Abstract
Applying evidence from recently available public information on Enron, I defined Enron’s culture as one rooted in agency theory by asserting that Enron’s members were predominantly agency-reasoning individuals. I then identified conditions present at Enron’s collapse: a strong agency culture with collectively non-compliant norms, a munificent rare-failure environment, and new hires with little business ethics training. Turning to four possible antidotes (selection, objectivist integrity, integrity capacity, and stewardship reasoning) to an agency culture under these conditions, I argued that the currently available ethics literature would have made little difference toward averting Enron’s collapse if any of the recommendations from the relevant ethics literature had been implemented. I conclude by identifying new directions for business ethics literature in order to make it more implementable under the conditions identified at Enron. Essentially, we need a way to clearly determine (1) the difference between connivance and commitment, (2) what is meant by balance with regard to the multiple dimensions of ethics and legal theories, and (3) the proper balance between agency and stewardship reasoning.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
M.J. Abdolmohammadi W.J. Read D.P. Scarbrough (2003) ArticleTitle‘Does Selection-Socialization Help To Explain Accountants’ Weak Ethical Reasoning?’ Journal of Business Ethics 42 IssueID1 71–81 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1021691001119
C.I. Barnard (1968) The Functions of the Executive Harvard University Press Cambridge, MA
T.E. Becker (1998) ArticleTitle‘Integrity in Organizations Beyond Honesty and Conscientiousness’ Academy of Management Review 23 IssueID1 162–169
Better Investing. (2001). ‘Enron Corporation Reinventing the Energy Business’. 51(3): 54–55
L. Block (2003) ArticleTitle‘The Leadership-Culture Connection An Exploratory Investigation’ Leadership and Organization Development Journal 24 318–334 Occurrence Handle10.1108/01437730310494293
M. Brush (1997) ArticleTitle‘How Utilities can Light Up your Profits’ Money 25 IssueID13 108–112
R. Bryce (2003) Pipe Dreams Greed, Ego, Jealousy, and The Death of Enron Public Affairs New York, NY
Chief Executive (1997). ‘Ken Unplugged’. 128, 40–42
J.G. Clawson (2002) Level Three Leadership Prentice-Hall Upper Saddle River, NJ
R.H. Coase (1937) ArticleTitle‘The Nature of the Firm’ Economica 4 386–405
J. Conger E. Lawler D. Feingold (2001) Corporate Boards Jossey-Bass San Francisco, CA
S.J. Conroy T.L.N. Emerson (2004) ArticleTitle‘Business Ethics and Religion Religiosity as a Predictor of Ethical Awareness among Students’ Journal of Business Ethics 50 IssueID4 383–396 Occurrence Handle10.1023/B:BUSI.0000025040.41263.09
Craig S., Weil J. (2001). ‘Most Analysis Remain Plugged In to Enron’. Wall Street Journal (Eastern Edition) 26 October
B. Cruver (2002) Anatomy of Greed The Unshredded Truth Form an Enron Insider Carroll and Graf New York, NY
M. Csikszentmihalyi (1990) Flow The Psychology of Optimal Experience Harper & Row New York, NY
M. Csikszentmihalyi J. LeFevre (1989) ArticleTitle‘Optimal Experience in Work and Leisure’ Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 56 IssueID5 815–822 Occurrence Handle10.1037/0022-3514.56.5.815 Occurrence Handle2724069
C.M. Daily D.R. Dalton A.A. Cannella SuffixJr. (2003) ArticleTitle‘Corporate Governance Decades of Dialogue and Data’ Academy of Management Review 28 IssueID3 371–382
J.H. Davis F.D. Schoorman L. Donaldson (1997) ArticleTitle‘Toward A Stewardship Theory of Management’ Academy of Management Review 22 IssueID1 20–47
K.M. Eisenhardt (1989) ArticleTitle‘Agency Theory An Assessment and Review’ Academy of Management Review 14 IssueID1 57–74
F. Elloumi J. Gueyié (2001) ArticleTitle‘CEO Compensation, IOS and The Role of Corporate Governance’ Corporate Governance 1 IssueID2 23–33 Occurrence Handle10.1108/EUM0000000005487
E.F. Fama (1980) ArticleTitle‘Agency Problems and the Theory of the Firm’ The Journal of Political Economy 88 IssueID288–307 88 288–307 Occurrence Handle10.1086/260866
H. Fayol (1949) General and Industrial Management, English Edition Sir Isaac Pitman and Sons London
S. Finkelstein R.A. D’Aveni (1994) ArticleTitle‘CEO Duality As a Double-Edged Sword How Boards of Directors Balance Entrenchment Avoidance and Unity of Command’ Academy of Management Journal 37 IssueID5 1079–1108
S.A. Frankforter S.L. Berman T.M. Jones (2000) ArticleTitle‘Boards of Directors and Shark Repellants Assessing the Value of an Agency Theory Perspective’ Journal of Management Studies 37 IssueID3 321–348
P.C. Fusaro R.M. Miller (2002) What Went Wrong At Enron Everyone’s Guide To The Largest Bankruptcy In History John Wiley and Sons Hoboken, NJ
J.R. Galbraith (2002) Designing Organizations An Executive Guide to Strategy, Structure, and Process Jossey-Bass San Francisco, CA
J. Gandz F.G. Bird (1996) ArticleTitle‘The Ethics of Empowerment’ Journal of Business Ethics 15 IssueID4 383–392 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00380359
B.R. Gaumnitz J.C. Lere (2004) ArticleTitle‘A Classification Scheme for Codes of Business Ethics’ Journal of Business Ethics 49 IssueID4 329–335 Occurrence Handle10.1023/B:BUSI.0000021053.73525.23
B.R. Golden E.J. Zajac (2001) ArticleTitle‘When Will Boards Influence Strategy? Inclination X Power = Strategic Change’ Strategic Management Journal 22 IssueID12 1087–1111 Occurrence Handle10.1002/smj.202
G. Hamel (1997) ArticleTitle‘Turning Your Business Upside Down’ Fortune 135 IssueID12 87–88
J.L. Harrison (1986) ArticleTitle‘Egoism, Altruism, and Market Illusions The Limits of Law and Economics’ UCLA Law Review 33 IssueID5 1309–1354
M.A. Hitt R.D. Ireland R.E. Hoskisson (2005) Strategic Management Competitiveness and Globalization EditionNumber6 South-Western Mason, OH
M.C. Jensen W.H. Meckling (1976) ArticleTitle‘A Theory of The Firm Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure’ Journal of Financial Economics 3 305–360 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
J.R. Katzenbach D.K. Smith (1993) The Wisdom of Teams Creating the High-Performance Organization Harper Collins New York, NY
J.-J. Laffont D. Martimort (2002) The Theory of Incentives The Principal–Agent Model Princeton University Press Princeton, NJ
McWilliams G. (1997). ‘The Quiet Man Who’s Jolting Utilities; CEO Kenneth Lay is Getting Enron Ready for Open Electricity Markets and Shaking Up a Staid Industry’. Business Week, 9 June, p. 84
Q. Mills (2003) Wheel, Deal, and Steal Deceptive Accounting, Deceitful CEOs, and Ineffective Reforms Financial Times Prentice-Hall Upper Saddle River, NJ
L.S. Paine (1994) ArticleTitleManaging for Organizational Integrity’ Harvard Business Review 72 IssueID2 106–117
L. Peikoff (1991) Objectivism The Philosophy of Ayn Rand Signet New York, NY
J.A. Petrick J.F Quinn (2000) ArticleTitle‘The Integrity Capacity Construct and Moral Progress in Business’ Journal of Business Ethics 23 IssueID1 3–18 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1006214726062
J.A. Petrick R.F. Scherer (2003) ArticleTitle‘The Enron Scandal and The Neglect of Management Integrity Capacity’ Mid-American Journal of Business 18 IssueID1 37–49
J.A. Petrick R.F. Scherer J.D. Brodzinski J.F. Quinn A.F. Ainina (1999) ArticleTitle‘Global Leadership Skills and Reputational Capital Intangible Resources for Sustained Competitive Advantage’ Academy of Management Executive 13 IssueID1 58–69
M.G. Piety (2004) ArticleTitle‘The Long Term Capitalism and Culture in the New Millennium’ Journal of Business Ethics 51 IssueID2 103–118 Occurrence Handle10.1023/B:BUSI.0000033605.51733.92
W. Powers R. Troubh H. Winokur (2002) Report on Investigation by the Special Investigative Committe of the Board of Directors of Enron Corp Enron Corporation Houston, TX
A. Rhand (1964) The Virtue of Selfishness A New Concept of Egoism Signet New York, NY
V.K. Rangan K.G. Palepu S. Srinivasan A. Bhasin M. Desai (1996) Enron Development Corp. The Dabhol Power Project in Maharashtra. India (A) Harvard Business Press Boston, MA
K.J. Rediker A. Seth (1995) ArticleTitle‘Boards of Directors and Substitution Effects of Alternative Governance Mechanisms’ Strategic Management Journal. 16 85–99
E.H. Schein (1992) Organizational Culture and Leadership Jossey-Bass San Francisco, CA
Senate Subcommittee on Investigations (2002). The Role of The Board of Directors in Enron’s Collapse, Report 107–70. U.S. Senate Government Affairs Documents, Washington, DC
R.R. Sims J. Brinkmann (2003) ArticleTitle‘Enron Ethics (Or Culture Matters More than Codes)’ Journal of Business Ethics 45 IssueID3 243–256 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1024194519384
J.B. Sorensen (2002) ArticleTitle‘The Strength of Corporate Culture and the Reliability of Firm Performance’ Administrative Science Quarterly. 47 IssueID1 70–91
E.H. Sutherland (1940) ArticleTitle‘White-Collar Criminality’ American Sociological Review 5 IssueID1 1–12
M. Swartz S. Watkins (2003) Power Failure Doubleday New York, NY
P. Tufano S. Bhatnagar (1994) Enron Gas Services Harvard Business Press Boston, MA
M. Weber (2001) The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism [and Other Writings] Penguin New York, NY
D. Windsor (2004) ‘Business Ethics at “The “Crooked E”” N.B. Rapoport B.G. Dharan (Eds) Enron Corporate Fiascos and Their Implications. Foundation Press New York, NY 659–687
G. Yukl (1998) Leadership In Organizations EditionNumber4 Prentice-Hall Toronto
G. Zandstra (2002) ArticleTitle‘Enron, Board Governance, and Moral Failings’ Corporate Governance. 2 IssueID2 16–19 Occurrence Handle10.1108/14720700210430333
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Brian E. Kulik is a Ph.D. candidate in Management at Washington State University’s School of Business. His work focuses on the prevention of corporate corruption, corporate governance and ethics, teamwork and diversity, and research methods. His research to date has appeared in the Western and National Academy of Management conference proceedings and the journal Organizational Analysis. He earned M.S. degrees from Washington State University and The University of Cincinnati, and M.B.A. from The University of Denver.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kulik, B.W. Agency Theory, Reasoning and Culture at Enron: In Search of a Solution. J Bus Ethics 59, 347–360 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-004-7308-2
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-004-7308-2