Abstract
Dissanayake argues that art behaviors – which she characterizes first as patterns or syndromes of creation and response and later as rhythms and modes of mutuality – are universal, innate, old, and a source of intrinsic pleasure, these being hallmarks of biological adaptation. Art behaviors proved to enhance survival by reinforcing cooperation, interdependence, and community, and, hence, became selected for at the genetic level. Indeed, she claims that art is essential to the fullest realization of our human nature. I make three criticisms: Dissanayake’s theory cannot account adequately for differences in the aesthetic value of artworks; the connections drawn between art and reproductive success are too stretched to account for art's production, nature, and reception; indeed, art enters the picture only because it is so thinly characterized that it remains in doubt that her topic is art as we understand it.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
S. Davies (2000) ‘Non-western art and art’s definition’ N. Carroll (Eds) Theories of Art Today University of Wisconsin Press Madison 199–216
E. Dissanayake (1988) What is Art for? University of Washington Press Seattle
E. Dissanayake (1995) Homo Aestheticus: Where Art Comes from and Why University of Washington Press Seattle
E. Dissanayake (1998) ArticleTitle℈Komar and Melamid discover pleistocene taste’ Philosophy and Literature 22 486–496
E. Dissanayake (2000) Art and Intimacy: How the Arts Began University of Washington Press Seattle
D. Dutton (2003) ‘Universalismevolutionary psychology, and aesthetics’ S. Davies A.C. Sukla (Eds) Art and Essence Praeger Westport 213–226
G. Miller (2000) The Mating Mind: How Sexual Choice Shaped the Evolution of Human Nature Doubleday London
G.H. Orians J.H. Heerwagen (1992) ‘Evolved responses to landscapes’ J.H. Barkow L. Cosmides J. Tooby (Eds) The Adapted Mind: Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of Culture Oxford University Press New York 555–579
L. Shiner (2001) The Invention of Art: A Cultural History University of Chicago Press Chicago
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Davies, S. Ellen Dissanayake’s Evolutionary Aesthetic. Biol Philos 20, 291–304 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-004-0193-3
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-004-0193-3