Skip to main content
Log in

Modification of Two-Equation Models to Account for Plant Drag

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Boundary-Layer Meteorology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A modification of the most popular two-equation (E–φ) models, taking into account the plant drag, is proposed. Here E is the turbulent kinetic energy (TKE) and φ is any of the following variables: El (product of E and the mixing length l), \(\varepsilon\) (dissipation rate of TKE), and ω (specific dissipation of TKE, \(\omega = \varepsilon\!/\!E\)). The proposed modification is due to the fact that the model constants estimated experimentally for ‘free-air’ flow do not allow for adequate reconstruction of the ratio between the production and dissipation rates of TKE in the vegetation canopy and have to be adjusted. The modification is universal, i.e. of the same type for all E–φ models considered. The numerical experiments carried out for both homogeneous and heterogeneous plant canopies with E–φ models (and with the El model taken as a kind of reference) show that the modification performs well. They also suggest that E\(\varepsilon\) and E–ω schemes are more promising than the EEl scheme for canopy flow simulation since they are not limited by the need to use a wall function.

In addition, a new parameterization for enhanced dissipation within the plant canopy is derived. It minimizes the model sensitivity to C μ, the key parameter for two-equation schemes, and whose estimates unfortunately vary considerably from experiment to experiment. The comparison of results of new modified E\(\varepsilon\) and E –ω models with observations from both field and wind-tunnel experiments shows that the proposed parameterization is quite robust. However, because of uncertainties with the turbulence Prandtl and Schmidt numbers for the E\(\varepsilon\) model within the canopy, the E–ω model is recommended for future implementation, with the suggested modifications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amiro BD (1990) Drag coefficients and turbulence spectra within three Boreal forest canopies. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 52:227–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Apsley DD, Castro IP (1997) A limited-length-scale k\(\varepsilon\) model for the neutral and stably-stratified atmospheric boundary layer. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 83:75–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayotte KW, Finnigan JJ, Raupach MR (1999) A second-order closure for neutrally stratified vegetative canopy flows. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 90:189–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackadar AK (1962) The vertical distribution of wind and turbulent exchange in a neutral atmosphere. J Geophys Res 67:3095–3102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brunet Y, Finnigan JJ, Raupach MR (1994) A wind tunnel study of air flow in waving wheat: single-point velocity statistics. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 70:95–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cescatti A, Marcolla B (2004) Drag coefficient and turbulence intensity in conifer canopies. Agric For Meteorol 121:197–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen JM, Black TA, Novak MD, Adams RS (1995) A wind tunnel study of turbulent air flow in forest clearcuts. In Coutts MP, Grace J (eds) Wind and trees. Cambridge University Press, London, pp 71–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Counihan J (1969) An improved method of simulating an atmospheric boundary layer in a wind tunnel. Atmos Environ 3:197–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deacon EL (1973) Geostrophic drag coefficients. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 5:321–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deardorf JW (1978) Closure of second- and third-moment rate equations for diffusion in homogeneous turbulence. Phys Fluids 21:525–530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Detering HW, Etling D (1985) Application of the E\(\varepsilon\) turbulence model to the atmospheric boundary layer. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 33:113–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dubov A, Bykova A, Marunich C (1978) Turbulence in vegetation canopy. Hydrometeoizdat, Leningrad, 182 pp (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Finnigan JJ, Brunet Y (1995) Turbulent airflow in forests on flat and hilly terrain. In: Coutts MP, Grace J (eds) Wind and trees. Cambridge University Press, London, pp 3–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Finnigan JJ (2000) Turbulence in plant canopies. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 32:519–571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foudhil H, Brunet Y, Caltagirone J-P (2005) A fine-scale k\(\varepsilon\) model for atmospheric flow over heterogeneous landscapes. Environ Fluid Mech 5:247–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardiner BA (1994) Wind and wind forces in a plantation spruce forest. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 67:161–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green SR (1992) Modelling turbulent air flow in a stand of widely-spaced trees. Phoenics J 5:294–312

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallidin S (1985) Leaf and bark area distribution in a pine forest. In: Hutchison BA, Hicks BB (eds) The forest-atmosphere interaction. D. Riedel Publishing Company, Dordrecht/Boston/Lancaster, pp 39–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Hipsey MR, Sivapalan M, Clement TP (2004) A numerical and field investigation of surface heat fluxes from small wind-sheltered waterbodies in semi-arid Western Australia. Environ Fluid Mech 4:79–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones WP, Launder BE (1972) The prediction of laminarization with a two-equation model of turbulence. Int J Heat Mass Transfer 15:301–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaimal JC, Finnigan JJ (1994) Atmospheric boundary layer flows: their structure and measurement. Oxford University Press, New York, 289 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Kantha LH (2004) The length scale equation in turbulence models. Nonlinear Process Geophys 7:1–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Kantha LH, Bao J-W, Carniel S (2005) A note on tennekes hypothesis and its impact on second moment closure models. Ocean Model 9:23–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Katul GG, Albertson JD (1998) An investigation of higher order closure models for a forested canopy. Meteorol 89:47–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Katul GG, Chang WH (1999) Principal length scales in second-order closure models for canopy turbulence. J Appl Meteorol 38:1631–1643

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katul GG, Mahrt L, Poggi D, Sanz C (2004) One- and two-equation models for canopy turbulence. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 113:81–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klaassen W (1992) Averige fluxes from heterogeneous vegetated regions. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 58:329–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolmogorov A (1942) Turbulence flow equations of an uncompressible fluid. Transactions of the USSR Academy of Sciences, book “Physics” 6:56–58 (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kondo J, Akashi S (1976) Numerical studies on the two-dimensional flow in horizontally homogeneous canopy layers. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 10:255–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Launder BE, Spalding DB (1974) The numerical computation of turbulent flows. Comp Meth Appl Mech Eng 3:269–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Launder BE, Reece GJ, Rodi W (1975) Progress in development of a Reynolds-stress turbulence closure. J Fluid Mech 68:537–566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laykhtman D (1970) Physics of atmospheric boundary layer. Hydrometeoizdat, Leningrad, 341pp (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Legg BJ, Coppin PC, Raupach MR (1984) A three-hot-wire anemometer for measuring two velocity components in high intensity turbulent boundary-layers. J Phys E 17:970–976

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li ZJ, Miller DR, Lin JD (1985) A first order closure scheme to describe counter-gradient momentum transport in plant canopies. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 33:77–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li ZJ, Lin JD, Miller DR (1990) Air flow over and through a forest edge: a steady-state numerical simulation. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 51:179–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lien FS, Yee E, Wilson JD (2005) Numerical modelling of the turbulent flow developing within and over a 3-d building array, Part II: a mathematical foundation for a distributed drag force approach. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 114:245–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu J, Chen JM, Black TA, Novak MD (1996) E\(\varepsilon\) modelling of turbulent air flow downwind of a model forest edge. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 77:21–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mellor GL, Yamada T (1974) A hierarchy of turbulence closure models for planetary boundary layers. J Atmos Sci 31:1791–1806

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyers T, Paw U (1986) Testing of a higher-order closure model for modeling airflow within and above plant canopies. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 37:297–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller DR, Lin JD, Lu ZN (1991) Air flow across an alpine forest clearing: a model and field measurements. Agric For Metorol 56:209–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morse AP, Gardiner BA, Marshall BJ (2002) Mechanisms controlling turbulence development across a forest edge. Boundary Layer Meteorol 103:227–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neary VS (2003) Numerical solution of fully developed flow with vegetative resistance. J Eng Mech 129:558–563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Novak MD, Warland JS, Orchansly AL, Ketler R, Green S (2000) Wind tunnel and field measurement flow in forest. Part I: uniformly thinned stands. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 95:457–459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pielke R (2002) Mesoscale meteorological modeling. Academic Press, San Diego, California, 676 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinard J-P, Wilson JD (2001) First- and second-order closure models for wind in a plant canopy. J Appl Meteorol 40:1762–1768

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poggi D, Porporato A, Ridolfi L, Albertson JD, Katul GG (2004) The effect of vegetation density on canopy sub-layer turbulence. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 111:565–587

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pope SB (2000) Turbulent flows. Cambridge University Press, United Kingdom, 771 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Raupach MR, Shaw RH (1982) Averaging procedures for flow within vegetation canopies. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 22:79–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raupach MR, Bradley EF, Ghadiri H (1987) A wind tunnel investigation into aerodynamic effect of forest clearings on the nesting of Abbott’s Booby on Christmas Island, Internal report, CSIRO Centre for environmental Mechanics, Canberra

  • Raupach MR, Finnigan JJ, Brunet Y (1996) Coherent eddies and turbulence in vegetation canopies: the mixing layer analogy. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 78:351–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raynor GS (1971) Wind and temperature structure in a Coniferous forest and a contiguous field. Forest Sci 17(3):351–363

    Google Scholar 

  • Saffman PG (1970) A model for inhomogeneous turbulent flow. Proc Roy Soc London A 317:417–433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanz C (2003) A note on k\(\varepsilon\) modelling of vegetation canopy air-flows. Meteorol 108:191–197

    Google Scholar 

  • Seginer I (1974) Aerodynamic roughness of vegetated surfaces. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 5:383–393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seginer I, Mulhearn PJ, Bradley EF, Finnigan JJ (1976) Turbulent flow in a model plant canopy. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 10:423–453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw RH, Silversides RH, Thurtell GW (1974) Some observations of turbulence and turbulent transport within and above plant canopies. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 5:429–449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw RH, Den Hartog G, Neumann HH (1988) Influence of foliar density and thermal stability on profiles of Reynolds stress and turbulent intensity in a Deciduous forest. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 45:391–409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sogachev A, Menzhulin G, Heimann M, Lloyd J (2002) A simple three dimensional canopy—planetary boundary layer simulation model for scalar concentrations and fluxes. Tellus 54B:784–819

    Google Scholar 

  • Sogachev A, Panferov O, Gravenhorst G, Vesala T (2005) Numerical analysis of flux footprints for different landscapes. Theor Appl Climatol 80(2–4):169–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Umlauf L, Burchard H (2003) A generic length-scale equation for geophysical turbulence models. J Marine Res 61:235–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Ulden AP, Holtslag AAM (1980) The wind at heights between 10 m and 200 m in comparison with the geostrophic wind. J Proc Sem Radioactive Releases, Vol 1, Riso, Denmark, C.E.C. Luxemburg, pp 83–92

  • Van Ulden AP, Wieringa J (1996) Atmospheric boundary layer research at cabauw. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 78:39–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veen AWL, Klaassen W, Kruijt B, Hutjes RWA (1996) Forest edges and the soil–vegetation–atmosphere interaction at the landscape scale: the state of affairs. Progress in Phys Geog 20(3):292–310

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang H, Takle ES (1995) A numerical simulation of boundary-layer flows near shelterbelts. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 75:141–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warner JC, Sherwood CR, Arango HG, Signell RP (2005) Performance of four turbulence closure models implemented using a generic length scalar method. Ocean Model 8:81–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wichmann M, Schaller E (1986) On the determination of the closure parameters in higher-order closure models. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 37:323–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilcox DC (1988) Reassessment of the scale determining equation for advance turbulence models. AIAA J 26:1299–1310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilcox DC (1998) Turbulence modeling for CFD. DCW Industries, Inc, La Cañada, CA, 540 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson JD (1988) A second-order closure model for flow through vegetation. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 42:371–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson JD, Flesch TK (1999) Wind and remnant tree sway in forest openings III. A windflow model to diagnose spatial variation. Agric For Meteorol 93:259–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson JD, Finnigan JJ, Raupach MR (1998) A first-order closure for disturbed plant canopy flows, and its application to windflow through a canopy on a ridge. Quat J Roy Meteorol Soc 124:705–732

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson JD, Ward DP, Thurtell GW, Kidd GE (1982) Statistics of atmospheric turbulence within and above a corn canopy. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 24:495–519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson NR, Shaw RH (1977) A higher order closure model for canopy flow. J Appl Meteorol 16:1197–1205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wooding RA (1968) A low speed wind tunnel for model studies in micrometeorology. II. The Pye laboratory wind tunnel. Aust CSIRO Div Plant Ind Tech Pap 25:1–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Wyngaard JC, Cote OR, Rao KS (1974) Modeling the atmospheric boundary layer. Adv Geophys 18A:193–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamada T (1982) A numerical model study of turbulent airflow in and above a forest canopy. J Meteorol Soc Japan 60:439–454

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeng P, Takahashi H (2000) A first-order closure model for the wind flow within and above vegetation canopies. Agric For Meteorol 103:301–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zilitinkevich S (1970) Dynamics of the atmospheric boundary layer. Hydrometeoizdat, Leningrad, 291 pp (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrey Sogachev.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sogachev, A., Panferov, O. Modification of Two-Equation Models to Account for Plant Drag. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 121, 229–266 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-006-9073-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-006-9073-5

Keywords

Navigation