663–680.
Clarkson, M. B. E. (1995). A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 20, 92–117.
*Clarkson, P., Li, Y., & Richardson, G. (2004). The market valuation of environmental capital expenditures by pulp and paper companies. Accounting Review, 79, 329–353.
*Clarkson, P., Li, Y., Richardson, G., & Vasvari, F. (2008). Revisiting the relation between environmental performance and environmental disclosure: An empirical analysis. Accounting, Organizations & Society, 33(4/5), 303–327.
*Clemons, B. (2006). Economic incentives and small firms: Does it pay to be green? Journal of Business Research, 59, 492–500.
*Coombs, J. E., & Gilley, K. M. (2005). Stakeholder management as a predictor of CEO compensation: Main effects and interactions with financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 26, 827–840.
*Cormier, D., & Gordon, I. M. (2001). An examination of social environmental reporting strategies. Accounting, Auditing, & Accountability Journal, 14: 587–616.
D’Amboise, G., & Muldowney, M. (1988). Management theory for small business: Attempts and requirements. Academy of Management Review, 13, 226–240.
Dean, T. J., Brown, R. L., & Bamford, C. E. (1998). Differences in large and small firms responses to environmental context: strategic implications from a comparative analysis of business formations. Strategic Management Journal, 19, 709–728.
*Dooley, R. S., & Lerner, L. D. (1994). Pollution, profits, and stakeholders: The constraining effect of economic performance on CEO concern with stakeholder expectations. Journal of Business Ethics, 13, 701–711.
*Dowell, G., Hart, S., & Yeung, B. (2000). Do corporate global environmental standards create or destroy market value? Management Science, 46, 1059–1074.
Eden, L., Levitas, E., & Martinez, R. J. (1997). The production, transfer and spillover of technology: Comparing large and small, multinationals as technology producers. Small Business Economics, 9, 53–66.
Engardio, P., Capell, K., Carey, J., & Hall, K. (2007). Beyond the green corporation. Jan: Business Week. 29.
Etzion, D. (2007). Research on organizations and the natural environment, 1992-present: A review. Journal of Management, 33, 637–664.
Fiegenbaum, A., & Karnani, A. (1991). Output flexibility: A competitive advantage for small firms. Strategic Management Journal, 12, 101–114.
*Fogler, H. R., & Nutt, F. (1975). A note on social responsibility and stock valuation. Academy of Management Journal, 18(1), 155–160.
*Freedman, M., & Jaggi, B. (1986). An analysis of the impact of corporate pollution disclosures included in annual financial statements on investors’ decisions. Advances in Public Interest Accounting, 1, 193–212.
Freedman, M., & Jaggi, B. (1994). Analysis of the association between pollution performance and input cost factors: The case of electric utility plants. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 13(1), 31–48.
Freeman, R., & Evan, W. (1990). Corporate governance: A stakeholder interpretation. Journal of Behavioral Economics, 19(4), 337.
Friedman, M. (1970, September). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. New York Times Magazine, 13, 33.
*Gilley, K. M., Worrell, D. L., & El-Jelly, A. (2000). Corporate environmental initiatives and anticipated firm performance: The differential effects of process-driven versus product-driven greening initiatives. Journal of Management, 26, 1199–1216.
Greer, J., & Bruno, K. (1996). Greenwash: The reality behind corporate environmentalism. New York: Apex Press.
Griffin, J., & Mahon, J. (1997). The corporate social performance and corporate financial performance debate. Business & Society, 36(1), 5.
Hart, S. L. (1995). A natural-resource-based view of the firm. Academy of Management Review, 20, 996–1014.
Henriques, I., & Sadorsky, P. (1999). The relationship between environmental commitment and managerial perceptions of stakeholder importance. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 87–99.
Hoffman, A. J. (2001). From heresy to dogma: An institutional history of corporate environmentalism. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Howard, G. S. (1994). Why do people say nasty things about self-reports? Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15, 399–404.
Hunt, C. B., & Auster, E. R. (1990). Proactive environmental management: Avoiding the toxic trap. Sloan Management Review, 31(2), 7–18.
Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (1990). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings. Newbury Park: Sage.
*Ingram, R. (1978). An investigation of the information content of (certain) social responsibility disclosures. Journal of Accounting Research, 16, 270–285.
Jaffe, A. B., Peterson, S. R., Portney, P. R., & Stavins, R. N. (1995). Environmental regulation and the competitiveness of U.S. manufacturing: What does the evidence tell us? Journal of Economic Literature, 33(1), 132–163.
*Johnson, R. A., & Greening, D. W. (1999). The effects of corporate governance and institutional ownership types on corporate social performance. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 564–576.
*Judge, W., & Elenkov, D. (2005). Organizational capacity for change and environmental performance: an empirical assessment of Bulgarian firms. Journal of Business Research, 58(7), 893–901.
*Judge, W. Q., & Douglas, T. J. (1998). Performance implications of incorporating environmental issues into the strategic planning process: an empirical assessment, Journal of Management Studies, 35, 241–62.
*King, A., & Lenox, M. (2002). Exploring the locus of profitable pollution reduction. Management Science, 48, 289–299.
*Klassen, R. D., & McLaughlin, C. P. 1996. The impact of environmental management on firm performance. Management Science, 42, 1199–1214.
*Klassen, R. D., & Whybark, D. C. (1999). The impact of environmental technologies on manufacturing performance. Academy of Management Journal, 42(6), 599–615.
*Konar, S., & Cohen, M. A. (2001). Does the market value environmental performance? The Review of Economics and Statistics, 83, 281–289.
Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (2001). Practical meta-analysis. Applied social research methods series (Vol. 49). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
*Magness, V. (2006). Strategic posture, financial performance and environmental disclosure. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 19, 540–563.
*Majumdar, S. K., & Marcus, A. A. (2001). Rules versus discretion: The productivity consequences of flexible regulation. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 170–179.
*Makni, R., Francoeur, C., & Bellavance, F. (2009). Causality between corporate social performance and financial performance: Evidence from Canadian firms. Journal of Business Ethics 89(3), 409–422.
Marcus, A., & Geffen, D. (1998). The dialectics of competency acquisition: Pollution prevention in electric generation. Strategic Management Journal, 19(12), 1145.
*Marcus, A. A., & Goodman, R. S. (1986). Compliance and performance: Toward a contingency theory. Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy, 8, 193–221.
*Menguc, B., & Ozanne, L. (2005). Challenges of the green imperative: a natural resource-based approach to the environmental orientation–business performance relationship. Journal of Business Research, 58(4), 430–438.
*Melnyk, S. A., Stroufe, R. P., & Calatone, R. (2003). Assessing the impact of environmental management systems on corporate and environmental performance. Journal of Operations Management, 21, 329–351.
Nehrt, C. (1996). Timing and intensity effects of environmental investments. Strategic Management Journal, 17(7), 535–547.
*Nelling, E., & Webb, E. (2009). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: A virtuous circle revisited. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 32(2), 197–209.
Okada, K., & Sawai, M. (Eds.). (1999). Small firms, large concerns (p. 314). Oxford University Press: New York.
Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F., & Rynes, S. (2003). Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organization Studies, 24(3), 403–441.
Orwin, R. G. (1983). A fail-safe N for effect size in meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Statistics, 8, 157–159.
Pasquero, J. (1991). Supraorganizational collaboration: The Canadian environmental experiment. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 27(1), 38–64.
Porter, M., & Van der Linde, C. (1995). Toward a new conception of the environmental-competitiveness relationship. Journal of Economic Perspective, 9(4), 97–118.
Roome, N. (1992). Developing environmental management systems. Business Strategy and the Environment, 1, 11–24.
Rockness, Schlachter, J., & Rockness, H. O. (1986). Hazardous waste disposal, corporate disclosure, and financial performance in the chemical industry. Advances in Public Interest Accounting, 1, 167–191.
*Russo, M. V., & Fouts, P. A. (1997). A resource-based perspective on corporate environmental performance and profitability. Academy of Management Journal, 40, 534–559.
Schmitt, N. (1994). Method bias: The importance of theory and measurement. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15, 393–398.
Schwarz, N. (1999). Self-reports. American Psychologist, 54, 93–105.
*Shane, P. B., & Spicer, B. H. (1983). Market response to environmental information produced outside the firm. The Accounting Review, 58, 521–538.
Sharma, S. (2000). Managerial interpretations and organizational context as predictors of corporate choice of environmental strategy. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 681–697.
Sharma, S. (2001). Different strokes: Regulatory styles and environmental strategy in the North American oil and gas industry. Business Strategy and the Environment, 10, 344–364.
Sharma, S., & Starik, M. (Eds.). (2002). Research in corporate sustainability: The evolving theory and practice of organizations in the natural environment. Northampton: Edward Elgar Academic Publishing.
Sharma, S., & Vredenburg, H. (1998). Proactive corporate environmental strategy and the development of competitively valuable organizational capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 19, 729–753.
Shrivastava, P. (1995). The role of corporations in achieving ecological sustainability. Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 936–961.
*Slater, D. J., & Dixon-Fowler, H. R. (2009). CEO international assignment experience and corporate social performance, Journal of Business Ethics, 89, 473–489.
Spaeder, K. E. (2006, March). Think green: Entrepreneurs are turning environmental problems into opportunities. Entrepreneur Magazine. Retrieved January 3, 2008. http://www.entrepreneur.com/magazine/entrepreneur/2006/march/83592.html.
Spector, P. E. (1994). Using self-report questionnaires in OB research: A comment on the use of a controversial method. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15, 385–392.
*Spicer, B. (1978). Investors, corporate social performance and information disclosure: An empirical study. Accounting Review, 53(1), 94–111.
Starik, M., & Marcus, A. A. (2000). Introduction to the special research forum on the management of organizations in the natural environmental. Academy of Management Journal, 43(4), 539–546.
Storey, D. (1994). Understanding the small business sector. London: Routledge.
Tozzi, J. (2008, October and 31) Why small manufacturers are going green. Business Week.
Trochim, W. (2001). The research methods knowledge base (2nd ed.). Cincinnati: Automatic Dog Publishing.
*Turban, D., & Greening, D. (1997). Corporate social performance and organizational attractiveness to prospective employees. Academy of Management Journal, 40(3), 658–672.
Ullman, A. A. (1985). Data in search of a theory: A critical examination of the relationships among social performance, social disclosure, and economic performance of U.S. firms. Academy of Management Review, 10, 540–557.
Wagner, (2007). Integration of environmental management with other managerial functions of the firm. Long Range Planning, 40, 611–628.
Walley, N., & Whitehead, B. (1994). It’s not easy being green. Harvard Business Review, 72(3), 46–52.
Wartick, S. L., & Cochran, P. L. (1985). The evolution of the corporate social performance model. Academy of Management Review, 10, 758–769.
Welsh, J., & White, J. (1981). A small business is not a little big business. Harvard Business Review, 59(4), 18–27.
Wilson, D. B., & Lipsey, M. W. (2001). Practical meta-analysis. Applied social research methods series, vol 49. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Woo, C. Y. Y., & Cooper, A. C. (1981). Strategies of effective low share businesses. Strategic Management Journal, 2, 301–318.
Yu, T. (2001). Toward a capabilities perspective of the small firm. International Journal of Management Reviews, 3(3), 185–197.
*Yu, V., Ting, H. I., & Wu, Y. C. J. (2009). Assessing the greenness for European firms: A resource efficiency perspective. Management Decision, 47(7), 1065–1079.
Zhu, Q., Sarkis, J., & Lai, K. (2007). Initiatives and outcomes of green supply chain management implementation by Chinese manufacturers. Journal of Environmental Management, 85, 179–189.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dixon-Fowler, H.R., Slater, D.J., Johnson, J.L. et al. Beyond “Does it Pay to be Green?” A Meta-Analysis of Moderators of the CEP–CFP Relationship. J Bus Ethics 112, 353–366 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1268-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1268-8