Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Are important bird areas and special protected areas enough for conservation?: the case of Bonelli’s eagle in a Mediterranean area

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Biodiversity and Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Bonelli’s eagle (BE) is considered by the European Union as a high-priority species for conservation in the Valencian Community (East of Spain). However, in 2006 the European Union opened a legal procedure against the Spanish Kingdom, accused of lacking of an adequate network of special protected areas (SPAs) to preserve the BE in the region. Here we evaluate whether important bird areas (IBAs) and SPAs network is enough to preserve this species, on the basis of a thorough analysis of habitat preferences. A GAP analysis is performed to conduct a revision of current SPAs and BirdLife proposed IBAs. Our results suggest that the current network of SPAs becomes insufficient to protect the BE. The IBAs network, although improves the current network of SPAs, increasing the percentage of BE potential habitat included, also results inadequate. We propose a new SPAs network according to the potential suitable habitat for the species. Given the trade-off between financial investment and the conservation of biodiversity, we propose to maximize the surface of potential habitat included in the protected network minimizing the surface of the region that would be necessary to protect, thus avoiding an unnecessary expense and otherwise unrealistic results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andelman SJ, Fagan WF (2000) Umbrellas and flagships: efficient conservation surrogates or expensive mistakes?. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:5954–5959

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Araujo MB (2004) Matching species with reserves–uncertainties from using data at different resolutions. Biol Conserv 118:533–538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Argos (1996) User’s manual. CLS/Service Argos, Toulouse

  • BirdLife (2004a) Birds in Europe: population estimates, trends and conservation status. BirdLife International, Cambridge

  • BirdLife (2004b) Species factsheet: Hieraaetus fasciatus. BirdLife International, Cambridge

  • Burley F (1988) Monitoring biological diversity for setting priorities in conservation. In: Wilson E (ed) Biodiversity. National Academy Press, Washington, pp 227–230

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll C, Noss RF, Paquet PC (2001) Carnivores as focal species for conservation planning in the Rocky Mountain region. Ecol Appl 11:961–980

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Klerk HM, Fjeldsa J, Blyth S, Burgess ND (2004) Gaps in the protected area network for threatened Afrotropical birds. Biol Conserv 117:529–537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Del Moral JC (2006) El águila perdicera en España. Población en 2005 y método de censo. SEO/BirdLife, Madrid

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietz RW, Czech B (2005) Conservation deficits for the continental United States: an ecosystem gap analysis. Conserv Biol 19:1478–1487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Encarta-online (2006) “Valencian Community”, In Microsoft© Encarta© Encyclopedia online 2006. 1997–2006 ©Microsoft Corporation

  • ESRI (1999) ArcView GIS 3.2. Environmental Systems Research Institute Inc. 1992–1999, New York

  • Fjeldsa J, Burgess ND, Blyth S, de Klerk HM (2004) Where are the major gaps in the reserve network for Africa’s mammals? Oryx 38:17–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Groom M, Gary KM, Ronald CC (2006) Principles of conservation biology, 3rd edn. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland

    Google Scholar 

  • Guisan A, Zimmermann NE (2000) Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology. Ecol Modell 135:147–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S (2000) Applied logistic regression analysis, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Keating KA, Cherry S (2004) Use and interpretation of logistic regression in habitat selection studies. J Wildl Manage 68:774–789

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keating KA, Brewster WG, Key CH (1991) Satellite telemetry–performance of animal-tracking systems. J Wildl Manage 55:160–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kenward R (2001) A manual for wildlife radio tagging. Academic, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerr JT (1997) Species richness, endemism, and the choice of areas for conservation. Conserv Biol 11:1094–1100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick JB (1983) An iterative method for establishing priorities for the selection of nature reserves–an example from Tasmania. Biol Conserv 25:127–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • López-López P, García-Ripollés C, Aguilar JM, García-López F, Verdejo J (2006) Modelling breeding habitat preferences of Bonelli’s eagle (Hieraaetus fasciatus) in relation to topography, disturbance, climate and land use at different spatial scales. J Ornithol 147:97–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • López-López P, García-Ripollés C, Urios V (in press a) Population size, breeding performance and territory quality of Bonelli’s eagle (Hieraaetus fasciatus) in eastern Iberian Peninsula. Bird Study

  • López-López P, García-Ripollés C, Soutullo Á, Cadahía L, Urios V (in press b) Identifying potentially nesting habitat for golden eagles (Aquila chrysaetos) applied to Important Bird Areas design. Anim Conserv

  • Maiorano L, Falcuccia A, Boitani L (2006) Gap analysis of terrestrial vertebrates in Italy: priorities for conservation planning in a human dominated landscape. Biol Conserv 133:455–473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manly BFJ, McDonald L, Thomas DL, McDonald T, Erickson WP (2002) Resource selection by animals: statistical design and analysis for field studies, 2nd edn. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Meffe G, Ronald C (1997) Principles of conservation biology. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy DD, Noon BR (1992) Integrating scientific methods with habitat conservation planning–reserve design for northern spotted owls. Ecol Appl 2:3–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newton I (1979) Population ecology of raptors. T & AD Poyser, Berkhamstead, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Oldfield TEE, Smith RJ, Harrop SR, Leader-Williams N (2004) A gap analysis of terrestrial protected areas in England and its implications for conservation policy. Biol Conserv 120:303–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearce J, Ferrier S (2000) Evaluating the predictive performance of habitat models developed using logistic regression. Ecol Modell 133:225–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pressey RL (1994) Ad hoc reservations–forward or backward steps in developing representative reserve systems. Conserv Biol 8:662–668

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Primack RB (2000) A primer of conservation biology, 2nd edn. Sinauer, Sunderland

    Google Scholar 

  • Pullin AS (2004) Conservation biology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Real J (2004) Águila-azor perdicera, Hieraaetus fasciatus. In: Madroño A, González C, Atienza JC (eds) Red book of the birds of Spain. Libro Rojo de las Aves de España. Dirección General para la Biodiversidad-SEO/Birdlife, Madrid, pp 154–157

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodrigues ASL, Tratt R, Wheeler BD, Gaston KJ (1999) The performance of existing networks of conservation areas in representing biodiversity. Proc R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci 266:1453–1460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodrigues ASL, Andelman SJ, Bakarr MI, Boitani L, Brooks TM, Cowling RM, Fishpool LDC, da Fonseca GAB, Gaston KJ, Hoffmann M, Long JS, Marquet PA, Pilgrim JD, Pressey RL, Schipper J, Sechrest W, Stuart SN, Underhill LG, Waller RW, Watts MEJ, Yan X (2004) Effectiveness of the global protected area network in representing species diversity. Nature 428:640–643

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Scott JM, Csuti B, Jacobi JD, Estes JE (1987) Species richness–a geographic approach to protecting future biological diversity. Bioscience 37:782–788

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott JM, Davis F, Csuti B, Noss R, Butterfield B, Groves C, Anderson H, Caicco S, Derchia F, Edwards TC, Ulliman J, Wright RG (1993) Gap analysis–a geographic approach to protection of biological diversity. Wildl Monogr 121:1–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott JM, Davis FW, McGhie RG, Wright RG, Groves C, Estes J (2001) Nature reserves: do they capture the full range of America’s biological diversity? Ecol Appl 11:999–1007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SEO (2006a) Luxembourg judges Spain for insufficient SPA. Luxemburgo juzga a España por insuficientes ZEPA La Garcilla 127:39

    Google Scholar 

  • SEO (2006b) The Luxembourg Council considers insufficient the Spanish SPA network. El Tribunal de Luxemburgo considera insuficiente la red de ZEPA del estado español. La Garcilla 128:47

    Google Scholar 

  • Sergio F, Newton I, Marchesi L (2005) Top predators and biodiversity. Nature 436:192–192

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sergio F, Newton I, Marchesi L, Pedrini P (2006) Ecologically justified charisma: preservation of top predators delivers biodiversity conservation. J Appl Ecol 43:1049–1055

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1981) Biometry. Freeman WH and Company, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Soutullo Á, Cadahía L, Urios V, Ferrer M, Negro JJ (in press) Accuracy of lightweight satellite telemetry: a case study in the Iberian Peninsula. J Wildl Manage

  • StatSoft (2004) STATISTICA (data analysis software system), version 7. StatSoft Incorporated, Tulsa

    Google Scholar 

  • Steenhof K, Kochert MN (1982) An evaluation of methods used to estimate raptor nesting success. J Wildl Manage 46:885–893

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland WJ, Green RE (2004) Habitat assessment. In: Sutherland WJ, Newton I, Green RE (eds) Bird ecology and conservation. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 251–268

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Viada C (1998) Áreas Importantes para las Aves en España. Monografía n° 5. SEO/BirdLife, Madrid

    Google Scholar 

  • Yip JY, Corlett RT, Dudgeon D (2004) A fine-scale gap analysis of the existing protected area system in Hong Kong, China. Biodivers Conserv 13:943–957

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank F. García-López, J.M. Aguilar and J. Verdejo for helping in the fieldwork and their valuable suggestions about raptor biology. We also thank P. Mateache, J. Jimenez and E. Rodríguez of the Conselleria de Territori i Habitatge of the Generalitat Valenciana for their support and GIS assistance. We are grateful to E. Barba for his support and confidence. P. López-López and L. Cadahía are supported by FPU grants of the Spanish Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia (references AP2005-0874 and AP2001-1444, respectively). All the research was compliant with all the laws of Spain where it was conducted. This paper is a part of P. López-López PhD thesis.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pascual López-López.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

López-López, P., García-Ripollés, C., Soutullo, Á. et al. Are important bird areas and special protected areas enough for conservation?: the case of Bonelli’s eagle in a Mediterranean area. Biodivers Conserv 16, 3755–3780 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-007-9179-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-007-9179-1

Keywords

Navigation