Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Ethical Decision Making: Special or No Different?

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Theories of ethical decision making assume it is a process that is special, or different in some regard, from typical individual decision making. Empirical results of the most widely known theories in the field of business ethics contain numerous inconsistencies and contradictions. In an attempt to assess why we continue to lack understanding of how individuals make ethical decisions at work, an inductive study of ethical decision making was conducted. The results of this preliminary study suggest that ethical decision making might not be meaningfully “special” or different from other decision making processes. The implications of this research are potentially significant in that they challenge the fundamental assumption of existing ethical decision making research. This research could serve as an impetus for further examination of whether ethical decision making is meaningfully different from other decision making processes. Such studies could create new directions for the field of business ethics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdolmohammadi, M. J., & Baker, C. R. (2008). Moral reasoning and questionable behavior: A study of extensive copying from the Internet by accounting students. CPA Journal, 58(11), 58–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ambrose, M. L., & Schminke, M. (1999). Sex differences in business ethics: The importance of perceptions. Journal of Managerial Issues, 11(4), 454–474.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, T., & Valentine, S. (2004). Issue contingencies and marketers’ recognition of ethical issues, ethical judgments and behavioral intentions. Journal of Business Research, 57(4), 338–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bebeau, M. J., Rest, J. R., & Yamoor, C. M. (1985). Measuring dental students ethical sensitivity. Journal of Dental Education, 49, 225–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bird, F. (1996). The muted conscience: Moral silence and the practice of ethics in business. Westport, CT: Quorum Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borkowski, S. C., & Ugras, T. J. (1998). Business students and ethics: A meta-analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 17(11), 1117–1127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyatzis, R. E. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brady, F., & Wheeler, G. (1996). An empirical study of ethical predispositions. Journal of Business Ethics, 16, 927–940.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brierley, J. A., & Cowton, C. J. (2000). Putting meta-analysis to work: Accountants’ organizational professional conflict. Journal of Business Ethics, 4(2), 343–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butterfield, K. D., Trevino, L. K., & Weaver, G. R. (2000). Moral awareness in business organizations: Influences of issue-related and social context factors. Human Relations, 53, 981–1018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, K., Dutton, J. E., & Quinn, R. (2003). Positive organizational scholarship: Foundations of a new discipline. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Kohler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, D. S., Kacmar, K. M., & Wadsworth, L. L. (2002). The impact of moral intensity dimensions on ethical-decision-making: Assessing the relevance of orientation. Journal of Managerial Issues, 14(1), 15–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaiken, S., & Trope, Y. (1999). Dual process theories in social psychology. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chia, A., & Mee, L. S. (2000). The effects of issue characteristics on the recognition of moral issues. Journal of Business Ethics, 27(3), 255–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colby, A., & Kohlberg, L. (1987). The measurement of moral judgment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crary, A. (2007). Beyond moral judgment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Damasio, A., Tranel, D., & Damasio, H. (1990). Individuals with sociopathic behavior caused by frontal damage fail to respond automatically to social stimuli. Behavioral Brain Research, 41, 81–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, M. A., Andersen, M. G., & Curtis, M. B. (2001). Measuring ethical ideology in business ethics: A critical analysis of the ethics position questionnaire. Journal of Business Ethics, 32(1), 35–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, M., Johnson, N., & Ohmer, D. (1998). Issue contingent effects on ethical decision-making: A cross cultural comparison. Journal of Business Ethics, 17(4), 373–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeConinck, J. B., & Lewis, W. F. (1997). The influence of deontological and teleological considerations and ethical climate on sales managers’ intentions to reward or punish sales force behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 16(5), 497–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Derry, R. (1989). An empirical study of moral reasoning among managers. Journal of Business Ethics, 8(11), 855–862.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, P. C., Davidson, R. A., & Schwartz, B. N. (2001). The effect of organizational culture and ethical orientation on accountants’ ethical judgments. Journal of Business Ethics, 34(2), 101–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elm, D. R., & Nichols, M. L. (1993). An investigation of the moral reasoning of managers. Journal of Business Ethics, 13, 817–873.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandes, M. F., & Randall, D. M. (1992). The nature of social desirability response effects in ethics research. Business Ethics Quarterly, 2(2), 183–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flannery, B. L., & May, D. R. (2000). Environmental ethical decision-making in the U. S. metal-finishing industry. Academy of Management Journal, 43(4), 642–662.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forsyth, D. R. (1985). Individual differences in information integration during moral judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 264–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franke, G. R., Crown, D. F., & Spake, D. F. (1997). Gender differences in ethical perceptions of business practices: A social role theory perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(6), 920–934.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R. E. (1994). The politics of stakeholder theory: Some future directions. Business Ethics Quarterly, 4(4), 409–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frey, B. F. (2000). The impact of moral intensity o decision-making in a business context. Journal of Business Ethics, 26(3), 181–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, J. C. (1991). Toward an integration of Kohlberg’s and Hoffman’s theories of morality. In W. M. Kurtines & J. L. Gerwirtz (Eds.), Handbook of moral behavior and development: Volume I, advances in theory, research and applications (pp. 183–222). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gino, F., Moore, D. A., & Bazerman, M. (2008). No harm, no foul: The outcome bias in ethical judgments. Carnegie Mellon University Working Paper Series, Philadelphia, PA.

  • Glazer, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago, IL: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glover, S. H., Bumpus, M. A., Logan, J. E., & Ciesla, J. R. (1997). Re-examining the influence of individual values on ethical decision making. Journal of Business Ethics, 16(12/13), 1319–1329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greene, J. D. (2011). The moral brain and how to use it. New York: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, J. D., Sommerville, R. B., Nystrom, L. E., Darley, J. M., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). An fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment. Science, 293, 2105–2108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haidt, J. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108, 814–834.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haidt, J. (2007). The new synthesis in moral psychology. Science, 316(5827), 998–1002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrington, S. J. (1997). A test of person-issue contingent model of ethical decision-making in organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 16(4), 363–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hauser, M. (2006). Moral minds: How nature designed our universal sense of right and wrong. New York: Ecco/HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, T. (1991). Ethical decision-making by individuals in organizations: An issue contingent model. Academy of Management Review, 16(12), 366–395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D. (2003). Maps of bounded rationality: Psychology for behavioral economics. American Economic Review, 93(5), 1449–1475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, P. C., & Elm, D. R. (2003). The effect of context on moral intensity of ethical issues: Revising Jones’ issue-contingent model. Journal of Business Ethics, 48(2), 139–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L. (1969). Stage and sequence. The cognitive developmental approach to socialization. In D. A. Goslin (Ed.), Handbook of socialization theory (pp. 347–480). Chicago: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L. (1981). The meaning & measurement of moral development. Worcester, MA: Clark University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kujala, J. (2001). A multidimensional approach to Finnish managers’ moral decision-making. Journal of Business Ethics, 34(3/4), 231–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lietsch, D. L. (2004). Differences in perceptions of moral intensity in the moral decision process: An empirical examination of accounting students. Journal of Business Ethics, 53(3), 313–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Locke, K. (2001). Grounded theory in management research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, B., & Dewe, P. (1997). An investigation of the components of moral intensity. Journal of Business Ethics, 16(5), 521–530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martinko, M. J., Gundlach, M. J., & Douglas, S. C. (2002). Toward an integrative theory of counterproductive workplace behavior: A causal reasoning perspective. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 10(1/2), 36–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • May, D. R., & Pauli, K. P. (2002). The role of moral intensity in decision-making. Business & Society, 41, 84–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McMahon, J. M., & Harvey, R. J. (2006). The effect of moral intensity on ethical judgment. Journal of Business Ethics, 72(4), 335–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Messick, D., & Bazerman, M. (1996). Ethical leadership and the psychology of decision making. Sloan Management Review, 37, 9–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moe, T., Ferrell, L., & Mansfield, P. (2000). A review of empirical studies assessing ethical decision making in business. Journal of Business Ethics, 25, 185–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, S. A., & McDonald, R. A. (1995). The role of moral intensity in moral judgments: An empirical investigation. Journal of Business Ethics, 14(9), 715–726.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Fallon, M. J., & Butterfield, K. D. (2005). A review of the empirical ethical decision-making literature: 1996–2003. Journal of Business Ethics, 59(4), 375–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paine, L. S. (2004). Value shift: Why companies must merge social and financial imperatives to achieve superior performance. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palazzo, G., Krings, F., & Hoffrage, U. (2008). A person-situation interactionist framework to account for ethical blindness. Paper presented at the National Academy of Management, Anaheim, CA.

  • Rallapalli, K. C., Vitell, S. J., & Barnes, J. H. (1998). The influence of norms on ethical judgments and intentions: An empirical study of marketing professionals. Journal of Business Research, 43(3), 157–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Randall, D. M., & Fernandes, M. F. (1991). The social desirability response bias in ethics research. Journal of Business Ethics, 10(11), 805–817.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rest, J. (1979). Moral development. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rest, J. R., Barnett, R., Bebeau, M., Deemer, E., Getz, I., Moon, Y., et al. (1986). Moral development: Advances in research and theory. New York: Praeger Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, S. J. (2006). Moral awareness and ethical predispositions: Investigating the role of individual differences in the recognition of moral issues. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(1), 233–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, S. J., & Ceranic, T. (2006). The effects of diverse ethical predispositions on group ethical decision-making. Working paper, University of Washington.

  • Robertson, D. (1993). Empiricism in business ethics: Suggested research directions. Journal of Business Ethics, 12(8), 585–599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, D., Snarey, J., Ousley, O., Harenski, K., Bowman, F. D., Gilkey, R., et al. (2007). The neural processing of moral sensitivity to issues of justice and care. Neuropsychologia, 45(8), 755–766.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schminke, M., Ambrose, M. L., & Noel, T. W. (1997). The effect of ethical frameworks on perceptions of organizational justice. Academy of Management Journal, 40(5), 1190–1207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, E. D. (2000). Moral values: Situationally defined individual difference. Business Ethics Quarterly, 10(2), 497–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaub, M. K. (1997). Commentary on the relationship between and individual’s values and perceptions of moral intensity: An empirical study. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 9, 41–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, M. (1996). The role of moral intensity and fairness perception in judgments of ethicality: A comparison of managerial professionals and the general public. Journal of Business Ethics, 15(4), 469–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singhapadki, A., Vitell, S. J., & Kraft, K. L. (1996). Moral intensity and moral decision-making of marketing professionals. Journal of Business Research, 36, 245–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sparks, J. R., & Hunt, S. D. (1998). Marketing researcher ethical sensitivity: Conceptualization, measurement, and exploratory investigation. Journal of Marketing, 62, 96–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Treviño, L. K. (1986). Ethical decision-making in organizations: A person-situation interactionist model. Academy of Management Review, 11(3), 601–617.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treviño, L. K., Butterfield, K., & McCabe, D. (1998). The ethical context in organizations: Influences on employee attitudes and behaviors. Business Ethics Quarterly, 8(3), 447–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Treviño, L. K., & Weaver, G. R. (1994). Business ethics/business ethics: One field or two? Business Ethics Quarterly, 4(2), 113–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Treviño, L. K., Weaver, G. R., & Reynolds, S. J. (2006). Behavioral ethics in organizations: A review. Journal of Management, 32(6), 951–990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1986). Rational choice and the framing of decisions. Journal of Business, 59(4), S251–S278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vardi, Y. (2001). The effects of organizational and ethical climates on misconduct at work. Journal of Business Ethics, 29(4), 325–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warren, D. (2003). Constructive and destructive deviance in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 28(4), 622–632.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, J. (1990). Managers’ moral reasoning: Assessing their responses to three moral dilemmas. Human Relations, 43, 228–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, J. (1996). Influences upon managerial moral decision-making: Nature of harm and magnitude of consequences. Human Relations, 49, 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, J., & Wasieleski, D. (2001). Investigating influences on managers’ moral reasoning: The impact of context and personal and organizational factors. Business & Society, 40(1), 79–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dawn R. Elm.

Appendix

Appendix

See Tables 6, 7, and 8.

Table 6 Interview question format
Table 7 Inductive coding scheme development (thematic analysis, Boyatzis 1998)
Table 8 Coding scheme

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Elm, D.R., Radin, T.J. Ethical Decision Making: Special or No Different?. J Bus Ethics 107, 313–329 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-1041-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-1041-4

Keywords

Navigation