Skip to main content
Log in

Comparing Conservation Priorities for Useful Plants Among Botanists and Tibetan Doctors

  • ORIGINAL PAPER
  • Published:
Biodiversity and Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Perspectives of diverse constituencies need to be incorporated when developing conservation strategies. In Menri (Medicine Mountains) of the Eastern Himalayas, Tibetan doctors and professional botanists were interviewed about conservation of useful plants. We compare these two perspectives and find they differ significantly in conservation priorities (Wilcoxon Signed Ranks P < 0.05), both in how they prioritized, as well as the priorities themselves. Tibetan doctors first consider which plants are most important to their medical practice and, then secondarily, the conservation status of these plants. Additionally, perceptions of threatened medicinal plants differ among Tibetan doctors who received medical training in Lhasa, who were local trained, and who were self-taught. In contrast, professional botanists came to a consensus among themselves by first considering the conservation status of plants and then considering use. We conclude that, in order to effect community based conservation, opinions from both Tibetan doctors and professional botanists should be considered in establishing conservation priorities and sustainable conservation programs. Furthermore, we set our own research agenda based on combined perspectives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams WM, Aveling R, Brockington D, Dickson B, Elliott J, Hutton J, Roe D, Vira B, Wolmer W (2004) Biodiversity conservation and the eradication of poverty. Science 306:1146–1149

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barett CB,, Brandon K, Gibson C, Ghertsen H (2001) Conserving tropical biodiversity amid weak institutions. Bioscience 51(497–502):497–502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett BC (1992) Plants and people of the Amazonian rainforests: the role of ethnobotany in sustainable development. Bioscience 42:599–607

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkes F, Colding J, Folke C (2000) Rediscovery of traditional ecological knowledge as adaptive management. Ecol Appl 10(5):1251–1262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkes F (2004) Rethinking community-based conservation. Conserv Biol 18(3):621–630

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brosius JP (1997) Endangered forest, endangered people: environmentalist representations of indigenous knowledge. Human Ecol 25(1):47–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell LM, Vainio-Mattila A (2003) Participatory development and community-based conservation: opportunities missed for lesson learned? Human Ecol 31(3):417–437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cardi F (2005) Evolution of Tibetan medical knowledge in the socio-economic context: the exploitation of medicinal substances among traditional doctors. Milan, Societa Italiana di Scienze Naturali

  • Chapin M (2004) Challenge to conservationists. World Watch Magazine November/December 2004

  • Etkin NL (2002) Local knowledge of biotic diversity and its conservation in rural Hausaland, Northern Nigeria. Econ Bot 56(1):73–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fang ZD (1993) The wildflowers in Hengduan Mountains in Yunnan China. Yunnan People’s Publishing House, Kunming

    Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher SA (1990) Parks, protected areas and local populations: new international issues and imperatives. Landscape Urban Plan 19:197–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gadgil M (1992) Conserving biodiversity as if people matter: a case study from India. Ambio 21(3):266–270

    Google Scholar 

  • International Council for Science (Fensted JE, Hoyningen-Huene P, Hu Q, Kokwaro J, Nakashima D, Salick J, Shrum W, Subbarayappa BV) (2002) Science, traditional knowledge and sustainable development. ICSU Series on Sustainable Development, Paris

  • The World Conservation Union (1980) The world conservation strategy. The World Conservation Union, Gland, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  • Johannes RE (1978) Traditional marine conservation methods in Oceania and their demise. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 9:349–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johannes RE (1998) The case of data-less marine resource management: examples from tropical near-shore finfisheries. Trends Ecol Evol 13:243–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kellert SR (1985) Social and perceptual factors in endangered species management. J Wildlife Manage 49(2):528–536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kletter C, Kriechbaum M (2001) Tibetan medicinal plants. CRC Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Lama YC, Ghimire SK, Aumeeruddy-Thomas Y (2001) Medicinal plants of Dolpo. WWF Nepal Program, Kathmandu, Nepal

    Google Scholar 

  • Law W, Salick J (2005) Human induced dwarfing of Himalayan snow lotus (Saussurea laniceps (Asteraceae)). Proc Natl Acad Sci 102:10218–10220

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Law W, Salick J, Knight TM (In preparation) Comparative population ecologies and sustainable harvest of Tibetan medicinal snow lotus (Saussurea laniceps and S. medusa (Asteraceae)).

  • Mackinnon J, Sha M, Cheung C, Carey G, Zhu X, Melville D (1996) A biodiversity review of China. WWF International, Hong Kong

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcus RR (2001) Seeing the forest for the trees: integrated conservation and development projects and local perceptions of conservation in Madagascar. Human Ecol 29(4):381–397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCune B, Mefford MJ (1999) PC-ORD. Gleneden Beach, Oregon, MjM software design: multivariate analysis of ecological data

  • Mehta JN, Kellert SR (1998) Local attitudes toward community-based conservation policy and programmes in Nepal: a case study in the Makalu-Barun conservation area. Environ Conserv 25(4):320–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mittermeier RA, Myers N, Thomsen JB, Da Fonseca GAB, Olivieri S (1998) Biodiversity hotspots and major tropical wilderness areas: approaches to setting conservation priorities. Conserv Biol 12:516–520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphree MW (2002) Protected areas and the commons. Common Prop Resour Digest 60:1–3

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsen CS, Larsen HO (2003) Alpine medicinal plant trade and Himalayan mountain livelihood strategies. Geogr J 169:243–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olsen CS, Bhattarai N (2005) A typology of economic agents in the Himalayan plant trade. Mountain Res Develop 25:37–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olsson P, Folke C (2001) Local ecological knowledge and institutional dynamics for ecosystem management: a study of Lake Racken Watershed, Sweden. Ecosystems 4:85–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ohmagari K, Berkes F (1997) Transmission of indigenous knowledge and bush skills among the Western James Bay Cree women of subarctic Canada. Human Ecol 25(2):197–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Redford KH, Sanderson SE (2000) Extracting humans from nature. Conserv Biol 14:1362–1364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salick J, Anderson D, Woo J, Sherman R, Norbu C, Na A, Dorje S (2004) Tibetan ethnobotany and gradient analyses, Menri (Medicine Mountains), Eastern Himalayas millennium ecosystem assessment

  • Salick J, Yang YP, Gunn BF (2005) In situ capacity building: traditional ecological knowledge for conservation and sustainable development. Saint Louis, MO

  • Salick J, Amend A, Gunn B, Law W, Schmidt H, Byg A (2006) Tibetan medicine plurality. Econ Bot 60(2)

  • SAS Inc. (2003) JMP. Cary, NC

  • Sheil D, Lawrence A (2004) Tropical biologists, local people and conservation: new opportunities for collaboration. Trends Ecol Evol 19(12):634–638

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • SPSS Inc. (2001) SPSS for windows. Chicago, Illinois

  • Songorwa AN (1999) Community-based wildlife management (CWM) in Tanzania: are the communities interested? World Develop 27:2061–2079

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu J, Wilkes A (2004) Biodiversity impact analysis in northwest Yunnan, southwest China. Biodivers Conserv 13:955–983

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang JS, Chuchengjiancuo (1989) Diqing Zang Yao. Kunming Shi, Yunnan Min Zu Chu Ban She

Download references

Acknowledgements

Support for this study was provided by NSF #408123, the Mellon Foundation, and The Nature Conservancy. We would also like to thank Jessica Woo, Norbu Cili, Luke Harmon, Bob Moseley, Denise Glover, Anja Byg, and all our esteemed informants for their help and guidance with this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wayne Law.

Appendix 1

Appendix 1

Appendix 1 List of threatened, useful plants and fungi produced by botanists and Tibetan doctors with descriptions of use categories and threat values. Mode was used for threat values of plants given by more than one Tibetan doctor

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Law, W., Salick, J. Comparing Conservation Priorities for Useful Plants Among Botanists and Tibetan Doctors. Biodivers Conserv 16, 1747–1759 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-006-9057-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-006-9057-2

Keywords

Navigation