Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Do Firms Practice What They Preach? The Relationship Between Mission Statements and Stakeholder Management

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The accuracy of corporate mission statements has not been well explored. In this study, the authors investigate the relationship between mission statement content and stakeholder management actions. Findings indicate that although social issues such as the environment and diversity are less frequently included, their mention in mission statements is significantly associated with behaviors regarding these issues. The study found no relationship between firms with mission statements that mention specific stakeholder groups (employees, customers, and community) and behaviors regarding these stakeholders. This suggests that the inclusion of specific stakeholder groups in missions is likely the result of institutional pressures, while specifying social issues in missions is related to policy decisions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ashforth B. E., B. W. Gibbs 1990. The Double-edge of Organizational Legitimation, Organization Science, 1(2): 177–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bailey J. A. (1996). Measuring Your Mission. Management Accounting, 44(3): 44–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Bart C. K. (1997a). Sex, Lies, and Mission Statements. Business Horizons, 40 (6): 9–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bart C. K. (1997b) Industrial Firms and the Power of Mission, Industrial Marketing Management, 26 (4): 371–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bart C. K. (1998) Mission Matters. CA Magazine, 131(2): 31–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Bart C. K., M. C. Baetz (1998). The Relationship Between Mission Statements and Firm Performance: An Exploratory Study. The Journal of Management Studies, 35 (6): 823–853

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bart C. K., N. Bontis, S. Taggar 2001. A Model of the Impact of Mission Statements on Firm Performance. Management Decision, 39(1): 19–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bart C. K., M. Hupfer, (2004). Mission Statements in Canadian Hospitals. Journal of Health Organization and Management, 18(2):92–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartkus B. R., M. Glassman, R. B. McAfee (2000) Mission Statements: are They Smoke and Mirrors? Business Horizons, 43(6):23–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartkus B. R., M. Glassman, R. B. McAfee (2004). A Comparison of the Quality of European, Japanese and U. S. Mission Statements: A Content Analysis. European Management Journal, 22, 4, 393–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell A. 1997. Mission Statements. Long Range Planning, 30(6): 931–932

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, A. and M. Alexander: 1997, ‹What’s Wrong with Strategy?’, Harvard Business Review 75(6), 42–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen L. T. 1997. Marketing as Auto-Communication. Consumption, Markets, and Culture, 1(1): 197–228

    Google Scholar 

  • David F. R. 1989. How Companies Define Their Mission. Long Range Planning, 22(1):90–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson T., L. E. Preston (1995) The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence and Implications. Academy of Management Review, 20(1): 65–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drucker P. F. (1973) Management: Tasks, Responsibilities, Practices, New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairfax L. M. 2006. The Rhetoric of Corporate Law: The Impact of Stakeholder Rhetoric on Corporate Norms. Journal of Corporation Law 31(3): 675–718

    Google Scholar 

  • Herbig P., J. Milewicz 1995. To be or Not to be…Credible that is: A Model of Reputation and Credibility Among Competing Firms. Marketing Intelligence & Planning 13(6):24–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillman A. J., G. D. Keim 2001. Shareholder Value, Stakeholder Management, and Social Issues: What’s the Bottom Line? Strategic Management Journal 22(2): 125–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ireland R., M. Hitt (1992). Mission Statements: Importance, Challenge and Recommendations for Development. Business Horizons 35 (3): 34–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaptein M. 2004. Business Codes of Multinational Firms: What do They Say? Journal of Business Ethics: 50(1):13–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krohe J. Jr. 1995. Do You Really Need a Mission Statement? Across the Board, 32(7): 16–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Leuthesser L., C. Kohli (1997). Corporate Identity: The Role of Mission Statements. Business Horizons 40(3): 59–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin I. M. (2000) Vision Revisited. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 36(1), 91–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahon J. F., S. L. Wartick 2003. Dealing with Stakeholders: How Reputation, Credibility and Framing Influence the Game. Corporate Reputation Review 6(1):19–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKay, B.: 2000. ‹For Coke’s Big Race Lawsuit, a New Wild Card – a Flamboyant Lawyer Known for Winning Big Awards Joins the Fray for Plaintiffs’, The Wall Street Journal, April 14, B1

  • Meyer J. W., B. Rowan (1977). Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony. American Journal of Sociology 83(2): 340–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell R. K., B. R. Agle, D. J. Wood 1997 Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of Who and What Really Counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4): 853–886

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore G. 1993. The Demise of Ethical Schizophrenia? Business Strategy Review, 4(1): 53–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morsing M. 2006. Corporate Social Responsibility as Strategic Auto-communication: On the Role of External Stakeholders for Member Identification. Business Ethics: A European Review, 15(2):171–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Gorman C., R. Doran (1999) Mission Statements in Small and Medium-sized Businesses. Journal of Small Business Management 37(4):59–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce J. A., F. R. David (1987) Corporate Mission Statements: The Bottom Line. Academy of Management Executive, 1 (2): 109–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, J., II and K. Roth: 1988, ‹Multi Nationalization of the Mission Statement’, SAM Advanced Management Journal (Summer), 39–44

  • Pfeffer, J. and G. R. Salancik: 1978, The External Control of Organizations, a Resource Dependence Perspective (Harper and Row, New York)

  • Plender, J.: 2003, ‹Lights Flash’, Financial Times, March 31, 26

  • Schafer, S.: 2000, ‹Coke to Pay $193 Million in Bias Suit; Black Employees Sought Damages’, The Washington Post, November 17, Final A01

  • Segal, D.: 1999, ‹Denny’s Serves Up a Sensitive Image: Restaurant Chain Launches PR Drive to Show Minorities It Has Changed Its Ways’, Washington Post, April 7, Final E01

  • Suchman M. 1995. Managing Legitimacy: Strategy and Institutional Approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3): 571–610

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vogt J. 1994. Demystifying the Mission Statement. Nonprofit World, 12(1): 29–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Waddock, S. and N. Smith: 2000, `Corporate Responsibility Audits. Doing Well by Doing Good', Sloan Management Review 41(2), 75–83. Cambridge. Winter 2000

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright J. N. (2002) Mission and Reality and Why not? Journal of Change Management. 3(1): 30–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Business Administration, Old Dominion University, 49th & Hampton, Norfolk, VA, 23529, U.S.A.

    Barbara R. Bartkus & Myron Glassman

Authors
  1. Barbara R. Bartkus
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Myron Glassman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Barbara R. Bartkus.

Additional information

Barbara R. Bartkus is Associate Professor at Old Dominion University. She received her Ph.D. from Texas A&M University. Her research interests includes strategic goals, governance and corporate philanthropy.

Myron Glassman is Professor of Marketing at Old Dominion University. He received his Ph.D. from the University of Illinois. His research focuses on integrating marketing and management concepts.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bartkus, B.R., Glassman, M. Do Firms Practice What They Preach? The Relationship Between Mission Statements and Stakeholder Management. J Bus Ethics 83, 207–216 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9612-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9612-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation