Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluating the Ethics of Inversion

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the last five years, a number of U.S. companies have either moved their locus of incorporation to countries with more favorable tax laws, or announced such moves. Given this trend toward “inversions”, and the polemics that have accompanied it, we offer two ways in which the ethics of such a move can be evaluated. We provide multinational executives with two applications of ethics to inversion: Kant’s deontological theory and the consequentialist perspective of utilitarianism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • M. Banai L. M. Sama (2000) ArticleTitle‘Ethical Dilemmas in MNC’s International Staffing Policies: A Conceptual’ Framework Journal of Business Ethics 25 221–235 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1006079511331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D. W. Conklin D. A. Robertson (1999) ArticleTitle‘Tax Havens: Investment Distortions and Public Policy’ Canadian Public Policy 25 IssueID3 333–344

    Google Scholar 

  • M. A. Desai J. R. Hines SuffixJr. (2002) ArticleTitle‘Expectations and Expatriations: Tracing the Causes and Consequences of Corporate Inversions’ National Tax Journal 55 IssueID3 409–440

    Google Scholar 

  • O.C. Ferrell J. Fraedrich L. Ferrell (2002) Business Ethics: Ethical Decision Making and Cases EditionNumber5 Houghton Mifflin New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. C.: 2002, ‘Tax Move to Bermuda Could Cost Investors’, New York Times July 15, BU 1+.

  • Kant, I.: 1785, Groundwork of the Metaphysic of Morals trans. H.J. Paton, 1964, Harper & Row, New York.

  • T. Kostova S. Zaheer (1999) ArticleTitle‘Organizational Legitimacy Under Conditions of Uncertainty: The Case of the Multinational Enterprise’ Academy of Management Review 24 IssueID1 64–81

    Google Scholar 

  • D. McLeod (2002) ArticleTitle‘Mom, Apple Pie and Tax Avoidance’. Business Insurance 8 6

    Google Scholar 

  • McTague, J.: 2002, ‘Tax Havens Make Senators See Red, White, and Blue’, Barrons April 22, MW21.

  • M. Mehafdi (2000) ArticleTitle‘The Ethics of International Transfer Pricing’ Journal of Business Ethics 28 365–381 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1006353027052

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mill, J. S.: 1861, Utilitarianism, George Shaw (ed.), 1979, (Hackett Publishing Co, Indianapolis).

  • Stanley Works: 2002, ‘The Stanley Works Announces Revote Plans’, Press release on reincorporation, downloaded on May 28, 2002, 1:26 p.m. from www.Stanleyworks.com

  • Van Leent P. 2000, ‘Increased Mobility adds Complexity for Multinational Businesses’, International Tax Review, December 6–7.

  • M. G. Velasquez (2002) Business Ethics: Concepts and Cases EditionNumber5 Prentice-Hall Upper Saddle River, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • D. A. Zalewski (2003) ArticleTitle‘Corporate Objectives – Maximizing Social versus Private Equity’ Journal of Economic Issues 37 IssueID2 503–509

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Susan H. Godar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Godar, S.H., O’Connor, P.J. & Taylor, V.A. Evaluating the Ethics of Inversion. J Bus Ethics 61, 1–6 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-005-1176-2

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-005-1176-2

Keywords

Navigation