Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Conflicting values: ecosystem services and invasive tree management

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Biological Invasions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Tree species have been planted widely beyond their native ranges to provide or enhance ecosystem services such as timber and fibre production, erosion control, and aesthetic or amenity benefits. At the same time, non-native tree species can have strongly negative impacts on ecosystem services when they naturalize and subsequently become invasive and disrupt or transform communities and ecosystems. The dichotomy between positive and negative effects on ecosystem services has led to significant conflicts over the removal of non-native invasive tree species worldwide. These conflicts are often viewed in only a local context but we suggest that a global synthesis sheds important light on the dimensions of the phenomenon. We collated examples of conflict surrounding the control or management of tree invasions where conflict has caused delay, increased cost, or cessation of projects aimed at invasive tree removal. We found that conflicts span a diverse range of taxa, systems and countries, and that most conflicts emerge around three areas: urban and near-urban trees; trees that provide direct economic benefits; and invasive trees that are used by native species for habitat or food. We suggest that such conflict should be seen as a normal occurrence in invasive tree removal. Assessing both positive and negative effects of invasive species on multiple ecosystem services may provide a useful framework for the resolution of conflicts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

This review came out of discussions at a workshop in Isla Victoria, Bariloche, Argentina, in September 2012. We thank Hitoshi Sakio, Tadashi Fukami, Bob Frame and Simon Fowler for additional discussions and helpful input. IAD, LEB, and DAP were supported by Core funding for Crown Research Institutes from the New Zealand Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment’s Science and Innovation Group. DMR and BWvW acknowledge support from the DST-NRF Centre of Excellence for Invasion Biology (CIB) and the Working for Water (WfW) programme, partly through the CIB/WfW collaborative project on “Research for integrated management of invasive alien species”. DMR acknowledges funding from the National Research Foundation (Grant 85417). The Oppenheimer Memorial Trust cofunded the attendance of several participants at the Bariloche workshop.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ian A. Dickie.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dickie, I.A., Bennett, B.M., Burrows, L.E. et al. Conflicting values: ecosystem services and invasive tree management. Biol Invasions 16, 705–719 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-013-0609-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-013-0609-6

Keywords

Navigation