Skip to main content
Log in

The Mandatory Corporate Social Responsibility in Indonesia: Problems and Implications

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The adoption of the 2007 Indonesian Law No. 40 has created significant debate over the nature of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), namely, whether it is voluntary or mandatory. On the one hand, the adoption of such a law represents a legal recognition of the existence of CSR, and this clarification on the legal nature of a concept is necessary for understanding the obligation and responsibility. On the other hand, it has created much confusion surrounding its substance and procedures. This article tries to analyze the development and consequences of CSR under 2007 Indonesian Law No. 40, through the discussion of mandatory versus voluntary dichotomy. It is argued in this article that the mandatory nature of CSR is legitimate and therefore encouraged; however, in practice, this is problematic, as it not only requires a precise concept of interpretation of CSR and identification of the duty bearer and beneficiaries, but also an effective implementation mechanism and a means of verifying the impact.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Angus-Leppan, T., Metcalf, L. & Benn, S.: 2010, ‘Leadership Styles and CRC Practice: An Examination of Sensemaking, Institutional Drivers and CSR Leadership,’ Journal of Business Ethics, 93, 189 - 213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baxi, U.: 2005, ‘Market Fundamentalisms: Business Ethics at the Altar of Human Rights,’ Human Rights Law Review, 5:1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broberg, M. P.: 1996, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility in the European Communities – The Scandinavian Viewpoint,’ Journal of Business Ethics, 15(6), 615–622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chinkin, C.: 2003, ‘Normative Development in the International Legal System,’ In D. Shelton (Ed.) Commitment and Compliance (Oxford University Press, Oxford).

    Google Scholar 

  • Deva, S.: 2004a, ‘Acting Extraterritorial to Tame Multinational Corporations for Human Rights Violations: Who Should ‘Bell the Cat’?,’ Melbourne Journal of International Law, 5, 52-54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deva, S.: 2004b, ‘Relations of “Corporate Observance of Human Rights” to “Competitive Advantage”: An Economic Investigation’, APRU Doctoral Students Conference, University of Sydney.

  • IISD: 2004, The ISO and Corporate Social Responsibility, Issue Briefing Note: Perceptions and Definitions of Social Responsibility (International Institute for Sustainable Development), pp. 1–10.

  • Koestoer, Y. T.: 2007, Corporate Social Responsibility in Indonesia: Building Internal Corporate Values to Address Challenges in CSR Implementation (Good Corporate and Social Governance in Promoting ASEAN’s Regional Integration, Jakarta), pp. 1–11.

  • Lesmana, T.: 2007, ‘CSR untuk Kesejahteraan Rakyat’, Media Indonesia.

  • Maemunah, S.: 2007, ‘Negara Lemah, CSR Menguat’, Jatam.

  • Matten, D. & Moon, J.: 2005, ‘A Conceptual Framework for Understanding CSR,’ In A. Habisch, J. Jonker, M. Wegner & R. Schidpeter (Eds.) Corporate Social Responsibility Across Europe (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Heidelberg).

    Google Scholar 

  • Matten, D. & J. Moon: 2008, ‘”Implicit” and “Explicit” CSR: A Conceptual Framework for A Comparative Understanding of Corporate Social Responsibility,’ Academy of Management Review, 33(2), 404–424.

    Google Scholar 

  • Priyono, H.: 2 July 2007, ‘CSR – Charity or Democratic Accountability?’, The Jakarta Post. Jakarta.

  • Sedyono, C. H. 2007. ‘Corporate Social Responsibility in Indonesia.’ Jakarta: Indonesia Business Links.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sethi, S. P.: 2005, Effectiveness of Industry-Based Codes in Serving Public Interest – The Case of International Council on Mining and Metals (ICMM) (International Center for Corporate Accountability).

  • Széll, G.: 2004, ‘European Union – Japan: Corporate Social Responsibility & Changing Wage System – the Role of Trade Unions’, in Workshop on EU-Japan: Corporate Social Responsibility & Changing Wage System – The Role of Trade Unions (Sano Shoin Conference Centre, Tokyo).

  • Uriarte, D. A.: 2008, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility in the ASEAN Region’, in The LCF CSR Conference 2008 (Makati City, Philippines), pp. 1–11.

  • Vogel, D.: 2005, The Market for Virtue: The Potential and Limits of Corporate Social Responsibility (Brookings Institution Press,Washington D.C).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolff, F. & Barth, R. 2005. ‘Corporate Social Responsibility: Integrating a Business and Societal Governance Perspective.’ Berlin: RARE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wowoho, J.: 2009, Sinkronisasi Kebijakan Corporate Social Responsibility Dengan Hukum Pajak Sebagai Upaya Mewujudkan Kesejahteraan di Indonesia (Universitas Sebelas Maret), pp. 1–15.

  • Zerk, J. A.: 2006, Multinationals and Corporate Social Responsibility (Cambridge University Press,Cambridge).

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patricia Rinwigati Waagstein.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Waagstein, P.R. The Mandatory Corporate Social Responsibility in Indonesia: Problems and Implications. J Bus Ethics 98, 455–466 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0587-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0587-x

Keywords

Navigation