Abstract
Previous research on the impacts of global trade on Mexican companies showed that the family remained the basic institutional model. Since then, however, Mexico’s economy has become the most open economy in Latin America with a rising percentage of university-educated workers. As a middle-income country unable to provide the cheapest labor in the world, Mexico may yet benefit from globalization by entering the global knowledge economy. In semi-structured interviews with eight university-educated knowledge workers from Cuernavaca, Mexico, this exploratory study looked for evidence of change and adaptation. The interviews raised questions about factors that may prolong or curtail the future pervasiveness of patriarchal business practices. It was hypothesized that merit-based hiring and promotion have become highly valued, while the social responsibility of nepotism is being questioned. The article presents several additional hypotheses about the changes that may be taking place in Mexican business practices.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Beugelsdijk, S., and S. Smulders: 2004, ‘Bridging and Bonding Social Capital: Which Type Is Good for Economic Growth?’, in W. Arts, J. Hagenaars and L. Halman (eds.), The Cultural Diversity of European Unity. Findings, Explanations and Reflections from the European Values Study (Brill, Leiden, Netherlands), pp. 147-184.
Carr, C.: 2005, ‘Are German, Japanese and Anglo-Saxon Strategic Decision Styles Still Divergent in the Context of Globalization?’. Journal of Management Studies, 42(6), 1155-1188.
Chrisman, J. J., J. H. Chua, F. W. Kellermanns, and E. P. C. Chang: 2007, ‘Are Family Managers Agents or Stewards? An Exploratory Study in Privately Held Family Firms’, Journal of Business Research, 60(10), 1030-1038.
Corbetta, G. and C. Salvato: 2004, ‘Self-Serving or Self-Actualizing? Models of Man and Agency Costs in Different Types of Family Firms: A Commentary on ‘Comparing the Agency Costs of Family and Non-family Firms: Conceptual Issues and Exploratory Evidence,’ Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 28(4), 355-362.
Davis, J. H., F. D. Schoorman, and L. Donaldson: 1997, ‘Towards a Stewardship Theory of Management, Academy of Management Review, 22(1), 20-47.
Delhey, J. and K. Newton: 2005, ‘Predicting Cross-National Levels of Social Trust: Global Pattern or Nordic Exceptionalism?’. European Sociological Review, 21(4), 311-327.
DiMaggio, P. and W. W. Powell: 1983, ‘The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields,’ American Sociological Review, 48, 147-160.
Eisenhardt, K.: 1989, ‘Agency Theory: An Assessment and Review,’ Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 57-74.
Fox, J.: 1994, ‘The Difficult Transition from Clientelism to Citizenship: Lessons from Mexico,’ World Politics, 46(2), 151-184.
Fox, J.: 1996, ‘How Does Civil Society Thicken? The Political Construction of Social Capital in Rural Mexico,’ World Development 24(6), 1089-1103.
Garrett, G.: 2004, ‘Globalization’s Missing Middle,’ Foreign Affairs 83(6), 84-96.
Gittell, R. and A. Vidal: 1998, Community Organizing: Building Social Capital as a Development Strategy (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).
Granovetter, M. S.: 1973, ‘The Strength of Weak Ties,’ American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360-1380.
Howell, J. P., J. DelaCerda, S. M. Martínez, L. Prieto, J. A. Bautista, J. Ortiz, P. Dorfman, and M. J. Méndez: 2007, ‘Leadership and Culture in Mexico,’ Journal of World Business, 42(4), 449-462.
Hunt, R.: 1965, ‘The Developmental Cycle of the Family Business in Rural Mexico,’ in anonymous (ed.), Essays in Economic Anthropology: Dedicated to the Memory of Karl Polanyi (American Ethnological Society, distributed by University of Washington Press, Seattle, WA), pp. 54-79.
Kovriga, A.V.: 2001, ‘Urban Management and Local Government as New Institutions in the New Ukraine,’ International Journal of Public Administration, 24(2), 163-178.
Lomnitz, L.: 1982, ‘Horizontal and Vertical Relations and the Social Structure of Urban Mexico,’ Latin American Research Review, 17(2), 51-74.
Lomnitz, L. and M. Pérez-Lizaur: 1978, ‘The History of a Mexican Urban Family,’ Journal of Family History, 3(4), 392-409.
Lomnitz, L. and M. Pérez-Lizaur: 1987, A Mexican Elite Family, 1820-1980 (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).
Martínez, S. M.: 2006, ‘Institutional Transformation in an Emerging Economy: Mexican Business from 1995 through 1998’, Virtual Conference Presentation at Business as an Agent of World Benefit Global Forum, October 23–25, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Martínez, S. M. and P. F. Dorfman: 1998, ‘The Mexican Entrepreneur: An Ethnographic Study of the Mexico Empresario,’ International Studies in Management and Organization, 28(2), 97-123.
Martinsons, M.G. and R. M. Davison: 2007, ‘Strategic Decision Making and Support Systems: Comparing American, Japanese and Chinese Management,’ Decision Support Systems, 43(1), 284-300.
Mikênê, S., and A. Valackienê: 2007, ‘Changes of Work Model in Knowledge Society’, Economics and Management 12, 600–605.
Moreno-Dodson, B. and Q. Woden: 2007, Public Finance and Poverty Reduction (World Bank Publications, Washington, DC), p. 216.
Peter, L. J. and R. Hull: 1969, The Peter Principle (William Morrow and Company, New York).
Programa de las Naciones Unidas para el desarrollo: 2007, Informe sobre Desarrollo Humano México 2006-2007: Migración y Desarrollo Humano (Programa de las Naciones Unidas para el desarrollo, Ciudad de México), p. 23.
Realo, A., J. Allik and B. Greenfield: 2008, ‘Radius of Trust: Social Capital in Relation to Familism and Institutional Collectivism,’ Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 39(4), 447-462.
Rocha J., and L. E. DeGarate: 2009, ‘Interlocking Directorates and the Mexican Economic Elite: Financial and Sociological Considerations’, Paper Presented at Sunbelt XXIX, the Annual Conference of the International Network for Social Network Analysis, March 11–15, San Diego, California.
Rottenburg, R: 1996, ‘On Intercultural Translation,’ in B. Czarniawska and G. Sevon (eds.), Translating Organizational Change (Walter de Gruyter, Berlin), pp. 191-240.
Sharma, P.: 2008, ‘Commentary: Familiness: Capital Stocks and Flows between Family and Business,’ Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice 32(6), 971-977.
Weber, M.: 1978/1921, Economy and Society (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA).
Winkler, R.: 1997, ‘The Size and Some Effects of the Underground Economy in Mexico,’ in O. Lippert and M. Walker (eds.), The Underground Economy: Global Evidence of Its Size and Impact (The Fraser Institute, Vancouver).
Woolcock, M.: 2002, ‘Social Capital in Theory and Practice: Where do We Stand?’ in J. Isham, T. Kelly and S. Ramaswamy (eds.), Social Capital and Economic Development: Well-Being in Developing Countries (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK), pp. 18-39.
World Trade Organization: 2008, International Trade Statistics 2008 (WTO Publications, Geneva), p.12.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Boutilier, R. Globalization and the Careers of Mexican Knowledge Workers: An Exploratory Study of Employer and Worker Adaptations. J Bus Ethics 88 (Suppl 2), 319–333 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0284-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0284-9