Skip to main content
Log in

How do Small and Medium Enterprises Go “Green”? A Study of Environmental Management Programs in the U.S. Wine Industry

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In industries populated by small and medium enterprises, managers’ good intentions frequently incur barriers to superior environmental performance (Tilley, Bus Strategy Environ 8:238–248, 1999). During the period when the U.S. wine industry was beginning to promote voluntary adoption of sound environmental practices, we examined managers’ attitudes, norms, and perceptions of stakeholder pressures to assess their intentions to implement environmental management programs (EMP). We found that managers within the simple structures of these small and medium firms are responsive to attitudes, norms, and pressures from internal stakeholders and that voluntarily established EMP increased the success of firms’ implementation of energy conservation and recycling practices. Applications of our findings to future research on small and medium enterprises as well as direct practical applications of our results are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ajzen, I. (1991). ‹A theory of planned behavior’. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211. doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alberti, M., Cain, L., Calabrese, A., & Rossi, D. (2000). ‹Evaluation of the costs and benefits of an environmental management systems’. International Journal of Production Research, 38, 4455–4466. doi:10.1080/00207540050205226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, R.N.L., Darnall, N., Gallagher, D., Keiner, S.T., Feldman, E., Mitchell, M., Amaral, D., & Jacoby, J.(2001). ‹Environmental management systems: History, theory, and implementation research.’ In Coglianese, C. and Nash, J. (Eds). Regulating from the Inside: Can Environmental Management Systems Achieve Policy Goals? Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anton, W.R.Q., Deltas, G., & Khanna, M. (2004). ‹Incentives for environmental self-regulation and implications for environmental performance’. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 48, 632–654. doi:10.1016/j.jeem.2003.06.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baldy, M. (1995). The University Wine Course 2nd Edition. The Wine Appreciation Guild: San Francisco, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee, S.B., Iyer, S., & Kashyap, R.K. (2003). ‹Corporate environmentalism: antecedents and influence of industry type’. Journal of Marketing, 67, 106–122. doi:10.1509/jmkg.67.2.106.18604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bansal, P., & Clelland, I. (2004). ‹Talking trash: legitimacy, impression management, and unsystematic risk in the context if the natural environment’. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 93–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bansal, P., & Hunter, T. (2003). ‹Strategic explanations for the early adoption of ISO 14001’. Journal of Business Ethics, 46, 289–299. doi:10.1023/A:1025536731830.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouma, J., & Kamp-Roelands, N. (2000). ‹Stakeholders’ expectations of an environmental management system: some exploratory research’. European Accounting Review, 9, 131–144. doi:10.1080/096381800407987.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • California Sustainable Winegrowing Alliance: 2006, California Sustainable Winegrowing Program Progress Report 2006.

  • Carmin, J., Darnall, N., & Mil-Homens, J. (2003). ‹Stakeholder involvement in the design of US voluntary environmental programs: Does sponsorship matter’? Policy Studies Journal: the Journal of the Policy Studies Organization, 31, 527–543. doi:10.1111/1541-0072.00041.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carraro, C., & Leveque, F.(1999). Voluntary Approaches in Environmental Policy. Kluwer Academic Publishers: Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cartier, R., Dolan, P., & Matz, T.(2004). ‹Looking towards the future’. In Thach, L. and Matz, T. (Eds.), Wine a Global Business. Elmsford, NY: Miranda Press, 203-212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coglianese, C., & Nash, J.(2001). ‹Environmental management systems and the new policy agenda’. In Coglianese, C. and Nash, J. (Eds). Regulating from the Inside: Can Environmental Management Systems Achieve Policy Goals? Washington, DC: Resources for the Future: 61-81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cordano, M., & Frieze, I.H. (2000). ‹Pollution reduction preferences of U.S. environmental managers: Applying Ajzen’s theory of planned behavior’. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 624–641. doi:10.2307/1556358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cordano, M., Frieze, I., & Ellis, K. (2004). ‹Entangled affiliations and attitudes: An analysis of the influences on environmental policy stakeholders’ behavioral intentions’. Journal of Business Ethics, 49, 27–40. doi:10.1023/B:BUSI.0000013850.14353.b6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darnall, N., & Edwards, D. (2006). ‹Predicting the cost of environmental management system adoption: The role of capabilities, resources and ownership structure’. Strategic Management Journal, 27, 301–320. doi:10.1002/smj.518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunlap, R.E., & Van Liere, K.D. (1984). ‹Commitment to the dominant social paradigm and concern for environmental quality’. Social Science, 65, 1013–1028.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, A.R. 2005. The Sustainability Revolution: A Portrait of a Paradigm Shift, New Society Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Firestone, J. (2002). ‹Agency governance and enforcement: The influence of mission on environmental decision making’. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 21, 381–408. doi:10.1002/pam.10052.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fish, T.: 2002, ‹Sierra Club Tries to Block New Beringer Complex in Napa’, Wine Spectator January 18, p. 17

  • Flannery, B.L., & May, D.R. (2000). ‹An empirical study of the effect of moral intensity on environmental ethical decision-making’. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 642–662. doi:10.2307/1556359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Florida, R., & Davison, D. (2001). ‹Gaining from green management: Environmental management systems inside and outside the factory’. California Management Review, 43, 64–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folwell, R.J., & Volanti, M. (2003). ‹The changing market structure of the USA wine industry’. Journal of Wine Research, 14, 25–30. doi:10.1080/0957126032000114964.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, D.R. (2003). ‹Building environmental management systems focused on sustainability: The influence of employees, company leaders, and external stakeholders’. In Starik, M. and Sharma, S. (eds.) New Horizons in Research in Sustainable Organizations: Emerging Ideas, Approaches, and Tools for Practitioners and Researchers. Sheffield, England: Greenleaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henriques, I., & Sadorsky, P. (1996). ‹The determinants of an environmentally responsive firm: An empirical approach’. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 30, 381–395. doi:10.1006/jeem.1996.0026.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, R.J., & Bansal, P. (2003). ‹Seeing the need for ISO 14001’. Journal of Management Studies, 40, 1047–1067. doi:10.1111/1467-6486.00370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolk, A. (2000). Economics of Environmental Management. Essex, England: Pearson Education Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koski, C., & May, P.J. (2006). ‹Interests and implementation: Fostering voluntary regulatory actions’. Journal of Public Administration: Research and Theory, 16, 329–340. doi:10.1093/jopart/mui048.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, A.T., & Morell, D.(1995). ‹Leading-edge environmental management: Motivation, opportunity, resources, and processes’. In Collins, D. and Starik, M. (Eds.), Research in corporate social performance and policy: Greenwich, CT: JAI, 99-126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, S.R., Cordano, M., & Silverman, M. (2005). ‹Exploring individual and institutional drivers of proactive environmentalism in the US Wine Industry’. Business Strategy and the Environment, 14, 92–109. doi:10.1002/bse.433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCaffrey, D.P., Smith, A.E., & Martinez-Moyano, I.J. (2007). ‹Then let’s have a dialogue: Interdependence and negotiation in a cohesive regulatory system’. Journal of Public Administration: Research and Theory, 17, 307–334. doi:10.1093/jopart/muj020.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Potoski, M., & Prakash, A. (2005). ‹Covenants with weak swords: ISO 14001 and facilities’ environmental performance’. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 24, 745–769. doi:10.1002/pam.20136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rondinelli, D., & Vastag, G. (2000). ‹Panacea, common sense, or just a label? The value of ISO 14001 environmental management systems’. European Management Journal, 18, 499–510. doi:10.1016/S0263-2373(00)00039-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothenberg, S., & Becker, M. (2004). ‹Technical assistance programs and the diffusion of environmental technologies in the printing industry: the case of SME’s. Business & Society, 43, 366–397. doi:10.1177/0007650304268801.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sawyer, C. (2003). ‹A western approach to Nicolas Joly’s focus on biodynamics, philosophy and applications’. Vineyard and Winery Management, 29, 26–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sogg, D.: 2000, ‹Sonoma wineries and environmentalists battle over pesticides’, Wine Spectator, http://www.winespectator.com/Wine/Daily/News/0%2C1145%2C1745%2C00.html.

  • Stead, W.E., & Stead, J.G.(1995). ‹An empirical investigation of sustainability strategy implementation in industrial organizations’. In Collins, D. and Starik, M. (Eds.), Research in Corporate Social Performance Policy. Greenwich, CT: JAI, 43-66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, R., Greenspan, M., Beckstoffer, D., & Thach, L.(2004). ‹The business of viticulture’. In Thach, L. and Matz, T. (Eds.), Wine a Global Business. Elmsford, NY: Miranda Press, 203-212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilley, F. (1999). ‹The gap between the environmental attitudes and the environmental behavior of small firms’. Business Strategy and the Environment, 8, 238–248. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-0836(199907/08)8:4<238::AID-BSE197>3.0.CO;2-M.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Liere, K.D., & Dunlap, R.E. (1981). ‹Environmental concern: Does it make a difference how it is measured?’. Environment and Behavior, 13, 651–676. doi:10.1177/0013916581136001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, G., & Cooper, W.H. (2001). ‹Ecological embeddedness’. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 1265–1282.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge a Business and International Education (BIE) grant from the U.S. Department of Education and a matching grant from the College of Business at San Francisco State University in support of this research as well as endorsements for the surveys by the New York Wine and Grape Commission, American Vintners Association (now called WineAmerica), the Washington Wine Commission, and the WineVision Sustainability Task Force. The authors also wish to acknowledge thoughtful and thorough reviews by Nicole Darnall, Mike McCall, and Deborah Gallagher.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mark Cordano.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cordano, M., Marshall, R.S. & Silverman, M. How do Small and Medium Enterprises Go “Green”? A Study of Environmental Management Programs in the U.S. Wine Industry. J Bus Ethics 92, 463–478 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0168-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0168-z

Key words

Navigation