Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Addressing target two of the Global Strategy for Plant Conservation by rapidly identifying plants at risk

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Biodiversity and Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Target two of the 2002 Global Strategy for Plant Conservation (GSPC), “A preliminary assessment of the conservation status of all known plant species, at national, regional, and international levels” was not accomplished by its original 2010 target date and has therefore been included as a revised 2020 target, “An assessment of the conservation status of all known plant species, as far as possible, to guide conservation action.” The most widely used system to estimate risk of extinction, the International Union for the Conservation of Nature Red List, provides conservation assessments for fewer than 15,000 plant species. Progress achieving Target two has been hampered by the large number of plant species and the difficulty assembling the data needed for Red List assessments. Two streamlined methods for identifying those plant species considered At Risk under the GSPC Target two are compared and contrasted. Both methods use readily available locality data from herbarium specimens to efficiently identify At Risk species and approximate the list of species that would be identified as threatened by Red List analyses. A comprehensive analysis of the native plant species of Puerto Rico using both streamlined methods identifies 570 of the 2,025 species at some risk of extinction. More efficient systems for assessing threat allow a more timely response to Target two, allow conservation efforts to be directed to the species that need attention, and the list of threatened plants can be used to identify priority areas for plant conservation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acevedo-Rodríguez P, Strong MT (2007) Catalogue of the seed plants of the West Indies. http://botany.si.edu/Antilles/WestIndies/catalog.htm. Accessed 1 July 2009

  • Acevedo-Rodríguez P, Strong MT (2008) Floristic richness and affinities in the West Indies. Bot Rev 74:5–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beyer HL (2007) Hawth’s analysis tools for ArcGIS, version 3.27. http://www.spatialecology.com/htools. Accessed 1 August 2009

  • BirdLife International (2008) State of the world’s birds: indicators for our changing world. BirdLife International, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Bramwell D (2002) How many plant species are there? Pl Talk 28:32–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Brummitt N, Bachman SP, Moat J (2008) Applications of the IUCN Red List: towards a global barometer for plant diversity. Endanger Species Res 6:127–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgman MA, Maslin BR, Andrewartha D, Keatley MR, Boek C, McCarthy M (2000) Inferring threat from scientific collections: power tests and an application to western Australian Acacia species. In: Ferson S, Burgman M (eds) Quantitative methods for conservation biology. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Cardoso P, Borges PAV, Triantis KA, Ferrández MA, Martín JL (2011) Adapting the IUCN red list criteria for invertebrates. Biol Conserv 144:2432–2440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Convention on Biological Diversity (2010) Global strategy for plant conservation: technical rationale, justification for updating and suggested milestones and indicators. UNEP/CBD/COP

  • Donaldson J (2003) Cycads. Status survey and conservation action plan. IUCN/SSC Cycad Specialist Group. IUCN, Gland

    Google Scholar 

  • ESRI (2007) ArcGIS, version 9.2. Environmental Systems Research Institute (ESRI), Redlands

  • Farjon A, Bachman S, Gardner M, Luscombe D, Reynolds C, Thomas P (2006) Conservation assessments of data deficient (DD) conifers, using herbarium and GIS data. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer DO, Blomberg SP (2010) Correlates of rediscovery and the detectability of extinction in mammals. Proc R Soc B (published online 29 September 2010)

  • Gaston KJ, Fuller RA (2009) The sizes of species geographic ranges. J Appl Ecol 46:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golding J (2002) Southern African plant red data lists. Southern African Botanical Diversity Network Report No. 14, Pretoria

  • Govaerts R (2001) How many species of seed plants are there? Taxon 50:1085–1090

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GSPC (2002) Global strategy for plant conservation. The Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, Montreal

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann M, Brooks TM, daFonseca GAB, Gascon C, Hawkins AFA, James RE, Langhammer P, Mittermeier RA, Pilgrim JD, Rodrigues ASL, Silva JMC (2008) Conservation planning and the IUCN Red List. Endanger Species Res 6:113–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IUCN (2001) IUCN Red List categories and criteria, version 3.1. IUCN Species Survival Commission. IUCN, Gland

    Google Scholar 

  • IUCN (2008) Guidelines for using the IUCN Red List categories and criteria, version. 7.0. IUCN Species Survival Commission. IUCN, Gland

    Google Scholar 

  • IUCN (2009) The IUCN Red List of threatened species 2009 update: plant facts. IUCN, Gland. http://cmsdata.iucn.org/downloads. Accessed 1 September 2010

  • IUCN (2011) IUCN Red List of threatened species. IUCN, Gland. https://www.redlist.org. Accessed 18 November 2011

  • Joppa LN, Roberts DL, Pimm SL (2010) How many species of flowering plants are there?. Proc R Soc B (published online 7 July 2010)

  • Jorgensen PM, León-Yánez S (1999) Catalogue of the vascular plants of Ecuador. Mo Bot Gard, St. Louis

    Google Scholar 

  • Krupnick GA, Kress WJ, Wagner WL (2009) Achieving target 2 of the global strategy for plant conservation: building a preliminary assessment of vascular plant species using data from herbarium specimens. Biodivers Conserv 18:1459–1474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee TM, Jetz W (2010) Unraveling the structure of species extinction risk for predictive conservation science. Proc R Soc B (published online 13 October 2010)

  • León B, Pitman N, Roque J (eds) (2006) El libro rojo de las plantas endémicas del Perú. Rev Peru Biol Número especial 13(2): (Diciembre 2006)

  • Llamozas S, Duno R, Meier W, Riina R, Stauffer F, Aymard G, Huber O, Ortíz, R (eds) (2003) Libro Rojo de la Flora Venezolana. 1ª Edición. PROVITA/Fundación Empresas Polar/Fundación Instituto Botánico de Venezuela “Dr. Tobias Lasser”/Conservación Internacional. Caracas

  • Miller JS, Porter-Morgan HA (2011) Assessing the effectiveness of Madagascar’s changing protected areas system: a case study of threatened Boraginales. Oryx 45:201–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mora C, Tittensor DP, Adl S, Simpson AGB, Worm B (2011) How many species are there on earth and in the ocean? PLoS Biol 9(8):e1001127. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001127

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nic Lughadha E (2004) Towards a working list of all known plant species. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 359:681–687

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pimm SL (1998) Extinction. In: Sutherland WJ (ed) Conservation science and action. Blackwell Science Ltd, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitman NCA, Jorgensen PM (2002) Estimating the size of the world’s threatened flora. Science 298:989

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Prance GT, Beentje H, Dransfield J, Johns R (2000) The tropical flora remains undercollected. Ann Mo Bot Gard 87:67–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raimondo D, von Staden L, Foden W, Victor JE, Heime NA, Turner RC, Kamundi DA, Manyama PA (eds) (2009) Red List of South African plants 2009. Strelitzia 25. South African National Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria

  • Rivers MC, Taylor L, Brummitt NA, Meagher TR, Roberts DL, Lughadha EN (2011) How many herbarium specimens are needed to detect threatened species? Biol Conserv 144:2541–2547

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robbirt KM, Roberts DL, Hawkins JA (2006) Comparing IUCN and probabilistic assessments of threat: do IUCN red list criteria conflate rarity and threat? Biodivers Conserv 15:1903–1912

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schipper J, Chanson J, Chiozza F, Cox N, Hoffmann M, Katariya V, Lamoreux J, Rodrigues ASL, Stuart SN, Temple HJ, Baillie JEM, Boitani L, Lacher TE, Mittermeier RA, Smith AT, Absolon D, Aguiar JM, Amori G, Bakkour N, Baldi RA, Berridge RJ, Bielby J, Black PA, Blanc JJ, Brooks TM, Burton JA, Butynski TM, Catullo G, Chapman R, Cokeliss Z, Collen B, Conroy J, Cooke JG, da Fonseca GAB, Derocher AE, Dublin HT, Duckworth JW, Emmons L, Emslie RH, Festa-Bianchet M, Foster M, Foster SN, Garshelis DL, Gates C, Gimenez-Dixon M, Gonzalez S, Gonzalez-Maya JF, Good TC, Hammerson G, Hammond PS, Happold D, Happold M, Hare J, Harris RB, Hawkins CE, Haywood M, Heaney L, Hedges S, Helgen KM, Hilton-Taylor C, Hussain SA, Ishii N, Jefferson TA, Jenkins RKB, Johnston CH, Keith M, Kingdon J, Knox D, Kovacs KM, Langhammer P, Leus KM, Lewison R, Lichtenstein G, Lowry LF, Macavoy Z, Mace GM, Mallon DP, Masi M, McKnight MW, Medellín R, Medici P, Mills G, Moehlman PD, Molur S, Mora AE, Nowell K, Oates JF, Olech W, Oliver WLR, Oprea M, Patterson B, Perrin WF, Polidoro BA, Pollock C, Powel A, Protas Y, Racey PA, Ragle J, Ramani P, Rathbun G, Reeves RR, Reilly SB, Reynolds JE III, Rondinini C, Rulli M, Rylands AB, Savini S, Schank CJ, Sechrest W, Self-Sullivan C, Shoemaker A, Sillero-Zubiri C, Silva N, Smith DE, Srinivasulu C, Stephenson PJ, van Strien N, Talukdar BK, Taylor BL, Timmins R, Tirira DG, Tognelli MF, Tsytsulina K, Veiga LM, Vié J-C, Williamson L, Wyatt SA, Xie Y, Young BE (2008) The status of the world’s land and marine mammals: diversity, threat and knowledge. Science 322:225–230

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • SEMARNAT (Secretaría de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales) (2002) Norma Oficial Mexicana NOM–059–ECOL–2001, proteccíon ambiental—especies nativas de México de flora y fauna silvestres—categorías de riesgo y especificaciones para su inclusíon, exclusíon o cambio—lista de especies en riesgo. Diario Oficial de la Federacíon (6 de marzo de 2002), Primera seccíon. Diario Oficial de la Federacíon, México City, México

  • Stebbins GL (1974) Flowering plants: evolution beyond the species level. The Belnap Press of Harvard University, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuart SN, Hoffmann M, Chanson JS, Cox NA, Berridge RJ, Ramani P, Young BE (2008) Threatened amphibians of the world. Lynx Edicions, Barcelona

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorne RF (2002) How many species of seed plants are there? Taxon 51:511–522

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valencia RN, Pitman N, León-Yánez S, Jorgensen PM (2000) Libro rojo de las plants endémicas del Ecuador. Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador

  • Willis F, Moat J, Paton A (2003) Defining a role for herbarium data in Red List assessments: a case study of Plectranthus from Eastern and Southern tropical Africa. Biodivers Conserv 12:1537–1552

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zanoni TA (1995) What happened to all those provinces? Flora of the Greater Antilles. Newsletter 7:3–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Zona S, Verdecia R, Sánchez AL, Lewis CE, Maunder M (2007) The conservation status of West Indian palms (Arecaceae). Oryx 41(3):300–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The Puerto Rico “Plants at Risk Initiative” was generously supported by Robert and Encarnita Quinlan. The New York Botanical Garden acknowledges the Prospect Hill Foundation for their support of the NYBG GIS laboratory. The authors thank Pedro Jimenez for logistical support in Puerto Rico. We also thank the following for support during visits to Puerto Rico, encouragement, and suggestions: Eugenio Santiago, Johanna Delgado, and Rafael Diaz from the Universidad de Puerto Rico, Jardín Botánico, James Ackerman and Frank Axelrod from the Universidad de Puerto Rico, Rio Piedras, Duane Kolterman and Jeanine Velez Gavilan from the Universidad de Puerto Rico, Mayagüez, and an anonymous reviewer for helpful suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James S. Miller.

Appendix: Native Puerto Rican seed plant species categorized as at risk

Appendix: Native Puerto Rican seed plant species categorized as at risk

See Table 1.

Table 1 The 77 species of native Puerto Rican seed plants currently assessed in IUCN’s Red List with preliminary conservation assessments from the methods evaluated here

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Miller, J.S., Porter-Morgan, H.A., Stevens, H. et al. Addressing target two of the Global Strategy for Plant Conservation by rapidly identifying plants at risk. Biodivers Conserv 21, 1877–1887 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-012-0285-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-012-0285-3

Keywords

Navigation