Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Corporate Responsibility for Economic, Social and Cultural Rights: Rights in Search of a Remedy?

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It is no longer a revelation that companies have some responsibility to uphold human rights. However, delineating the boundaries of the relationship between business and human rights is more vexed. What is it that we are asking corporations to assume responsibility for and how far does that responsibility extend? This article focuses on the extent to which economic, social and cultural rights fall within a corporation’s sphere of responsibility. It then analyses how corporations may be held accountable for violations of such rights. Specifically, the article considers the use of soft law as a protective mechanism; it also details how victims of harmful corporate behaviour are using litigation (pursuant to ATCA and common law domestic causes of action) to seek redress and recognition of the harms they have directly or indirectly experienced. The article concludes with an analysis of Professor Ruggie’s (the United Nations Special Representative on the issue of transnational corporations and human rights) 2008 and 2009 Reports in which it is suggested that a respect-based framework must be interpreted as imposing proactive requirements on companies to prevent the infringement of human rights. Future efforts must also be directed towards the recognition of a specialised complementary corporate responsibility to protect human rights.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Bibliography

Books

  • O’Neill, O.: 1996, Towards Justice and Virtue: A Constructive Account of Practical Reasoning (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).

    Google Scholar 

  • Raz, J.: 1986, The Morality of Freedom, (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tushnet, M.: 2008, Weak Courts, Strong Rights: Judicial Review and Social Welfare Rights in Comparative Constitutional Law, (Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey).

    Google Scholar 

Chapters

  • Eide A 2001 ‘Economic, Social and Cultural Rights as Human Rights’. In: A. Eide, C. Krause and A. Rosas (Ed.), Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. Martinus Nijhoff: The Hague, Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eide, A. and A. Rosas: 2001, ‘Economic, Social and Cultural Rights: A Universal Challenge’, in A. Eide, C. Krause and A. Rosas (eds.), Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, Netherlands), 38 pp

  • Gao, Z., G. Akpan and J. Vanjik: 2002, ‘Public Participation in Mining and Petroleum in Asia and the Pacific: The Ok Tedi Case and its Implications’. In: D. Zillman, A. Lucas and G. Pring (Ed.), Human Rights in Natural Resource Development. Oxford University Press: Oxford UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Handl, G.: 2001, ‘Human Rights and Protection of the Environment’, in A. Eide, C. Krause and A. Rosas (eds.), Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, Netherlands), pp. 303–330

  • Jagers, N.: 1999, ‘The Legal Status of the Multinational Corporation Under International Law’. In: M. K. Addo (Ed.), Human Rights Standards and the Responsibility of Transnational Corporations. Kluwer Law International: The Hague Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langford, M. and B. Thiele: 2005, ‘Introduction’. In: J. Squires, M. Langford and B. Thiele (Ed.), The Road to a Remedy: Current Issues in the Litigation of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. Australian Human Rights Centre University of New South Wales: Sydney.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liebenberg, S.: 2001, ‘The Protection of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights in Domestic Legal Systems’. In: A. Eide, C. Krause and A. Rosas (Ed.), Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. Martinus Nijhoff: The Hague, Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, C.: 2001, ‘Multinational Enterprises and Emergent Jurisprudence on Violations of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights’. In: A. Eide, C. Krause and A. Rosas (Ed.), Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. Martinus Nijhoff The Hague: Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sunstein, C. R.: 1996, ‘Against Positive Rights’. In: A. Sajó and K. Lauer (Ed.), Western Rights? Post-Communist Applications. Kluwer Law International, The Hague Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

Journal articles

  • Anderson, M.: 2002, ‘Transnational Corporations and Environmental Damage: Is Tort Law the Answer?’, Washburn Law Journal 41(3), 399-426.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frynas, J.G.: 2004, ‘Social and environmental litigation against transnational firms in Africa’, Journal of Modern African Studies 42(3), 363-88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsu, P-Y.: 2004, ‘Should Congress Repeal the Alien Tort Claims Act?’, Southern Illinois University Law Journal 28(3), 579-98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinley, D. and R. Chambers: 2006, ‘The UN Human Rights Norms for Corporations: The Private Implications of Public International Law’, Human Rights Law Review 6(3), 447-97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kinley, D. and J. Nolan: 2008, ‘Trading and Aiding in Human Rights: Corporations in the Global Economy’, Nordic Journal of Human Rights Law, 4, 353-77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinley, D. and J. Tadaki: 2003–2004, ‘From Talk to Walk: The Emergence of Human Rights Responsibilities for Corporations at International Law’, Virginia Journal of International Law 44(4), 931–1023

  • Letner Cerkic, J.: 2008, ‘Corporate Responsibility for Human Rights: A Critical Analysis of the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises’, Hanse Law Review 3(1), 71-100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liebenberg, S.: 2005, ‘The value of human dignity in interpreting socio-economic rights’. South African Journal on Human Rights 21: 1-31.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCorquodale, R. and P. Simons: 2007, ‘Responsibility Beyond Borders: State Responsibility for Extraterritorial Violations by Corporations of International Human Rights Law’, Modern Law Review 70(4), 598-625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muchlinski, P.: 1987, ‘The Bhopal Case: Controlling Ultrahazardous Industrial Activities Undertaken by Foreign Investors’, Modern Law Review 50(5), 545-587.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ratner, S. R.: 2001, ‘Corporations and Human Rights: A Theory of Legal Responsibility’, Yale Law Journal 111(3), 443-545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roth, K.: 2004, ‘Defending Economic, Social and Cultural Rights: Practical Issues Faced by an International Human Rights Organization’, Human Rights Quarterly 26(1), 63-73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steinhardt, R. G.: 2007–2008, ‘Soft Law, Hard Markets: Competitive Self-Interest and the Emergence of Human Rights Responsibilities for Multinational Corporations’, Brookings Journal of International Law 33(3), 933–953

  • Stephens, B.: 2002, ‘Translating Filártiga: A Comparative and International Law Analysis of Domestic Remedies for International Human Rights Violations’, Yale Journal of International Law 27, 1-57.

    Google Scholar 

Reports

  • Amnesty International: 2000, ‘Business and Human Rights in a Time of Change’

  • Amnesty International: 2004, ‘Clouds of Injustice: Bhopal Disaster 20 Years on’

  • Amnesty International: 2008, ‘Submission to the Special Representative of the Secretary-General on the Issue of Human Rights and Transnational Corporations and Other Business Enterprises’

  • Amnesty International and Pax Christi International: 2000, ‘Multinational Enterprises and Human Rights’

  • Australian Law Reform Commission: 2003, ‘Report No. 102: Sentencing – Corporate Offenders’

  • De Schutter, O.: 2006, ‘Extraterritorial Jurisdiction as a Tool for Improving the Human Rights Accountability of Transnational Corporations’

  • EarthRights International: 2006, ‘Transnational Litigation Manual for Human Rights and Environmental Cases in United States Courts’

  • EarthRights International, Racimos de Ungurahui and Amazon Watch: 2007, ‘A Legacy of Harm: Occidental Petroleum in Indigenous Territory in the Peruvian Amazon’

  • Gordon, K. and M. Miyake: 2000, ‘Deciphering Codes of Corporate Conduct: A Review of Their Contents’, OECD Working Papers on International Investment, No. 1999/2

  • International Institute for Environment and Development: 2003, ‘Legal Issues in Corporate Citizenship’

  • International Network for Economic, Social and Cultural Rights Corporate Accountability Working Group: 2005, ‘Consultation on Human Rights and the Extractive Industry’

Newspaper, magazine and internet articles

Cases

  • Aguinda v Texaco, Inc, 945 F Supp 625 (SDNY, 1996)

  • Aguinda v Texaco, Inc, 142 F Supp 2d 534 (SDNY, 2001)

  • Aguinda v Texaco, Inc, 303 F 3d 470 (2d 2002)

  • Bano v Union Carbide, 2000 WL 1225789 (DC SDNY, 2000)

  • Bano v Union Carbide, 273 F 3d 120 (2d Cir, 2001)

  • Bano v Union Carbide, 2003 WL 1344884 (DC SDNY, 2003)

  • Bano vUnion Carbide, 361 F 3d 696 (2d Cir, 2004)

  • Bano v Union Carbide, 198 F App’x 32 (2d Cir, 2006)

  • Beanal v Freeport-McMoran Inc, 969 F Supp 362 (DC EDLA, 1997)

  • Beanal v Freeport-McMoran Inc, 197 F 3d 161 (5th Cir, 1999)

  • Case Concerning the Barcelona Traction, Light and Power Company Limited (New Application: 1962) (Belgium v Spain) [1970] ICJ Rep 3

  • Case Concerning the Gabcikovo-Nagymaros Project (Hungary v Slovakia) 25 September 1997, ICJ Rep 7

  • Connelly v RTZ [1996] QB 361 (CA)

  • Connelly v RTZ [1998] AC 854 (HL).

  • Dagi v BHP [1995] 1 VR 428

  • Doe v Unocal, 963 F Supp 880 (CD Cal, 1997)

  • Doe I v Unocal, 395 F 3d 932 (9th Cir, 2002)

  • Doe v Unocal Corp, WL 359787 (9th Cir, 2003)

  • Dow Chemicals Co vCastro-Alfaro, 786 SW 2d 674 (S Ct Texas, 1990)

  • Ex parte Chairperson of the Constitutional Assembly: In re Certification of the Republic of South Africa, 1996 (4) SA 744 (CC)

  • Flores v Southern Peru Copper Corp, 343 F 3d 140 (2003)

  • Guerra v Italy, Judgment of 19 February 1998, ECtHR, Report of Judgments and Decisions 1998-I, No. 64

  • In re Agent Orange Product Liability Litigation, 373 F Supp 2d 7 (DC EDNY, 2005)

  • In re Union Carbide Corp Gas Plant Disaster at Bhopal, India, 634 F Supp 867 (DC SDNY, 1986)

  • In re Union Carbide Corp. Gas Plant Disaster at Bhopal, India, 809 F 2d 195 (2d Cir, 1987)

  • Iwanowa v Ford MotorCo 67 F Supp 2d (DNJ, 1999)

  • Kadic v Karadzic, 70 F 3rd 232 (2d Cir, 1995)

  • Lopez-Ostra v Spain, Judgment of 9 December 1994, Publications of the European Court of Human Rights, Series A, No. 303-C

  • Lubbe v Cape plc, [1998] CLC 1559 (CA)

  • Lubbe v Cape plc, [2000] 4 All ER 268 (HL)

  • Minister of Health v Treatment Action Campaign, 2002 (5) SA 721 (CC)

  • Presbyterian Church of Sudan v Talisman Energy 244 F Supp 2d 289 (SDNY, 2003)

  • Presbyterian Church of Sudan v Talisman Energy No. 01 Civ 9882, 2005 WL 2082847 (SDNY, 2005)

  • Republic of South Africa v Grootboom, 2001 (1) SA 46 (CC)

  • Sequihua v Texaco 847 F Supp 61 (SD Texas, 1994)

  • Sosa v Alvarez-Machain 542 US 2739 (US S Ct, 2004)

  • Tomas Mayna Carijano v Occidental Petroleum Corp, CV 07-5068 PSG-PJW (DC CDC, 15 April 2008)

  • Vietnam Association for Victims of Agent Orange/Dioxin v Dow Chemical Co, Docket No. 05-1953-cv, 22 February 2008

  • Voth v Manildra Flour Mills (1990) 171 CLR 538

Conventions, UN documents and other international instruments

  • 1968Brussels Convention on Jurisdiction and the Enforcement of Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters 27 September 1968 [revised and consolidated version published in 1998 OJ (C27/1)]

  • 1988 Additional Protocol to the American Convention on Human Rights in the Area of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, OAS Treaty Series 69 (entered into force 17 November 1988)

  • Commission on Human Rights Dec 2004/116, Responsibilities of Transnational Corporations and Related Business Enterprises with Regard to Human Rights, UN Doc E/CN.4/Dec/2004/116 (20 April 2004)

  • Commission on Human Rights, Res 2005/69, Human Rights and Transnational Corporations and Other Business Enterprises, UN Doc E/CN.4/RES/2005/69 (20 April 2005)

  • Committee on Civil and Political Rights, General Comment 6: The Right to Life (Art. 6): 30/04/1982, UN Doc E/1996/22

  • Committee on Civil and Political Rights, General Comment 31: Nature of the General Legal Obligation Imposed on States Parties to the Covenant: 26/05/2004, UN Doc CCPR/C/21/Rev.1/Add.13

  • Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, General Comment 14: The Right to the Highest Attainable Standard of Health: 11/08/2000, UN Doc E/C.12/2000/4

  • Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights General Comment 15: The Right to Water: 20/01/2003, UN Doc E/C.12/2002/11

  • Convention on the Elimination of all Forms of Racial Discrimination opened for signature 21 December 1965, 660 UNTS 195 (entered into force 4 January 1969)

  • Convention on the Rights of the Child, opened for signature 20 November 1989, 1577 UNTS 3 (entered into force 2 September 1990)

  • European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, ETS No. 5 (1950)

  • ILO Convention No. 87 Concerning Freedom of Association and Protection of the Right to Organise, opened for signature 9 July 1948, 68 UNTS 17 (entered into force 4 July 1950)

  • ILO Convention No. 155 Concerning Occupational Safety and Health Convention, 1981, opened for signature 22 June 1981, 1331 UNTS 279 (entered into force 11 August 1983)

  • International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights 1976, opened for signature 16 December 1966, 999 UNTS 171 (entered into force 23 March).

  • International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights 1976, opened for signature 16 December 1966, 999 UNTS 3 (entered into force 3 January).

  • International Law Commission, Draft Code of Offences Against the Peace and Security of Mankind, UN Doc A/CN.4/SER.A/1985/Add.1

  • Maastricht Guidelines on Violations of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, Maastricht, January 22–26, 1997

  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises (2000)

  • Report of the Open-Ended Working Group on an Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights on Its Fifth Session (Geneva, 4–8 February and 31 March to 4 April 2008), Promotion and Protection of all Human Rights, Civil, Political, Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, Including the Right to Development, UN Doc A/HRC/8/7

  • Rio Declaration on Environment and Development, 1992, 31 ILM 874

  • Ruggie, J.: 2006, ‘Interim Report of the Special Representative of the Secretary-General on the Issue of Human Rights and Transnational Corporations and Other Business Enterprises’, UN Doc E/CN.4/2006/97 (22 February 2006)

  • Ruggie, J.: 2007, ‘Business and Human Rights: Mapping International Standards of Responsibility and Accountability for Corporate Acts’, Report of the Special Representative of the Secretary-General on the Issue of Human Rights and Transnational Corporations and Other Business Enterprises, UN Doc A/HRC/4/35 (9 February 2007)

  • Ruggie, J.: 2008, ‘Protect, Respect and Remedy: A Framework for Business and Human Rights’, Report of the Special Representative of the Secretary-General on the Issue of Human Rights and Transnational Corporations and Other Business Enterprises, UN Doc A/HRC/8/5 (7 April 2008)

  • Ruggie, J.: 2009, ‘Business and Human Rights: Towards Operationalizing the “Protect, Respect and Remedy” Framework’, Report of the Special Representative of the Secretary-General on the Issue of Human Rights and Transnational Corporations and Other Business Enterprises, UN Doc A/HRC/11/13 (22 April 2009)

  • Stockholm Declaration on the Human Environment, 1972, UN Doc A/CONF.48/14/Rev.1

  • United Nations, Declaration on the Right to Development, GA Res 41/128 (4 December 1986)

  • United Nations Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC), Sub-Commission on the Protection and Promotion of Human Rights, Norms on the Responsibilities of Transnational Corporations and Other Business Enterprises with Regard to Human Rights, U.N. Doc. E/CN.4/Sub.2/2003/12/Rev.2 (26 August 2003)

  • United Nations General Assembly, Draft International Covenant on Human Rights and Measures of Implementation: Future Work of the Commission on Human Rights, GA Res 421(V), UN GAOR, 5th Session (4 December 1950)

  • United Nations General Assembly, Universal Declaration of Human Rights, adopted 10 December 1948, GA Res 217 A (III), UN GAOR, 3rd Session, UN Doc A/810 (1948)

  • World Conference on Human Rights, Vienna Declaration and Programme of Action UN Doc A/CONF.157/23 (12 July 1993)

Other

  • Meeran, R.: 2003, ‘Corporations, Human Rights and Transnational Litigation’, http://www.law.monash.edu.au/castancentre/events/2003/meeranpaper.html.

  • Weissbrodt, D.: 2008, ‘International Standard-Setting on the Human Rights Responsibilities of Business’ (Speech delivered at the Stefan A. Riesenfeld Symposium, Berkeley, California, 14 March 2008)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Law, University of NSW, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia

    Justine Nolan & Luke Taylor

Authors
  1. Justine Nolan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Luke Taylor
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Justine Nolan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nolan, J., Taylor, L. Corporate Responsibility for Economic, Social and Cultural Rights: Rights in Search of a Remedy?. J Bus Ethics 87 (Suppl 2), 433–451 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0295-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0295-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation