Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Multinational Oil Companies and the Adoption of Sustainable Development: A Resource-Based and Institutional Theory Interpretation of Adoption Heterogeneity

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Sustainable development is often framed as a social issue to which corporations should pay attention because it offers both opportunities and challenges. Through the use of institutional theory and the resource-based view of the firm, we shed some light on why, more than 20 years after sustainable development was first introduced, we see neither the adoption of this business model as dominant nor its converse, that is the total abandonment of the model as unworkable and unprofitable. We focus on multinational corporations (MNCs) because they were among the organizations first called to take action. In order to illustrate the institutional pressures MNCs face and their strategic response to these pressures, we analysed four major oil and gas multinationals subject to similar sustainable development pressures – climate change, biodiversity, renewable energy development and social investment. We argue that normative and coercive isomorphism does not occur at the global level because sustainable development is largely a stakeholder-driven rather than a broad social pressure. That is, host country interpretation of sustainable development pressures varies across an MNC’s subsidiary network. Based on the analysis of the four major MNCs’ annual reports from 2000 to 2005, we argue that mimetic isomorphism may occur, but since it implies the use of complex and intangible resources, mimetic processes are slow, rare and discretionary.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abrahamson, E. and Hambrick, D. C.: 1997, ‘Attentional homogeneity in industries: The effect of discretion’, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18(7), 513-532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ansoff, H.: 1979, The changing shape of the strategic problem. In: D. E. Schendel and C. W. Hofer (eds), Strategic Management. A New View of Business Policy and Planning. Little, Brown & Company, Boston, pp. 23-44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arora, S. and Cason, T.: 1995, ‘An experiment in voluntary environmental regulation: Participation in epa’s 33/50 program’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 28(3), 271-286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bansal, P. (2005) Evolving sustainably: A longitudinal study of corporate sustainable development. Strategic Management Journal 26(3):197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barker, G., G. Smith, F. Vacas, E. Swingholm, R. Yuill and M. Aleman: 1997, ‘Managing Nontechnical Risks Associated with Seismic Operations in the Tropical Rain Forest of Ecuador’, Oil & Gas Journal 95(16), 50–60.

  • Barney, J. B.: 1991, ‘Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage’, Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barney, J.: 2001, ‘Resource-based theories of competitive advantage: A ten year retrospective on the resource-based view’, Journal of Management, 27(6), 643–650.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barney, J.: 2002, Gaining and sustaining competitive advantage (Prentice Hall: New Jersey).

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrera-Hernandez, L., Lucas, A., McCoy, E. and McCready, J.: 2000, Energy and environmental law in latin america & the caribbean: Legislative inventory & analysis.. (OLADE, University of Calgary, CIDA: Quito).

    Google Scholar 

  • Barret, S.: 1991, ‘Environmental regulation for competitive advantage’, Business Strategy Review, 2(1), 1-15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beardsley, T.: 1988, ‘Winds of change’, Scientific American, 259(3), 18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bettman, J. R. and Weitz, B. A.: 1983, ‘Attributions in the board room: Causal reasoning in corporate annual reports’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 28(2), 165-183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buysse, K. and Verbeke, A.: 2003, ‘Proactive environmental strategies: A stakeholder management perspective’, Strategic Management Journal, 24(5), 453-470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A.: 1979, ‘A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance’, Academy of Management Review, 4(4), 497-505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaffee, E. E.: 1985, ‘Three models of strategy’, Academy of Management Review, 10(1), 89-98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, M. J. and Hambrick, D.: 1995, ‘Speed, stealth, and selective attack: How small firms differ from large firms in competitive behavior’, Academy of Management Journal, 38(2), 453-482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christmann, P.: 2000, ‘Effects of “Best practices” Of environmental management on cost advantage: The role of complementary assets’, Academy of Management Journal, 43(4), 663-680.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarkson, M. E.: 1995, ‘A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance’, Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 92-117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collis, D. and Montgomery, C.: 1995, ‘Competing on resources: Strategy in the 1990s.’, Harvard Business Review, 73(4), 118-130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cormier, D., I. Gordon and M. Magnan: 2004, Corporate environmental disclosure: Contrasting management’s perceptions with reality. Journal of Business Ethics, 49(2), 143-165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dierickx, I. and Cool, K.: 1989, ‘Asset stock accumulation and the sustainability of competitive advantage: Reply’, Management Science, 35(12), 1514-1511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, P. and Powell, W.: 1983, ‘The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields’, American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147-160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dirsmith, M. W. and Covaleski, M. A.: 1983, ‘Strategy, external communication and environmental context’, Strategic Management Journal, 4(2), 137-151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duriau, V., Reger, R. and Pfarrer, M.: 2007, ‘A content analysis of the content analysis literature in organization studies: Research themes, data sources, and methodological refinements’, Organizational Research Methods, 10(1), 5-34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elkington J. (1998) Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st century business. New Society, Stony Creek, CT.

    Google Scholar 

  • ENDS: 2008, ‘EU Makes Economic Case to Halt ‘Unprecedented’ Rate of Biodiversity Loss’, ENDS (Environmental Data Services), (401), 54–56.

  • Fiol, M.: 1995, ‘Corporate communications: Comparing executives’ private and public statements’, Academy of Management Journal, 38(2), 522-537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foreign Affairs: 2008, ‘Winds of change’, Foreign Affairs, 87(2), 8-9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R., E: 1984, Strategic management: Stakeholder approach (Pitman: Boston).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gjertsen, H. and Barrett, C. B.: 2004, ‘Context-dependent biodiversity conservation management regimes: Theory and simulation’, Land Economics, 80(3), 323-339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gladwin, T., Kennelly, J. and Krause, T.-S.: 1995, ‘Shifting paradigms for sustainable development: Implications for management theory and research’, Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 874-907.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant, R.: 1991, ‘The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: Implications for strategy formulation’, California Management Review, 33(3), 114-135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grigg, A.: 2007, ‘Biodiversity and the Extractive Industry: Innovative Practices and Remaining Challenges’, Greener Management International, (52), 63–76.

  • Hall, R.: 1992, ‘The strategic analysis of intangible resources’, Strategic Management Journal, 13(2), 135-144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, R.: 1993, ‘A framework linking intangible resources and capabilities to sustainable competitive advantage’, Strategic Management Journal, 14(13), 607-618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, J. and Vredenburg, H.: 2003, ‘The challenges of sustainable development innovation’, MIT Sloan Management Review, 45(1), 61-68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, S.: 1995, ‘A natural resource-based-view of the firm’, Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 986-1014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, S.: 1997, ‘Beyond greening: Strategies for a sustainable world’, Harvard Business Review, 75(1), 66-76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, S. and Ahuja, G.: 1996, ‘Does it pay to be green? An empirical examination of the relationship between emission reduction and firm performance’, Business Strategy and the Environment, 5, 30-37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, S. and Milstein, M.: 2003, ‘Creating sustainable value’, Academy of Management Executive, 17(2), 56-69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, S. and Sharma, S.: 2004, ‘Engaging fringe stakeholders for competitive imagination’, Academy of Management Executive, 18(1), 7-18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawken, P. (1994) The ecology of commerce: A declaration of sustainability. HarperBusiness, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henriques, I. and Sadorsky, P.: 1996, ‘The determinants of an environmentally responsive firm: An empirical approach’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 30(3), 381-395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henriques, I. and Sadorsky, P.: 1999, ‘The relationship between environmental commitment and managerial perceptions of stakeholder importance’, Academy of Management Journal, 42(1), 87-99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hinings, B. and Greenwood, R.: 1988,The normative prescription of organizations, in Zucker, Institutional patterns and organizations: Culture and environment. Ballinger, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higginson, N. and H. Vredenburg: 2010, `Collaborating for Sustainability: Strategic Knowledge Networks, Natural Resource Management and Regional Development', International Journal of Sustainable Economy 2(3), 334–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman A. (2001) From heresy to dogma: An institutional history of corporate environmentalism. Stanford Business Books, Stanford, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Idahosa, P.: 2002, ‘Business ethics and development in conflict (zones): The case of talisman oil’, Journal of Business Ethics, 39(3), 227-247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Energy Agency: 2005, Key World Energy Statistics: International Energy Agency

  • International Organization for Standardization: 2009, Iso Survey 2008 – Principal Findings (ISO, Geneva), www.Iso.Org/iso/survey2008.Pdf. Accessed 16 April 2010.

  • Jauch, L., Osborn, R. and Martin, T.: 1980, ‘Structured content analysis of cases: A complementary method for organizational research’, The Academy of Management Review 5(4), 517–525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kabanoff, B. and Brown, S. (2008) Knowledge structures of prospectors, analyzers, and defenders: Content, structure, stability, and performance. Strategic Management Journal, 29(2), 149–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, A. and Lenox, M.: 2000, ‘Industry self-regulation without sanctions: The chemical industry’s responsible care program’, Academy of Management Journal, 43(4), 698-716.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klassen, R. and McLaughin, C., P: 1996, ‘The impact of environmental management on firm performance’, Management Science, 42(8), 1199-1214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knott, D.: 1997, ‘Royal Dutch/Shell Reinventing Itself as Total Energy Company’, Oil & Gas Journal 95(97), 29–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolk A., Walhain S., Wateringen, S. v. d.: 2001, ‘Environmental reporting by the fortune global 250: Exploring the influence of nationality and sector’, Business Strategy and the Environment, 10(1), 15–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kondra, A. and Hinings, C.: 1998, ‘Organizational diversity and change in institutional theory’, Organization Studies, 19(5), 743-767.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konrad, A., Steurer, R., Langer, M. and Martinuzzi, A.: 2006, ‘Empirical findings on business–society relations in Europe’, Journal of Business Ethics, 63(1), 89–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krauss, C. and J. A. D. Mouawad: 2009, ‘Oil Industry is Stressing Cooperation on Climate’, New York Times, p. 3.

  • LaGrega, M., P. Buckingham, J. Evans (1994). Hazardous Waste Management. McGraw Hill, New York, pp. 1–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loza, J.: 2004, ‘Business-community partnerships: The case for community organization capacity building’, Journal of Business Ethics, 53(3), 297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madsen, B. T.: 2000, ‘Energy’s wind of change’, UNESCO Courier, 53(3), 9-10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mascaenhas, B. and Aaker, D.: 1989, ‘Mobility barriers and strategic groups’, Strategic Management Journal, 10(5), 475-585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGee, J. and Thomas, H.: 1986, ‘Strategic groups: Theory, research and taxonomy’, Strategic Management Journal, 7(2), 141-160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McPhail, K. and A. Davy: 1998, ‘Integrating Social Concerns into Private Sector Decisionmaking. A Review of Corporate Practices in the Mining, Oil, and Gas Sectors’, World Bank Discussion Paper No. 384.

  • Meyer, J. and Rowan, B.: 1977, ‘Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony’, American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340-363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D. and Chen, M.-J.: 1996, ‘The simplicity of competitive repertoires: An empirical analysis’, Strategic Management Journal, 17(6), 419-439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MintGlobal database – MintGlobal Bureau van Dijk: 2008, Retrieved June 4, 2009

  • Mintzberg, H., Ahlstrand, B. and Lampel, J.: 1998, Strategy safari: A guided tour through the wilds of strategic management. The Free Press: New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moser, T.: 2001, ‘Mncs and sustainable business practice: The case of the colombian and peruvian petroleum industries’, World Development, 29(2), 291-309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nidumolu, R., Prahalad, C. K. and Rangaswami, M. R.: 2009, ‘Why sustainability is now the key driver of innovation’, Harvard Business Review, 87(9), 56-64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Offstein, E. and Gnyawali, D.: 2005, ‘Firm competitive behavior as a determinant of CEO pay: Empirical evidence from the us pharmaceutical industry’, Journal of Managerial Psychology, 20(5/6), 335-354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, C.: 1991, ‘Strategic response to institutional processes’, Academy of Management Review, 18(1), 145-179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, J. D., Charles, I. S. and Arkalgud, R.: 2001, ‘Strategic groups and competitive enactment: A study of dynamic relationships between mental models and performance’, Strategic Management Journal, 22(5), 435–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Payne, D. and Raiborn, C.: 2001, ‘Sustainable development: The ethics support the economics’, Journal of Business Ethics, 32(2), 157-168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, D.: 2005, ‘Paradoxes in biodiversity conservation’, World Economics, 6(3), 57-69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petersen, H. and Vredenburg, H.: 2009, ‘Morals or economics? Institutional investor preferences for corporate social responsibility’, Journal of Business Ethics, 90(1), 1–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pettus, M.: 2001, ‘The resource-based view as a developmental growth process: Evidence from the deregulated trucking industry’, Academy of Management Journal, 44(4), 878-895.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. and van der Linde, C.: 1995, ‘Green and competitive: Ending the stalemate’, Harvard Business Review, 73(5): 120-134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prahalad, C. and Hamel, G.: 1990, ‘The core competence of the corporation’, Harvard Business Review, 68(3):91-97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raisch, S. and von Krogh, G.: 2007, ‘Navigating a path to smart growth’, MIT Sloan Management Review, 48(3), 65-72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajagopalan, N. and Spreitzer, G. M.: 1997, ‘Torward a theory of strategic change: A multi-lens perspective and integrative framework’, The Academy of Management Review, 22(1), 48-79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rajvanshi, A.: 2005, ‘Strengthening biodiversity conservation through community-oriented development projects: Environmental review of the india ecodevelopment project’, Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy & Management, 7(2), 299-325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Redclift, M.: 1987, Sustainable development. Exploring the contradiction (Methuen: London and New York).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Reinhardt, F.: 1998, ‘Environmental product differentiation: Implications for corporate strategy’, California Management Review, 40(4), 43-73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, D.: 2007, ‘China: Wind Power’s New Force’, Business Week Online, p. 22.

  • Rugman, A. and Verbeke, A.: 1998a, ‘Corporate strategies and environmental regulations: An organizing framework’, Strategic Management Journal, 19(4), 363-375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rugman, A. and Verbeke, A.: 1998b, ‘Corporate strategy and international environmental policy’, Journal of International Business Studies, 29(4), 819-833.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salancik, G. R. and Meindl, J. R.: 1984, ‘Corporate attributions as strategic illusions of management control’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 29(2), 238-254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, S. and Henriques, I.: 2005, ‘Stakeholder influences on sustainability practices in the canadian forest products industry’, Strategic Management Journal, 26(2), 159–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, S. and Vredenburg, H.: 1998, ‘Proactive corporate environmental strategy and the development of competitively valuable organizational capabilities’, Strategic Management Journal, 19(18), 729-753.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, S., Vredenburg, H. and Westley, F.: 1994, ‘Strategic bridging: A role for the multinational corporation in third world development’, Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 30(4), 458-476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shrivastava, P.: 1995b, ‘Environmental technologies and competitive advantage’, Strategic Management Journal, 16, 183-200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shrivastava, P. and Hart, S.: 1995, ‘Creating sustainable corporations’, Business Strategy and the Environment, 4(3), 154-165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stead, J. and Stead, E.: 2000, ‘Eco-enterprise strategy: Standing for sustainability’, Journal of Business Ethics, 24(4), 313-329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steurer, R., Langer, M., Konrad, A. and Martinuzzi, A.: 2005, ‘Corporations, stakeholders and sustainable development i: A theoretical exploration of business–society relations’, Journal of Business Ethics, 61(3), 263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sweeney, L. and Coughlan, J.: 2008, ‘Do different industries report corporate social responsibility differently? An investigation through the lens of stakeholder theory’, Journal of Marketing Communications, 14(2), 113-124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Economist: 2008, ‘Winds of change’, Economist, 389(8609), 22-25.

    Google Scholar 

  • The World Bank: 2000, Greening industry: New roles for communities, markets and governments. (Oxford University Press: New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ugochukwu, C. N. C. and Ertel, J. r.: 2008, ‘Negative impacts of oil exploration on biodiversity management in the niger delta area of nigeria’, Impact Assessment & Project Appraisal, 26(2), 139-147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations: 1992, World investment report (United Nations Publications: New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • van Marrewijk, M. and Werre, M.: 2003, ‘Multiple levels of corporate sustainability’, Journal of Business Ethics, 44(2-3), 107-119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vredenburg, H. and F. Westley: 2002, Sustainable Development Leadership in Three Contexts: Managing For Global Competitiveness. In P. N. Nemetz (eds), Bringing Business on Board: Sustainable Development and the B-School Curriculum. JBA Press, Vancouver, pp. 239–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wackernagel, M. and Rees, W.: 1996, Our ecological footprint (New Society Bublishers: Gabriola Island).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wasserstorm, R. and Reider, S.: 1997a, ‘Lessons from conoco’s experiences in ecuador’s rain forest’, Oil & Gas Journal, 95(33), 24-25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wasserstorm, R. and Reider, S.: 1997b, ‘Oil firms in environmentally sensitive areas learing to balance stakholder interests’, Oil & Gas Journal, 95(33), 23-27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber R. (1990) Basic content analysis. Sage, Newbury Park, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wernerfelt, B.: 1984, ‘A resource-based view of the firm’, Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 171-180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westley, F. and Vredenburg, H.: 1991, ‘Strategic bridging: The collaboration between environmentalist and business in the marketing of green products’, Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 27(1), 65-90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westley, F. and Vredenburg, H.: 1996, ‘Sustainability and the corporation. Criteria for aligning economic practice with environmental protection’, Journal of Management Inquiry, 5(2), 104-119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westley, F. and Vredenburg, H.: 1997, ‘Interorganizational collaboration and the preservation of global biodiversity’, Organization Science, 8(4), 381-403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westney, D. E.: (1993). Institutionalization Theory and the Multinational Corporation. In S. Ghoshal and E. D. Westney (eds), Organization Theory and the Multinational Corporation. St. Martin’s Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Commission on Environment and Development: 1987, Our common future (Oxford University Press: Oxford).

    Google Scholar 

  • World Resources Institute: 2002, Emerging Environmental Risks and Shareholder Value in the Oil and Gas Industry

  • Zucker, L.: 1987, ‘Institutional theories of organizations’, Annual Review of Sociology, 13(1), 443-464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Management, University of Lethbridge, Lethbridge, AB, Canada

    Luis Fernando Escobar

  2. Haskayne School of Business, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada

    Harrie Vredenburg

Authors
  1. Luis Fernando Escobar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Harrie Vredenburg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luis Fernando Escobar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Escobar, L.F., Vredenburg, H. Multinational Oil Companies and the Adoption of Sustainable Development: A Resource-Based and Institutional Theory Interpretation of Adoption Heterogeneity. J Bus Ethics 98, 39–65 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0534-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0534-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation