Skip to main content
Log in

Priority resource access mediates competitive intensity between an invasive weevil and native floral herbivores

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Biological Invasions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Mechanisms underlying invasive species impacts remain incompletely understood. We tested the hypothesis that priority resource access by an invasive biocontrol weevil, Rhinocyllus conicus, intensifies and alters the outcome of competition with native floral herbivores over flower head resources of the non-target, native host plant Cirsium canescens, specifically with the predominant, synchronous tephritid fly Paracantha culta. Four main results emerged. First, we documented strong, asymmetric competition, with R. conicus out-competing P. culta. Second, weevil priority access to floral resources accelerated competitive suppression of P. culta. Evidence for competitive suppression with increased weevil priority included decreases in both the numbers and the total biomass of native flies, plus decreases in individual P. culta fly mass and, so, potential fitness. Third, we found evidence for three concurrent mechanisms underlying the competitive suppression of P. culta by R. conicus. Prior use of a flower head by R. conicus interfered with P. culta pre-oviposition behavior. Once oviposition occurred, the weevil also reduced fly post-oviposition performance. Preemptive resource exploitation occurred, shown by the significant effect of flower head size on the total number of insects developing and in the magnitude of R. conicus effects on P. culta. Interference also occurred, shown by a spatial shift of surviving P. culta individuals away from the preferred receptacle resources as R. conicus priority increased. Finally, fourth, using an individual-based model (IBM), we found that the competitive interactions documented have the potential for imposing demographic consequences, causing a reduction in P. culta population sizes. Thus, priority resource access by an invasive insect increased competitive impact on the predominant native insect in the invaded floral guild. This study also provides the first experimental evidence for non-target effects of a weed biological control agent on an associated native insect herbivore.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agrawal AA, Ackerly DD, Adler F, Arnold AE, Caceres C, Doak DF, Post E, Hudson PJ, Maron J, Mooney KA, Power M, Schemske D, Stachowicz J, Strauss S, Turner MG, Werner E (2007) Filling key gaps in population and community ecology. Front Ecol Environ 5:145–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berube DE (1980) Interspecific competition between Urophora affinis and U. quadrifasciata (Diptera: Tephritidae) for ovipositional sites on diffuse knapweed (Centaurea diffusa: Compositae). J Appl Entomol 90:299–306

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowe M, Bouchier R (2006) Interspecific interactions between the gall-fly Urophora affinis Frfld. (Diptera: Tephritidae) and the weevil Larinus minutus Gyll. (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), two biological control agents released against spotted knapweed, Centaurea stobe L. ssp. micranthos. Biocontrol Sci Tech 16:417–430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denno RF, McClure MS, Ott JR (1995) Interspecific interactions in phytophagous insects: competition reexamined and resurrected. Ann Rev Entomol 40:297–331

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gandhi KJK, Herms DA (2010) Direct and indirect effects of alien insect herbivores on ecological processes and interactions in forests of eastern North America. Biol Invasions 12:389–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gassmann A, Louda SM (2001) Rhinocyllus conicus: initial evaluation and subsequent ecological impacts in North America. In: Wajnberg E, Scott JK, Quimby PC (eds) Evaluating indirect ecological effects of biological control. CABI International, Wallingford, pp 147–183

    Google Scholar 

  • Goeden RD, Andres LA, Freeman TE, Harris P, Pienkowski RL, Walker CR (1974) Present status of projects on the biological control of weeds with insects and plant pathogens in the United States and Canada. Weed Sci 22:490–495

    Google Scholar 

  • Headrick D, Goeden RD (1990) Life history of Paracantha gentilis (Diptera: Tephritidae). Ann Entomol Soc Am 83:776–785

    Google Scholar 

  • Howarth FG (1990) Hawaiian terrestrial arthropods: an overview. Bishop Mus Occas Pap 30:4–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt-Joshi T, Blossey B (2005) Interactions of root and leaf herbivores on purple loosestrife (Lythrum salicaria). Oecologia 142:554–563

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan I, Denno R (2007) Interspecific interactions in phytophagous insects revisited: a quantitative assessment of competition theory. Ecol Lett 10:977–994

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kaul RB (1989) Plants. In: Bleed A, Flowerday C (eds) An atlas of the Sand Hills. University of Nebraska–Lincoln, Lincoln, pp 127–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaul RB, Sutherland D, Rolfsmeier S (2007) The flora of Nebraska. Conservation and Survey Division, School of Natural Resources, Institute of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Nebraska, Lincoln

    Google Scholar 

  • Keeler KH, Harrison AT, Vescio L (1980) The flora and Sand Hills prairie communities of Arapaho Prairie, Arthur County, Nebraska. Prairie Nat 12:65–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenis M, Auger-Rozenberg M-A, Roques A, Timms L, Pere C, Cock JW, Settele J, Augustin S, Lopez-Vaamonde C (2009) Ecological effects of invasive alien insects. Biol Invasions 11:21–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lalonde RB, Roitberg BD (1992) Host selection behavior of a thistle-feeding fly: choices and consequences. Oecologia 90:534–539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamp WO, McCarty MK (1981) Biology and ecology of Platte thistle (Cirsium canescens). Weed Sci 29:686–692

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamp WO, McCarty MK (1982a) Biology of predispersal seed predators of the Platte thistle Cirsium canescens. J Kans Entomol Soc 55:305–316

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamp WO, McCarty MK (1982b) Predispersal seed predation of a native thistle, Cirsium canescens. Environ Entomol 11:847–851

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine JM, Vila M, D’Antonio CM, Dukes JS, Grigulis K, Lavorel S (2003) Mechanisms underlying the impact of exotic plant invasions. Proc R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci 270:775–781

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Louda SM (1998a) Population growth of Rhinocyllus conicus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) on two species of native thistles in prairie. Environ Entomol 27:834–841

    Google Scholar 

  • Louda SM (1998b) Ecology of interactions in biological control practice and policy. Bull Br Ecol Soc 294:8–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Louda SM (2000) Negative ecological effects of the musk thistle biocontrol agent, Rhinocyllus conicus Fröl. In: Follet PA, Duan JJ (eds) Nontarget effects of biological control. Kluwer, Boston, pp 215–243

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Louda SM, Arnett AE (2000) Predicting non-target ecological effects of biological control agents: evidence from Rhinocyllus conicus. In: Spencer NR (ed) Proceedings of the 10th international symposium on the biological control of weeds. Montana State University, Bozeman, pp 551–567

  • Louda SM, Potvin MA (1995) Effect of inflorescence-feeding insects in the demography and lifetime fitness of a native plant. Ecology 76:229–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Louda SM, Kendall D, Connor J, Simberloff D (1997) Ecological effects of an insect introduced for the biological control of weeds. Science 277:1088–1090

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Louda SM, Arnett AE, Rand TA, Russell FL (2003a) Invasiveness of some biological control insects and adequacy of their ecological risk assessment and regulation. Conserv Biol 17:73–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Louda SM, Pemberton RW, Johnson MT, Follett PA (2003b) Nontarget effects—the Achilles’ Heel of biological control? Retrospective analyses to reduce risk associated with biocontrol introductions. Ann Rev Entomol 48:365–396

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Louda SM, Rand TA, Arnett AE, McClay AS, Shea K, McEachern AK (2005a) Evaluation of ecological risk to populations of a threatened plant from an invasive biocontrol insect. Ecol Appl 15:234–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Louda SM, Rand TA, Russell FL, Arnett AE (2005b) Assessment of ecological risks in biocontrol: input from retrospective ecological analyses. Biol Control 35:253–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maron JL, Vila M (2001) When do herbivores affect plant invasion? Evidence for the natural enemies and biotic resistance hypotheses. Oikos 95:361–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nufio CR, Papaj DR (2001) Host marking behavior in phytophagous insects and parasitoids. Entomol Exp Appl 99:273–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker IM, Simberloff D, Lonsdale WM, Goodell K, Wonham M, Kareiva PM, Williamson H, Holle BV, Moyle PB, Byers JE, Goldwasser L (1999) Impact: toward a framework for understanding the ecological effects of invaders. Biol Invasions 1:3–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearson DE, Callaway RM (2003) Indirect effects of host-specific biological control agents. Trends Ecol Evol 18:456–461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rand TA, Louda SM (2006) Invasive insect abundance varies across the biogeographic distribution of a native host plant. Ecol Appl 16:877–890

    Google Scholar 

  • Rees NE (1982) Collecting, handling and releasing Rhinocyllus conicus, a biological control agent of musk thistle. Agric Res Serv USDA 579:1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose KA, Louda SM, Rees M (2005) Demographic and evolutionary impacts of native and invasive insect herbivores: a case study with Platte thistle, Cirsium canescens. Ecology 86:453–465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell FL, Louda SM (2004) Phenological synchrony affects interaction strength of an exotic weevil with Platte thistle, a native host plant. Oecologia 139:525–534

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell FL, Louda SM (2005) Indirect effects mediate floral herbivory on a native thistle by an invasive exotic insect. Oecologia 146:373–384

    Google Scholar 

  • Simberloff D, Stiling P (1996) How risky is biological control? Ecology 77:1965–1974

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith L, Mayer M (2005) Field cage assessment of interference among insects attacking seed heads of spotted and diffuse knapweed. Biocont Sci Technol 15:427–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White E, Wilson J, Clarke AR (2006) Biotic indirect effects: a neglected concept in invasion biology. Divers Distrib 12:443–455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe LM (2002) Why alien invaders succeed: support for the escape-from-enemy hypothesis. Am Nat 160:705–711

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zwölfer H, Harris P (1984) Biology and host specificity of Rhinocyllus conicus (Froel.) (Col., Curculionidae), a successful agent for biocontrol of the thistle, Carduus nutans L. Zeit Ang Entomol 97:36–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Kayla Christensen for energetic help in the field, Chad Andersen and Nate Brandt for conscientious help in the lab, and Steve Archer for discussions on data handling and analyses of the initial experiment. We appreciate the logistical support provided by UNL Cedar Point Biological Station staff and the financial support provided by NSF grant DEB 96-15299 to S. M. L., a D. H. Smith Conservation Research Fellowship to T. A. R., and a Howard Hughes Medical Institute Scholarship for the Summer Independent Research Experience to A. A. R. K. We appreciate the stimulus for improvement provided by the comments of an anonymous reviewer, and the insightful suggestions of the Editor-in-Chief, Dan Simberloff. USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T. A. Rand.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOC 416 kb)

Supplementary material 2 (DOC 44 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Louda, S.M., Rand, T.A., Kula, A.A.R. et al. Priority resource access mediates competitive intensity between an invasive weevil and native floral herbivores. Biol Invasions 13, 2233–2248 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-011-0036-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-011-0036-5

Keywords

Navigation