Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Genetic population structure of invasive nutria (Myocastor coypus) in Louisiana, USA: is it sufficient for the development of eradication units?

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Biological Invasions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The effective control of invasive mammals, because of their potentially high dispersive capacity, demands an understanding of spatial patterns of gene flow leading to the designation of population units for systematic eradication. Nutria, or coypu (Myocastor coypus), are large, semi-aquatic rodents, originally exported from their native South America for the value of their fur, and are now considered pests on many continents due to overgrazing of wetlands. This study was aimed at assessing the potential for establishing eradication units for the control of nutria in a severely impacted region of the US, southern Louisiana, using nine microsatellite loci, and systematic sampling from each of eight major watershed basins. Unexpectedly high levels of genetic diversity were revealed in comparison to native populations both in terms of numbers of alleles and observed heterozygosities, suggesting that multiple source populations may have originally contributed to the establishment of the Louisiana fur trade, which have subsequently become intermingled. Genetic differentiation among watersheds was nearly undetectable, as evidenced by a very small, albeit significant overall F ST value of 0.0059. Interestingly, one of the Bayesian clustering algorithms used in this study identified 11 populations that may represent a fading remnant of the original source populations, although these clusters were not supported by a coherent pattern of geography. Unfortunately, these findings suggest that neither the establishment of locally manageable eradication units, nor the development of biological control agents known for their close association with a single source population will be effective in the control of Louisiana nutria.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdelkrim J, Pascal M, Calmet C, Samadi S (2005) Importance of assessing population genetic structure before eradication of invasive species: examples from insular Norway Rat populations. Conserv Biol 19:1509–1518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balloux F, Brunner H, Lugon-Moulin N, Hausser J, Goudet J (2000) Microsatellites can be misleading: an empirical and simulation study. Evolution 54:1414–1422

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bergman DL, Chandler MD, Locklear A (2002) The economic impact of invasive species to wildlife services’ cooperators. In: Clark L, Hone J, Shivik JA, Watkins RA, Vercauteren KC, Yoder JK (eds) Human conflicts with wildlife: economic considerations. Proceedings of the third NWRC special symposium. National Wildlife Research Center, Fort Collins, pp 169–178

  • Callahan CR, Henderson AP, Eackles MS, King TL (2005) Microsatellite DNA markers for the study of population structure and dynamics in nutria (Myocastor coypus). Mol Ecol Notes 5:124–126

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carter J, Leonard BP (2002) A review of the literature on the worldwide distribution, spread of, and efforts to eradicate the coypu (Myocastor coypus). Wildl Soc Bull 30:162–175

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter J, Foote AL, Johnson-Randall LA (1999) Modeling the effects of nutria (Myocastor coypus) on wetland loss. Wetlands 19:209–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corander J, Waldmann P, Sillanpää MJ (2003) Bayesian analysis of genetic differentiation between populations. Genetics 163:367–374

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Corander J, Waldmann P, Marttinen P, Sillanpää MJ (2004) BAPS 2: enhanced possibilities for the analysis of genetic population structure. Bioinformatics 20:2363–2369

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Corander J, Marttinen P, Mantyniemi S (2006) Bayesian identification of stock mixtures from molecular marker data. Fish Bull 104:550–558

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornuet JM, Luikart G (1996) Description and power analysis of two tests for detecting recent population bottlenecks from allele frequency data. Genetics 144:2001–2014

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Courchamp F, Chapius JL, Pascal M (2003) Mammalian invaders on islands: impacts, control and control impact. Biol Rev 78:347–383

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Di Rienzo A, Peterson AC, Garza JC, Valdes AM, Slatkin M, Freimer NB (1994) Mutational processes of simple-sequence repeat loci in human populations. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 91:3166–3170

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Estoup A, Guillemaud T (2010) Reconstructing routes of invasion using genetic data: why, how and so what? Mol Ecol 19:4113–4130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evanno G, Regnaut S, Goudet J (2005) Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software STRUCTURE: a simulation study. Mol Ecol 14:2611–2620

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ford MA, Grace JB (1998) Effects of vertebrate herbivores on soil processes, plant biomass, litter accumulation and soil elevation changes in a coastal marsh. J Ecol 86:974–982

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gosling LM (1989) Extinction to order. New Sci 121:44–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Goudet J (2002) FSTAT, version 2.9.3, a program to estimate and test gene diversities and fixation indices. http://www2.unil.ch/popgen/softwares/fstat.htm

  • Guichon ML, Borgnia M, Righi CF, Cassini GH, Cassini MH (2003) Social behavior and group formation in the coypu (Myocastor coypus) in the Argentinean pampas. J Mammal 84:254–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hampton JO, Spencer PBS, Alpers DL, Twigg LE, Woolnough AP, Doust J, Higgs T, Pluske J (2004) Molecular techniques, wildlife management and the importance of genetic population structure and dispersal: a case study with feral pigs. J Appl Ecol 41:735–743

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hedrick PW (1999) Perspective: highly variable loci and their interpretation in evolution and conservation. Evolution 53:313–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ibrahim KM, Nichols RA, Hewitt GM (1996) Spatial patterns of genetic variation generated by different forms of dispersal during range expansion. Heredity 77:282–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson-Randall LA, Foote AL (2005) Effects of managed impoundments and herbivory on wetland plant production and stand structure. Wetlands 25:38–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kinler N, Linscombe G, Hartley S (1998) A survey of nutria herbivory damage in coastal Louisiana in 1998. Fur and Refuge Division: Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries

  • Lawson Handley L-J, Estoup A, Evans DM, Thomas CE, Lombaert E, Facon B, Aebi A, Roy HE (2011) Ecological genetics of invasive alien species. Biocontrol 56:409–428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee CE (2002) Evolutionary genetics of invasive species. Trends Ecol Evol 17:386–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luikart G, Sherwin WB, Steele BM, Allendorf FW (1998) Usefulness of molecular markers for detecting population bottlenecks via monitoring genetic change. Mol Ecol 7:963–974

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mack RN, Simberloff D, Lonsdale WM, Evans H, Clout M, Bazzaz FA (2000) Biotic invasions: causes, epidemiology, global consequences, and control. Ecol Appl 10:689–710

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mantel NA (1967) The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach. Cancer Res 27:209–220

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mullenbach R, Lagoda PJL, Welter C (1989) An efficient salt-chloroform extraction of DNA from blood and tissues. Trends Genet 5:391

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nei M, Maruyama T, Chakraborty R (1975) The bottleneck effect and genetic variability in populations. Evolution 29:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nolfo-Clements LE (2009) Nutria survivorship, movement patterns, and home ranges. Southeast Nat 8:399–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P (2000) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155:945–959

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Raymond M, Rousset F (1995) GENEPOP (version 1.2): population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. J Hered 86:248–249

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice WR (1989) Analyzing tables of statistical tests. Evolution 43:223–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson BC, Gemmell NJ (2004) Defining eradication units to control invasive pests. J Appl Ecol 41:1042–1048

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roderick GK, Navajas M (2003) Genes in new environments: genetics and evolution in biological control. Nat Rev Gen 4:889–899

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rohlf FJ (2000) NTSYSpc Ver. 2.1: numerical taxonomy and multivariate analysis system. Applied Biostatistics, Port Jefferson, New York

  • Schrey AW, Heist EJ (2003) Microsatellite analysis of population structure in the shortfin mako (Isurus oxyrinchus). Can J Fish Aquat Sci 60:670–675

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Swarzenski CM (2003) Surface-water hydrology of the gulf intracoastal waterway in south-central Louisiana. U.S. Geological Survey Paper 1672. http://www.pubs.usgs.gov/pp/pp1672/pdf/pp1672.pdf. Accessed 15 Oct 2007

  • Taylor KL, Grace JB (1995) The effects of vertebrate herbivory on plant community structure in the coastal marshes of the Pearl River, Louisiana, USA. Wetlands 15:68–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor RH, Kaiser GW, Drever MC (2000) Eradication of Norway rats for recovery of seabird habitat on Langara Island, British Columbia. Restor Ecol 8:151–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Towns DR, Broome KG (2003) From small Maria to massive Campbell: forty years of rat eradications from New Zealand islands. N Z J Zool 30:337–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Túnez JI, Guichón ML, Centrón D, Henderson AP, Callahan C, Cassini MH (2009) Relatedness and social organization of coypus in the Argentinean pampas. Mol Ecol 18:147–155

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Van Oosterhout C, Hutchinson WF, Wills DPM, Shipley P (2004) Micro-checker: software for identifying and correcting genotyping errors in microsatellite data. Mol Ecol Notes 4:535–538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright S (1931) Evolution in Mendelian populations. Genetics 16:97–159

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank S. Merino for field assistance, J. Carter for assisting with the coordination of tissue sampling activities, B. Kubátová for technical assistance, and P. Leberg and D. Johnson for helpful comments on a previous version of this manuscript. Tissue samples and accompanying spatial information were obtained with the cooperation of Coastal Environments, Inc. Funding was provided by the National Invasive Species Program of the U.S. Geological Survey. The use of trade names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Steven E. Travis

    Present address: Department of Biology, University of New England, 11 Hills Beach Road, Biddeford, ME, 04005, USA

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biology, University of Louisiana at Lafayette, Lafayette, LA, 70504, USA

    Karen Klima

  2. US Geological Survey, National Wetlands Research Center, 700 Cajundome Blvd., Lafayette, LA, 70506, USA

    Steven E. Travis

Authors
  1. Karen Klima
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Steven E. Travis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Steven E. Travis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Klima, K., Travis, S.E. Genetic population structure of invasive nutria (Myocastor coypus) in Louisiana, USA: is it sufficient for the development of eradication units?. Biol Invasions 14, 1909–1918 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-012-0201-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-012-0201-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation