Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Understanding and managing the introduction pathways of alien taxa: South Africa as a case study

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Biological Invasions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

For the effective prevention of biological invasions, the pathways responsible for introductions must be understood and managed. However introduction pathways, particularly for developing nations, have been understudied. Using the Hulme et al. (J Appl Ecol 45:403–414, 2008) pathway classification, we assessed the South African introduction pathways in terms of the number of introductions, the invasion success of introduced taxa, how the pathways have changed over time, and how these factors vary for vertebrates, invertebrates and plants. Pathway and date of introduction, region of origin, distribution and invasion status data for 2111 alien taxa were extracted from databases. Most alien and invasive taxa were deliberately introduced and subsequently escaped captivity or cultivation. Pathway prominence also varied temporally and across organism types. Vertebrates and plants were largely escapes and although most plant escapes have become invasive, this is not the case for vertebrates. However the number of new plant and vertebrate escapes has increased over time. Invertebrates have been deliberately released or unintentionally introduced as contaminants or stowaways. For invertebrates the number of release, contaminant and stowaway introductions has increased, and most contaminants and stowaways have become invasive. As effective screening procedures are in place for invertebrates released for biological control, the major threats for South Africa are from vertebrate and plant escapes and invertebrate contaminants and stowaways. We recommend improvements to risk assessment and education to prevent escapes, and prioritised inspection strategies to reduce stowaway and contaminant introductions. Finally, as introduction pathways and introduced taxa change temporally, biosecurity decisions need to be informed by information on current and future pathways.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Areal FJ, Touza J, MacLeod A, Dehnen-Schmutz K, Perrings C, Palmieri MG, Spence NJ (2008) Integrating drivers influencing the detection of plant pests carried in the international cut flower trade. J Environ Manag 89:300–307

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bacon SJ, Bacher S, Aebi A (2012) Gaps in border controls are related to quarantine alien insect invasions in Europe. PLoS One 7:e47689

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Bewick V, Cheek L, Ball J (2004) Statistics review 8: qualitative data—tests of association. Crit Care 8:46–53

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Blackburn TM, Pyšek P, Bacher S, Carlton JT, Duncan RP, Jarošík V, Wilson JRU, Richardson DM (2011) A proposed unified framework for biological invasions. Trends Ecol Evol 26:333–339

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cassey P, Blackburn TM, Russell GJ, Jones KE, Lockwood JL (2004) Influences on the transport and establishment of exotic bird species: an analysis of the parrots (Psittaciformes) of the world. Glob Chang Biol 10:417–426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crawley MJ (2007) The R Book. Wiley, Chichester

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dehnen-Schmutz K, Touza J, Perrings C, Williamson M (2007) A century of the ornamental plant trade and its impact on invasion success. Divers Distrib 13:527–534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Essl F, Bacher S, Blackburn TM, Booy O, Brundu G, Brunel S, Cardoso A-C, Eschen R, Gallardo B, Galil B, García-Berthou E, Genovesi P, Groom Q, Harrower C, Hulme PE, Katsanevakis S, Kenis M, Kühn I, Kumschick S, Martinou AF, Nentwig W, O’Flynn C, Pagad S, Pergl J, Pyšek P, Rabitsch W, Richardson DM, Roques A, Roy HE, Scalera R, Schindler S, Seebens H, Vanderhoeven S, Vilá M, Wilson JRU, Zenetos A, Jeschke JM (2015) Crossing frontiers in tackling pathways of biological invasions. Bioscience  65:769–782

  • Everett RA (2000) Patterns and pathways of biological invasions. Trends Ecol Evol 15:177–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Everitt BS (1977) The analysis of contingency tables. Chapman and Hall Ltd, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Faulkner KT, Spear D, Robertson MP, Rouget M, Wilson JRU (2015) An assessment of the information content of South African alien species databases.  Bothalia: Afr Biodivers Conserv 45:1–11. doi:10.4102/abc.v45i1.1103

  • Foxcroft LC, Richardson DM, Wilson JRU (2008) Ornamental plants as invasive aliens: problems and solutions in Kruger National Park, South Africa. Environ Manag 41:32–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gertzen E, Familiar O, Leung B (2008) Quantifying invasion pathways: fish introductions from the aquarium trade. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 65:1265–1273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giliomee JH (2011) Recent establishment of many alien insects in South Africa—a cause for concern. African Entomol 19:151–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez-Nuñez X (2008) 15-year review: trade policy in South Africa. Trade and Industrial Policy Strategies, Pretoria

    Google Scholar 

  • Hastie T (2013) gam: generalized additive models. http://cran.r-project.org/package=gam. Accessed 3 July 2014

  • Henderson L (2006) Comparisons of invasive plants in southern Africa originating from southern temperate, northern temperate and tropical regions. Bothalia 36:201–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herbert DG (2010) The introduced terrestrial mollusca of South Africa. South African National Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria

    Google Scholar 

  • Hulme PE (2006) Beyond control: wider implications for the management of biological invasions. J Appl Ecol 43:835–847

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hulme PE (2009) Trade, transport and trouble: managing invasive species pathways in an era of globalization. J Appl Ecol 46:10–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hulme PE, Bacher S, Kenis M, Klotz S, Kühn I, Minchin D, Nentwig W, Olenin S, Panov V, Pergl J, Pyšek P, Roques A, Sol D, Solarz W, Vilà M (2008) Grasping at the routes of biological invasions: a framework for integrating pathways into policy. J Appl Ecol 45:403–414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katsanevakis S, Zenetos A, Belchior C, Cardoso AC (2013) Invading European seas: assessing pathways of introduction of marine aliens. Ocean Coast Manag 76:64–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kenis M, Rabitsch W, Auger-Rozenberg M-A, Roques A (2007) How can alien species inventories and interception data help us prevent insect invasions? Bull Entomol Res 97:489–502

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Klein H (2011) A catalogue of the insects, mites and pathogens that have been used or rejected, or are under consideration, for the biological control of invasive alien plants in South Africa. African Entomol 19:515–549

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolar CS, Lodge DM (2001) Progress in invasion biology: predicting invaders. Trends Ecol Evol 16:199–204

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kolar CS, Lodge DM (2002) Ecological predictions and risk assessment for alien fishes in North America. Science 298:1233–1236

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kraus F (2007) Using pathway analysis to inform prevention strategies for alien reptiles and amphibians. Manag Vertebr Invasive Species 21:94–103

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumschick S, Richardson DM (2013) Species-based risk assessments for biological invasions: advances and challenges. Divers Distrib 19:1095–1105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambdon PW, Lloret F, Hulme PE (2008) How do introduction characteristics influence the invasion success of Mediterranean alien plants? Perspect Plant Ecol Evol Syst 10:143–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehan NE, Murphy JR, Thorburn LP, Bradley BA (2013) Accidental introductions are an important source of invasive plants in the continental United States. Am J Bot 100:1287–1293

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Leung B, Lodge DM, Finnoff D, Shogren JF, Lewis MA, Lamberti G (2002) An ounce of prevention or a pound of cure: bioeconomic risk analysis of invasive species. Proc R Soc Lond B 269:2407–2413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levine JM, D’Antonio CM (2003) Forecasting biological invasions with increasing international trade. Conserv Biol 17:322–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lockwood JL, Cassey P, Blackburn TM (2009) The more you introduce the more you get: the role of colonization pressure and propagule pressure in invasion ecology. Divers Distrib 15:904–910

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacIsaac HJ, Robbins TC, Lewis MA (2002) Modeling ships’ ballast water as invasion threats to the Great Lakes. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 59:1245–1256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mack RN (2005) Predicting the identity of plant invaders: future contributions from horticulture. HortScience 40:1168–1174

    Google Scholar 

  • Mack RN, Erneberg M (2002) The United States naturalized flora: largely the product of deliberate introductions. Ann Missouri Bot Gard 89:176–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin GD, Coetzee JA (2011) Pet stores, aquarists and the internet trade as modes of introduction and spread of invasive macrophytes in South Africa. Water SA 37:371–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mead A, Carlton JT, Griffiths CL, Rius M (2011) Introduced and cryptogenic marine and estuarine species of South Africa. J Nat Hist 45:2463–2524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moran VC, Hoffmann JH, Zimmermann HG (2005) Biological control of invasive alien plants in South Africa: necessity, circumspection, and success. Front Ecol Environ 3:77–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moran VC, Hoffmann JH, Zimmermann HG (2013) 100 years of biological control of invasive alien plants in South Africa: history, practice and achievements. S Afr J Sci 109:1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pheloung PC, Williams PA, Halloy SR (1999) A weed risk assessment model for use as a biosecurity tool evaluating plant introductions. J Environ Manag 57:239–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puth LM, Post DM (2005) Studying invasion: have we missed the boat? Ecol Lett 8:715–721

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pyšek P, Richardson DM, Pergl J, Jarošík V, Sixtová Z, Weber E (2008) Geographical and taxonomic biases in invasion ecology. Trends Ecol Evol 23:237–244

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pyšek P, Jarošík V, Pergl J (2011) Alien plants introduced by different pathways differ in invasion success: unintentional introductions as a threat to natural areas. PLoS One 6:e24890

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • R Core Team (2013) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. http://www.r-project.org/. Accessed 23 April 2014

  • Reichard SH, White P (2001) Horticulture as a pathway of invasive plant introductions in the United States. Bioscience 51:103–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson DM, Pyšek P, Rejmánek M, Barbour MG, Panetta FD, West CJ (2000) Naturalization and invasion of alien plants: concepts and definitions. Divers Distrib 6:93–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson DM, Cambray JA, Chapman RA, Dean WRJ, Griffiths CL, Le Maitre DC, Newton DJ, Winstanley TJ (2003) Vectors and pathways of biological invasions in South Africa—past, present and future. In: Ruiz GM, Carlton JT (eds) Invasive species: vectors and management strategies. Island Press, Washington, pp 292–349

    Google Scholar 

  • Saccaggi DL, Pieterse W (2013) Intercepting aliens: insects and mites on budwood imported to South Africa. J Econ Entomol 106:1179–1189

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Simberloff D (2006) Risk assessments, blacklists, and white lists for introduced species: Are predictions good enough to be useful? Agric Resour Econ Rev 35:1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Simberloff D (2009) The role of propagule pressure in biological invasions. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 40:81–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simberloff D, Martin J-L, Genovesi P, Maris V, Wardle DA, Aronson J, Courchamp F, Galil B, García-Berthou E, Pascal M, Pyšek P, Sousa R, Tabacchi E, Vilà M (2013) Impacts of biological invasions: what’s what and the way forward. Trends Ecol Evol 28:58–66

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • van Wilgen BW, Richardson DM, Le Maitre DC, Marais C, Magadlela D (2001) The economic consequences of alien plant invasions: examples of impacts and approaches to sustainable management in South Africa. Environ Dev Sustain 3:145–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Wilgen NJ, Wilson JRU, Elith J, Wintle BA, Richardson DM (2010) Alien invaders and reptile traders: what drives the live animal trade in South Africa? Anim Conserv 13:24–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westphal MI, Browne M, MacKinnon K, Noble I (2008) The link between international trade and the global distribution of invasive alien species. Biol Invasions 10:391–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams PA, Newfield M (2002) A weed risk assessment system for new conservation weeds in New Zealand. Department of Conservation, Wellington

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson JRU, Dormontt EE, Prentis PJ, Lowe AJ, Richardson DM (2009) Something in the way you move: dispersal pathways affect invasion success. Trends Ecol Evol 24:136–144

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wittenberg R, Cock MJW (2005) Best practices for the prevention and management of invasive alien species. In: Mooney HA, Mack RN, McNeely JA, Neville LE, Schei PJ, Wage JK (eds) Invasive alien species: a new synthesis. Island Press, Washington, pp 209–232

    Google Scholar 

  • Wojtasik EM (2013) Richness and diversity of alien ethnomedicinal plant taxa used and sold for traditional medicine in South Africa. Dissertation, University of Witwatersrand

  • Xu H, Qiang S, Han Z, Guo J, Huang Z, Sun H, He S, Ding H, Wu H, Wan F (2006) The status and causes of alien species invasion in China. Biodivers Conserv 15:2893–2904

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zuur AF, Ieno EN, Walker NJ, Saveliev AA, Smith GM (2009) Mixed effects models and extensions in ecology with R. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the South African National Department of Environment Affairs through its funding of the South African National Biodiversity Institute’s Invasive Species Programme. Additional funding was provided by the DST-NRF Centre for Invasion Biology. MR acknowledges funding from the South African Research Chairs Initiative of the Department of Science and Technology and National Research Foundation of South Africa. We thank Dian Spear for advice on data collection as well as Hildegard Klein and Angela Bownes for their help with additional information on biological control agents.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Katelyn T. Faulkner.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 16 kb)

Supplementary material 2 (DOCX 21 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Faulkner, K.T., Robertson, M.P., Rouget, M. et al. Understanding and managing the introduction pathways of alien taxa: South Africa as a case study. Biol Invasions 18, 73–87 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-015-0990-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-015-0990-4

Keywords

Navigation