Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Stakeholder influence on corporate strategies over time

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Modern management reporting on its company's performance is influenced by individuals’ ethical considerations. Stakeholders’ philosophies have continued to change over the last 75 years affecting reporting systems for companies reporting information internally and externally. These fundamental changes in philosophy have affected how information is conveyed. We are not claiming that only one philosophical viewpoint dominates companies reporting practices, but there does appear to be a changing trend of philosophies building on one another. We use resource dependence theory in relationship to a decision-making model to explain changing stakeholders positions over time. This paper argues that six dominant philosophical theories have influenced the way individuals and organizations report financial and other information. Further, these philosophies then are depicted in a model that helps us to understand what influences companies to present themselves to the outside world. A vignette is used to depict changing philosophical views for several companies’ management report over 75 years.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bentham, J.: 1962, The Works of Jeremy Bentham (John Bowring, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Berman, S., A. Wicks, S. Kotha and T. Jones: 1999, ‘Does Stakeholder Orientation Matter? The Rela-tionship Between Stakeholder Management Models and Firm Financial Performance’, Academy of Manage-ment Journal 4, 488–506.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhappu, A.: 2000, The Japanese Family: An Institutional Logic for Japanese Corporate Networks and Japanese Management’, Academy of Management Review 25, 409–415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birkinshaw, J. and N. Hood: 1998, ‘Multinational Sub-sidiary Evolution: Capability and Charter Change in Foreign-Owned Subsidiary Companies’, Academy of Management Review 23, 773–795.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowie, N.: 1991, ‘Challenging the Egoistic Paradigm’, Business Ethics Quarterly 1, 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brass, D., K. Butterfield, and B. Skaggs: 1998, Rela-tionships and unethical behavior: A social network perspective’, Academy of Management Review 23, 14–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coca-Cola. (1935), Annual Report.

  • Cohen, R. L.: 1987, ‘Distributive Justice: Theory and Research’, Social Justice Research 1, 19–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colquitt, J. A., D. E. Conlon, M. J. Wesson, C. O. L. H. Porter, and K. Y. Ng, 2001. ‘Justice at the Millen-nium: A Meta-Analytic Review of 25 years of Orga-nizational Justice Research’, Journal of Applied Psychology 86, 425–445.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornell, B. and A. Shapiro: 1987, ‘Corporate Stake-holders and Corporate Finance’, Financial Management 16, 5–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Culbertson, A. L. and W. Rodgers: 1997, ‘Improving Managerial Effectiveness in the Workplace: The Case of Sexual Harassment of Navy Women’, Journal of Applied Social Psychology 27, 1953–1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cyert, R. M. and C. L. Hedrick: 1972, ‘Theory of the Firm: Past, Present, and Future; An Interpretation’, Journal of Economic Literature 10, 398–412.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dess, G. and J. Shaw: 2001, ‘Voluntary Turnover, Social Capital, and Organizational Performance’, Academy of Management Review 26, 446–456.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, T.: 1999, ‘Making Stakeholder Theory Whole’, Academy Management Review 24, 237–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, T. and L. Preston: 1995, ‘The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, Implications’, Academy Management Review 20, 65–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drazin, R., A. Glynn and R. Kazanjian: 1999, Multilevel Theorizing about Creativity in Organizations: A Sensemaking Perspective’, Academy of Management Review 24, 286–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forbes, D. and F. Miliken: 1999, ‘Cognition and Cor-porate Governance: Understanding Boards of Direc-tors as Strategic Decision-Making Groups’, Academy of Management Review 24, 489–505.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franke, G. R., D. F. Crown and D.F. Spake: 1997, ‘Gender Differences in Ethical Perceptions of Business Practices: A Social Role Theory Perspective’, Journal of Applied Psychology 82, 920–934.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R. E.: 1984, Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach (Pitman Publishing, Boston).

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M.: 1970, ‘The Responsibility of Business is to Increase its Profits’, New York Times Magazine, Sep-tember 13, 1970.

  • Frooman, J.: 1999, ‘Stakeholder Influence Strategies’, Academy of Management Review 24, 191–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilliland, S. W.: 1993, ‘The Perceived Fairness of Selection Systems: An Organizational Justice Per-spective’, Academy Management Review 18, 694–734.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gioia, D. A., M. Schultz and K. G. Corley: 2000, ‘Organizational Identity, Image, and Adaptive Insta-bility’, Academy Management Review 25, 63–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, R., D. Owen and C. Adams: 1996, Accounting and Accountability. Changes and Challenges in Corporate Social and Environmental Reporting (Prentice-Hall, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, M. and K. Kram: 2001, ‘Reconceptualizing Mentoring at Work: A Development Network Per-spective’, Academy of Management Review 26, 264–288.

  • Hobbes, T.: 1926, Leviathan (Hafner, NY).

  • Hu, H. T.: 1990, ‘Risk, Time, and Fiduciary Principles in Corporate Investment’, UCLA Law Review 38, 282.

  • Inguyen, Q.: 1999, ‘Emotional Capability, Emotional Intelligence, and Radical Change’, Academy of Man-agement Review 24, 325–345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jawahar, I. M. and G. L. Mclaughlin: 2001, ‘Toward a Descriptive Stakeholder Theory: An Organizational Life Cycle Approach’, Academy of Management Review 26, 397–414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, R. and D. Greening: 1999, ‘The Effects of Corporate Governance and Institutional Ownership Types on Corporate Social Performance’, Academy of Management Review 42, 564–576.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson-Laird, P. N.: 1981, ‘Mental Models in Cognitive Science’, in D. A. Norman (ed.), Perspectives on Cognitive Science (Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ), pp. 147–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, T. M.: 1991, ‘Ethical Decision-Making by Indi-viduals in Organizations: An Issue-Contingent Model’, Academy of Management Review 16, 366–395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, T. M. and A. C. Wicks, 1999, ‘Convergent Stakeholder Theory’, Academy of Management Review 24, 206–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, W. A.: 1990, ‘Toward an Agenda for Business Ethics Research’, Academy of Management Review 15, 311–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D. and A. Tversky: 1982, ‘On the Study of Statistical Intuitions’, in D. Kahneman, P. Slovic and A. Tversky (eds.), Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (Cambridge, New York), pp. 493–508.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korsgaard, M. A., B. M. Meglino and S. W. Lester: 1997, ‘Beyond Helping: Do Other-Oriented Values have Broader Implications in Organizations?’, Journal of Applied Psychology 82, 160–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kostova, T.: 1999, ‘Transnational Transfer of Strategic Organizational Practices: A Contextual Perspective’, Academy of Management Review 24, 308–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leana, C. and H. Van Buren III: 1999, ‘Organizational Social Capital and Employment Practices’, Academy of Management Review 24, 538–555.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masterson, S. S.: 2001, ‘A Trickle-Down Model of Organizational Justice: Relating Employees’ and Customers’ Perceptions of and Reactions to Fairness. Journal of Applied Psychology 86, 594–604.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mill, J. S.: 1957, Utilitarianism (Bobbs-Merrill, Indianapolis).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, R. K., B. R. Agle and D. J. Wood: 1997, ‘Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of Who and What Really Counts’, Academy of Management Review 22, 853–886.

    Google Scholar 

  • Modigliani, F. and M. H. Miller: 1958, ‘The Cost of Capital, Corporation Finance, and the Theory of Investment’, American Economic Review 48, 261–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moneva, J. and F. Llena: 2000, ‘Environmental Disclo-sures in the Annual Reports of Large Companies in Spain’, The European Accounting Review 9,7–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nahapiet, J. and S. Ghoshal: 1998, ‘Social Capital, Intellectual Capital and the Organizational Advantage’, Academy of Management Review 23, 242–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nehrt, C.: 1998: ‘Maintainability of First Mover Advantages when Environmental Regulations Differ Between Countries’, Academy of Management Review 23, 77–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, K.: 2000, ‘Organizational Transformation during Institutional Upheaval’, Academy of Management Review 25, 602–619.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nutt, P. C.: 1998, ‘Framing Strategic Decisions’, Orga-nization Science 9, 195–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Leary, A., R. Paetzold and R. Griffin: 2000, Sexual Harassment as Aggressive Behavior: An Actor Based Perspective’, Academy of Management Review 25, 372–388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pendergrast, M.: 1993, For God, Country, and Coca-Cola (Charles Scribner's Sons, NY).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J.: 1982, Organizations and Organization Theory (Pitman Publishing, Marshfield, MA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J. and A. Leong: 1977, ‘Resource Allocations in United funds: Examination of Power and Depen-dence’, Social Forces 55, 775–790.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J. and G. Salancik: 1978, The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective (Harper and Row, NY).

    Google Scholar 

  • Prestholdt, P. H., I. M. Lane and R. C. Mathews: 1987, ‘Nurse Turnover as Reasoned Action: Development of a Process Model’, Journal of Applied Psychology 72, 221–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J.: 1993, Political liberalism (Colombia University Press, NY).

    Google Scholar 

  • Robin, D. P., R. E. Reidenbach and P. J. Forrest: 1996, ‘The Perceived Importance of an Ethical Issue as an Influence on the Ethical Decision-Making of ad Managers’, Journal of Business Research 35, 17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodgers, W.: 1991, ‘How Do Loan Officers make their Decisions about Credit risks? A Study of Parallel Dis-tributed Processing (PDP)’, Journal of Economic Psy-chology 12, 243–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodgers, W.: 1992, ‘The Effects of Accounting Infor-mation on Individuals’ Perceptual Processes’, Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance 7, 67–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodgers, W.: 1997, Throughput Modeling: Financial Infor-mation Used by Decision Makers (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodgers, W.: 1999, ‘The Influences of Conflicting Information on Novices’ and Loan Officers’ Actions’, Journal of Economic Psychology 20, 123–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodgers, W. and S. Gago: 2001, ‘Cultural and Ethical Effects on Managerial Decisions: Examined in a Throughput Model’, Journal of Business Ethics 31, 355–367.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, M.: 1997, Ethics and Justice in Organizations. (Ashgate, Sydney).

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A.: 1991, The Wealth of Nations (Prometheus Books).

  • Trevino, L. K. and S. A. Youngblood: 1990, ‘Bad Apples in Bad Barrels: A Causal Analysis of Ethical Decision-Making Behavior’, Journal of Applied Psychology 75, 378–385.

    Google Scholar 

  • Unsworth, K.: 2001, ‘Unpacking Creativity. Academy of Management Review 23, 77–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldman, D. and F. Yammarino: 1999, ‘CEO Charis-matic Leadership: Levels-of-Management and Levels-of-Analysis Effects’, Academy of Management Review 24, 266–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wrzesniewski, A. and J. Dutton: 2001, ‘Crafting a Job: Revisioning Employees as Active crafters of their Work’, Academy of Management Review 26, 179–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wyburd, G.: 1998, Competitive and Ethical? (Kogan Page Limited, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zahra, S., R. Ireland, I. Gutierrez and M. Hitt: 2000, ‘Privatization and Entrepreneurial Transformation: Emerging Issues and a Future Research Agenda’, Academy of Management Review 25, 509–524.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Graduate School of Management, University of California, Riverside, USA

    Waymond Rodgers & Susana Gago

Authors
  1. Waymond Rodgers
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Susana Gago
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rodgers, W., Gago, S. Stakeholder influence on corporate strategies over time. Journal of Business Ethics 52, 349–363 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-004-1534-5

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-004-1534-5

Search

Navigation