How well do herbarium data predict the locationof present populations? A test using Echinacea species in Missouri Authors
First Online: 20 November 2006 Received: 27 June 2005 Accepted: 05 January 2006 DOI:
Cite this article as: Applequist, W.L., Mcglinn, D.J., Miller, M. et al. Biodivers Conserv (2007) 16: 1397. doi:10.1007/s10531-006-6737-x Abstract
The four native Missouri taxa of
Echinacea were used as a model to test the predictive value of herbarium data with regard to present-day distribution. Specimens with label data considered potentially adequate to relocate the population were databased and the sites in question were visited. Most of the historical populations were not relocated, although a greater percentage of those collected post-1980 were found to still exist. Time since collection significantly affected the probability of relocation of E. purpurea and E. pallida var. pallida, the two native taxa commonly harvested for medicinal products. The collection rate for E. pallida var. pallida remained high over time. However, the collection rate for E. purpurea has been much reduced in recent decades. Few of the historical populations were relocated, and located populations on unprotected public land were very small, perhaps indicating that habitat loss or human activity is causing a decline in Missouri populations of E. purpurea. Keywords Conservation Echinacea Herbarium specimens Historical populations Missouri References
Antonovics J., Hood M.E., Thrall P.H., Abrams J.Y. and Duthie G.M. (2003). Herbarium studies on the distribution of anther-smut fungus (
Microbotryum violaceum) and Silene species (Caryophyllaceae) in the eastern United States. Am. J. Bot. 90: 1522–1531
Binns S.E., Baum B.R. and Arnason J.T. (2002). A taxonomic revision of
Echinacea (Asteraceae). Syst. Bot. 27: 610–632
Burgman M.A., Grimson R.C. and Ferson S. (1995). Inferring threat from scientific collections.
Delisle F., Lavoie C., Jean M. and Lachance D. (2003). Reconstructing the spread of invasive plants: taking into account biases associated with herbarium specimens.
J. Biogeogr. 30: 1033–1042
Freckleton R.P. and Watkinson A.R. (2002). Large-scale spatial dynamics of plants: metapopulations, regional ensembles and patchy populations.
Funk V.A., Zermoglio M.F. and Nasir N. (1999). Testing the use of specimen collection data and GIS in biodiversity exploration and conservation decision making in Guyana.
Golding J.S. (2001). Southern African herbaria and Red Data Lists.
Hedenas L., Bisang I., Tehler A., Hamnede M., Jaederfelt K. and Odelvik G. (2002). A herbarium-based method for estimates of temporal frequency changes: mosses in Sweden.
Heyligers P.C. (1998). Some New South Wales coastal plant distributions: a comparison of herbarium records with transect survey data.
Cunninghamia 5: 645–664
Kimmel V.I. and Probasco G.E. (1980). Change in woody cover on limestone glades between 1938 and 1975.
Trans. Mo. Acad. Sci. 14: 69–74
Koponen H.S., Hellqvist H., Lindqvist-Kreuze H., Bang U. and Valkonen J.P.T. (2000). Occurrence of
) on cultivated and wild
species in Finland and Sweden.
Ann. Appl. Biol.
Kropf M. and Bernhardt K.-G. 2004. The historical distribution of
Anthyllis montana subsp. jacquinii (Fabaceae) in Austria: insights from herbarium material. Planta Europaea4th European Conference on the Conservation of Wild Plants, 17–20.09.2004, ValenciaSpain.Available on the World Wide Web at http://www.nerium.net/plantaeuropaea/Download/Procedings/Kropf_Bernhart.pdf [sic; accessed 2 May 2005].
MacDougall A.S., Loo J.A., Clayden S.R., Goltz J.G. and Hinds H.R. (1998). Defining conservation priorities for plant taxa in southeastern New Brunswick, Canada using herbarium records.
McGregor R.L. (1968). The taxonomy of the genus
Echinacea (Compositae). Univ. Kansas Sci. Bull. 68: 113–142
Nilsson S.G. and Nilsson I.N. (1983). Are estimated species turnover rates on islands largely sampling errors?.
Parkhurst D.F. (1978). The adaptive significance of stomatal occurrence on one or both surfaces of leaves.
Primack D., Imbres C., Primack R.B., Miller-Rushing A.J. and Del Tredici P. (2004). Herbarium specimens demonstrate earlier flowering times in response to warming in Boston.
Am. J. Bot. 91: 1260–1264
Pyšek P. (1991).
Folia Geobotanica et Phytotaxonomica 26: 439–454
Quinn G. and Keough M. (2002). Experimental Design and Data Analysis for Biologists. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeUK
(2004). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, ViennaAustria
Rich T.C.G. and Woodruff E.R. (1992). Recording bias in botanical surveys.
Watsonia 19: 73–95
Ristaino J.B. (1988). The importance of archival and herbarium materials in understanding the role of oospores in late blight epidemics of the past.
Saltonstall K. (2002). Cryptic invasion by a non-native genotype of the common reed
into North America.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
Schatz G.E. (2002). Taxonomy and herbaria in service of plant conservation: lessons from Madagascar's endemic families.
Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard.
Stuckey R.L. (1980). Distributional history of
Lythrum salicaria (purple loosestrife) in North America. Bartonia 47: 3–20
ter Steege H., Jansen-Jacobs M.J. and Datadin V.K. (2000). Can botanical collections assist in a National Protected Area Strategy in Guyana?.
Ungricht S., Rasplus J.-Y. and Kjellberg F. (2005). Extinction threat evaluation of endemic fig trees of New Caledonia: priority assessment for taxonomy and conservation with herbarium collections.
Weber E. (1998). The dynamics of plant invasions: a case study of three exotic goldenrod species (
L.) in Europe.
Willis F., Moat J. and Paton A. (2003). Defining a role for herbarium data in Red List assessments: a case study of
from eastern and southern tropical Africa.