Abstract
Monitoring of fog capture and bird communities helped to build social capital for conservation at Loma Alta, Ecuador and encouraged the local community to protect 3000 hectares of tropical forest. Data collected during monitoring were used to facilitate action and cooperation at local, regional, national, and international levels for conservation of biodiversity in western Ecuador, including the designation of an Important Bird Area in the region. Through involvement with the monitoring efforts, local people became more aware of the value of ecosystem services, learned about local birds and their conservation status, became familiar with ecotourism, and began to include conservation of biodiversity with sustainable development planning in their community. The context of monitoring, the objectives and participants, field methods, impacts in terms of conservation action, and the costs and benefits of the two monitoring initiatives are described.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
C.D. Becker B. López-Lanús (1997) ArticleTitleConservation value of a garúa forest in the dry season: a bird survey in the Reserva Ecológica de Loma AltaEcuador Cotinga 8 66–74
C.D. Becker (1999) ArticleTitleProtecting a garúa forest in Ecuador: the role of institutions and ecosystem valuation Ambio 28 156–161
C.D. Becker (2002) ArticleTitleGrassroots to grassroots: why forest preservation was rapid at Loma Alta, Ecuador World Deve. 31 163–176
Becker C.D. and Ghamire K. 2003. Synergy between traditional ecological knowledge and conservation science supports forest preservation in Ecuador. Conserv. Ecol. (online).
Bennun L., Matiku P., Mulwa R., Mwangi S. and Buckley P. 2005. Monitoring important bird areas in Africa: towards a sustainable and scaleable system. Biodivers. Conserv. (this issue).
B.J. Best M. Kessler (1995) Biodiversity and Conservation in Tumbesian Ecuador and Peru BirdLife International Cambridge, UK
Birdlife International. 2004. What is an Important Bird Area? http://www.birdlife.net/action/campaigns/iba_campaign/whats_an_iba.html
N.J. Collar M.J. Crosby A.J. Stattersfield (1994) Birds to Watch 2: The World List of Threatened Birds Birdlife International Cambridge, UK
P.R. Ehrlich E.O. Wilson (1991) ArticleTitleBiodiversity studies: science and policy Science 253 758–762
E. Estudillo C.D. Becker (2002) Las Aves endémicas de la Región Tumbesina presentes en la Reserva Ecológica Comunal Loma Congreso Binacional entre Ecuador y Perú Ciudad de Piura, Perú
A.H. Gentry (1977) Endangered plant species and habitats of Ecuador and Amazonian Peru G.T. Prance T.S. Elaisi (Eds) Extinction is Forever New York Botanic Garden New York, USA
GBIF. 2000. The Global Biodiversity Information Facility. http://www.gbif.org/
C. Gibson C.D. Becker (2000) Lack of institutional demand: why a strong local community in western Ecuador fails to protect its forest C. Gibson M. McKean E. Ostrom (Eds) People and Forests: Communities, Institutions, and the Governance of Forests MIT Press Cambridge, MA
R. Greenberg (1996) Managed forest patches and the diversity of birds in southern Mexico J. Schelhas R. Greenberg (Eds) Forest Patches in Tropical Landscapes Island Press Washington DC, USA
J. Lubchenco (1998) ArticleTitleEntering the century of the environment: a new social contract for science Science 279 491–496 Occurrence Handle10.1126/science.279.5350.491
N. Myers (1988) ArticleTitleThreatened biotas: hot spots in tropical forests Environmentalist 8 187–208 Occurrence Handle12322582
NBII. 2001. National Biological Information Infrastructure 2001. http://www.nbii.gov/
E. Ostrom (1990) Governing the Commons Cambridge University Press New York, USA
Ostrom E. 1998. The International Forestry Resources and Institutions Research Program: a methodology for relating human incentives and actions on forest cover biodiversity. In: Dallmeier F. and Cominskey J.A. (eds), in Forest Biodiversity in NorthCentral, and South America and the Caribbean: Research and Monitoring. Man and the Biosphere Series 22: 1–28.
J. Pretty (2003) ArticleTitleSocial capital and the collective management of resources Science 302 1912–1914 Occurrence Handle10.1126/science.1090847 Occurrence Handle14671287
R.S. Ridgely P.J. Greenfield (2001) The Birds of Ecuador Cornell University Press Ithaca, New York, USA
J. Rijsoort Particlevan Z. Jinfeng (2005) ArticleTitleParticipatory resource monitoring as a means for promoting social change in Yunnan, P.R. China Biodivers. Conserv. 14 2543–2573
M.E. Soulé B.A. Wilcox (1980) Conservation Biology: An Evolutionary-Ecological Perspective Sinauer Associates Sunderland, MA, USA
A.J. Stattersfield M.J. Crosby A.J. Long D.C. Wege (1998) Endemic Bird Areas of the World: Priorities for Biodiversity Conservation BirdLife International Cambridge, UK
Stevenson R.D. and Morris R.A. 2004. Community Science for Biodiversity Monitoring, 4 pp. http://www.cs.umb.edu/efg/CommSci/Monitoring.htm.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Becker, C., Agreda, A., Astudillo, E. et al. Community-based Monitoring of Fog Capture and Biodiversity at Loma Alta, Ecuador Enhance Social Capital and Institutional Cooperation. Biodivers Conserv 14, 2695–2707 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-005-8402-1
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-005-8402-1