Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Reflective Judgement: Understanding Entrepreneurship as Ethical Practice

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recently, the ethical rather than just the economic resonance of entrepreneurship has attracted attention with researchers highlighting entrepreneurship and ethics as interwoven processes of value creation and management. Recognising that traditional normative perspectives on ethics are limited in application in entrepreneurial contexts, this stream of research has theorised entrepreneurship and ethics as the pragmatic production of useful effects through the alignment of public–private values. In this article, we critique this view and use Kant’s concept of reflective judgement as discussed in his Critique of the Power of Judgement to theorise ethical entrepreneurial practice as the capacity to routinely break free from current conventions through the imaginative creation and use of self-legislating maxims. Through an analysis of the narratives of 12 entrepreneurs, we suggest there are three dimensions to reflective judgement in entrepreneurial contexts: (1) Social Performance; (2) Public Challenge and; (3) Personal Autonomy. Whilst the entrepreneurs were alive to the importance of commercial return, their narratives demonstrated further concern for, and commitment to, standards that they rationally and imaginatively felt as being appropriate. In our discussion, we integrate the findings into existing theoretical categories from entrepreneurship studies to better appreciate ethics within the context of value creation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aldrich, H.E. and C. M. Fiol: 1994, ‘Fools Rush In? ‘The Institutional Context of Industry Creation’, Academy of Management Review, 19(4), 645–670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, T., A. Miner and D. Eesley: 2003, ‘Improvising Firms: Bricolage, Account Giving and Improvisational Competencies in the Founding Process’, Research Policy 32(2), 255–276

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron, R.A.: 2004, ‘The cognitive perspective: A valuable tool for answering entrepreneurship’s basic “why” questions’, Journal of Business Venturing, 19(2), 221-239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bucar, B., M. Glas, and R. D. Hisrich: 2003, ‘Ethics and Entrepreneurs: An International Comparative Study’, Journal of Business Venturing, 18(2), 261-281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Busenitz, L. W. and J. B. Barney: 1997, ‘Differences between Entrepreneurs and Managers in Large Organizations: Biases and Heuristics in Strategic Decision-making. Journal of Business Venturing, 12(1), 9-30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carland, J. W., Hoy, F., Boulton, W. and Carland, J: 1984, ‘Differentiating entrepreneurs from small business owners: a conceptualization’, Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 354-359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter, N. M., Gartner, W. B., Shaver, K. G. and Gatewood, E. J: 2003, ‘The career reasons of nascent entrepreneurs’, Journal of Business Venturing, 18(1), 13-39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chau, L. L. and W. Siu: 2000, ‘Ethical Decision-Making in Corporate Entrepreneurial Organizations’, Journal of Business Ethics, 23(4), 365-375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ciavarella, M. A., A. K. Buchholz, C. M., Riordan, R. D. Gatewood and G. S. Stokes: 2004, ‘The Big Five and Venture Survival: Is there a Linkage?’ Journal of Business Venturing, 19(4), 465-483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, L and G. Musson: 2000, ‘Entrepreneurial Identities: Reflections from Two Case Studies’, Organization, 7(1): 31-48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crockett, C: 2005, ‘The cultural paradigm of virtue’ Journal of Business Ethics, 62, 191- 208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Czarniawska-Joerges, B: 1997, Organizational Identity: A Reader, (Oxford University Press, Oxford).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodd, S. & Anderson, A. R.: 2007, ‘Mumpsimus and the mything of the individualistic entrepreneur’. International Small Business Journal, 25(4), 341-360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Down, S.: 2006, Narratives of Enterprise: Crafting Entrepreneurial Self-Identity in a Small Firm (Edward Elgar, Northampton)

  • Downing S.: 2005, ‘The social construction of entrepreneurship: Narrative and dramatic processes in the coproduction of organizations and identities’, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(2), 185-204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher, D.: 2007, ‘Toy Story: The narrative world of entrepreneurship and the creation of interpretive communities’, Journal of Business Venturing, 22(5), 649-672.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R. E.: 1994, ‘The politics of stakeholder theory’, Business Ethics Quarterly, 4(4), 409-421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R. E.: 1997, ‘A Stakeholder Theory of the Modern of the Modern Corporation’. In: T. Beauchamp and N. Bowie (eds), Ethical Theory and Business. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, pp. 66-76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, T. and Y. Tian: 2006, ‘Social and symbolic capital and responsible entrepreneurship: An empirical investigation of SME narratives’, Journal of Business Ethics, 67, 287-304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gabriel, Y: 2000, ‘Storytelling in organizations: Facts, fictions and fantasies’, (Oxford University Press, Oxford).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gartner, W.: 2007, ‘Entrepreneurial Narrative and a Science of the Imagination', Journal of Business Venturing 22(5), 613–627

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B. and A. Strauss, 1967, The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E: 1959, ‘The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life’ (Garden City, Doubleday).

    Google Scholar 

  • Greve, A. and J. W. Salaff: 2003, ‘Social Networks and Entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 28, 1-22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guyer, P.: 2006, ‘Kant’s Ambitions in the Third Critique’. In P.Guyer (ed) The Cambridge Companion to Kant (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge), pp. 538-587.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannafey, F. T.: 2003, ‘Entrepreneurship and Ethics: A Literature Review’, Journal of Business Ethics 46(2), 99-110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harmeling, S., Sarasvathy, S and R. E. Freeman: 2008, ‘Related debates in ethics and entrepreneurship: Values, opportunities and contingency’, Journal of Business Ethics, 84(3), 341-365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, J. D. and R. E. Freeman: 2008, ‘The Impossibility of the Separation Thesis’, Business Ethics Quarterly 18(4), 541–548

  • Harrison, R., M. Dibben, and C. Mason: 1997, ‘The Role of Trust in the Informal Investor’s Investment Decision: An Exploratory Analysis’, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 21(4), 63-82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartman, E. 1996: Organizational Ethics and the Good Life. (Oxford University Press, Oxford).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hjorth, D. and C. Steyaert: 2004, ‘Narrative and Discursive Approaches in Entrepreneurship’ Northhampton: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoang, H. and B. Antonic: 2003, ‘Network-based Research in Entrepreneurship: A Critical review’, Journal of Business Venturing, 18(2), 165-187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Humphreys, N., D. Robin, R. E. Reidenback and D. Moak: 1993, ‘The Ethical Decision Making Process of Small Business Owner/Managers and Their Customers’, Journal of Small business Management 31(3), 9-22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janjuha-Jivraj, S.: 2003, ‘The sustainability of social capital within ethnic networks’, Journal of Business Ethics, 47(1), 31-43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jennings, P. L., L. Perren and S. Carter: 2005, ‘Guest Editors’ Introduction: Alternative Perspectives on Entrepreneurship Research', Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 29(2), 145–152

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I.: 1790/1914, Critique of Judgement, 2nd ed. Trans. J. H. Bernard (MacMillan, London)

  • Karra, N., N. Phillips and P. Tracy: 2006, ‘Altruism and Agency in the Family Firm: Exploring the Role of Family, Kinship and Ethnicity’ Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(6), 861-877.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korunka, C., Frank, H., Luegar, M. and J. Mugler: 2003, ‘The Entrepreneurial Personality in the Context of Resources, Environment, and the Startup Process – A Configurational Approach’, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 28(1), 23-42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langley, A.: 1999, ‘Strategies for Theorizing From Process Data', Academy of Management Review 24(4), 691–710

    Google Scholar 

  • Lepoutre, J and Heene, A: 2006, ‘Investigating the Impact of Firm Size on Small Business Social Responsibility: A Critical Review’, Journal of Business Ethics, 67(3), 257-273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln, Y. S. and E. G. Guba, E. G. 1985, Naturalistic Inquiry (Sage, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke, K.: 1996, ‘Rewriting “The Discovery of Grounded Theory” after 25 years’, Journal of Management Inquiry, 5(3), 239-245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Longenecker, J. S., J. A. McKinney and C. W. Moore: 1989, ‘Ethics in Small Business’, Journal of Small Business Management, 27(1), 27-31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lounsbury, M. and M. A. Glynn: 2001. ‘Cultural Entrepreneurship: Stories, legitimacy, and the acquisition of resources’, Strategic Management Journal, 22(6-7), 545-564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Low, M. B. and Abrahamson, E: 1997. ‘Movements, bandwagons, and clones: Industry evolution and the entrepreneurial process’. Journal of Business Venturing, 12(6), 435-457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martens, M. L., J. E. Jennings and P. D. Jennings: 2007, ‘Do the Stories They Tell Get Them the Money They Need? The Role of Entrepreneurial Narratives in Resource Acquisition’, Academy of Management Journal, 50(5), 1107-1132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayo, M. A.: 1991, ‘Ethical Problems Encountered by U.S Small Businesses in International Marketing’, Journal of Small Business Management 29(2), 51- 59.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClelland, D. C.: 1961, The Achieving Society, (Van Nostrand, Princeton, NJ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. W. and B. Rowan: 1991, ‘Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony’, in W. W. Powell and P. J. DiMaggio (eds.), The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis (University of Chicago Press, Chicago)

  • Miles, M. B and A. M. Huberman: 1994, Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. (Sage, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, R. K.: 2002, ‘Entrepreneurship and Stakeholder Theory: Comment on Ruffin Lecture #2’, Ruffin Series in Business Ethics 3, 175–196

  • Mitchell, R. K., Busenitz, T., Lant, P. P. and E. A. McDougall: 2002, Towards a Theory of Entrepreneurial Cognition: Rethinking the People Side of Entrepreneurship’, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 27(2), 93-104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, M. H., M. Schindelhutte, J. Walton and J. Allen: 2002, ‘The Ethical Context of Entrepreneurship: Proposing and Testing a Developmental Framework’, Journal of Business Ethics, 40(4), 331-361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nayak, A., Maclean, M., Harvey, C. and R. Chia: 2007, ‘Entrepreneurship, corporate governance and Indian business elites’, International Journal of Indian Culture and Business Management 1(1/2), 9-27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ogbor, J. O.: 2000, ‘Mythicizing and reification in entrepreneurial discourse: Ideology-critique of entrepreneurial studies’, Journal of Management Studies, 37(5), 605-635.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polkinghorne, D. E.:1988, Narrative Knowing and the Human Sciences, State University of New York Press, Albany).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, H. J. and I. Rubin: 2005, Qualitative Interviewing: The Art of Hearing Data, (Sage, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarasvathy, S.: 2002, ‘Entrepreneurship as Economics with Imagination’, Ruffin Series in Business Ethics 3, 95–112

  • Sarasvathy, S.: 2008, Effectuation: Elements of Entrepreneurial Experience, (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneewind, J.B.: 2007, ‘Toward enlightenment: Kant and the sources of darkness’, in D. Rutherford (ed.) The Cambridge companion to early modern philosophy. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge). pp.328-351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J: 1954, ‘History of Economic Analysis’ (Oxford, Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, D.: 2001, Interpreting Qualitative Data: Methods for Analyzing Talk, Text and Interaction. (Sage, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R. J.:1999, ‘Social/personality Psychology in Context’ Theory and Psychology, 9(6), 769-786.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snoeyenbos, M and J. Humber: 2005, ‘Utilitarianism and business ethics’, In F. Allhoff and A. Vaidya, Anand (Eds.), Business Ethics, A Three Volume Set. (Sage, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, R. C.: 1992, Ethics and Excellence: Cooperation and Integrity in Business, (Oxford University Press, Oxford).

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, L. J., Schmidpeter, R. and A. Habisch: 2003, ‘Assessing social capital: Small and medium sized enterprises in Germany and the UK’, Journal of Business Ethics, 47(1), 17-29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Starr, J. A. and I. C. MacMillan: 1990, ‘Resource Cooptation via Social Contracting: Resource Acquisition Strategies for New Ventures.’ Strategic Management Journal, 11, 79-92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steier, L. and R. Greenwood: 2000, ‘Entrepreneurship and the evolution of angel financial networks’ Organization Studies, 21(1), 163-192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A. and J. Corbin: 1990, ‘Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedure and Techniques. (Sage, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Suchman, M. C.: 1995, ‘Managing Legitimacy: Strategies and Institutional Approaches’, Academy of Management Review 20(3), 371–610

  • Teal, E. J. and A. B. Carroll: 1999, ‘Moral reasoning skills: Are entrepreneurs different?,’ Journal of Business Ethics, 19(3), 229-240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tornikoski, E. T. and S. L. Newbert: 2007, ‘Exploring the Determinants of Organizational Emergence: A Legitimacy Perspective’, Journal of Business Venturing 22(2), 311–335

    Google Scholar 

  • Ucbasaran, D. and Westhead, P. and Wright, M.: 2001, ‘The focus of entrepreneurial research: contextual and process issues.’ Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 5(4), 57-80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Velamuri, R. S.: 2002, ‘Entrepreneurship, Altruism and the Good Society’, Ruffin Series in Business Ethics 3, 125–143

  • Venkataraman, S.: 1997, ‘The Distinctive Domain of Entrepreneurship Research’, in J. A. Katz (ed.), Advances in Entrepreneurship, Firm Emergence, and Growth, Vol. 3. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, pp. 119-138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Venkataraman, S.: 2002, ‘Stakeholder Value Equilibration and the Entrepreneurial Process’, Ruffin Series in Business Ethics 3, 45–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren, L.: 2004, ‘Negotiating entrepreneurial identity – communities of practice and changing discourses’, The International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 5(1), 25-35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zott, C. and Q. N. Huy: 2007, ‘How Entrepreneurs use Symbolic Management to Acquire Resources’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 52(1), 70-105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jean Clarke.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Clarke, J., Holt, R. Reflective Judgement: Understanding Entrepreneurship as Ethical Practice. J Bus Ethics 94, 317–331 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0265-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0265-z

Key words

Navigation