Skip to main content
Log in

Trends in cation, nitrogen, sulfate and hydrogen ion concentrations in precipitation in the United States and Europe from 1978 to 2010: a new look at an old problem

  • Published:
Biogeochemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Industrial emissions of SO2 and NOx, resulting in the formation and deposition of sulfuric and nitric acids, affect the health of both terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems. Since the mid-late 20th century, legislation to control acid rain precursors in both Europe and the US has led to significant declines in both SO4–S and H+ in precipitation and streams. However, several authors noted that declines in streamwater SO4–S did not result in stoichiometric reductions in stream H+, and suggested that observed reductions in base cation inputs in precipitation could lessen the effect of air pollution control on improving stream pH. We examined long-term precipitation chemistry (1978–2010) from nearly 30 sites in the US and Europe that are variably affected by acid deposition and that have a variety of industrial and land-use histories to (1) quantify trends in SO4–S, H+, NH4–N, Ca, and NO3–N, (2) assess stoichiometry between H+ and SO4–S before and after 1990, and (3) examine regional synchrony of trends. We expected that although the overall efforts of developed countries to reduce air pollution and acid rain by the mid-late 20th century would tend to synchronize precipitation chemistry among regions, geographically varied patterns of fossil fuel use and pollution control measures would produce important asynchronies among European countries and the United States. We also expected that control of particulate versus gaseous emission, along with trends in NH3 emissions, would be the two most significant factors affecting the stoichiometry between SO4–S and H+. Relationships among H+, SO4–S, NH4–N, and cations differed markedly between the US and Europe. Controlling for SO4–S levels, H+ in precipitation was significantly lower in Europe than in the US, because (1) alkaline dust loading from the Sahara/Sahel was greater in Europe than the US, and (2) emission of NH3, which neutralizes acidity upon conversion to NH4 +, is generally significantly higher in Europe than in the US. Trends in SO4–S and H+ in precipitation were close to stoichometric in the US throughout the period of record, but not in Europe, especially eastern Europe. Ca in precipitation declined significantly before, but not after 1990 in most of the US, but Ca declined in eastern Europe even after 1990. SO4–S in precipitation was only weakly related to fossil fuel consumption. The stoichiometry of SO4–S and H+ may be explained in part by emission controls, which varied over time and among regions. Control of particulate emissions reduces alkaline particles that neutralize acid precursors as well as S-containing particulates, reducing SO4–S and Ca more steeply than H+, consistent with trends in the northeastern US and Europe before 1990. In contrast, control of gaseous SO2 emissions results in a stoichiometric relationship between SO4–S and H+, consistent with trends in the US and many western European countries, especially after 1991. However, in many European countries, declining NH3 emissions contributed to the lack of stoichiometry between SO4–S and H+.Recent reductions in NOx emissions have also contributed to declines in H+ in precipitation. Future changes in precipitation acidity are likely to depend on multiple factors including trends in NOx and NH3 emission controls, naturally occurring dust, and fossil fuel use, with significant implications for the health of both terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aber JD (1982) Potential effects of acid precipitation on soil nitrogen and productivity of forest ecosystems. Water Air Soil Pollut 18:405–412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aber JD, McDowell NG, Nadelhoffer KJ, Magill A, Berntson G, Kamakea M, McNully S, Currie W, Rustad L, Fernandez I (1998) Nitrogen saturation in temperate forest ecosystems. Bioscience 48:921–934

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker LA, Herlihy AT, Kaufmann PR (1991) Acidic lakes and streams in the United States: the role of acidic deposition. Science 252:1151–1154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Battye R, Battye W, Overcash C, Fudge S (1994) Development and selection of ammonia emission factors. EPA/600/R-94/190. Final report prepared for United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development. USEPA Contract No. 68-D3-0034, Work Assignment 0–3

  • Bowman WD, Cleveland CC, Halada L, Hresko J, Baron JS (2008) Negative impact of nitrogen deposition on soil buffering capacity. Nat Geosci 1:767–770

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown TC, Froemke P (2012) Improved measures of atmospheric deposition have a negligible effect on multivariate measures of risk of water-quality impairment: response from Brown and Froemke. Bioscience 62:621–622

    Google Scholar 

  • Burton AW, Aherne J (2012) Changes in the chemistry of small Irish lakes. Ambio 41:170–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarisse L, Clerbaux C, Dentener F, Hurtmans D, Coheur P-F (2009) Global ammonia distribution derived from infrared satellite observations. Nature Geosci 2:479–483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Draaijers GJP, Leeuwen EP, Jong PGH, Erisman JW (1997) Base-cation deposition in Europe—Part II. Acid neutralization capacity and contribution to forest nutrition. Atmos Environ 31:4159–4168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Driscoll CT, Likens GE, Hedin LO, Eaton JS, Bormann FH (1989) Changes in the chemistry of surface waters. Environ Sci Technol 23:137–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Earthtrends (2003) Earthtrends: environmental information. http://earthtrends.wri.org. Accessed March 2012

  • Elliott EM, Kendall C, Boyer EW, Burns DA, Lear GG, Golden HE, Harlin K, Bytnerowicz A, Butler TJ, Glatz R (2009) Dual nitrate isotopes in dry deposition: utility for partitioning NOx source contributions to landscape nitrogen deposition. J Geophys Res Biogeosci 114:G04020

    Google Scholar 

  • Emmett B (2007) Nitrogen Saturation of Terrestrial Ecosystems: some recent findings and their implications for our conceptual framework. Water Air Soil Pollut Focus 7:99–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EPA (2001). National pollutant discharge elimination system permit regulation and effluent limitations: guidelines and standards for concentrated animal feeding operations; proposed rule (January 2001)

  • EPA (2012). Nitrogen Oxides (NOx) Control Regulations. http://www.epa.gov/region1/airquality/nox.html. Accessed 14 May 2013

  • Erisman JW, Draaijers GPJ (1995) Atmospheric deposition in relation to acidification and eutrophication. Studies in Environmental Science, vol 63. Elsevier, Amsterdam, p 9

  • Erisman JW, Grennfelt P, Sutton M (2003) The European perspective on nitrogen emission and deposition. Environ Int 29:311–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Federer CA, Hornbeck JW, Tritton LM, Martin CW, Pierce RS, Smith CT (1989) Long term depletion of calcium and other nutrients in eastern US forests. Environ Manage 13:593–601

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser MP, Cass GR (1998) Detection of excess ammonia emissions from in-use vehicles and the implications for fine particle control. Environ Sci Technol 32:1053–1057

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gbondo-Tugbawa SS, Driscoll CT (2003) Factors controlling long-term changes in soil pools of exchangeable basic cations and stream acid neutralizing capacity in a northern hardwood forest ecosystem. Biogeochemistry 63:161–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ginoux P, Prospero JM, Torres O, Chin M (2004) Long-term simulation of global dust distribution with the GOCART model: correlation with North Atlantic Oscillation. Environ Model & Softw 19:113–128

    Google Scholar 

  • Greaver TL, Sullivan TJ, Herrick JD, Barber MC, Baron JS, Cosby BJ, Deerhake ME, Dennis RL, Dubois J-JB, Goodale CL, Herlihy AT, Lawrence GB, Liu L, Lynch JA, Novak KJ (2012) Ecological effects of nitrogen and sulfur air pollution in the US: what do we know? Front Ecol Environ 10:365–372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grini A, Myhre G, Zender CS, Isaksen ISA (2005) Model simulations of dust sources and transport in the global atmosphere: effects of soil erodibility and wind speed variability. J Geophys Res 110:D02205

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedin LO, Granat L, Likens GE, Buishand TA, Galloway JN, Butler TJ, Rodhe H (1994) Steep declines in atmospheric base cations in regions of Europe and North America. Nature 367:351–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horváth L, Sutton MA (1998) Long term record of ammonia and ammonium concentrations at K-Puszta, Hungary. Atmos Environ 32:339–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horváth L, Fagerli H, Sutton MA (2009) Long-term record (1981-2005) of ammonia and ammonium concentrations at K-Puszta Hungary and the effect of sulphur dioxide emission change on measured and modelled concentrations. In: Sutton MA, Reis S, Baker SMH (eds) Atmospheric ammonia: detecting emission changes and environmental impacts. Springer, Berlin, pp 181–185

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Joslin JD, Kelly JM, Van Miegroet H (1992) Soil chemistry and nutrition of North American spruce-fir stands: evidence for recent change. J Environ Qual 21:12–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Juice SM, Fahey TJ, Siccama TG, Driscoll CT, Denny EG, Eager C, Cleavitt NL, Minocha R, Richardson AD (2006) Response of sugar maple to calcium addition to northern hardwood forest. Ecology 87:1267–1280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann CB, Bowersox V, Larson R, Larson S (2007) Monitoring Long-term Trends in Sulfate and Ammonium in US Precipitation: results from the National Atmospheric Deposition Program/National Trends Network. Water Air Soil Pollut Focus 7:59–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Likens GE, Bormann FH, Pierce RS, Eaton JS, Munn RE (1984) Long-term trends in precipitation chemistry at Hubbard Brook, New Hampshire. Atmos Environ 18:2641–2647

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Likens GE, Driscoll CT, Buso DC (1996) Long-term effects of acid rain: response and recovery of a forest ecosystem. Science 272:244–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lövblad G, Tarrason L, Tørseth K, Dutchak S (2004) EMEP Assessment. Part I, European perspective, Norwegian Meteorological Institute, Oslo

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovett GM, Lindberg SE (1993) Atmospheric deposition and canopy interactions of nitrogen in forests. Can J For Res 23:1603–1616

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loye-Pilot MD, Martin JM, Morelli K (1986) Saharan dust: influence on the rain acidity and significance for atmospheric input to Mediterranean. Nature 321:427–428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martinez-Garcia A, Rosell-Mele A, Jaccard SL, Geibert W, Sigman DM, Haug GH (2011) Southern Ocean dust-climate coupling over the past four million years. Nature 476:312–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Medhi N (2009) Regulatory matters: which factors matter in regulating the environment? APPAM 2009 Conference Paper

  • Merkel M (2002) Raising a stink: air emissions from factory farms. Report of environmental integrity project. http://environmentalintegrity.org/news_reports/Report_Raising_Stink.php. Accessed 14 May 2013

  • Metcalfe SE, Atkins DHF, Derwent RG (1989) Acid deposition modelling and the interpretation of the United Kingdom secondary precipitation network data. Atmos Environ (1967) 23:2033–2052

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mosquera J, Monteny GJ, Erisman JW (2005) Overview and assessment of techniques to measure ammonia emissions from animal houses: the case of the Netherlands. Environ Pollut 135:381–388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mulitza S, Heslop D, Pittauerova D, Fischer HW, Meyer I, Stuut JB, Zabel M, Mollenhauer G, Collins JA, Kuhnert H, Schulz M (2010) Increase in African dust flux at the onset of commercial agriculture in the Sahel region. Nature 466:226–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neff JC, Ballantyne AP, Farmer GL, Mahowald NM, Conroy JL, Landry CC, Overpeck JT, Painter TH, Lawrence CR, Reynolds RL (2008) Increasing eolian dust deposition in the western United States linked to human activity. Nature Geosci 1:189–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norton SA, Vesely J (2003) Acidification and acid rain. Treatise Geochem 9:367–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oulehle F, McDowell WH, Aitkenhead-Peterson JA, Krám P, Hruška J, Navrátil T, Buzek F, Fottová D (2008) Long-term trends in stream nitrate concentrations and losses across watersheds undergoing recovery from acidification in the Czech Republic. Ecosystems 11:410–425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pannatier EG, Luster J, Zimmermann S, Blaser P (2005) Acidification of Soil solution in a chestnut forest stand in southern Switzerland: are there signs of recovery? Environ Sci Technol 39:7761–7767

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piccolo MC, Perillo GME, Varela P (1988) Alkaline precipitation in Bahia Blanca, Argentina. Environ Sci Technol 22:216–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prospero JM, Lamb PJ (2003) African droughts and dust transport to the Caribbean: climate change implications. Science 302:1024–1027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rusek J (1993) Air-pollution-mediated changes in alpine ecosystems and ecotones. Ecol Appl 3:409–416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schindler DW (1988) Effects of acid rain on freshwater ecosystems. Science 239:149–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlesinger WH, Hartley AE (1992) A global budget for atmospheric NH3. Biogeochemistry 15:191–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schulze E-D (1989) Air pollution and forest decline in a spruce (Picea abies) forest. Science 244:776–783

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skjøth CA, Geels C (2013) The effect of climate and climate change on ammonia emissions in Europe. Atmos Chem Phys 13:117–128

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith SJ, van Aardenne J, Klimont Z, Andres RJ, Volke A, Delgado Arias S (2011) Anthropogenic sulfur dioxide emissions: 1850–2005. Atmos Chem Phys 11(1101–1116):2011

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoddard JL, Jeffries DS, Lukewille A, Clair TA, Dillon PJ, Driscoll CT, Forsius M, Johannessen M, Kahl JS, Kellogg JH, Kemp A, Mannio J, Monteith DT, Murdoch PS, Patrick S, Rebsdorf A, Skjelkvale BL, Stainton MP, Traaen T, van Dam H, Webster KE, Wieting J, Wilander A (1999) Regional trends in aquatic recovery from acidification in North America and Europe. Nature 401:575–578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan TJ, Charles DF, Smol JP, Cumming BF, Selle AR, Thomas DR, Bernert JA, Dixit SS (1990) Quantification of changes in lakewater chemistry in response to acidic deposition. Nature 345:54–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan TJ, Cosby BJ, Jackson WA, Snyder KU, Herlihy AT (2011) Acidification and prognosis for future recovery of acid-sensitive streams in the Southern Blue Ridge Province. Water Air Soil Pollut 219:11–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor MR, Rubin ES, Hounshell DA (2005) Control of SO2 emissions from power plants: a case of induced technological innovation in the US. Technol Forecast Soc Change 72:697–718

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vicars WC, Sickman JO (2011) Mineral dust transport to the Sierra Nevada, California: loading rates and potential source areas. J Geophys Res 116:G01018

    Google Scholar 

  • Warby RA, Johnson CE, Driscoll CT (2009) Continuing acidification of organic soils across the northeastern USA: 1984–2001. Soil Sci Soc Am J 73:274–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu H, Remer LA, Chin M, Bian H, Tan Q, Yuan T, Zhang Y (2012) Aerosols from overseas rival domestic emissions over North America. Science 337:566–569

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported in part by NSF Grants 0823380, 0333257, and 0817064, as well as NSF LTER and US Forest Service support to sites with long-term precipitation chemistry records (Andrews, Coweeta, Fernow, Hubbard Brook, Kane, and Marcell Experimental Forests, Kellogg Biological Station). We also acknowledge funding to the National Atmospheric Deposition Program, as well as support for the EMEP (European precipitation monitoring program). C.T. Driscoll generously provided invaluable advice for the analysis and interpretation of the data.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kate Lajtha.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Dale Johnson

Appendix

Appendix

See Table 9.

Table 9 Annual concentrations of H+, SO4–S, Ca, NO3–N, and NH4–N (μeq/L) at the sites used in this study

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lajtha, K., Jones, J. Trends in cation, nitrogen, sulfate and hydrogen ion concentrations in precipitation in the United States and Europe from 1978 to 2010: a new look at an old problem. Biogeochemistry 116, 303–334 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-013-9860-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-013-9860-2

Keywords

Navigation