Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A Critical Review of Sustainable Business Indices and their Impact

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Most studies into the performance of socially responsible investment vehicles have focused on the performance of sustainable or socially responsible mutual funds. This research has been complemented recently by a number of studies that have examined the performance of sustainable investment indices. In both cases, the majority of studies have concluded that the returns of socially responsible investment vehicles have either underperformed, or failed to outperform, comparable market indices. Although the impact of sustainable indices to date has been limited, the recent launch of sustainable indices by Dow Jones and FTSE suggests that more attention is being paid to the subject by financial markets, investors, and companies. This development raises a number of important issues which are reviewed in this article: (a) the performance of indices compared with their benchmark indices; (b) the methodologies employed in compiling the indices; and (c) the impact of the indices on companies and the investment community. The article concludes with a number of suggestions for areas that merit future research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abramson L., Chung D.: 2000, Socially Responsible Investing: Viable for Value Investors? Journal of Investing 9(3), 73–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Barkawi, A.: 2004. SAM, Managing Director (Interview conducted on January 30, 2004)

  • Barnett, M. L. and R. M. Salomon: 2002, Unpacking Social Responsibility: The Curvilinear Relationship Between Social And Financial Performance, Academy of Management Best Paper Proceedings, SIM: B1–6

  • Bauer, R., K. Koedijk and R. Otten: 2002, ‹International Evidence on Ethical Mutual Fund Performance and Investment Style’, Social Science Research Network, March 2

  • Calvert Group, Ltd. http://www.calvertgroup.com/aboutindex_1515.html (Accessed January 25, 2004)

  • Cummings L. S.: 2000, The Financial Performance of Ethical Investment Trusts: An Australian Perspective. Journal of Business Ethics 25(1), 79–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deutsche Bank AG: 2002, Portfolio, Index and Futures Research. ‹Are SRI Indices Responsible?’, October 2002

  • Domini Social Investments: 2004, http://www.domini.com/Social-Screening/creation_maintenance.doc_ cvt.htm (Accessed January 26, 2004)

  • Domini A: 2001, Socially Responsible Investing: Making Money and Making a Difference. Chicago, IL: Dearborn Trade

    Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson T., Preston L. E.: 1995, The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts Evidence and Implications. Academy of Management Review 20(1), 65–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dow Jones Sustainability Indices: 2004, http://www. sustainability-indexes.com/djsi_pdf/publications/DJSI_ WORLD_Guidebooks/DJSI_World_Guidebook_50.pdf (Accessed January 6, 2004)

  • Ethibel: 2004, http://www.ethibel.org/subs_e/2_label/sub2_2.html (Accessed January 24, 2004)

  • Ethical Investment Research Service: 2004, http://www.eiris.org/Pages/TopMenu/FAQ.htm (Accessed January 25, 2004)

  • Friedman M.: 1962, Capitalism and Freedom. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M.: 1970, ‹The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase its Profits’, New York Times Magazine, Sep 13, 32,33,122,126

  • Geczy, C., R. Stambaugh and D. Levin: 2003, ‹Investing in Socially Responsible Mutual Funds’, Working Paper at http://finance.wharton.upenn.edu/∼geczy/workingpapers.htm (Accessed February 9, 2004)

  • Guerard J. B. Jr.: 1997a, Is There a Cost to Being Socially Responsible in Investing? Journal of Investing 6(2), 11–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Guerard J. B. Jr.: 1997b, Additional Evidence on the Cost of Being Socially Responsible in Investing. Journal of Investing 6(4), 31–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, S., H. Jo and M. Statman: 1993, ‹Doing Well While Doing Good? The Investment Performance of Socially Responsible Mutual Funds’, Financial Analysis Journal Nov/Dec, 62–66

  • Handy, C.: 2002, ‹What’s a Business For?’, Harvard Business Review 80(12), 49–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Hickman K. A., Teets W. R., Kohls J. J.: 1999, Social Investing and Modern Portfolio Theory. American Business Review 17(1), 72–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Hydro: 2004, http://www.hydro.com/en/global_commitment/sustainability_rating/index.html (Accessed February 3, 2004)

  • Kinder P., Domini A.: 1997, Social Screening: Paradigms Old and New. Journal of Investing 6(4), 12–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Krumsiek B. J.: 1997, The Emergence of a New Era in Mutual Fund Investing Socially Responsible Investing Comes of Age. Journal of Investing 6(4), 25–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurtz L: 1997, No Effect, or No Net Effect? Studies on Socially Responsible Investing. Journal of Investing 6(4), 37–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McWilliams A., Siegel D.: 1997, The Role Of Money Managers In Assessing Corporate Social Responsibility Research. Journal of Investing 6(4), 98–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pax World Funds: 2004, http://www.paxfund.com/history.htm (Accessed January 16, 2004)

  • Rivoli P.: 2003, Making A Difference Or Making A Statement? Finance Research And Socially Responsible Investment. Business Ethics Quarterly 13(3), 271–287

    Google Scholar 

  • Schepers D. H.: 2003, A Critique of Social Investing’s Diversity Measures. Business & Society Review 108(4), 487–508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schueth S.: 2003, Socially Responsible Investing in the United States. Journal of Business Ethics 43(3), 189–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shell: 2002, http://www.shell.com/home/Framework?siteId=in-en&FC2=&FC3=/global/news_and_library/press_releases/2002/shell_leads_energy_sector_04092 002.html (Accessed February 3, 2004)

  • Social Investment Forum: 2003, ‹Report on Socially Responsible Investing Trends in the United States’, December, 4,11

  • Statman, M.: 2000, ‹Socially Responsible Mutual Funds’, Association for Investment Management and Research May/June, 30–38

  • Sauer D.: 1997, The Impact of Social-Responsibility Screens on Investment Performance: Evidence from the Domini Social Index and Domini Equity Mutual Fund. Review of Financial Economics 6, 137–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sustainable Asset Management: 2004, http://www.sam-group.com/e/about/about.cfm (Accessed January 5, 2004)

  • Swoboda, M.: 2004, SAM, Senior Research Analyst (Interview Conducted on February 4, 2004)

  • Tanner, R.: 2004, FTSE, CSR Marketing Executive (Interview Conducted on February 16, 2004)

  • Vigeo: 2004, http://www.arese-sa.com/site.php?rub=6&lang=en (Accessed January 25, 2004)

  • WestLB Equity: 2004, http://research.westlb.com/sri/sri_research.php (Accessed February 5, 2004)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephen J. Fowler.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fowler, S.J., Hope, C. A Critical Review of Sustainable Business Indices and their Impact. J Bus Ethics 76, 243–252 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9590-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9590-2

Keywords

Navigation