Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Application of bioclimatic models coupled with network analysis for risk assessment of the killer shrimp, Dikerogammarus villosus, in Great Britain

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Biological Invasions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study we use a combination of techniques to assess the general risk of invasion by the aquatic invader Dikerogammarus villosus in Great Britain at multiple scales. First, bioclimatic models (Support Vector Machine algorithm) were used to identify regions showing the highest climatic match with the European range of the species, and that might be at highest risk of initial colonization if provided with propagules. The model showed that nearly 60% of Great Britain shows the minimum bioclimatic suitability for the species, particularly southern and eastern England. Afterwards, a Network Analysis was used to model the natural spatio-temporal spread of the killer shrimp in the Great Ouse River catchment (SE England), the first region invaded by this species. This model suggested that the northern part of the catchment, including two relevant Ramsar sites (Ouse Washes and Wicken fen) are at serious risk of being invaded in the short-term (<5 years). Taking into account the rapid spread of the killer shrimp in other European countries, its broad environmental tolerance, the high climate suitability of broad areas of Great Britain to the species, the current spread of other Ponto-Caspian species, and the high natural and artificial connectivity of the hydrological network, we conclude that D. villosus is very likely to continue its spread in Great Britain, dramatically affecting the native biodiversity. The multi-scale approach proposed in this study combines large-scale bioclimatic models with local-scale dispersal models, providing managers with a powerful spatial and temporal basis for informed decision-making.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aldridge DC (2005) The zebra mussel, Dreissena polymorpha, in the Anglian region: results of river and water treatment works surveys. Cambridge Environmental Consultants, Cambridge, p 31

    Google Scholar 

  • Aldridge DC (2010) Dreissena polymorpha in Great Britain: history of spread, impacts and control. In: van der Velde G, Rajagopal S, bij de Vaate A (eds) The Zebra Mussel in Europe. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden, pp 79–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Aldridge DC, Elliott P, Moggridge GD (2004) The recent and rapid spread of the zebra mussel (Dreissena polymorpha) in Great Britain. Biol Conserv 119:253–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beaumont LJ, Gallagher RV, Thuiller W et al (2009) Different climatic envelopes among invasive populations may lead to underestimations of current and future biological invasions. Divers Distrib 15:409–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bilton DT, Freeland JR, Okamura B (2001) Dispersal in freshwater invertebrates. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 32:159–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boets P, Lock K, Messiaen M et al (2010) Combining data-driven methods and lab studies to analyse the ecology of Dikerogammarus villosus. Ecol Inform 5:133–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruijs MCM, Kelleher B, van der Velde G et al (2001) Oxygen consumption, temperature and salinity tolerance of the invasive amphipod Dikerogammarus villosus: indicators of further dispersal via ballast water transport. Arch Hydrobiol 152:633–646

    Google Scholar 

  • Casellato S, Visentin A, La Piana G (2007) The predatory impact of Dikerogammarus villosus on fish. In: Gherardi F (ed) Biological invaders in inland waters: profiles, distribution and threats. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 495–506

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Chen PF, Wiley EO, Mcnyset KM (2007) Ecological niche modeling as a predictive tool: silver and bighead carps in North America. Biol Invasions 9:43–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Souza Muñoz M, De Giovanni R, de Siqueira M, Sutton T, Brewer P, Pereira R, Canhos D, Canhos V (2011) openModeller: a generic approach to species’ potential distribution modelling. GeoInformatica 15:111–135

  • Devin S, Beisel JN, Bachmann V et al (2001) Dikerogammarus villosus (Amphipoda: Gammaridae): another invasive species newly established in the Moselle river and French hydrosystems. Ann De Limnol Int J Limnol 37:21–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devin S, Piscart C, Beisel JN et al (2003) Ecological traits of the amphipod invader Dikerogammarus villosus on a mesohabitat scale. Arch Hydrobiol 158:43–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dick JTA, Platvoet D, Kelly DW (2002) Predatory impact of the freshwater invader Dikerogammarus villosus (Crustacea: Amphipoda). Can J Fish Aquat Sci 59:1078–1084

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drake JM, Bossenbroek JM (2004) The potential distribution of zebra mussels in the United States. Bioscience 54:931–941

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drake JM, Randin C, Guisan A (2006) Modelling ecological niches with support vector machines. J Appl Ecol 43:424–432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elith J, Graham CH (2009) Do they? how do they? why do they differ? On finding reasons for differing performances of species distribution models. Ecography 32:66–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliott JM (2002) The drift distances and time spent in the drift by freshwater shrimps, Gammarus pulex, in a small stony stream, and their implications for the interpretation of downstream dispersal. Freshw Biol 47:1403–1417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliott JM (2003) A comparative study of the dispersal of 10 species of stream invertebrates. Freshw Biol 48:1652–1668

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gergs R, Rothhaupt KO (2008) Feeding rates, assimilation efficiencies and growth of two amphipod species on biodeposited material from zebra mussels. Freshw Biol 53:2494–2503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gherardi F (2007) Biological invasions in inland waters: an overview. In: Gherardi F (ed) Biological invaders in inland waters: profiles, distribution, and threats. Springer, Netherlands, pp 3–25

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Guisan A, Thuiller W (2005) Predicting species distribution: offering more than simple habitat models. Ecol Lett 8:993–1009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hancock MA, Hughes JM (1999) Direct measures of instream movement in a freshwater shrimp using a genetic marker. Hydrobiologia 416:23–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanley JA, McNeil BJ (1982) The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 1:29–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Hijmans RJ, Cameron SE, Parra JL et al (2005) Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. Int J Climatol 25:1965–1978

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jocque M, Field R, Brendonck L et al (2010) Climatic control of dispersal-ecological specialization trade-offs: a metacommunity process at the heart of the latitudinal diversity gradient? Global Ecol Biogeogr 19:244–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keller RP, Ermgassen P, Aldridge DC (2009) Vectors and timing of freshwater invasions in Great Britain. Conserv Biol 23:1526–1534

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kraft CE, Sullivan PJ, Karatayev AY et al (2002) Landscape patterns of an aquatic invader: assessing dispersal extent from spatial distributions. Ecol Appl 12:749–759

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar S, Spaulding SA, Stohlgren TJ et al (2009) Potential habitat distribution for the freshwater diatom Didymosphenia geminata in the continental US. Front Ecol Environ 7:415–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leathwick JR, Elith J, Chadderton WL et al (2008) Dispersal, disturbance and the contrasting biogeographies of New Zealand’s diadromous and non-diadromous fish species. J Biogeogr 35:1481–1497

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leuven R, van der Velde G, Baijens I et al (2009) The River Rhine: a global highway for dispersal of aquatic invasive species. Biol Invasions 11:1989–2008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loo SE, Mac Nally R, Lake PS (2007) Forecasting New Zealand mudsnail invasion range: model comparisons using native and invaded ranges. Ecol Appl 17:181–189

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • MacNeil C, Platvoet D, Dick JTA et al (2010) The Ponto-Caspian ‘killer shrimp’, Dikerogammarus villosus (Sowinsky, 1894), invades the British Isles. Aquat Invasions 5:441–445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madgwick G, Aldridge DC (2011) Killer shrimps in Britain: hype or horror? British Wildlife Publishing, Dorset, UK, pp 408–412

  • McNyset KM (2005) Use of ecological niche modelling to predict distributions of freshwater fish species in Kansas. Ecol Freshw Fish 14:243–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niggebrugge K, Durance I, Watson AM et al (2007) Applying landscape ecology to conservation biology: spatially explicit analysis reveals dispersal limits on threatened wetland gastropods. Biol Conserv 139:286–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oreska M, Aldridge D (2011) Estimating the financial costs of freshwater invasive species in Great Britain: a standardized approach to invasive species costing. Biol Invasions 13:305–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson AT (2003) Predicting the geography of species’ invasions via ecological niche modeling. Q Rev Biol 78:419–433

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips SJ, Elith J (2010) POC plots: calibrating species distribution models with presence-only data. Ecology 91:2476–2484

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Piscart C, Devin S, Beisel JN et al (2003) Growth-related life-history traits of an invasive gammarid species: evaluation with a Laird-Gompertz model. Can J Zool Revue Canadienne De Zoologie 81:2006–2014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Platt JC (1999) Probabilistic outputs for Support Vector Machines and comparison to regularized likelihood methods. In: Scholkopf B, Burges CJC, Smola AJ (eds) Advances in Kernel methods—support vector learning. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 185–208

    Google Scholar 

  • Platvoet D, Dick JTA, MacNeil C et al (2009) Invader-invader interactions in relation to environmental heterogeneity leads to zonation of two invasive amphipods, Dikerogammarus villosus (Sowinsky) and Gammarus tigrinus. Biol Invasions 11:2085–2093

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pockl M (2009) Success of the invasive Ponto-Caspian amphipod Dikerogammarus villosus by life history traits and reproductive capacity. Biol Invasions 11:2021–2041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pockl M, Webb BW, Sutcliffe DW (2003) Life history and reproductive capacity of Gammarus fossarum and G. roeseli (Crustacea: Amphipoda) under naturally fluctuating water temperatures: a simulation study. Freshw Biol 48:53–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ricciardi A, Rasmussen JB (1998) Predicting the identity and impact of future biological invaders: a priority for aquatic resource management. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 55:1759–1765

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodda GH, Jarnevich CS, Reed RN (2011) Challenges in identifying sites climatically matched to the native ranges of animal invaders. Plos One 6(2):e14670. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0014670

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sala OE, Chapin FS, Armesto JJ et al (2000) Biodiversity—global biodiversity scenarios for the year 2100. Science 287:1770–1774

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schick RS, Lindley ST (2007) Directed connectivity among fish populations in a riverine network. J Appl Ecol 44:1116–1126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schölkopf B, Smola AJ, Williamson RC et al (2000) New support vector algorithms. Neural Comput 12:1207–1245

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sheader M (1996) Factors influencing egg size in the gammarid amphipod Gammarus insensibilis. Mar Biol 124:519–526

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Timar L, Phaneuf DJ (2009) Modeling the human-induced spread of an aquatic invasive: the case of the zebra mussel. Ecol Econ 68:3060–3071

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Urban DL, Minor ES, Treml EA et al (2009) Graph models of habitat mosaics. Ecol Lett 12:260–273

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Václavík T, Meentemeyer RK (2011) Equilibrium or not? Modelling potential distribution of invasive species in different stages of invasion. Divers Distrib. doi:10.1111/j.1472-4642.2011.00854.x

  • van Riel MC, van der Velde G, Rajagopal S et al (2006) Trophic relationships in the Rhine food web during invasion and after establishment of the Ponto-Caspian invader Dikerogammarus villosus. Hydrobiologia 565:39–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiens JA (2002) Riverine landscapes: taking landscape ecology into the water. Freshw Biol 47:501–515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wijnhoven S, van Riel MC, van der Velde G (2003) Exotic and indigenous freshwater gammarid species: physiological tolerance to water temperature in relation to ionic content of the water. Aquat Ecol 37:151–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Commission (FP7/2007-2013, Marie Curie IEF program) under grant agreement no 251785. The author would like to thank C. McLaughlan for her help with the English editing.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Belinda Gallardo.

Appendices

Appendix 1

See Fig. 4.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Map showing Dikerogammarus villosus occurrence points (N = 248) used for calibration of species distribution models

Appendix 2

See Fig. 5.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Response of D. villosus climate suitability to the set of environmental predictors used as predictors. Response graphs were calculated by extracting 1,000 random points from the seven European environmental layers and the climate suitability map of D. villosus

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gallardo, B., Errea, M.P. & Aldridge, D.C. Application of bioclimatic models coupled with network analysis for risk assessment of the killer shrimp, Dikerogammarus villosus, in Great Britain. Biol Invasions 14, 1265–1278 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-011-0154-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-011-0154-0

Keywords

Navigation