Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Correlation between consanguineous marriages and age-standardized mortality rate due to breast cancer, an ecologic study

  • Letter to the editor
  • Published:
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Bittles AH (2001) Consanguinity and its relevance to clinical genetics. Clin Genet 60:89–98

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Stoltenberg C, Magnus P, Skrondal A, Lie RT (1999) Consanguinity and recurrence risk of stillbirth and infant death. Am J Public Health 89:517–523

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bittles AH, Neel JV (1994) The costs of human inbreeding and their implications for variations at the DNA level. Nat Genet 8:117–121

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Nafissi S, Ansari-Lari M, Saadat M (2010) Effect of inbreeding on weight gain of offspring from birth to 12 months after birth: a study from Iran. J Biosoc Sci 42:195–200

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Saadat M (2008) Consanguinity and national IQ scores. J Epidemiol Community Health 62:566–567

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Saadat M, Zendeh-Boodi Z (2006) Correlation between incidences of self-inflicted burns and means of inbreeding coefficients, an ecologic study. Ann Epidemiol 16:708–711

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Saadat M (2007) Consanguinity associated with child and adult mortality in 24 Asian and African countries, an ecological study. Iran J Public Health 36:35–39

    Google Scholar 

  8. Martin AO, Dunn JK, Simpson JL, Olsen CL, Kemel S, Grace M, Lisa S, Sarto GE, Smalley B, Steinberg AG (1980) Cancer mortality in a human isolate. J Natl Cancer Inst 65:109–113

    Google Scholar 

  9. Rudan I (1999) Inbreeding and cancer incidence in human isolates. Hum Biol 91:173–187

    Google Scholar 

  10. Denic S, Frampton C, Nicholls MG (2007) Risk of cancer in an inbred population. Cancer Detect Prev 31:263–269

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bener A, El Ayoubi HR, Chouchane L, Ali AI, Al Kubaisi A, Al Sulaiti H, Teebi AS (2009) Impact of consanguinity on cancer in a highly endogamous population. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 10:1–4

    Google Scholar 

  12. Denic S, Bener A, Sabri S, Khatib F, Milenkovic J (2005) Parental consanguinity and risk of breast cancer: a population-based case-control study. Med Sci Monit 11:CR415–CR419

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Denic S, Bener A (2001) Consanguinity decreases risk of breast cancer-cervical cancer unaffected. Br J Cancer 85:1675–1679

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Saadat M, Ansari-Lari M, Farhud DD (2004) Consanguineous marriage in Iran. Ann Hum Biol 31:263–269

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Othman H, Saadat M (2009) Prevalence of consanguineous marriages in Syria. J Biosoc Sci 41:685–692

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Foulkes WD, Wong N, Rozen F, Brunet J-S, Narod SA (1998) Survival of patients with breast cancer and BRCA1 mutations. Lancet 351:1359–1360

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Robson N, Gilewski T, Haas B, Levin D, Borgen P, Rajan P, Hirschaut Y, Pressmann P, Rosen PP, Lesser ML, Norton L, Offit K (1998) BRCA-associated breast cancer in young women. J Clin Oncol 16:1642–1649

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Stoppa-Lyonnet D, Ansquer Y, Dreyfus H, Gautier C, Gauthier-Villars M, Bourstyn E, Clogh KB, Magdelenat H, Pouillart P, Vincent-Salomon A, Fourquet A, Institute Curie Breast Cancer Group, Asselain B (2000) Familial invasive breast cancers. Worse outcome related to BRCA1 mutations. J Clin Oncol 18:4053–4059

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hagen AI, Tretli S, Maehle L, Apold J, Veda N, Moller P (2009) Survival in Norwegian BRCA1 mutation carriers with breast cancer. Hered Cancer Clin Pract 7:7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Hung RJ, Hall J, Bernnan P, Boffestta P (2005) Genetic polymorphisms in the base excision repair pathway and cancer risk: a HuGE review. Am J Epidemiol 162:925–942

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Saadat M (2006) Genetic polymorphisms of glutathione S-transferase T1 (GSTT1) and susceptibility to gastric cancer: a meta-analysis. Cancer Sci 97:505–509

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Saadat M, Ansari-Lari M (2009) Polymorphism of XRCC1 (at codon 399) and susceptibility to breast cancer, a meta-analysis of the literatures. Breast Cancer Res Treat 115:137–144

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The authors are indebted to Dr. Maryam Ansari-Lari for critical reading of the manuscript and for her contribution in discussion. This study was supported by Shiraz University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mostafa Saadat.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Saadat, M., Saadat, I. Correlation between consanguineous marriages and age-standardized mortality rate due to breast cancer, an ecologic study. Breast Cancer Res Treat 121, 795–797 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-009-0711-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-009-0711-8

Keywords

Navigation