Skip to main content
Log in

Behavioral Measures of Multisensory Integration: Bounds on Bimodal Detection Probability

  • Letter to the Editor
  • Published:
Brain Topography Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

One way to test and quantify multisensory integration in a behavioral paradigm is to compare bimodal detection probability with bounds defined by some combination of the unimodal detection probabilities. Here we (1) improve on an upper bound recently suggested by Stevenson et al. (Brain Topogr 27(6):707–730, 2014), (2) present a lower bound, (3) interpret the bounds in terms of stochastic dependency between the detection probabilities, (4) discuss some additional assumptions required for the validity of any such bound, (5) suggest some potential applications to neurophysiologic measures, and point out some parallels to the ‘race model inequality’ for reaction times.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Notes

  1. Throughout, we write \(P_{{\mathcal{AV}}}(A=1, V=1)\) instead of \(P_{{\mathcal{AV}}}(\{A=1\}\cap \{V=1\})\), etc., for convenience.

References

  • Colonius H (1990) Possibly dependent probability summation of reaction time. J Math Psychol 34:253–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colonius H, Diederich A (2006) Race model inequality: interpreting a geometric measure of the amount of violation. Psychol Rev 113(1):148–154

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Diederich A (1992) Intersensory facilitation: race, superposition, and diffusion models for reaction time to multiple stimuli. Verlag Peter Lang

  • Fréchet M (1951) Sur les tableaux de corrélation dont les marges sont donnés. Annales de l’Université de Lyon Section A, Séries 3(14):53–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Grice G (1968) Stimulus intensity and response evocation. Psychol Rev 75:359–373

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Joe H (1997) Multivariate models and dependence concepts. No. 73 in monographs on statistics and applied probability. Chapman & Hall, London, UK

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Joe H (2015) Dependence modeling with copulas. No. 134 in monographs on statistics and applied probability. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall A, Olkin I (1985) A family of bivariate distributions generated by the bivariate bernoulli distribution. J Am Stat Assoc 80(390):332–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller J (1982) Divided attention: evidence for coactivation with redundant signals. Cognit Psychol 14:247–279

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Otto T, Mamassian P (2012) Noise and correlations in parallel perceptual decision making. Curr Biol 22(15):1391–1396

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Otto TU, Dassy B, Mamassian P (2013) Principles of multisensory behavior. J Neurosci 33(17):7463–7474

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stein B, Meredith M (1993) The merging of the senses. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein EB (ed) (2012) The new handbook of multisensory processing. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson R, Ghose D, Fister J, Sarko D, Altieri N, Nidiffer A, Kurela L, Siemann J, James T, Wallace M (2014) Identifying and quantifying multisensory integration: a tutorial review. Brain Topogr 27(6):707–730

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thorisson H (2000) Coupling, stationarity, and regeneration. Springer, New York, NY

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Townsend J, Nozawa G (1995) Spatio-temporal properties of elementary perception: an investigation of parallel, serial, and coactive theories. J Math Psychol 39(4):321–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Townsend J, Wenger M (2004) A theory of interactive parallel processing: new capacity measures and predictions for a response time inequality series. Psychol Rev 111(4):1003–1035

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich R, Miller J (1997) Tests of race models for reaction time in experiments with asynchronous redundant signals. J Math Psychol 41(4):367–381

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Thanks to Adele Diederich for some helpful comments. Comments from the anonymous reviewers for improving readability are greatly appreciated.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hans Colonius.

Appendix

Appendix

Derivation of the Bounds in Eq. (4)

The Fréchet bounds (Fréchet 1951; Joe 1997) for the bivariate Bernoulli distribution with fixed marginal probabilities \(p_{1+}, p_{+1}\) presented in Table 1 are

$$\max \{0, p_{1+}+p_{+1} -1\} \le p_{11} \le \min \{p_{1+}, p_{+1}\}.$$
(7)

We want an upper and a lower bound for

$$\begin{aligned}1-p_{00}&\equiv p_{11}+p_{01}+p_{10} \\&= p_{+1}+p_{1+}-p_{11}\end{aligned}$$
(8)

Inserting the upper and the lower Fréchet bound for \(p_{11}\) yields

$$\begin{aligned} p_{+1}+p_{1+}-\min \{p_{1+}, p_{+1}\}&\le 1-p_{00} \le p_{+1}+p_{1+}- \max \{0, p_{1+}+p_{+1} -1\} \\ \text{ or, }& \\ \max \{ p_{1+}, p_{+1}\}&\le 1-p_{00} \le \min \{p_{1+}+p_{+1},1\}, \end{aligned}$$
(9)

with the last line following after simple algebraic transformations. Then Eq. (9) is identical to the bounds in Eq. (4).

Dependence Between\(A\) and \(V\)

The correlation between \(A\) and \(V\) equals

$$\rho = \frac{p_{11}-\pi _1\pi _2}{\sqrt{\pi _1(1-\pi _1)\pi _2(1-\pi _2)}}.$$

Inserting the upper and lower Fréchet bound for \(p_{11}\) into this expression results in

$$\begin{aligned} \max \left\{ -\sqrt{\frac{\pi _1 \pi _2}{\bar{\pi }_1 \bar{\pi }_2}},-\sqrt{\frac{\bar{\pi }_1 \bar{\pi }_2}{\pi _1 \pi _2}}\right\} \le \rho \le \sqrt{ \frac{\pi _{min}(1-\pi _{max})}{\pi _{max}(1-\pi _{min})}}, \end{aligned}$$

where \(\bar{\pi }_i=1-\pi _i\), \(i=1,2\), \(\pi _{min}=\min \{\pi _1,\pi _2\}\), and \(\pi _{max}=\max \{\pi _1,\pi _2\}\). The claims about perfect positive and negative dependence also follow by simple insertions into these bounds.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Colonius, H. Behavioral Measures of Multisensory Integration: Bounds on Bimodal Detection Probability. Brain Topogr 28, 1–4 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10548-014-0421-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10548-014-0421-3

Keywords

Navigation