Abstract
To evaluate the association between preoperative breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) utilization and the rate of multiple surgeries, and to investigate the extent of any variation of rates of multiple surgeries among physicians. We identified patients with stage 0, I, or II breast cancer diagnosed between 2002 and 2007 in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare database. Using diagnosis and procedure codes, we defined that the initial treatment episode had ended when a gap in surgery occurred at least 90 days after primary surgery. Surgical procedures of partial mastectomy or mastectomy during the initial treatment period were calculated to identify patients who received multiple surgeries. Multilevel logistic regression models were used to identify patient- and physician-level predictors of multiple surgeries. Of 45,453 women with early stage breast cancer who were treated by 2,595 surgeons during the study period, 9,462 patients (20.8 %) received multiple breast surgeries; of these patients, 8,318 (87.9 %) underwent one additional surgery, 988 (10.4 %) received two additional surgeries, and 156 (1.6 %) received three or more additional surgeries. Among 2,997 (6.6 % of the entire cohort) women who underwent preoperative breast MRI evaluation, 770 received multiple breast surgeries. After we adjusted for patient and tumor characteristics associated with multiple surgeries, we found that the rate of multiple surgeries was not significantly different between the two groups with or without preoperative breast MRI. Furthermore, the median odds ratio of 2.0, corresponding with the median value of the relative odds of receiving multiple surgeries between two randomly chosen physicians after controlling for other confounders, indicated a large individual surgeon effect. Substantial variation was observed in the rates of multiple surgeries in women aged 66 and older with early stage breast cancer. Evidence does not support that preoperative breast MRI reduces the incidence of multiple surgeries.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Lee MC, Rogers K, Griffith K et al (2009) Determinants of breast conservation rates: reasons for mastectomy at a comprehensive cancer center. Breast J 15(1):34–40
McCahill LE, Single RM, Aiello Bowles EJ et al (2012) Variability in reexcision following breast conservation surgery. JAMA 307(5):467–475
Kotwall C, Ranson M, Stiles A et al (2007) Relationship between initial margin status for invasive breast cancer and residual carcinoma after re-excision. Am Surg 73(4):337–343
Waljee JF, Hu ES, Newman LA et al (2008) Predictors of re-excision among women undergoing breast-conserving surgery for cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 15(5):1297–1303
Menes TS, Tartter PI, Bleiweiss I et al (2005) The consequence of multiple re-excisions to obtain clear lumpectomy margins in breast cancer patients. Ann Surg Oncol 12(11):881–885
Morrow M, Jagsi R, Alderman AK et al (2009) Surgeon recommendations and receipt of mastectomy for treatment of breast cancer. JAMA 302(14):1551–1556
Cellini C, Hollenbeck ST, Christos P et al (2004) Factors associated with residual breast cancer after reexcision for close or positive margins. Ann Surg Oncol 11(10):915–920
Subhas G, Shah AJ, Gupta A et al (2011) Review of third and fourth re-excision for narrow or positive margins of invasive and intraductal carcinoma. Int Surg 96(1):18–20
Wang SY, Virnig BA, Tuttle TM et al (2012) Variability of preoperative breast MRI utilization among older women with newly diagnosed early-stage breast cancer. Breast J (in press)
Lehman CD, DeMartini W, Anderson BO et al (2009) Indications for breast MRI in the patient with newly diagnosed breast cancer. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 7:193–201
Hwang N, Schiller DE, Crystal P et al (2009) Magnetic resonance imaging in the planning of initial lumpectomy for invasive breast carcinoma: its effect on ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence after breast-conservation therapy. Ann Surg Oncol 16(11):3000–3009
Bleicher RJ, Ciocca RM, Egleston BL et al (2009) The association of routine pretreatment magnetic resonance imaging with time to surgery, mastectomy rate, and margin status. J Am Coll Surg 209(2):180–187
Turnbull L, Brown S, Harvey I et al (2010) Comparative effectiveness of MRI in breast cancer (COMICE) trial: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 375:563–571
Houssami N, Ciatto S, Macaskill P et al (2008) Accuracy and surgical impact of magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer staging: systematic review and meta-analysis in detection of multifocal and multicentric cancer. J Clin Oncol 26(19):3248–3258
Vanderwalde LH, Dang CM, Bresee C et al (2011) Discordance between pathologic and radiologic tumor size on breast MRI may contribute to increased re-excision rates. Am Surg 77(10):1361–1363
Blair SL, Thompson K, Rococco J et al (2009) Attaining negative margins in breast-conservation operations: is there a consensus among breast surgeons? J Am Coll Surg 209(5):608–613
Azu M, Abrahamse P, Katz SJ et al (2010) What is an adequate margin for breast-conserving surgery? Surgeon attitudes and correlates. Ann Surg Oncol 17(2):558–563
SEER-Medicare Linked Database. http://healthservices.cancer.gov/seermedicare/overview/. Accessed 20 Sept 2010
Bach PB, Guadagnoli E, Schrag D et al (2002) Patient demographic and socioeconomic characteristics in the SEER-Medicare database applications and limitations. Med Care 40(8 Suppl IV):19–25
Friese CR, Neville BA, Edge SB et al (2009) Breast biopsy patterns and outcomes in Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare data. Cancer 115(4):716–724
Klabunde CN, Warren JL, Legler JM (2002) Assessing comorbidity using claims data: an overview. Med Care 40(8 Suppl IV):26–35
Baldwin LM, Adamache W, Klabunde CN et al (2002) Linking physician characteristics and medicare claims data: issues in data availability, quality, and measurement. Med Care 40(8 Suppl IV):82–95
Larsen K, Merlo J (2005) Appropriate assessment of neighborhood effects on individual health: integrating random and fixed effects in multilevel logistic regression. Am J Epidemiol 161:81–88
Miller BT, Abbott AM, Tuttle TM (2011) The influence of preoperative MRI on breast cancer treatment. Ann Surg Oncol, e-pub ahead of print
Pengel KE, Loo CE, Teertstra HJ et al (2008) The impact of preoperative MRI on breast-conserving surgery of invasive cancer: a comparative cohort study. Breast Cancer Res Treat 116(1):161–169
Mann RM, Loo CE, Wobbes T et al (2010) The impact of preoperative breast MRI on the re-excision rate in invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast. Breast Cancer Res Treat 119(2):415–422
Brennan ME, Houssami N, Lord S et al (2009) Magnetic resonance imaging screening of the contralateral breast in women with newly diagnosed breast cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis of incremental cancer detection and impact on surgical management. J Clin Oncol 27(33):5640–5649
Desch CE, McNiff KK, Schneider EC et al (2008) American Society of Clinical Oncology/National Comprehensive Cancer Network quality measures. J Clin Oncol 26(21):3631–3637
Talsma AK, Reedijk AM, Damhuis RA et al (2011) Re-resection rates after breast-conserving surgery as a performance indicator: introduction of a case-mix model to allow comparison between Dutch hospitals. Eur J Surg Oncol 37(4):357–363
Yeh ED (2010) Breast magnetic resonance imaging: Current clinical indications. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 18(2):155–169, vii
Morrow M, Freedman G (2006) A clinical oncology perspective on the use of breast MR. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 14(3):363–78, vi
Orel SG, Reynolds C, Schnall MD et al (1997) Breast carcinoma: MR imaging before re-excisional biopsy. Radiology 205(2):429–436
Acknowledgments
The authors acknowledge the efforts of the Applied Research Program, NCI; the Office of Research, Development and Information, CMS; Information Management Services (IMS), Inc.; and the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program tumor registries in the creation of the SEER-Medicare Database. The authors of this paper are responsible for its content. This research is supported by the Doctoral Dissertation Fellowship Award (to S.-Y. Wang) from the University of Minnesota Graduate School. At the time of the study, the corresponding author (S.-Y. W.) was a PhD student, Division of Health Policy and Management, University of Minnesota School of Public Health.
Conflict of interest
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, SY., Kuntz, K.M., Tuttle, T.M. et al. The association of preoperative breast magnetic resonance imaging and multiple breast surgeries among older women with early stage breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 138, 137–147 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-013-2420-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-013-2420-6