Skip to main content
Log in

Government Contracts and Contractor Behavior

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The U.S. government embraces the concepts of privatization and market competition, but the realm of contracting shows that it has not always been able to put its principles into practice. Although the contracting system is supposed to be open and competitive, in recent years the government has often awarded contracts with little or no competitive bidding, has chosen to award mostly cost-plus type contracts that force the government to assume more of the risk, and lacked efficiency in monitoring and overseeing private contractors. While the number and value of contracts have increased, the workforce to oversee these contracts has been reduced, preventing the government from adequately enforcing compliance with the contractors, and the government has not made use of past performance evaluations in its contracting system. Private contractors that do business with the U.S. government are for the most part well-established firms with ample resources and inside contacts; many contracts are still being awarded on preferential treatment and to the larger and well-established contractors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, W., J. McGuiness and J. Spicer: 2002, From Chaos to Clarity: How Cost-based Strategies are Undermining the Defense Department, Washington, DC: Defense Acquisition University Military Research Fellows Report, Defense Acquisition University, Fort Belvoir, VA.

  • F.M. Aston M.M. Worthington L. P. Goldsman (1992) Contracting with the Federal Government John Wiley & Sons New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Avant, Deborah.: 2004, ‘Mercenaries,’ Foreign Policy (July–August).

  • R. Berrios (2000) Contracting for Development Praeger Westport, CT

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratap Chaterjee (2004) Iraq, Inc: A Profitable Occupation Seven Stories Press NY

    Google Scholar 

  • P. S. Cole J. W. Beausoleil (2002) Past Performance Handbook, Management Concepts Vienna VA

    Google Scholar 

  • Commercial Activities Panel: 2001, ‘Testimony of Danielle Brian of Project on Government Oversight,’ Public Hearing, 11 June.

  • Department of Defense Office of the Inspector General: 2004, Contracts Awarded for the Coalition Provisional Authority by the Defense Contracting Command, Washington, D.C.

  • Eckholm, Erik: 2004a, ‘Auditors Testify about Waste in Iraq Contracts,’ The New York Times, 16 June, A8.

  • Eckholm, Erik: 2004b, ‘Financial Controls in Iraq Criticized by Overseers,’ The New York Times, 16 July, A10.

  • InstitutionalAuthorNameFAR (1999) Federal Acquisition Regulation CCH Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • GAO: 2003a, Better Training, Efficiency and Accountability: Services Acquisition Reform for the 21st Century, Hearing before the Committee on Government Reform, House of Representatives, Washington, DC, serial 108–29, 30 April.

  • GAO: 2003b, Contract Management Comments on Proposed Service Acquisition Reform Act, GAO-03-716T, 30 April.

  • GAO: 2004a, Contract Management: DOD Needs Measures for Small Business Subcontracting Program␣and Better Data on Foreign Subcontracts, GAO-04-381, April 5.

  • GAO: 2004b, Military Operations: DOD’s Extensive Use of Logistics Support Contracts Require Strengthened Oversight. July 21.

  • GAO: (2004c), Rebuilding Iraq: Fiscal year 2003 Contract Award Procedures and Management Challenges. Gao-04-605, June,.

  • D. Guttman B. Willner (1976) The Shadow of Government: The Government’s Multimillion Dollar Giveaway of its Decision-Making to Private Management Consultants, “Experts” and their Thinks Tanks Pantheon Books NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, S.: 2004, ‘Outsourcing Iraq,’ Government Executive, 36, 11, July 1, 56–63.

  • Henry, P. T.: 2000, Memorandum Through Administrative Assistant to the Secretary of the Army for Assistant Deputy Chief of Staff for Intelligence, Washington, D.C., Dec. 26.

  • Herbert, B.: 2003, ‘The Spoils of War,’ The New York Times, 10 April.

  • H. Holtz (1979) Government Contracts: Proposalmanship and Winning Strategies Plenum Press NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Markusen, A.: 2004, ‘The case against privatizing National Security,’ Dollars and Sense (May/June), 24–27.

  • Morgenson, G.: 2004, ‘Suit Accuses Halliburton of fraud in accounting,’ The New York Times, 6 August, C1.

  • R. C. Nash J. Cibinic (1993) Competitive Negotiation: The Source Selection Process National Law Center, Government Contracts Program, George Washington University Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, M.: 2004, ‘Contract with America,’ Mother Jones (May/June), 57–61, 92–93.

  • Shorrock, T.: 2003, ‘Selling (off) Iraq: how to privatize a country and make millions,’ The Nation, June 23, 11–16.

  • Ken Silverstein (2004) Private Warriors Verso NY and London

    Google Scholar 

  • P. W. Singer (2003) Corporate Warriors: The Rise of the Privatized Military Industry Cornell University Press Ithaca

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Congress: 1992, Government Contract Mismanagement, Hearing before the Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations of the Committee on Energy and Commerce, House of Representatives, 102 Congress, Serial 102–166, Washington, DC, 3 December.

  • U.S. Congress: 2003a, Better Training, Efficiency and Accountability: Services Acquisition Reform for the 21st Century, Hearing before the Committee on Government Reform, House of Representatives, Washington, DC, serial 108–29, 30 April.

  • U.S. Congress: 2003b, Contract Bundling and Small Business Procurement, Hearing before the Subcommittee on Regulatory Reform and Oversight of the Committee on Small Business, House of Representatives, Washington, DC, serial 108–25, 15 July.

  • U.S. Congress: 2003c, Hearing on Challenges that Small Businesses Face Accessing Homeland Security Contracts. Hearing before the Subcommittee on Small Business, House of Representatives, Washington, DC, serial 108–43, 21 October.

  • U.S. Congress: 2005, Halliburton’s Questioned and Unsupported Costs in Iraq Exceed $1.4 billion, U.S. House of Representatives, Committee on Government Reform – U.S. Senate, Democratic Policy Committee, Joint Report prepared for Rep. Henry A. Waxman and Sen. Byron L. Dorgan, Washington, D.C., June 27.

  • Utt, R.: 2004, ‘Competitive Contracting: An Avenue for Improvement,’ Foreign Service Journal. (April), 41–46.

  • Verloy, A.: 2004, Document Reveal Concern Regarding Halliburton Contract, (The Center for Public Integrity,Washington, D.C.), 3 November.

  • Wayne, L.: 2004a, ‘Telling all in Boeing inquiry,’ The New York Times, 16 June, C1.

  • Wayne, L.: 2004b, ‘Ex-Pentagon official gets 9 Months for conspiring to favor Boeing,’ The New York Times, October 2: B1.

  • Wayne, L.: 2003, ‘Lucrative Lobbying Jobs Await Many Leaving Government Service,’ The New York Times.

  • G. Wilson (2000) This War Really Matters: Inside the Fight for Defense Dollars CQ Press Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeller, S.: 2004, ‘On the work force roller coaster at USAID,’ Foreign Service Journal 81(4) April, 33–39.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ruben Berrios.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Berrios, R. Government Contracts and Contractor Behavior. J Bus Ethics 63, 119–130 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-005-3969-8

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-005-3969-8

Keywords

Navigation