Date: 20 Jul 2011
Stakeholder-Defined Corporate Responsibility for a Pre-Credit-Crunch Financial Service Company: Lessons for How Good Reputations are Won and Lost
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
This paper presents a study that identifies a stakeholder-defined concept of Corporate Responsibility (CR) in the context of a UK financial service organisation in the immediate pre-credit crunch era. From qualitative analysis of interviews and focus groups with employees and customers, we identify, in a wide-ranging stakeholder-defined concept of CR, six themes that together imply two necessary conditions for a firm to be regarded as responsible—both corporate actions and character must be consonant with CR. This provides both empirical support for a notable, recent theoretical contribution by Godfrey (in Acad Manag Rev 30:777–798, 2005) and novel lessons for reputation management practice.
Ahmad, S. J., O‘Regan, N., & Ghobadian, A. (2003). Managing for performance: Corporate responsibility and internal stakeholders. International Journal of Business Performance Management, 5, 141–153.CrossRef
Andriof, J., & Waddock, S. (2002). Unfolding stakeholder engagement. In J. Andriof, S. Waddock, B. Husted, & R. S. Sutherland (Eds.), Unfolding stakeholder thinking (pp. 19–42). Sheffield: Greenleaf.
Arjoon, S. (2005). Corporate governance: An ethical perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 61, 343–352.CrossRef
Basu, K., & Palazzo, G. (2008). Corporate social responsibility: A process model of sensemaking. Academy of Management Review, 33, 122–136.CrossRef
Becker-Olsen, K. L., Cudmore, A. B., & Hill, R. P. (2006). The impact of perceived corporate social responsibility on consumer behavior. Journal of Business Research, 59, 46–53.CrossRef
Bhattacharya, C. B., Korschun, D., & Sen, S. (2009). Strengthening Stakeholder-company relationships through mutually beneficial corporate social responsibility initiatives. Journal of Business Ethics, 85, 257–272.CrossRef
Boyatzis, R., & McKee, A. (2005). Resonant leadership: Renewing yourself and connecting with others through mindfulness, hope and compassion. Boston: Harvard Business School Press Books.
Brammer, S., & Pavelin, S. (2004). Voluntary social disclosures by large UK companies. Business Ethics: A European Review, 13, 86–99.CrossRef
Brammer, S., & Pavelin, S. (2006). Corporate reputation and social performance: The importance of fit. Journal of Management Studies, 43, 435–455.CrossRef
Bromley, D. (2002). Comparing corporate reputations: League tables, quotients, benchmarks or case studies? Corporate Reputation Review, 5, 35–50.CrossRef
Brown, R. (2000). Group processes: Dynamics within and between groups. London: Blackwell.
Carmeli, A. (2005). Perceived external prestige, affective commitment, and citizenship behaviors. Organization Studies, 26, 443–464.CrossRef
Carroll, A. B. (1979). A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. Academy of Management Review, 4, 497–505.
Carroll, A. B. (1998). The 4 faces of corporate citizenship. Business and Society Review, 100, 1–7.CrossRef
Collins, J. C., & Porras, J. I. (2000). Built to last: Successful habits of visionary companies. London: Random House Business Books.
Connolly, T., Conlon, E. J., & Deutsch, S. J. (1980). Organisational effectiveness: A multiple-constituency approach. Academy of Management Review, 5, 211–217.
Cowton, C. J. (2002). Integrity, responsibility and affinity: Three aspects of ethics in banking. Business Ethics: A European Review, 11, 393–400.CrossRef
Cramer, J., Van der Heijden, A., & Jonker, J. (2004). Corporate social responsibility: Balancing between thinking and acting. Paper presented at the inter-disciplinary CSR research conference, Nottingham.
Crook, C. (2005). The good company: A survey of corporate social responsibility (pp. 3–18). London: The Economist Newspaper.
Davies, G., Chun, R., da Silva, R. V., & Roper, S. (2003). Corporate reputation and competitiveness. London: Routledge.CrossRef
Dey, I. (1993). Qualitative data analysis. A user-friendly guide for social scientists. London: Routledge.CrossRef
Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20, 65–91.
Duska, R. F. (2005). A look at integrity in financial services. Journal of Financial Service Professionals, 59, 26–28.
Dutton, J. E., Dukerich, J. M., & Harquail, C. V. (1994). Organizational images and member identification. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39, 239–263.CrossRef
Easterby-Smith, M., Thorpe, R., & Lowe, A. (2002). Management research. London: Sage.
Elkington, J. (1997). Cannibals with forks. The triple bottom line of 21st century business. Oxford: Capstone Publishing Ltd.
Elkington, J. (2001). The chrysalis economy. Oxford: Capstone Publishing Ltd.
Fombrun, C. J. (1996). Reputation: Realizing value from the corporate image. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Fombrun, C. J., & Shanley, M. (1990). What’s in a name? Reputation building and corporate strategy. Academy of Management Journal, 33, 233–258.CrossRef
Fombrun, C. J., & van Riel, C. B. M. (2004). Fame and Fortune: How successful companies build winning reputations. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. New York: Basic Books.
Freeman, R. E., Wicks, A. C., & Parmar, B. (2004). Stakeholder theory and “the corporate objective revisited”. Organization Science, 15, 364–369.CrossRef
Gardberg, N. A., & Fombrun, C. J. (2002). The global reputation quotient project: First steps towards a cross-nationally valid measure of corporate reputation. Corporate Reputation Review, 4, 303–307.CrossRef
Garriga, E., & Mele, D. (2004). Corporate social responsibility theories: Mapping the territory. Journal of Business Ethics, 53, 51–71.CrossRef
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company.
Godfrey, P. C. (2005). The relationship between corporate philanthropy and shareholder wealth: A risk management perspective. Academy of Management Review, 30, 777–798.CrossRef
Godfrey, P. C., & Hatch, N. W. (2007). Researching corporate social responsibility: An agenda for the 21st century. Journal of Business Ethics, 70, 87–98.CrossRef
Godfrey, P. C., Merrill, C. B., & Hansen, J. M. (2009). The relationship between corporate social responsibility and shareholder value: An empirical test of the risk management hypothesis. Strategic Management Journal, 30, 425–445.CrossRef
Grayson, D., & Hodges, A. (2005). Why CSR has lost its way. European Business Forum, 20, 33.
Gunter, M. (2006). The green machine. Fortune Magazine, July. http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/fortune_archive/2006/08/07/8382593/.
Hanke, T., & Stark, W. (2009). Strategy development: Conceptual framework on corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 85, 507–516.CrossRef
Hillenbrand, C., & Money, K. (2009). Segmenting stakeholders in terms of corporate responsibility: Implications for reputation management. Australasian Marketing Journal, 17, 99–105.CrossRef
Hoffman, S., & Muller, S. (2009). Consumer boycotts due to factory relocation. Journal of Business Research, 62, 239–247.CrossRef
Jones, T. M. (1995). Instrumental stakeholder theory: A synthesis of ethics and economics. The Academy of Management Review, 20, 404–437.
Laplume, A. O., Sonpar, K., & Litz, R. A. (2008). Stakeholder theory: Reviewing a theory that moves us. Journal of Management, 34, 1152–1189.CrossRef
Lee, T. W. (1999). Using qualitative methods in organization research. London: Sage.
Lockett, A., Moon, J., & Visser, W. (2006). Corporate social responsibility in management research: Focus, nature, salience and sources of influence. Journal of Management Studies, 43, 115–136.CrossRef
MacMillan, K., Money, K., & Downing, S. (2000). Successful business relationships. Journal of General Management, 26, 69–83.
MacMillan, K., Money, K., Downing, S., & Hillenbrand, C. (2004). Giving your organisation SPIRIT: An overview and call to action for directors on issues of corporate governance, corporate reputation and corporate responsibility. Journal of General Management, 30, 15–42.
MacMillan, K., Money, K., Downing, S., & Hillenbrand, C. (2005). Reputation in relationships: Measuring experiences, emotions and behaviors. Corporate Reputation Review, 8, 214–232.CrossRef
Mahon, J. F., & Wartick, S. L. (2003). Dealing with stakeholders: How reputation, credibility and framing influence the game. Corporate Reputation Review, 6, 19–35.CrossRef
Maignan, I., & Ferrell, O. C. (2001). Corporate citizenship as a marketing instrument. European Journal of Marketing, 35, 457–484.CrossRef
Margolis, J. D., & Walsh, J. P. (2001). People and profits? The search for a link between a company’s social and financial performance. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (1995). Designing qualitative research. London: Sage.
McWilliams, A., Siegel, D. S., & Wright, P. M. (2006). Corporate social responsibility: Strategic implications. Journal of Management Studies, 43, 1–18.CrossRef
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, M. A. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Miles, M. P., Munilla, L. S., & Darroch, J. (2006). The role of strategic conversations with stakeholders in the formation of corporate social responsibility strategy. Journal of Business Ethics, 69, 195–205.CrossRef
Mohr, L. A., Webb, D. J., & Harris, K. E. (2001). Do consumers expect companies to be socially responsible? The impact of corporate social responsibility on buying behavior. The Journal of Consumer Affairs, 35, 45–72.CrossRef
Moir, L. (2001). What do we mean by corporate social responsibility? Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Effective Board Performance, 1, 16–22.CrossRef
Morsing, M., & Schultz, M. (2006). Corporate social responsibility communication: Stakeholder information, response and involvement strategies. Business Ethics, 15, 323–338.CrossRef
Neville, B. A., Bell, S. J., & Menguec, B. (2005). Corporate reputation, stakeholders and the social performance-financial performance relationship. European Journal of Marketing, 39, 1184–1220.CrossRef
New York Times. (2004). The republicans: The convention in New York—Bush accepts: ‘Our tested and confident nation can achieve anything’. New York Times, September 3 (accessed at nytimes.com on September 9, 2010).
New York Times. (2005). When the Joneses wear jeans. New York Times, May 29 (accessed at nytimes.com on September 9, 2010).
New York Times. (2008a). What created this monster? New York Times, March 23 (accessed at nytimes.com on September 9, 2010).
New York Times. (2008b). The housing-loan crisis. New York Times, October 26 (accessed at nytimes.com on September 9, 2010).
Orlitzky, M., & Benjamin, J. D. (2001). Corporate social performance and firm risk: A meta-analytic review. Business & Society, 40, 369–396.CrossRef
Pater, A., & van Lierop, L. (2006). Sense and sensitivity: The roles of organisation and stakeholders in managing corporate social responsibility. Business Ethics: A European Review, 15, 339–351.CrossRef
Peterson, D. K. (2004). The relationship between perceptions of corporate citizenship and organizational commitment. Business & Society, 43, 296–319.CrossRef
Polonsky, M. J., & Jevons, C. (2006). Understanding issue complexity when building a socially responsible brand. European Business Review, 18, 340–349.CrossRef
Polonsky, M. J., & Scott, D. (2005). An empirical examination of the stakeholder strategy matrix. European Journal of Marketing, 39, 1199–1221.CrossRef
Ravasi, D., & Schultz, M. (2006). Responding to organizational identity threats: Exploring the role of organizational culture. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 433–458.CrossRef
Ritchie, J., & Lewis, J. (2003). Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers. London: Sage.
Roome, N., & Jonker, J. 2004. Whistling in the dark. Paper presented at the inter-disciplinary CSR research conference, Nottingham.
Rouleau, L. (2005). Micro-practices of strategic sensemaking and sensegiving: How middle managers interpret and sell change every day. Journal of Management Studies, 42, 1413–1441.CrossRef
Sachs, S., & Ruehli, E. (2005). Changing managers’ values towards a broader stakeholder orientation. Corporate Governance, 5, 89–98.CrossRef
Schnietz, K. E., & Epstein, M. J. (2005). Exploring the financial value of a reputation for corporate social responsibility during a crisis. Corporate Reputation Review, 7, 327–345.CrossRef
Scholder Ellen, P., Webb, D. J., & Mohr, L. A. (2006). Building corporate associations: Consumer attributions for corporate socially responsible programs. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34, 147–157.CrossRef
Sen, S., & Bhattacharya, C. B. (2001). Does doing good always lead to doing better? Consumer reactions to corporate social responsibility. Journal of Marketing Research, 34, 158–166.
Sen, S., Bhattacharya, C. B., & Korschun, D. (2006). The role of corporate social responsibility in strengthening multiple stakeholder relationships: A field experiment. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34, 158–166.CrossRef
Smidts, A., Pruyn, T. H., & Van Riel, C. B. M. (2001). The impact of employee communication and perceived external prestige on organizational identification. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 1051–1062.CrossRef
Sonenshein, S. (2010). We’re changing—or are we? Untangling the role of progressive, regressive, and stability narratives during strategic changes implementation. Academy of Management Journal, 53, 477–512.CrossRef
Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (1998). Mixed methodology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Vitell, S. J., & Hidalgo, E. R. (2006). The impact of corporate ethical values and enforcement of ethical codes on the perceived importance of ethics in business: A comparison of U.S. and Spanish managers. Journal of Business Ethics, 64, 31–43.CrossRef
Vogel, D. (2005). Is there a market for virtue? The business case for corporate social responsibility. California Management Review, 47, 19–45.
Waddock, S. (2002). Leading corporate citizens. Vision, values, value added. Boston: McGraw-Hill Higher Education.
Waddock, S. (2003). What will it take to create a tipping point for corporate responsibility? Working paper no. 21, Boston College, Boston.
Waddock, S. (2004a). Parallel universes: Companies, academics, and the progress of corporate citizenship. Business and Society Review, 109, 5–42.CrossRef
Waddock, S. (2004b). Creating corporate accountability: Foundational principles to make corporate citizenship real. Journal of Business Ethics, 50, 313–327.CrossRef
Waddock, S., Bodwell, C., & Graves, S. (2002). Responsibility: The new business imperative. Academy of Management Executive, 16, 132–148.CrossRef
Walsh, G., Mitchell, V.-W., Jackson, P. R., & Beatty, S. E. (2009). Examining the antecedents and consequences of corporate reputation: A customer perspective. British Journal of Management, 20, 187–203.CrossRef
Wartick, S. L., & Cochran, P. L. (1985). The evolution of the corporate social performance model. Academy of Management Review, 10, 758–770.
Williams, R. J., & Barrett, J. D. (2000). Corporate philanthropy, criminal activity, and firm reputation: Is there a link? Journal of Business Ethics, 26, 341–350.CrossRef
Windsor, D. (2006). Corporate social responsibility: Three key approaches. Journal of Management Studies, 43, 93–114.CrossRef
Wood, D. J. (1991). Corporate social performance revisited. Academy of Management Review, 16, 691–718.
Wood, D. J., & Jones, R. E. (1995). Stakeholder mismatching: A theoretical problem in empirical research on corporate social performance. The International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 3, 229–267.CrossRef
Wood, D. J., Logsdon, J. M., Lewellyn, P. G., & Davenport, K. (2006). Global business citizenship. A transformative framework for ethics and sustainable capitalism. New York: M.E. Sharpe.
Yoon, Y., Gurhan-Canli, Z., & Schwarz, N. (2006). The effect of corporate social responsibility (CSR) activities on companies with bad reputations. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 16, 377–390.CrossRef
- Stakeholder-Defined Corporate Responsibility for a Pre-Credit-Crunch Financial Service Company: Lessons for How Good Reputations are Won and Lost
Journal of Business Ethics
Volume 105, Issue 3 , pp 337-356
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Corporate Responsibility
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. School of Management, Henley Business School, University of Reading, Greenlands, Henley-on-Thames, Oxfordshire, RG9 3AU, UK
- 2. School of Economics, University of Reading, Whiteknights, P.O. Box 217, Reading, Berkshire, RG6 6AH, UK