Abstract
Hybridization between genetically distinct populations of a single species can serve as an important stimulus for the evolution of invasiveness. Such intraspecific hybridization was examined in Pyrus calleryana, a Chinese tree species commonly planted as an ornamental in residential and commercial areas throughout the United States. This self-incompatible species is now escaping cultivation and appearing in disturbed habitats, where it has the potential to form dense thickets. Using genetic techniques incorporating nine microsatellite markers, we show that abundant fruit set on cultivated trees as well as the subsequent appearance of wild individuals result from crossing between genetically distinct horticultural cultivars of the same species that originated from different areas of China. We conclude that intraspecific hybridization can be a potent but little recognized process impacting the evolution of invasiveness in certain species.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abbott RJ (1992) Plant invasions, interspecific hybridization and the evolution of new plant taxa. Trends Ecol Evol 7:401–405
Aïnouche ML, Baumel A, Salmon A, Yannic G (2003) Hybridization, polyploidy and speciation in Spartina (Poaceae). New Phytol 161:165–172
Anderson NO, Ascher PD (1993) Male and female fertility of loosestrife (Lythrum) cultivars. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 118:851–858
Anderson E, Stebbins GL (1954) Hybridization as an evolutionary stimulus. Evolution 8:378–388
Anderson NO, Galatowitsch SM, Gomez N (2006) Selection strategies to reduce invasive potential in introduced plants. Euphytica 148:203–216
Arnold ML (1997) Natural hybridization and evolution. Oxford University Press, New York
Baker H (1974) The evolution of weeds. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 5:1–24
Bando J (2005) Rapid evolution and the spread of introduced species: new insights from Spartina alterniflora invasions. Meeting of the Ecological Society of America, Montreal
Burt JW, Muir AA, Piovia-Scott J, Veblan KE, Chang AL, Grossman JD, Weiskel HW (2007) Preventing horticultural introductions of invasive plants: potential efficacy of voluntary initiatives. Biol Invasions . doi:10.1007/s10530-007-9090-4
Clarke MM, Reichard SH, Hamilton CW (2006) Prevalence of different horticultural taxa of ivy (Hedera spp., Araliaceae) in invading populations. Biol Invasions 8:149–157
Cox GW (2004) Alien species and evolution: the evolutionary ecology of exotic plants, animals, microbes, and interacting native systems. Island Press, Washington
Cuizhi G, Spongberg SA (2003) Pyrus. Flora of China 9:173–179
Culley TM, Hardiman NA (2007) The beginning of a new invasive species: history and spread of the ornamental Callery Pear tree in the United States. Bioscience 57:956–964
Cunningham IS (1984) Frank N. Meyer: plant hunter in Asia. The Iowa State University Press, Ames
Darlington CD (1940) Taxonomic species and genetic systems. In: Huxley J (ed) The new systematics. Clarendon Press, Oxford
Durka W, Bossdorf O, Prati D, Auge H (2005) Molecular evidence for multiple introductions of garlic mustard (Alliaria petiolata, Brassicaceae) to North America. Mol Ecol 14:1697–1706
Ellstrand NC, Schierenbeck KA (2000) Hybridization as a stimulus for the evolution of invasiveness in plants? Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:7043–7050
Erickson DL, Fenster CB (2006) Intraspecific hybridization and the recovery of fitness in the native legume Chamaecrista fasciculata. Evolution 60:225–233
Facon B, Jarne P, Pointier JP, David P (2005) Hybridization and invasiveness in the freshwater snail Melanoides tuberculata: hybrid vigor is more important than increase in genetic variance. J Evol Biol 18:524–535
Falush D, Stephens M, Pritchard JK (2003) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data: Linked loci and correlated allele frequencies. Genetics 164:1567–1587
Farkas A, Orosz-Kovacs Z, Szabo LG (2002) Insect attraction of flowers in pear cultivars. In: Janick J, Sansavini S, Tagliavini M, Sugar D, Webster AD (eds) Proceedings of the VIIIth international symposium on Pear. Acta Horticulturae n. 596, ISHS pp 773–776
Genton BJ, Dhykoff JA, Giraud T (2005) High genetic diversity in French invasive populations of common ragweed, Ambrosia artemisiifolia, as a result of multiple sources of introduction. Mol Ecol 14:4275–4285
Gianfranceschi L, Seglias N, Tarchini R, Komjane M, Gessler C (1998) Simple sequence repeats for the genetic analysis of apple. Theor Appl Genet 96:1069–1076
Gilman EF, Watson DG (1994) Pyrus calleryana ‘Bradford’: ‘Bradford’ Callery pear. Fact Sheet ST-537, Environmental Horticulture Department, Florida Cooperative Extension Service, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida
Hardiman NA, Culley TM (2007) Genetic analysis of Callery Pear cultivars to determine the origin of invasive populations. In: Cavender N (ed) Ohio invasive plant research conference proceedings, Ohio Biological Survey, Columbus, pp 59–66
Hufford KM, Mazer SJ (2003) Plant ecotypes: genetic differentiation in the age of ecological restoration. Trends Ecol Evol 18:147–155
Husband BC, Barrett SCH (1991) Colonization history and population genetic structure of Eichhornia paniculata in Jamaica. Heredity 66:287–296
Jackson JE (2003) Biology of apples and pears. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Johansen-Morris AD, Latta RG (2006) Fitness consequences of hybridization between ecotypes of Avena barbata: Hybrid breakdown, hybrid vigor, and transgressive segregation. Evolution 60:1585–1595
Johnston AJ, Dieters MJ, Dungey HS, Nikles DG (2003) Intraspecific hybridization in Pinus caribaea var. hondurensis II. Genetic parameters. Euphytica 129:159–168
Khanduri VP, Sharma CM (2002) Intraspecific hybridization in Pinus roxburghii Sargent. Curr Sci 82:1003–1005
Kitajima K, Fox A, Sato T, Nagamatsu D (2006) Cultivar selection prior to introduction may increase invasiveness: evidence from Ardisia crenata. Biol Invasions 8:1471–1482
Kolbe JJ, Gor RE, Rodriguez Schettino L, Chamizo Lara A, Larson A, Losos JB (2004) Genetic variation increases during biological invasion by a Cuban lizard. Nature 431:177–181
Lavergne S, Molofsky J (2004) Reed canary grass (Phalaris arundinaceae) as a biological model in the study of plant invasions. Crit Rev Plant Sci 23:415–429
Lavergne S, Molofsky J (2007) Increased genetic variation and evolutionary potential drive the success of an invasive grass. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:3883–3888
Lavoie C, Dufresne C (2005) The spread of reed canarygrass (Phalaris arundinacea) in Quebec: a spatio-temporal perspective. Ecoscience 12:366–375
Lee CE (2002) Evolutionary genetics of invasive species. Trends Ecol Evol 17:386–391
Lee PLM, Patel RM, Conlan RS, Wainwright SJ, Hipkin CR (2004) Comparison of genetic diversities in native and alien populations of hoary mustard (Hirschfeldia incana [L.] Lagreze-Fossat). Int J Plant Sci 165:833–843
Lehrer JM, Brand MH, Lubell JD (2006) Four cultivars of Japanese Barberry demonstrate differential reproductive potential under landscape conditions. HortScience 41:762–767
Lelong B, Lavoie C, Jodoin Y, Belzile F (2007) Expansion pathways of the exotic common reed (Phragmites australis): a historical and genetic analysis. Divers Distrib 13:430–437
Li Y, Cheng Z, Smith WA, Ellis DR, Chen Y, Zheng X, Pei Y, Luo K, Zhao D, Yao Q, Duan H, Li Q (2004) Invasive ornamental plants: problems, challenges, and molecular tools to neutralize their invasiveness. Crit Rev Plant Sci 23:381–389
Luken JO, Thieret JW (1996) Amur honeysuckle, its fall from grace. Bioscience 46:18–24
Merigliano MF, Lesica P (1998) The native status of reed canarygrass (Phalaris arundinacea L.) in the inland Northwest, USA. Nat Areas J 18:223–230
Meyer FN (1918) Typescript of South China explorations. The special collections of the National Agricultural Library www.nal.usda.gov/speccoll/exhibits/meyer/meyer_typescript.html. Accessed 28 June 2007
Novak SJ (2007) The role of evolution in the invasion process. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:3671–3672
Novak SJ, Mack RN (1995) Allozyme diversity in the apomictic vine Bryonia alba (Cucurbitaceae): potential consequences of multiple introductions. Am J Bot 82:1153–1162
Novak SJ, Mack RN (2005) Genetic bottlenecks in alien plant species: influence of mating systems and introduction dynamics. In: Sax DF, Stachowicz JJ, Gaines SD (eds) Species invasions: insights into ecology, evolution, and biogeography. Sinauer Associates, Inc. Publishers, Sunderland, pp 201–228
Orson RA (1999) A paleoecological assessment of Phragmites australis in New England tidal marshes: changes in plant community structure during the last few millennia. Biol Invasions 1:149–158
Phillips L (2004) The 2005 urban tree of the year. City Trees 40:34–38
Pimentel D, Lach L, Zuniga R, Morrison D (2000) Environmental and economic costs of nonindigenous species in the United States. Bioscience 50:53–65
Pimentel D, Zuniga R, Morrison D (2005) Update on the environmental and economic costs associated with alien-invasive species in the United States. Ecol Econ 52:273–288
Piry S, Alapetite A, Cornuet J-M, Paetkau D, Baudouin L, Estoup A (2004) GENECLASS2: a software for genetic assignment and first-generation migrant detection. J Hered 95:536–539
Poulin J, Weller SG, Sakai AK (2005) Genetic diversity does not affect the invasiveness of fountain grass (Pennisetum setaceum) in Arizona, California and Hawaii. Divers Distrib 11:241–247
Price SC, Jain SK (1981) Are inbreeders better colonizers? Oecologia 49:283–286
Rannala B, Mountain JL (1997) Detecting immigration by using multilocus genotypes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94:9197–9201
Reichard SH, White P (2001) Horticulture as a pathway of invasive plant introductions in the United States. Bioscience 51:103–113
Roman J, Darling JA (2007) Paradox lost: genetic diversity and the success of aquatic invasions. Trends Ecol Evol 22:454–464
Roy J (1990) In search of the characteristics of plant invaders. In: di Castri F, Hansen AJ, Debussche M (eds) Biological invasions in Europe and the Mediterranean Basin. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 335–352
Sakai AK, Allendorf FW, Holt JS, Lodge DM, Molofsky J, With KA, Baughman S, Cabin RJ, Cohen JE, Ellstrand NC, McCauley DE, O’Neil P, Parker IM, Thompson JN, Weller SG (2001) The population biology of invasive species. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 32:305–332
Saltonstall K (2002) Cryptic invasion by a non-native genotype of the common reed, Phragmites australis, into North America. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:2445–2449
Schierenbeck KA (2004) Japanese honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica) as an invasive species; history, ecology, and context. Crit Rev Plant Sci 23:391–400
Schierenbeck KA, Aïnouche ML (2006) The role of evolutionary genetics in studies of plant invasions. In: Cadotte MW, McMahon SM, Fukami T (eds) Conceptual ecology and invasion biology: reciprocal approaches to nature. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 193–221
Schiffman PM (1997) Animal-mediated dispersal and disturbance: driving forces behind alien plant naturalization. In: Luken JO, Thieret JW (eds) Assessment and management of plant invasions. Springer-Verlag, New York, pp 87–94
Smouse PE, Peakall R (1999) Spatial autocorrelation analysis of individual multiallele and multilocus genetic structure. Heredity 82:561–573
Stebbins GL (1950) Variation and evolution in plants. Columbia University Press, New York
Stebbins GL (1959) The role of hybridization in evolution. Proc Am Philos Soc 103:231–251
Stebbins GL (1969) The significance of hybridization for plant taxonomy and evolution. Taxon 18:26–35
Swearingen J, Reshetiloff K, Slattery B, Zwicker S (2002) Plant invaders of mid-Atlantic natural areas. National Park Service and US Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington
Taylor CM, Hastings A (2005) Allee effects in biological invasions. Ecol Lett 8:895–908
Taylor CM, David HG, Cicille JC, Grevstad FS, Hastings A (2004) Consequences of an Allee effect in the invasion of a Pacific estuary by Spartina alterniflora. Ecology 85:3254–3266
Vincent MA (2005) On the spread and current distribution of Pyrus calleryana in the United States. Castanea 70:20–31
Whitehouse WE, Creech JL, Seaton GA (1963) Bradford ornamental pear—a promising shade tree. Am Nurseryman 117(7–8):56–60
Wilcox KL, Petrie SA, Maynard LA, Meyer SW (2003) Historical distribution and abundance of Phragmites australis at Long Point, Lake Erie, Ontario. J Great Lakes Res 29:664–680
Williams DA, Overholt WA, Cuda JP, Hughes CR (2005) Chloroplast and microsatellite DNA diversities reveal the introduction history of Brazilian peppertree (Schinus terebinthifolius) in Florida. Mol Ecol 14:3643–3656
Williams DA, Muchugu E, Overholt WA, Cuda JP (2007) Colonization patterns of the invasive Brazilian peppertree, Schinus terebinthifolius, in Florida. Heredity 98:284–293
Wilson SB, Knox GW (2006) Landscape performance, flowering, and seed viability of 15 Japanese Silver Grass cultivars grown in Northern and Southern Florida. Horttechnology 16:686–693
Wolfe LM, Blair AC, Penna BM (2007) Does intraspecific hybridization contribute to the evolution of invasiveness? An experimental test. Biol Invasions 9:515–521
Yamamoto T, Kimura T, Sawamura Y, Manabe T, Kotobuki K, Hayashi T, Ban Y, Matsuta N (2002) Simple sequence repeats for genetic analysis in pear. Euphytica 124:129–137
Zielinski QB (1965) Self-incompatibility in Pyrus species. Bull Torrey Bot Club 92:219–220
Acknowledgments
The authors thank D. Ayers, N. Ellstrand and K. Schierenbeck for organizing the symposium that led to this special issue, as well as enlightening discussions and comments on the manuscript. K. Manbeck provided an invaluable perspective from the green industry while M. Klooster, S. Rogstad and two anonymous reviewers provided helpful suggestions that greatly improved the manuscript. This research was supported by a grant from the US Department of Agriculture, Cooperative State Research, Education, and Extension Service, to T.M.C. (USDA CREES 06-35320-16565).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Culley, T.M., Hardiman, N.A. The role of intraspecific hybridization in the evolution of invasiveness: a case study of the ornamental pear tree Pyrus calleryana . Biol Invasions 11, 1107–1119 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-008-9386-z
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-008-9386-z